Research ArticleArticles

Measuring Heterogeneous Preferences for Adaptation Strategies in Response to Sea Level Rise: Evidence from Miami-Dade County

Xuqi Chen, Zhifeng Gao and Xiang Bi
Land Economics, February 2023, 99 (1) 38-62; DOI: https://doi.org/10.3368/le.062620-0093R1

References

  1. ↵
    1. Andreopoulos, D.,
    2. D. Damigos,
    3. F. Comiti, and
    4. C. Fischer
    . 2015. “Handling Preference Heterogeneity for River Services’ Adaptation to Climate Change.” Journal of Environmental Management 160: 201–11.
    OpenUrl
  2. ↵
    1. Ariza, E.,
    2. K. C. Lindeman,
    3. P. Mozumder, and
    4. D. O. Suman
    . 2014. “Beach Management in Florida: Assessing Stakeholder Perceptions on Governance.” Ocean & Coastal Management 96: 82–93.
    OpenUrl
  3. ↵
    1. Balcombe, K.,
    2. I. Fraser, and
    3. A. Chalak
    . 2009. “Model Selection in the Bayesian Mixed Logit: Misreporting or Heterogeneous Preferences.” Journal of Environmental Economics Management 57 (2): 219–25.
    OpenUrl
  4. ↵
    1. Bazzani, C.,
    2. V. Caputo,
    3. R. M. Nayga Jr., and
    4. M. Canavari
    . 2017. “Testing Commitment Cost Theory in Choice Experiments.” Economic Inquiry 55 (1): 383–96.
    OpenUrl
  5. ↵
    1. Bell, F. W., and
    2. V. R. Leeworthy
    . 1990. “Recreational Demand by Tourists for Salt-Water Beach Days.” Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 18 (3): 189–205.
    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
  6. ↵
    1. Betzold, C., and
    2. I. Mohamed
    . 2017. “Seawalls as a Response to Coastal Erosion and Flooding: A Case Study from Grande Comore, Comoros (West Indian Ocean).” Regional Environmental Change 17 (4): 1077–87.
    OpenUrl
  7. ↵
    1. Caldwell, M., and
    2. C. H. Segall
    . 2007. “No Day at the Beach: Sea Level Rise, Ecosystem Loss, and Public Access along the California Coast.” Ecology Law Quarterly 34: 533–78.
    OpenUrl
  8. ↵
    1. Caputo, V.,
    2. R. M. Nayga Jr., and
    3. R. Scarpa
    . 2013. “Food Miles or Carbon Emissions? Exploring Labelling Preference for Food Transport Footprint with a Stated Choice Study.” Australian Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics 57 (4): 465–82.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  9. ↵
    1. Caputo, V.,
    2. R. Scarpa, and
    3. R. M. Nayga Jr.
    2017. “Cue versus Independent Food Attributes: The Effect of Adding Attributes in Choice Experiments.” European Review of Agricultural Economics 44 (2): 211–30.
    OpenUrl
  10. ↵
    1. Caputo, V.,
    2. E. J. Van Loo,
    3. R. Scarpa,
    4. R. M. Nayga Jr, and
    5. W. Verbeke
    . 2018. “Comparing Serial, and Choice Task Stated and Inferred Attribute Non-attendance Methods in Food Choice Experiments.” Journal of Agricultural Economics 69 (1): 35–57.
    OpenUrl
  11. ↵
    1. Caracas, J. V. M.,
    2. G. de Carvalho Farias,
    3. L. F. M. Teixeira, and
    4. L. A. de Souza Ribeiro
    . 2014. “Implementation of a High-Efficiency, High-Lifetime, and Low-Cost Converter for an Autonomous Photovoltaic Water Pumping System.” IEEE Transactions on Industry Applications 50 (1): 631–41.
    OpenUrl
  12. ↵
    1. Carson, R. T.,
    2. J. J. Louviere,
    3. D. A. Anderson,
    4. P. Arabie,
    5. D. S. Bunch,
    6. D. A. Hensher,
    7. R. M. Johnson, et al.
    1994. “Experimental Analysis of Choice.” Marketing Letters 5 (4): 351–67.
    OpenUrl
  13. ↵
    1. Champ, P. A.,
    2. R. Moore, and
    3. R. C. Bishop
    . 2009. “A Comparison of Approaches to Mitigate Hypothetical Bias.” Agricultural and Resource Economics Review 38 (2): 166–80.
    OpenUrlWeb of Science
  14. ↵
    1. ChoiceMetrics
    . 2014. NGENE 1.1. 2 User Manual and Reference Guide: The Cutting Edge in Experimental Design. Sydney: ChoiceMetrics.
  15. ↵
    1. Crider, M.,
    2. P. Boynton,
    3. J. Huffman,
    4. J. E. Kepley,
    5. C. T. Liu,
    6. M. Mooney, and
    7. N. Woodfork
    . 2014. “Employment of Proactive Mitigation Strategies in Combination with Reactive Barriers to Counteract Sea Level Rise in South Florida.” Working paper. Arthur R. Marshall Foundation for the Everglades, Lake Worth.
  16. ↵
    1. de Bekker-Grob, E. W.,
    2. B. Donkers,
    3. M. F. Jonker, and
    4. E. A. Stolk
    . 2015. “Sample Size Requirements for Discrete-Choice Experiments in Healthcare: A Practical Guide.” Patient-Patient-Centered Outcomes Research 8 (5): 373–84.
    OpenUrl
  17. ↵
    1. de Bekker-Grob, E. W.,
    2. L. Hol,
    3. B. Donkers,
    4. L. Van Dam,
    5. J. D. F. Habbema,
    6. M. E. Van Leerdam,
    7. E. J. Kuipers,
    8. M. L. Essink-Bot, and
    9. E. W. Steyerberg
    . 2010. “Labeled versus Unlabeled Discrete Choice Experiments in Health Economics: An Application to Colorectal Cancer Screening.” Value in Health 13 (2): 315–23.
    OpenUrl
  18. ↵
    1. De Bruin, K.,
    2. R. B. Dellink,
    3. A. Ruijs,
    4. L. Bolwidt,
    5. A. Van Buuren,
    6. J. Graveland,
    7. R. S. De Groot, et al.
    2009. “Adapting to Climate Change in the Netherlands: An Inventory of Climate Adaptation Options and Ranking of Alternatives.” Climatic Change 95 (1–2): 23–45.
    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
  19. ↵
    1. De Salvo, M.,
    2. G. Signorello,
    3. G. Cucuzza,
    4. D. Begalli, and
    5. L. Agnoli
    . 2018. “Estimating Preferences for Controlling Beach Erosion in Sicily.” Aestimum 72: 27.
    OpenUrl
  20. ↵
    1. Dillman, D. A.,
    2. J. D. Smyth, and
    3. L. M. Christian
    . 2014. Internet, Phone, Mail, and Mixed-Mode Surveys: The Tailored Design Method. New York: John Wiley & Sons.
  21. ↵
    1. Dobkowski, A. H.
    1998. “Dumptrucks versus Dredges: An Economic Analysis of Sand Sources for Beach Nourishment.” Coastal Management 26 (4): 303–14.
    OpenUrlGeoRef
  22. ↵
    1. Fankhauser, S.
    1995. “Protection versus Retreat: The Economic Costs of Sea-Level Rise.” Environment and Planning A: Economy and Space 27 (2): 299–319.
    OpenUrl
  23. ↵
    1. FDEP (Florida Department of Environmental Protection)
    . 2018. Florida Adaptation Planning Guidebook. Available at https://floridadep.gov/sites/default/files/AdaptationPlanningGuidebook.pdf.
    1. Ferrini, S., and
    2. R. Scarpa
    . 2007. “Designs with A Priori Information for Non-market Valuation with Choice Experiments: A Monte Carlo Study.” Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 53 (3): 342–63.
    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
  25. ↵
    1. Fiebig, D. G.,
    2. M. P. Keane,
    3. J. Louviere, and
    4. N. Wasi
    . 2010. “The Generalized Multinomial Logit Model: Accounting for Scale and Coefficient Heterogeneity.” Marketing Science 29 (3): 393–421.
    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
  26. ↵
    1. Finkl, C. W.
    1996. “What Might Happen to America’s Shorelines if Artificial Beach Replenishment Is Curtailed: A Prognosis for Southeastern Florida and Other Sandy Regions along Regressive Coasts.” Journal of Coastal Research 12 (1): iii–ix.
    OpenUrlGeoRef
  27. ↵
    1. Florida Trend
    . 2019. “VISIT FLORIDA Announces an All-Time Record 126 Million Visitors in 2018.” Florida Trend, February 20.
  28. ↵
    1. Frenning, L.
    , ed. 2001. Pump Life Cycle Costs: A Guide to LCC Analysis for Pumping Systems. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Energy.
  29. ↵
    1. Gao, Z., and
    2. T. C. Schroeder
    . 2009. “Effects of Label Information on Consumer Willingness-to-Pay for Food Attributes.” American Journal of Agricultural Economics 91 (3): 795–809.
    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
  30. ↵
    1. Gao, Z.,
    2. X. Yu,
    3. C. Li, and
    4. B. R. McFadden
    . 2019. “The Interaction between Country of Origin and Genetically Modified Orange Juice in Urban China.” Food Quality and Preference 71: 475–84.
    OpenUrl
  31. ↵
    1. Gittman, R. K.,
    2. S. B. Scyphers,
    3. C. S. Smith,
    4. I. P. Neylan, and
    5. J. H. Grabowski
    2016. “Ecological Consequences of Shoreline Hardening: A Meta-analysis.” BioScience 66 (9): 763–73.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  32. ↵
    1. Goodell, J.
    2013. “Goodbye, Miami.” Rolling Stone, July 4.
  33. ↵
    1. Gopalakrishnan, S.,
    2. M. D. Smith,
    3. J. M. Slott, and
    4. A. B. Murray
    . 2011. “The Value of Disappearing Beaches: A Hedonic Pricing Model with Endogenous Beach Width.” Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 61 (3): 297–310.
    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
  34. ↵
    1. Greene, W. H.
    2012. NLOGIT Version 5 Reference Guide. Plainview, NY: Econometric Software.
  35. ↵
    1. Greene, W. H., and
    2. D. A. Hensher
    . 2010. “Does Scale Heterogeneity across Individuals Matter? An Empirical Assessment of Alternative Logit Models.” Transportation 37 (3): 413–28.
    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
    1. Greene, W. H., and
    2. D. A. Hensher
    . 2013. “Revealing Additional Dimensions of Preference Heterogeneity in a Latent Class Mixed Multinomial Logit Model.” Applied Economics 45 (14): 1897–902.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  37. ↵
    1. Greene, W. H.,
    2. D. A. Hensher, and
    3. J. Rose
    . 2006. “Accounting for Heterogeneity in the Variance of Unobserved Effects in Mixed Logit Models.” Transportation Research Part B: Methodological 40 (1): 75–92.
    OpenUrl
  38. ↵
    1. Hallegatte, S.
    2009. “Strategies to Adapt to an Uncertain Climate Change.” Global Environmental Change 19 (2): 240–47.
    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
  39. ↵
    1. Harris, A.
    2018. “Miami Beach’s Future Is ‘Uncertain,’ Experts Say, but Sea Rise Pumps Are a Good Start.” Miami Herald, April 20.
  40. ↵
    1. Hauer, M. E.,
    2. J. M. Evans, and
    3. D. R. Mishra
    . 2016. “Millions Projected to Be at Risk from Sea-Level Rise in the Continental United States.” Nature Climate Change 6 (7): 691–95.
    OpenUrl
  41. ↵
    1. Hensher, D. A., and
    2. W. H. Greene
    . 2003. “The Mixed Logit Model: The State of Practice.” Transportation 30 (2): 133–76.
    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
  42. ↵
    1. Hensher, D. A., and
    2. W. H. Greene
    . 2011. “Valuation of Travel Time Savings in WTP and Preference Space in the Presence of Taste and Scale Heterogeneity.” Journal of Transport Economics and Policy 45 (3): 505–25.
    OpenUrl
  43. ↵
    1. Hensher, D. A.,
    2. J. M. Rose, and
    3. W. H. Greene
    . 2005. Applied Choice Analysis: A Primer. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
  44. ↵
    1. Hindsley, P., and
    2. D. Yoskowitz
    . 2020. “Global Change-Local Values: Assessing Tradeoffs for Coastal Ecosystem Services in the Face of Sea Level Rise.” Global Environmental Change 61: 102039. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2020.102039.
    OpenUrl
  45. ↵
    1. Holladay, S. J.,
    2. H. Kunreuther, and
    3. V. Stahl
    . 2016. Measuring Flood Risk: What Are NYC Residents Willing to Pay for a Flood Protection System? New York: Institute for Policy Integrity, New York University School of Law. Available at https://policyintegrity.org/files/publications/Measuring_Flood_Risk_Policy_Brief.pdf.
  46. ↵
    1. Huber, J., and
    2. K. Zwerina
    . 1996. “The Importance of Utility Balance in Efficient Choice Designs.” Journal of Marketing Research 33 (3): 307–17.
    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
  47. ↵
    1. Hurtibise, R.
    2016. “Flood Insurance Rates Increase.” Sun Sentinel, April 1.
  48. ↵
    1. Hynes, S.,
    2. N. Hanley, and
    3. R. Scarpa
    . 2008. “Effects on Welfare Measures of Alternative Means of Accounting for Preference Heterogeneity in Recreational Demand Models.” American Journal of Agricultural Economics 90 (4): 1011–27.
    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
  49. ↵
    1. Imamura, K.,
    2. K. T. Takano,
    3. N. Mori,
    4. T. Nakashizuka, and
    5. S. Managi
    . 2016. “Attitudes toward Disaster-Prevention Risk in Japanese Coastal Areas: Analysis of Civil Preference.” Natural Hazards 82 (1): 209–26.
    OpenUrl
  50. ↵
    1. Johnston, R. J., and
    2. A. S. Abdulrahman
    . 2017. “Systematic Non-response in Discrete Choice Experiments: Implications for the Valuation of Climate Risk Reductions.” Journal of Environmental Economics and Policy 6 (3): 246–67.
    OpenUrl
  51. ↵
    1. Johnston, R. J.,
    2. K. J. Boyle,
    3. W. Adamowicz,
    4. J. Bennett,
    5. R. Brouwer,
    6. T. A. Cameron,
    7. W. M. Hanemann, et al.
    2017. “Contemporary Guidance for Stated Preference Studies.” Journal of the Association of Environmental and Resource Economists 4 (2): 319–405.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  52. ↵
    1. Johnston, R. J.,
    2. C. Makriyannis, and
    3. A. W. Whelchel
    . 2018. “Using Ecosystem Service Values to Evaluate Tradeoffs in Coastal Hazard Adaptation.” Coastal Management 46 (4): 259–77.
    OpenUrl
  53. ↵
    1. Kessels, R.,
    2. P. Goos, and
    3. M. Vandebroek
    . 2006. “A Comparison of Criteria to Design Efficient Choice Experiments.” Journal of Marketing Research 43 (3): 409–19.
    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
  54. ↵
    1. Klein, Y. L.,
    2. J. P. Osleeb, and
    3. M. R. Viola
    . 2004. “Tourism-Generated Earnings in the Coastal Zone: A Regional Analysis.” Journal of Coastal Research 20 (4): 1080–88.
    OpenUrl
  55. ↵
    1. Kousky, C.
    2011. “Understanding the Demand for Flood Insurance.” Natural Hazards Review 12 (2): 96–110.
    OpenUrl
  56. ↵
    1. Landry, C. E.
    2011. “Coastal Erosion as a Natural Resource Management Problem: An Economic Perspective.” Coastal Management 39 (3): 259–81.
    OpenUrl
  57. ↵
    1. Landry, C. E.,
    2. P. Hindsley,
    3. O. Bin,
    4. J. B. Kruse,
    5. J. C. Whitehead, and
    6. K. Wilson
    . 2011. “Weathering the Storm: Measuring Household Willingness-to-Pay for Risk-Reduction in Post-Katrina New Orleans.” Southern Economic Journal 77 (4): 991–1013.
    OpenUrl
  58. ↵
    1. Landry, C. E.,
    2. A. G. Keeler, and
    3. W. Kriesel
    . 2003. “An Economic Evaluation of Beach Erosion Management Alternatives.” Marine Resource Economics 18 (2): 105–27.
    OpenUrl
  59. ↵
    1. Landry, C. E.,
    2. J. S. Shonkwiler, and
    3. J. Whitehead
    . 2018. “Economic Values of Coastal Erosion Management: Joint Estimation of Use and Passive Use Values with Recreation and Contingent Valuation Data.” Working paper. University of Georgia, Athens.
  60. ↵
    1. Lindsay, B. E.,
    2. J. M. Halstead,
    3. H. C. Tupper, and
    4. J. J. Vaske
    . 1992. “Factors Influencing the Willingness to Pay for Coastal Beach Protection.” Coastal Management 20 (3): 291–302.
    OpenUrl
  61. ↵
    1. Liu, R.,
    2. Z. Gao,
    3. R. M. Nayga Jr.,
    4. H. A. Snell, and
    5. H. Ma
    . 2019. “Consumers’ Valuation for Food Traceability in China: Does Trust Matter?” Food Policy 88: 101768. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodpol.2019.101768.
    OpenUrl
  62. ↵
    1. London, J. B.
    2017. “Sea Level Rise and Coastal Management.” Oxford Research Encyclopedia of Environmental Science. Available at https://doi.org/10.1093/acrefore/9780199389414.013.377.
  63. ↵
    1. Louviere, J. J.,
    2. D. A. Hensher, and
    3. J. D. Swait
    . 2000. Stated Choice Methods: Analysis and Applications. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
  64. ↵
    1. Louviere, J. J., and
    2. R. J. Meyer
    . 2008. “Formal Choice Models of Informal Choices.” In Review of Marketing Research. Vol. 4, edited by N. K. Malhotra, 6–32. Bingley, UK: Emerald Group Publishing.
    OpenUrl
  65. ↵
    1. Louviere, J. J.,
    2. D. Street,
    3. L. Burgess,
    4. N. Wasi,
    5. T. Islam, and
    6. A. A. Marley
    . 2008. “Modeling the Choices of Individual Decision-Makers by Combining Efficient Choice Experiment Designs with Extra Preference Information.” Journal of Choice Modelling 1 (1): 128–64.
    OpenUrl
  66. ↵
    1. Lu, Q. C.,
    2. Z. R. Peng, and
    3. R. Du
    . 2012. “Economic Analysis of Impacts of Sea Level Rise and Adaptation Strategies in Transportation.” Transportation Research Record 2273: 54–61.
    OpenUrl
  67. ↵
    1. Lusk, J. L.,
    2. J. Roosen, and
    3. J. A. Fox
    . 2003. “Demand for Beef from Cattle Administered Growth Hormones or Fed Genetically Modified Corn: A Comparison of Consumers in France, Germany, the United Kingdom, and the United States.” American Journal of Agricultural Economics 85 (1): 16–29.
    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
  68. ↵
    1. Lusk, J. L., and
    2. T. C. Schroeder
    . 2004. “Are Choice Experiments Incentive Compatible? A Test with Quality Differentiated Beef Steaks.” American Journal of Agricultural Economics 86 (2): 467–82.
    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
  69. ↵
    1. Makriyannis, C.,
    2. R. J. Johnston, and
    3. A. W. Whelchel
    . 2018. “Are Choice Experiment Treatments of Outcome Uncertainty Sufficient? An Application to Climate Risk Reductions.” Agricultural and Resource Economics Review 47 (3): 419–51.
    OpenUrl
  70. ↵
    1. Matthews, Y.,
    2. Scarpa, R., and
    3. Marsh, D.
    2017a. “Stability of Willingness-to-Pay for Coastal Management: A Choice Experiment across Three Time Periods.” Ecological Economics 138: 64–73.
    OpenUrl
  71. ↵
    1. Matthews, Y.,
    2. Scarpa, R., and
    3. Marsh, D.
    2017b. “Using Virtual Environments to Improve the Realism of Choice Experiments: A Case Study about Coastal Erosion Management.” Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 81: 193–208.
    OpenUrl
  72. ↵
    1. McAlpine, S. A., and
    2. J. R. Porter
    . 2018. “Estimating Recent Local Impacts of Sea-Level Rise on Current Real-Estate Losses: A Housing Market Case Study in Miami-Dade, Florida.” Population Research and Policy Review 37 (6): 871–95.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  73. ↵
    1. McFadden, D.
    2001. “Economic Choices.” American Economic Review 91 (3): 351–78.
    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
  74. ↵
    1. McInerney, M. K.,
    2. S. C. Sweeney,
    3. O. S. Marshall Jr., and
    4. L. Clark
    . 2017. “Investigation of Hydrophobic Concrete Additive for Seawall Replacement at Pililaau Army Recreation Center, Hawaii.” ERDC/CERL TR-17-10. Washington, DC: United States Corps of Engineers.
  75. ↵
    1. Meas, T.,
    2. W. Hu,
    3. M. T. Batte,
    4. T. A. Woods, and
    5. S. Ernst
    . 2014. “Substitutes or Complements? Consumer Preference for Local and Organic Food Attributes.” American Journal of Agricultural Economics 97 (4): 1044–71.
    OpenUrl
  76. ↵
    1. Melillo, J. M.,
    2. T. T. Richmond, and
    3. G. Yohe
    . 2014. “Climate Change Impacts in the United States: Third National Climate Assessment.” Washington, DC: U.S. Global Change Research Program. Available at https://nca2014.globalchange.gov/downloads/high/NCA3_Climate_Change_Impacts_in_the_United%20States_HighRes.pdf.
  77. ↵
    1. Meyerhoff, J.,
    2. K. Rehdanz, and
    3. A. Wunsch
    ,. 2021. “Preferences for Coastal Adaptation to Climate Change: Evidence from a Choice Experiment.” Journal of Environmental Economics and Policy 10: 374–90.
    OpenUrl
  78. ↵
    1. Miami-Dade County Bond Administration
    . 2018. Annual Report to Bondholders. Vol. 1, ser. 23. Finance Department, Bond Administration.
  79. ↵
    1. Nerem, R. S.,
    2. B. D. Beckley,
    3. J. T. Fasullo,
    4. B. D. Hamlington,
    5. D. Masters, and
    6. G. T. Mitchum
    . 2018. “Climate-Change–Driven Accelerated Sea-Level Rise Detected in the Altimeter Era.” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 115 (9): 2022–25.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  80. ↵
    1. Nicholls, R. J., and
    2. A. Cazenave
    . 2010. “Sea-Level Rise and Its Impact on Coastal Zones.” Science 328 (5985): 1517–20.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  81. ↵
    1. Nicholls, R. J.,
    2. N. Marinova,
    3. J. A. Lowe,
    4. S. Brown,
    5. P. Vellinga,
    6. D. De Gusmao,
    7. J. Hinkel, and
    8. R. S. Tol
    . 2011. “Sea-Level Rise and Its Possible Impacts Given a ‘Beyond 4 C World’ in the Twenty-First Century.” Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences 369 (1934): 161–81.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  82. ↵
    1. Oliveira, S., and
    2. L. M. C. Pinto
    . 2021. “Choice Experiments to Elicit the Users’ Preferences for Coastal Erosion Management: The Case of Praia da Amorosa.” Environment, Development & Sustainability, 23 (7): 9749–65.
    OpenUrl
  83. ↵
    1. Omori, Y.
    2021. “Preference Heterogeneity of Coastal Gray, Green, and Hybrid Infrastructure against Sea-Level Rise: A Choice Experiment Application in Japan.” Sustainability 13 (16): 8927.
    OpenUrl
  84. ↵
    1. Ouma, E.,
    2. A. Abdulai, and
    3. A. Drucker
    . 2007. “Measuring Heterogeneous Preferences for Cattle Traits among Cattle-Keeping Households in East Africa.” American Journal of Agricultural Economics 89 (4): 1005–19.
    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
  85. ↵
    1. Ortega, D. L.,
    2. H. H. Wang,
    3. L. Wu, and
    4. N. J. Olynk
    . 2011. “Modeling Heterogeneity in Consumer Preferences for Select Food Safety Attributes in China.” Food Policy 36 (2): 318–24.
    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
  86. ↵
    1. Parsons, G. R., and
    2. M. Powell
    . 2001. “Measuring the Cost of Beach Retreat.” Coastal Management 29 (2): 91–103.
    OpenUrl
  87. ↵
    1. Pascoe, S.
    2019. “Recreational Beach Use Values with Multiple Activities.” Ecological Economics 160: 137–44.
    OpenUrl
  88. ↵
    1. Penn, J., and
    2. W. Hu
    . 2019. “Cheap Talk Efficacy under Potential and Actual Hypothetical Bias: A Meta-analysis.” Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 96: 22–35.
    OpenUrl
  89. ↵
    1. Penn, J.,
    2. W. Hu,
    3. L. Cox, and
    4. L. Kozloff
    . 2016. “Values for Recreational Beach Quality in Oahu, Hawaii.” Marine Resource Economics 31 (1): 47–62.
    OpenUrl
  90. ↵
    1. Phillips, M. R., and
    2. A. L. Jones
    . 2006. “Erosion and Tourism Infrastructure in the Coastal Zone: Problems, Consequences, and Management.” Tourism Management 27 (3): 517–24.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  91. ↵
    1. Phillips, Y., amd
    2. W. R. Council
    . 2010. Preferences for Coastal Erosion Management Options: A Latent Class Analysis of Visitors to Buffalo Beach. Available at https://www.nzae.org.nz/wp-content/uploads/2011/Session3/32_Phillips.pdf.
  92. ↵
    1. Pompe, J. J.
    1999. “Establishing Fees for Beach Protection: Paying for a Public Good.” Coastal Management 27 (1): 57–67.
    OpenUrl
  93. ↵
    1. Regulatory Economic Resources
    . 2019. “Stormwater Utility.” Miami-Dade County. Available at http://www.miamidade.gov/environment/stormwater-utility.asp.
  94. ↵
    1. Reidmiller, D. R.,
    2. C. W. Avery,
    3. D. R. Easterling,
    4. K. E. Kunkel,
    5. K. L. M. Lewis,
    6. T. K. Maycock,
    7. B. C. Stewart, et al.
    2018. Impacts, Risks, and Adaptation in the United States: Fourth National Climate Assessment. Washington, DC: U.S. Global Change Research Program.
  95. ↵
    1. Remoundou, K.,
    2. P. Diaz-Simal,
    3. P. Koundouri, and
    4. B. Rulleau
    ,. 2015. “Valuing Climate Change Mitigation: A Choice Experiment on a Coastal and Marine Ecosystem.” Ecosystem Services 11: 87–94.
    OpenUrl
  96. ↵
    1. Revelt, D., and
    2. K. Train
    . 1998. “Mixed Logit with Repeated Choices: Households’ Choices of Appliance Efficiency Level.” Review of Economics and Statistics 80 (4): 647–57.
    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
  97. ↵
    1. Rose, J. M., and
    2. M. C. Bliemer
    . 2013. “Sample Size Requirements for Stated Choice Experiments.” Transportation 40 (5): 1021–41.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  98. ↵
    1. Rulleau, B., and
    2. H. Rey-Valette
    . 2017. “Forward Planning to Maintain the Attractiveness of Coastal Areas: Choosing between Seawalls and Managed Retreat.” Environmental Science & Policy 72: 12–19.
    OpenUrl
  99. ↵
    1. Scarpa, R.,
    2. S. Ferrini, and
    3. K. Willis
    . 2005. “Performance of Error Component Models for Status-Quo Effects in Choice Experiments.” In Applications of Simulation Methods in Environmental and Resource Economics, edited by A. Alberini and R. Scarpa, 247–73. Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Springer.
  100. ↵
    1. Scarpa, R.,
    2. M. Thiene, and
    3. K. Train
    . 2008. “Utility in Willingness to Pay Space: A Tool to Address Confounding Random Scale Effects in Destination Choice to the Alps.” American Journal of Agricultural Economics 90 (4): 994–1010.
    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
  101. ↵
    1. Ščasný, M.,
    2. I. Zv?řinová,
    3. M. Czajkowski,
    4. E. Kyselá, and
    5. K. Zagórska
    . 2017. “Public Acceptability of Climate Change Mitigation Policies: A Discrete Choice Experiment.” Climate Policy 17 (1): S111–30.
    OpenUrl
  102. ↵
    1. Schmidt, L.,
    2. A. Delicado,
    3. C. Gomes,
    4. P. Granjo,
    5. S. Guerreiro,
    6. A. Horta,
    7. J. Mourato, et al.
    2013. “Change in the Way We Live and Plan the Coast: Stakeholders Discussions on Future Scenarios and Adaptation Strategies.” Journal of Coastal Research 65: 1033–39.
    OpenUrl
  103. ↵
    1. Shivlani, M. P.,
    2. D. Letson, and
    3. M. Theis
    . 2003. “Visitor Preferences for Public Beach Amenities and Beach Restoration in South Florida.” Coastal Management 31 (4): 367–85.
    OpenUrl
  104. ↵
    1. Shi, L.,
    2. J. Xie, and
    3. Z. Gao
    . 2018. “The Impact of Deal-Proneness on WTP Estimates in Incentive-Aligned Value Elicitation Methods.” Agricultural Economics 49 (3): 353–62.
    OpenUrl
  105. ↵
    1. Shoyama, K.,
    2. S. Managi, and
    3. Y. Yamagata
    . 2013. “Public Preferences for Biodiversity Conservation and Climate-Change Mitigation: A Choice Experiment Using Ecosystem Services Indicators.” Land Use Policy 34: 282–93.
    OpenUrl
  106. ↵
    1. Spurgeon, J.
    1999. “The Socio-economic Costs and Benefits of Coastal Habitat Rehabilitation and Creation.” Marine Pollution Bulletin 37 (8/12): 373–82.
    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
  107. ↵
    1. Stanton, E. A., and
    2. F. Ackerman
    . 2007. Florida and Climate Change: The Costs of Inaction. Medford, MA: Global Development and Environment Institute, Tufts University. Available at https://www.bu.edu/eci/files/2019/11/Florida_hr.pdf.
  108. ↵
    1. Sukop, M. C.,
    2. M. Rogers,
    3. G. Guannel,
    4. J. M. Infanti, and
    5. K. Hagemann
    . 2018. “High Temporal Resolution Modeling of the Impact of Rain, Tides, and Sea Level Rise on Water Table Flooding in the Arch Creek Basin, Miami-Dade County, Florida, USA.” Science of the Total Environment 616: 1668–88.
    OpenUrl
  109. ↵
    1. Swait, J., and
    2. W. Adamowicz
    . 2001. “The Influence of Task Complexity on Consumer Choice: A Latent Class Model of Decision Strategy Switching.” Journal of Consumer Research 28 (1): 135–48.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  110. ↵
    1. Titus, J. G.,
    2. D. E. Hudgens,
    3. D. L. Trescott,
    4. M. Craghan,
    5. W. H. Nuckols,
    6. C. H. Hershner,
    7. J. M. Kassakian, et al.
    2009. “State and Local Governments Plan for Development of Most Land Vulnerable to Rising Sea Level along the U.S. Atlantic Coast.” Environmental Research Letters 4 (4): 044008. https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/4/4/044008.
    OpenUrl
  111. ↵
    1. Train, K.
    2009. Discrete Choice Methods with Simulation. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
  112. ↵
    1. Train, K., and
    2. M. Weeks
    . 2005. “Discrete Choice Models in Preference Space and Willingness-to-Pay Space.” In Applications of Simulation Methods in Environmental and Resource Economics, edited by A. Alberini and R. Scarpa, 1–16. Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Springer.
  113. ↵
    1. United Nations Development Programme
    . 2007. “Fighting Climate Change: Human Solidarity in a Divided World.” In Human Development Report 2007/2008, 1–18. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
  114. ↵
    1. U.S. Census Bureau
    . 2018. “Quick Facts of Miami-Dade County, Florida.” Available at https://www.census.gov/quickfacts/fact/table/miamidadecountyflorida/POP060210.
  115. ↵
    1. U.S. Census Bureau
    . 2019. “Table 1: Top 10 Most Populous Counties. 2018.” Available at https://www.census.gov/newsroom/press-releases/2019/estimates-county-metro.html#table1.
  116. ↵
    1. Vo, Q. T.,
    2. C. Kuenzer,
    3. Q. M. Vo,
    4. F. Moder, and
    5. N. Oppelt
    . 2012. “Review of Valuation Methods for Mangrove Ecosystem Services.” Ecological Indicators 23: 431–46.
    OpenUrl
  117. ↵
    1. Wdowinski, S.,
    2. R. Bray,
    3. B. P. Kirtman, and
    4. Z. Wu
    . 2016. “Increasing Flooding Hazard in Coastal Communities due to Rising Sea Level: Case Study of Miami Beach, Florida.” Ocean & Coastal Management 126: 1–8.
    OpenUrl
  118. ↵
    1. Wongprawmas, R., and
    2. M. Canavari
    . 2017. “Consumers’ Willingness-to-Pay for Food Safety Labels in an Emerging Market: The Case of Fresh Produce in Thailand.” Food Policy 69: 25–34.
    OpenUrl
  119. ↵
    1. Wuepper, D.,
    2. A. Clemm, and
    3. P. Wree
    . 2019. “The Preference for Sustainable Coffee and a New Approach for Dealing with Hypothetical Bias.” Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization 158: 475–86.
    OpenUrl
Back to top

In this issue

Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Email Article
Citation Tools
Measuring Heterogeneous Preferences for Adaptation Strategies in Response to Sea Level Rise: Evidence from Miami-Dade County
Xuqi Chen, Zhifeng Gao, Xiang Bi
Land Economics Feb 2023, 99 (1) 38-62; DOI: 10.3368/le.062620-0093R1
Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
Bookmark this article

Jump to section

Keywords