Photovoltaics and the Solar Rebound

References

1. ↵
   1. Altonji, J. G.,
   2. T. E. Elder, and
   3. C. R. Taber

   . 2005. “An Evaluation of Instrumental Variable Strategies for Estimating the Effects of Catholic Schooling.” Journal of Human Resources 40 (4): 791–821.

   OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
2. ↵
   1. Anderson, T. W., and
   2. C. Hsiao

   . 1982. “Formulation and Estimation of Dynamic Models Using Panel Data.” Journal of Econometrics 18 (1): 47–82.

   OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
3. ↵
   1. Andor, M.,
   2. M. Frondel, and
   3. C. Vance

   . 2015. “Installing Photovoltaics in Germany: A License to Print Money?” Economic Analysis and Policy 48: 106–16.

   OpenUrl
4. ↵
   1. Angrist, J.,
   2. V. Lavy, and
   3. A. Schlosser

   . 2010. “Multiple Experiments for the Causal Link between the Quantity and Quality of Children.” Journal of Labor Economics 28 (4): 773–824.

   OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
5. ↵
   1. Arellano, M., and
   2. S. Bond

   . 1991. “Some Tests of Specification for Panel Data: Monte Carlo Evidence and an Application to Employment Equations.” Review of Economic Studies 58 (2): 277–97.

   OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
6. ↵
   1. Arellano, M., and
   2. O. Bover

   . 1995. “Another Look at the Instrumental Variable Estimation of Error-Components Models.” Journal of Econometrics 68 (1): 29–51.

   OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
7. ↵
   1. Baltagi, Badi H.

   2005. Econometric Analysis of Panel Data. New York: John Wiley & Sons.
8. ↵
   1. Barton-Henry, K.,
   2. L. Wenz, and
   3. A. Levermann

   . 2021. “Decay Radius of Climate Decision for Solar Panels in the City of Fresno, USA.” Scientific Reports 11 (1): 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-87714-w.

   OpenUrl
9. ↵
   1. BDEW (German Association of Energy and Water Industries)

   . 2016. Renewable Energies and the EEG: Facts, Figures, Graphics. Plants, Installed Capacity, Power Generation, Market Integration of Renewable Energies, EEG Payments and Regional Distribution of EEG Plants. Available at https://www.bdew.de/service/publikationen/energie-info-erneuerbare-energien-und-das-eeg-zahlen-fakten-grafiken-2016/.
10. ↵
    1. Beppler, R. C.,
    2. D. C. Matisoff, and
    3. M. E. Oliver

    . 2021. “Electricity Consumption Changes Following Solar Adoption: Testing for a Solar Rebound.” Economic Inquiry: 1–24.
11. ↵
    1. Binswanger, M.

    2001. “Technological Progress and Sustainable Development: What About the Rebound Effect?” Ecological Economics 36 (1): 119–32.

    OpenUrlCrossRef
12. ↵
    1. Blackwell, M.,
    2. S. Iacus,
    3. G. King, and
    4. G. Porro

    . 2009. “CEM: Coarsened Exact Matching in Stata.” Stata Journal 9 (4): 524–46.

    OpenUrl
13. ↵
    1. Blundell, R., and
    2. S. Bond

    . 1998. “Initial Conditions and Moment Restrictions in Dynamic Panel Data Models.” Journal of Econometrics 87 (1): 115–43.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
14. ↵
    1. BMWK (Federal Ministry for Economic Affairs and Climate Action)

    . 2014. Market Analysis Photovoltaic Roof Systems. Available at https://www.bmwk.de/Redaktion/DE/Downloads/M-O/marktanalyse-photovoltaik-dachanlagen.pdf.
15. ↵
    1. BMWK (Federal Ministry for Economic Affairs and Climate Action)

    . 2022. Time Series for the Development of Renewable Energy Sources in Germany. Available at https://www.erneuerbare-energien.de/EE/Redaktion/DE/Downloads/zeitreihen-zur-entwicklung-der-erneuerbaren-energien-in-deutschland-1990-2021-en.pdf.
16. ↵
    1. BNetzA (Federal Network Agency)

    . 2020. “EEG Register Data and Reference Values for Payment.” Available at https://www.bundesnetzagentur.de/DE/Fachthemen/ElektrizitaetundGas/ErneuerbareEnergien/ZahlenDatenInformationen/EEG_Registerdaten/ArchivDatenMeldgn/start.html.
17. ↵
    1. BNetzA and Bundeskartellamt (Federal Network Agency and Federal Cartel Office)

    . 2021. Monitoring Report 2020. Available at https://www.bundesnetzagentur.de/SharedDocs/Downloads/EN/Areas/ElectricityGas/CollectionCompanySpecificData/Monitoring/MonitoringReport2020.pdf.
18. ↵
    1. Boccard, N., and
    2. A. Gautier

    . 2021. “Solar Rebound: The Unintended Consequences of Subsidies.” Energy Economics 100: 105334. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2021.105334.

    OpenUrl
19. ↵
    1. Bollinger, B., and
    2. K. Gillingham

    . 2012. “Peer Effects in the Diffusion of Solar Photovoltaic Panels.” Marketing Science 31 (6): 900–912.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
20. ↵
    1. Bound, J., and
    2. D. A. Jaeger

    . 2000. “Do Compulsory School Attendance Laws Alone Explain the Association between Quarter of Birth and Earnings?” Research in Labor Economics 19 (4): 83–108.

    OpenUrlCrossRef
21. ↵
    1. Caird, S.,
    2. R. Roy, and
    3. H. Herring

    . 2008. “Improving the Energy Performance of UK Households: Results from Surveys of Consumer Adoption and Use of Low- and Zero-Carbon Technologies.” Energy Efficiency 1 (2): 149–66.

    OpenUrl
22. ↵
    1. Cameron, A. C., and
    2. P. K. Trivedi

    . 2005. Microeconometrics: Methods and Applications. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
23. ↵
    1. CEER (Council of European Energy Regulators)

    . 2013. Status Review of Renewable and Energy Efficiency Support Schemes in Europe. Available at https://www.ceer.eu/documents/104400/-/-/fb65b156-71a6-b717-a3ec-585b138aa3ae.
24. ↵
    1. Chan, N. W., and
    2. K. Gillingham

    . 2015. “The Microeconomic Theory of the Rebound Effect and Its Welfare Implications.” Journal of the Association of Environmental and Resource Economists 2 (1): 133–59.

    OpenUrlCrossRef
25. ↵
    1. Clark, A. E.,
    2. E. Diener,
    3. Y. Georgellis, and
    4. R. E. Lucas

    . 2008. “Lags and Leads in Life Satisfaction: A Test of the Baseline Hypothesis.” Economic Journal 118 (529): F222–43. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0297.2008.02150.x.

    OpenUrl
26. ↵
    1. Deng, G., and
    2. P. Newton

    . 2017. “Assessing the Impact of Solar PV on Domestic Electricity Consumption: Exploring the Prospect of Rebound Effects.” Energy Policy 110: 313–24.

    OpenUrl
27. ↵
    1. Dusonchet, L., and
    2. E. Telaretti

    . 2015. “Comparative Economic Analysis of Support Policies for Solar PV in the Most Representative EU Countries.” Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 42: 986–98.

    OpenUrl
28. ↵
    1. Dütschke, E.,
    2. M. Frondel,
    3. J. Schleich, and
    4. C. Vance

    . 2018. “Moral Licensing: Another Source of Rebound?” Frontiers in Energy Research 6 (38): 1–10.

    OpenUrl
29. ↵
    1. Ferraro, P. J., and
    2. J. J. Miranda

    . 2017. “Panel Data Designs and Estimators as Substitutes for Randomized Controlled Trials in the Evaluation of Public Programs.” Journal of the Association of Environmental and Resource Economists 4 (1): 281–317.

    OpenUrl
30. ↵
    1. Frondel, M., and
    2. G. Kussel

    . 2019. “Switching on Electricity Demand Response: Evidence for German Households.” Energy Journal 40 (5): 1–15.

    OpenUrl
31. 1. Frondel, M.,
    2. G. Kussel, and
    3. S. Sommer

    . 2019. “Heterogeneity in the Price Response of Residential Electricity Demand: A Dynamic Approach for Germany.” Resource and Energy Economics 57: 119–34.

    OpenUrl
32. ↵
    1. Frondel, M.,
    2. F. Martinez-Flores, and
    3. C. Vance

    . 2017. “Heterogeneous Rebound Effects in Individual Mobility: Evidence from German Households.” Journal of Transport Economics and Policy 51 (2): 95–114.

    OpenUrl
33. ↵
    1. Frondel, M.,
    2. J. Peters, and
    3. C. Vance

    . 2008. “Identifying the Rebound: Evidence from a German Household Panel.” Energy Journal 29 (4): 145–63.

    OpenUrl
34. ↵
    1. Frondel, M.,
    2. N. Ritter, and
    3. C. Vance

    . 2012. “Heterogeneity in the Rebound Effect: Further Evidence for Germany.” Energy Economics 34 (2): 461–67.

    OpenUrlCrossRef
35. ↵
    1. Frondel, M., and
    2. C. Vance

    . 2013. “Re-identifying the Rebound: What about Asymmetry?” Energy Journal 34 (4): 43–54.

    OpenUrl
36. ↵
    1. GRECS

    . 2022. “RWI-GRECS German Residential Energy Consumption Survey.” Available at https://www.rwi-essen.de/GRECS/.
37. ↵
    1. Greene, William H.

    2012. Econometric Analysis. 7th ed. Harlow, UK: Pearson Education.
38. ↵
    1. Havas, L.,
    2. J. Ballweg,
    3. C. Penna, and
    4. D. Race

    . 2015. “Power to Change: Analysis of Household Participation in a Renewable Energy and Energy Efficiency Programme in Central Australia.” Energy Policy 87: 325–33.

    OpenUrl
39. ↵
    1. Heckman, J. J.,
    2. H. Ichimura, and
    3. P. E. Todd

    . 1997. “Matching as an Econometric Evaluation Estimator: Evidence from Evaluating a Job Training Programme.” Review of Economic Studies 64 (4): 605–54.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
40. ↵
    1. Hondo, H., and
    2. K. Baba

    . 2010. “Socio-psychological Impacts of the Introduction of Energy Technologies: Change in Environmental Behavior of Households with Photovoltaic Systems.” Applied Energy 87 (1): 229–35.

    OpenUrl
41. ↵
    1. Iacus, S. M.,
    2. G. King, and
    3. G. Porro

    . 2012. “Causal Inference without Balance Checking: Coarsened Exact Matching.” Political Analysis 20 (1): 1–24.

    OpenUrlCrossRef
42. ↵
    1. ISE (Fraunhofer Institute for Solar Energy Systems)

    . 2021. Recent Facts about Photovoltaics in Germany. Available at https://www.ise.fraunhofer.de/content/dam/ise/en/documents/publications/studies/recent-facts-about-photovoltaics-in-germany.pdf.
43. ↵
    1. Jacksohn, A.,
    2. P. Grösche,
    3. K. Rehdanz, and
    4. C. Schröder

    . 2019. “Drivers of Renewable Technology Adoption in the Household Sector.” Energy Economics 81: 216–26.

    OpenUrl
44. ↵
    1. Keirstead, J.

    2007. “Behavioural Responses to Photovoltaic Systems in the UK Domestic Sector.” Energy Policy 35 (8): 4128–41.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
45. ↵
    1. Kleibergen, F., and
    2. R. Paap

    . 2006. “Generalized Reduced Rank Tests Using the Singular Value Decomposition.” Journal of Econometrics 133 (1): 97–126.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
46. ↵
    1. La Nauze, A.

    2019. “Power From the People: Rooftop Solar and a Downward-Sloping Supply of Electricity.” Journal of the Association of Environmental and Resource Economists 6 (6): 1135–68.

    OpenUrl
47. ↵
    1. Masson, G.,
    2. J. I. Briano, and
    3. M. J. Baez

    . 2016. “Review and Analysis of PV Self-Consumption Policies.” IEA Photovoltaic Power Systems Programme (PVPS) 1 (28).
48. ↵
    1. McKenna, E.,
    2. J. Pless, and
    3. S. J. Darby

    . 2018. “Solar Photovoltaic Self-Consumption in the UK Residential Sector: New Estimates from a Smart Grid Demonstration Project.” Energy Policy 118: 482–91.

    OpenUrl
49. ↵
    1. Motlagh, O.,
    2. P. Paevere,
    3. T. S. Hong, and
    4. G. Grozev

    . 2015. “Analysis of Household Electricity Consumption Behaviours: Impact of Domestic Electricity Generation.” Applied Mathematics and Computation 270: 165–78.

    OpenUrl
50. ↵
    1. Nelson, T.,
    2. P. Simshauser, and
    3. S. Kelley

    . 2011. “Australian Residential Solar Feed-In Tariffs: Industry Stimulus or Regressive Form of Taxation?” Economic Analysis and Policy 41 (2): 113–29.

    OpenUrl
51. ↵
    1. Nickell, S.

    1981. “Biases in Dynamic Models with Fixed Effects.” Econometrica 49 (6): 1417–26.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
52. ↵
    1. Nikodinoska, D., and
    2. C. Schröder

    . 2016. “On the Emissions-Inequality and Emissions-Welfare Trade-Offs in Energy Taxation: Evidence on the German Car Fuels Tax.” Resource and Energy Economics 44: 206–33.

    OpenUrl
53. ↵
    1. Oberst, C. A.,
    2. H. Schmitz, and
    3. R. Madlener

    . 2019. “Are Prosumer Households that Much Different? Evidence from Stated Residential Energy Consumption in Germany.” Ecological Economics 158: 101–15.

    OpenUrl
54. ↵
    1. Oliver, M. E.,
    2. J. Moreno-Cruz, and
    3. R. C. Beppler

    . 2019. “Microeconomics of the Rebound Effect for Residential Solar Photovoltaic Systems.” CESifo Working Paper 7635. Munich: Munich Society for the Promotion of Economic Research—CESifo GmbH.
55. ↵
    1. Qiu, Y. L.,
    2. Kahn, M. E., and
    3. B. Xing

    . 2019. “Quantifying the Rebound Effects of Residential Solar Panel Adoption.” Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 96: 310–41.

    OpenUrl
56. ↵
    1. Roodman, David

    . 2009a. “A Note on the Theme of Too Many Instruments.” Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics 71 (1): 135–58.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
57. ↵
    1. Roodman, David

    . 2009b. “How to Do xtabond2: An Introduction to Difference and System GMM in Stata.” Stata Journal 9 (1): 86–136.

    OpenUrl
58. ↵
    1. Rosenbaum, P. R., and
    2. D. B. Rubin

    . 1983. “The Central Role of the Propensity Score in Observational Studies for Causal Effects.” Biometrika 70 (1): 41–55.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
59. ↵
    1. Rubin, D. B.

    2001. “Using Propensity Scores to Help Design Observational Studies: Application to the Tobacco Litigation.” Health Services and Outcomes Research Methodology 2 (3–4): 169–88.

    OpenUrlCrossRef
60. ↵
    1. Ruf, H.

    2018. “Limitations for the Feed-In Power of Residential Photovoltaic Systems in Germany: An Overview of the Regulatory Framework.” Solar Energy 159: 588–600.

    OpenUrl
61. ↵
    1. Sekitou, M.,
    2. K. Tanaka, and
    3. S. Managi

    . 2018. “Household Electricity Demand after the Introduction of Solar Photovoltaic Systems.” Economic Analysis and Policy 57: 102–10.

    OpenUrl
62. ↵
    1. Smith, J. A., and
    2. P. E. Todd

    . 2005. “Does Matching Overcome Lalonde’s Critique of Nonexperimental Estimators?” Journal of Econometrics 125 (1–2): 305–53.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
63. ↵
    1. Spiller, E.,
    2. P. Sopher,
    3. N. Martin,
    4. M. Mirzatuny, and
    5. X. Zhang

    . 2017. “The Environmental Impacts of Green Technologies in TX.” Energy Economics 68: 199–214.

    OpenUrl
64. ↵
    1. Stock, J. H., and
    2. M. Yogo

    . 2005. “Testing for Weak Instruments in Linear IV Regression.” In Identification and Inference for Econometric Models: Essays in Honor of Thomas Rothenberg, edited by Donald W. K. Andrews and James H. Stock, 80–108. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
65. ↵
    1. Toroghi, S. O., and
    2. M. E. Oliver

    . 2019. “Framework for Assessment of the Direct Rebound Effect for Residential Photovoltaic Systems.” Applied Energy 251: 113391. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2019.113391.

    OpenUrl
66. ↵
    1. TSO (Transmission System Operators)

    . 2017. “EEG-Facility Master Data: Transmission System Operators.” Available at https://www.netztransparenz.de/EEG/Anlagenstammdaten.
67. ↵
    1. TSO (Transmission System Operators)

    . 2019. Medium-Term Forecast for Germany-Wide Electricity Generation from EEG-Supported Power Plants for the Calendar Years 2020 to 2024. Available at https://www.netztransparenz.de/portals/1/2019-10-11_Endbericht_enervis.pdf.
68. ↵
    1. van Kippersluis, H., and
    2. C. A. Rietveld

    . 2018. “Beyond Plausibly Exogenous.” Econometrics Journal 21 (3): 316–31.

    OpenUrl
69. ↵
    1. Wooldridge, Jeffrey M.

    2010. Econometric Analysis of Cross Section and Panel Data. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
70. ↵
    1. ZSW, Bosch & Partner

    2019. Vorbereitung und Begleitung bei der Erstellung eines Erfahrungsberichts gemäß § 97 Erneuerbare-Energien-Gesetz: Teilvorhaben II C. Solare Strahlungsenergie [Preparation and Support in the Creation of a Field Report in Accordance with Section 97 of the Renewable Energy Sources Act: Subproject II C. Solar Radiation Energy]. Baden-Wuerttemberg, Germany. Available at https://www.erneuerbare-energien.de/EE/Redaktion/DE/Downloads/bmwi_de/zsv-boschundpartner-vorbereitung-begleitung-eeg.pdf.