Quality over Quantity: Nonmarket Values of Restoring Coastal Dunes in the U.S. Pacific Northwest

References

1. ↵
   1. Aanesen, Margrethe,
   2. Claire Armstrong,
   3. Mikołaj Czajkowski,
   4. Jannike Falk-Petersen,
   5. Nick Hanley, and
   6. Ståle Navrud

   . 2015. “Willingness to Pay for Unfamiliar Public Goods: Preserving Cold-Water Coral in Norway.” Ecological Economics 112: 53–67. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2015.02.007.

   OpenUrl
2. ↵
   1. Adamowicz, W.,
   2. P. Boxall,
   3. M. Williams, and
   4. J. Louviere

   . 1998. “Stated Preference Approaches for Measuring Passive Use Values: Choice Experiments and Contingent Valuation.” American Journal of Agricultural Economics 80 (1): 64–75. https://doi.org/10.2307/3180269.

   OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
3. ↵
   1. Bennett, Elena M.,
   2. Garry D. Peterson, and
   3. Line J. Gordon

   . 2009. “Understanding Relationships among Multiple Ecosystem Services.” Ecology Letters 12 (12): 1394–1404. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1461-0248.2009.01387.x.

   OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
4. ↵
   1. Biel, Reuben G.,
   2. Sally D. Hacker,
   3. Peter Ruggiero,
   4. Nicholas Cohn, and
   5. Eric W. Seabloom

   . 2017. “Coastal Protection and Conservation on Sandy Beaches and Dunes: Context-Dependent Tradeoffs in Ecosystem Service Supply.” Ecosphere 8 (4): e01791. https://doi.org/10.1002/ecs2.1791.

   OpenUrl
5. ↵
   1. Carroll, Lindsay J.

   2016. “Evaluating Coastal Protection Services Associated with Restoration Management of an Endangered Shorebird in Oregon, USA.” M.A. thesis, Oregon State University. Available at https://ir.library.oregonstate.edu/concern/graduate_thesis_or_dissertations/c534fr93c.
6. ↵
   1. Carson, Richard T., and
   2. Mikołaj Czajkowski

   . 2019. “A New Baseline Model for Estimating Willingness to Pay from Discrete Choice Models.” Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 95: 57–61. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeem.2019.03.003.

   OpenUrl
7. ↵
   1. Carson, Richard T., and
   2. Theodore Groves

   . 2007. “Incentive and Informational Properties of Preference Questions.” Environmental and Resource Economics 37 (1): 181–210. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10640-007-9124-5.

   OpenUrlCrossRef
8. ↵
   1. Cooper, William S.

   1958. Coastal Sand Dunes of Oregon and Washington. Boulder, CO: Geological Society of America.
9. ↵
   1. Cummings, Ronald G., and
   2. Laura O. Taylor

   . 1999. “Unbiased Value Estimates for Environmental Goods: A Cheap Talk Design for the Contingent Valuation Method.” American Economic Review 89 (3): 649–65.

   OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
10. ↵
    1. Dillman, Don A.,
    2. Virginia Lesser,
    3. Robert Mason,
    4. John Carlson,
    5. Fern Willits,
    6. Rob Robertson, and
    7. Bryan Burke

    . 2007. “Personalization of Mail Surveys for General Public and Populations with a Group Identity: Results from Nine Studies.” Rural Sociology 72 (4): 632–46. https://doi.org/10.1526/003601107782638693.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
11. ↵
    1. Dissanayake, S. T. M., and
    2. A. W. Ando

    . 2014. “Valuing Grassland Restoration: Proximity to Substitutes and Trade-Offs among Conservation Attributes.” Land Economics 90 (2): 237–59. https://doi.org/10.3368/le.90.2.237.

    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
12. ↵
    1. Dundas, Steven J.,
    2. Roger H. von Haefen, and
    3. Carol Mansfield

    . 2018. “Recreation Costs of Endangered Species Protection: Evidence from Cape Hatteras National Seashore.” Marine Resource Economics 33 (1): 1–25. https://doi.org/10.1086/694752.

    OpenUrl
13. ↵
    1. Giles, Denise E. L., and
    2. Thomas N. Kaye

    . 2015. Abronia umbellata ss. Breviflora on the Oregon Coast: Reintroduction and Population Monitoring. Report to the Bureau of Land Management, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, U.S. Forest Service, and Oregon Department of Parks and Recreation.
14. ↵
    1. Hacker, Sally D.,
    2. Phoebe Zarnetske,
    3. Eric Seabloom,
    4. Peter Ruggiero,
    5. Jeremy Mull,
    6. Shawn Gerrity, and
    7. Colin Jones

    . 2012. “Subtle Differences in Two Non-native Congeneric Beach Grasses Significantly Affect their Colonization, Spread, and Impact.” Oikos 121 (1): 138–48. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0706.2011.18887.x.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
15. ↵
    1. Hensher, David A., and
    2. William H. Greene

    . 2003. “The Mixed Logit Model: The State of Practice.” Transportation 30 (2): 133–76. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1022558715350.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
16. ↵
    1. Hess, Stephane,
    2. Amanda Stathopoulos,
    3. Danny Campbell,
    4. Vikki O’Neill, and
    5. Sebastian Caus-sade

    . 2013. “It’s Not That I Don’t Care, I Just Don’t Care Very Much: Confounding between Attribute Non-attendance and Taste Heterogeneity.” Transportation 40 (3): 583–607. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11116-012-9438-1.

    OpenUrlCrossRef
17. ↵
    1. Huber, Joel, and
    2. Klaus Zwerina

    . 1996. “The Importance of Utility Balance in Efficient Choice Designs.” Journal of Marketing Research 33 (3): 307. https://doi.org/10.2307/3152127.
18. ↵
    1. Hynes, Stephen,
    2. Wenting Chen,
    3. Kofi Vondolia,
    4. Claire Armstrong, and
    5. Eamonn O’Connor

    . 2021. “Valuing the Ecosystem Service Benefits from Kelp Forest Restoration: A Choice Experiment from Norway.” Ecological Economics 179: 106833. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2020.106833.

    OpenUrl
19. ↵
    1. Ingeman, Kurt E.,
    2. Jameal F. Samhouri, and
    3. Adrian C. Stier

    . 2019. “Ocean Recoveries for Tomorrow’s Earth: Hitting a Moving Target.” Science 363 (6425): eaav1004. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aav1004.

    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
20. ↵
    1. Interis, Matthew G., and
    2. Daniel R. Petrolia

    . 2016. “Location, Location, Habitat: How the Value of Ecosystem Services Varies across Location and by Habitat.” Land Economics 92 (2): 292–307. https://doi.org/10.3368/le.92.2.292.

    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
21. ↵
    1. Johnston, Robert J.,
    2. Kevin J. Boyle,
    3. Wiktor Adamowicz,
    4. Jeff Bennett,
    5. Roy Brouwer,
    6. Trudy Ann Cameron,
    7. W. Michael Hanemann, et al.

    2017. “Contemporary Guidance for Stated Preference Studies.” Journal of the Association of Environmental and Resource Economists 4 (2): 319–405. https://doi.org/10.1086/691697.

    OpenUrlCrossRef
22. ↵
    1. Koetse, Mark J.

    2017. “Effects of Payment Vehicle Non-attendance in Choice Experiments on Value Estimates and the WTA-WTP Disparity.” Journal of Environmental Economics and Policy 6 (3): 225–45. https://doi.org/10.1080/21606544.2016.1268979.

    OpenUrl
23. ↵
    1. Krinsky, Itzhak, and
    2. A. Leslie Robb

    . 1986. “On Approximating the Statistical Properties of Elasticities.” Review of Economics and Statistics 68 (4): 715. https://doi.org/10.2307/1924536.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
24. ↵
    1. Lester, Sarah E.,
    2. Christopher Costello,
    3. Benjamin S. Halpern,
    4. Steven D. Gaines,
    5. Crow White, and
    6. John A. Barth

    . 2013. “Evaluating Tradeoffs among Ecosystem Services to Inform Marine Spatial Planning.” Marine Policy 38: 80–89.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
25. ↵
    1. Lew, Daniel K.

    2019. “Place of Residence and Cost Attribute Non-attendance in a Stated Preference Choice Experiment Involving a Marine Endangered Species.” Marine Resource Economics 34 (3): 225–45. https://doi.org/10.1086/705114.

    OpenUrl
26. 1. Lew, Daniel K.,
    2. David F. Layton, and
    3. Robert D. Rowe

    . 2010. “Valuing Enhancements to Endangered Species Protection under Alternative Baseline Futures: The Case of the Steller Sea Lion.” Marine Resource Economics 25 (2): 133–54. https://doi.org/10.5950/0738-1360-25.2.133.

    OpenUrl
27. ↵
    1. Lewis, David J.,
    2. Steven J. Dundas,
    3. David M. Kling,
    4. Daniel K. Lew, and
    5. Sally D. Hacker

    . 2019. “The Non-market Benefits of Early and Partial Gains in Managing Threatened Salmon.” PLOS One 14 (8): e0220260. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0220260.

    OpenUrl
28. ↵
    1. Longwoods Travel USA

    . 2018. “Oregon 2017 Regional Visitor Report: The Coast.” Travel Oregon. Available at https://industry.traveloregon.com/resources/research/oregon-coast-overnight-travel-study-2017-longwoods-international/ (accessed September 6, 2022).
29. ↵
    1. Loomis, John B.

    1987. “Expanding Contingent Value Sample Estimates to Aggregate Benefit Estimates: Current Practices and Proposed Solutions.” Land Economics 63 (4): 396–402.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
30. ↵
    1. Luijendijk, Arjen,
    2. Gerben Hagenaars,
    3. Roshanka Ranasinghe,
    4. Fedor Baart,
    5. Gennadii Donchyts, and
    6. Stefan Aarninkhof

    . 2018. “The State of the World’s Beaches.” Scientific Reports 8 (1): 6641. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-018-24630-6.

    OpenUrl
31. ↵
    1. Mansfield, C.,
    2. D. J. Phaneuf,
    3. F. R. Johnson,
    4. J.-C. Yang, and
    5. R. Beach

    . 2008. “Preferences for Public Lands Management under Competing Uses: The Case of Yellowstone National Park.” Land Economics 84 (2): 282–305. https://doi.org/10.3368/le.84.2.282.

    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
32. ↵
    1. Matthews, Yvonne,
    2. Riccardo Scarpa, and
    3. Dan Marsh

    . 2017. “Using Virtual Environments to Improve the Realism of Choice Experiments: A Case Study about Coastal Erosion Management.” Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 81: 193–208. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeem.2016.08.001.

    OpenUrl
33. ↵
    1. Milon, J. Walter, and
    2. David Scrogin

    . 2006. “Latent Preferences and Valuation of Wetland Ecosystem Restoration.” Ecological Economics 56 (2): 162–75. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2005.01.009.

    OpenUrlCrossRef
34. ↵
    1. Morrison, Mark, and
    2. Thomas C. Brown

    . 2009. “Testing the Effectiveness of Certainty Scales, Cheap Talk, and Dissonance-Minimization in Reducing Hypothetical Bias in Contingent Valuation Studies.” Environmental and Resource Economics 44 (3): 307–26. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10640-009-9287-3.

    OpenUrl
35. ↵
    1. Needles, Lisa A.,
    2. Sarah E. Lester,
    3. Richard Ambrose,
    4. Anders Andren,
    5. Marc Beyeler,
    6. Michael S. Connor,
    7. James E. Eckman,
    8. Barry A. Costa-Pierce,
    9. Steven D. Gaines, and
    10. Kevin D. Lafferty

    . 2015. “Managing Bay and Estuarine Ecosystems for Multiple Services.” Estuaries and Coasts 38 (1): 35–48.

    OpenUrl
36. ↵
    1. Oregon Dunes Restoration Collaborative and Travel Oregon

    . 2018. Restoring Oregon Dunes: The Bid to Save a National Treasure. Available at https://www.saveoregondunes.org/wp-content/uploads/2018/02/Dunes-Restoration-Strategy.pdf.
37. ↵
    1. Oregon Legislative Assembly

    . 1967. “Oregon HB 1601 Beach Bill.” In Oregon Laws and Resolutions: Enacted and Adopted by the Regular Session of the Fifty-Fourth Legislative Assembly Beginning January 9 and Ending June 14 1967. Salem: Oregon Legislative Assembly. Available at http://www.govoregon.org/beachbilltext.html.
38. ↵
    1. Petrolia, Daniel R.,
    2. Matthew G. Interis, and
    3. Joong-hyun Hwang

    . 2014. “America’s Wetland? A National Survey of Willingness to Pay for Restoration of Louisiana’s Coastal Wetlands.” Marine Resource Economics 29 (1): 17–37. https://doi.org/10.1086/676289.

    OpenUrl
39. ↵
    1. Ruggiero, Peter,
    2. Sally Hacker,
    3. Eric Seabloom, and
    4. Phoebe Zarnetske

    . 2018. “The Role of Vegetation in Determining Dune Morphology, Exposure to Sea-Level Rise, and Storm-Induced Coastal Hazards: A U.S. Pacific Northwest Perspective.” In Barrier Dynamics and Response to Changing Climate, edited by Laura J. Moore and A. Brad Murray, 337–61. Cham, Switzerland: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-68086-6_11.
40. ↵
    1. Scarpa, Riccardo,
    2. Raffaele Zanoli,
    3. Viola Bruschi, and
    4. Simona Naspetti

    . 2013. “Inferred and Stated Attribute Non-attendance in Food Choice Experiments.” American Journal of Agricultural Economics 95 (1): 165–80.

    OpenUrlCrossRef
41. ↵
    1. Seabloom, E. W., and
    2. A. M. Wiedemann

    . 1994. “Distribution and Effects of Ammophila breviligulata Fern (American Beachgrass) on the Foredunes of the Washington Coast.” Journal of Coastal Research, 178–88.
42. ↵
    1. U.S. Census Bureau

    . 2019. “American Community Survey 5-Year Estimates Data Profiles: 2014–2018.” Available at https://www.census.gov/acs/www/data/data-tables-and-tools/data-profiles/.
43. ↵
    1. USDA

    . 1991. Stabilizing Coastal Sand Dunes in the Pacific Northwest. Soil Conservation Service, Agriculture Handbook 687. Available at https://naldc.nal.usda.gov/download/CAT92981355/PDF.
44. ↵
    1. USDA

    . 2020. “Oregon Dunes Restoration Project: Final Environmental Assessment.” Available at https://www.fs.usda.gov/project/?project=52946 (accessed September 6, 2022).
45. ↵
    1. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service

    . 2007. Recovery Plan for the Pacific Coast Population of the Western Snowy Plover (Charadrius alexandrinus nivosus). 2 vols. Sacramento.
46. ↵
    1. Wiedemann, Alfred M., and
    2. Andrea Pickart

    . 1996. “The Ammophila Problem on the Northwest Coast of North America.” Landscape and Urban Planning 34 (3–4): 287–99. https://doi.org/10.1016/0169-2046(95)00240-5.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
47. ↵
    1. Zarnetske, Phoebe L.,
    2. Eric W. Seabloom, and
    3. Sally D. Hacker

    . 2010. “Non-target Effects of Invasive Species Management: Beachgrass, Birds, and Bulldozers in Coastal Dunes.” Ecosphere 1 (5). https://doi.org/10.1890/ES10-00101.1.