The Demand for Public Flood Protection under a Compulsory Private Flood Insurance Scheme

References

1. ↵
   1. Andor, M.,
   2. D. Osberghaus, and
   3. M. Simora

   . 2020. “Natural Disasters and Governmental Aid: Is There a Charity Hazard?” Ecological Economics 169: 106534. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2019.106534.

   OpenUrl
2. ↵
   1. Atreya, A.,
   2. S. Ferreira, and
   3. E. Michel-Kerjan

   . 2015. “What Drives Households to Buy Flood Insurance? New Evidence from Georgia.” Ecological Economics 117 (C): 153–61.

   OpenUrl
3. ↵
   1. Bin, O.,
   2. J. B. Kruse, and
   3. C. E. Landry

   . 2008. “Flood Hazards, Insurance Rates, and Amenities: Evidence from the Coastal Housing Market.” Journal of Risk and Insurance 75 (1): 63–82. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1539-6975.2007.00248.x.

   OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
4. ↵
   1. Borsky, S., and
   2. H. B. Hennighausen

   . 2022. “Public Flood Risk Mitigation and the Homeowner’s Insurance Demand Response.” Land Economics 98 (4): 534–59. https://doi.org/10.3368/le.98.4.061720-008R2.

   OpenUrl
5. ↵
   1. Botzen, W. J. W.,
   2. J. C. J. H. Aerts, and
   3. J. C. J. M. van den Bergh

   . 2009. “Willingness of Homeowners to Mitigate Climate Risk through Insurance.” Ecological Economics 68 (8): 2265–77. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2009.02.019.

   OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
6. 1. Botzen, W. J. W.,
   2. H. Kunreuther, and
   3. E. Michel-Kerjan

   . 2009. “Managing Natural Disaster Risks in a Changing Climate.” Environmental Hazards 8 (3): 209–25. https://doi.org/10.3763/ehaz.2009.0023.

   OpenUrl
7. ↵
   1. Botzen, W. J. W.,
   2. H. Kunreuther, and
   3. E. Michel-Kerjan

   . 2012. “Monatary Valuation of Insurance against Flood Risk under Climate Change.” International Economic Review 53 (3): 1005–25.

   OpenUrlCrossRef
8. ↵
   1. Botzen, W. J. W.,
   2. H. Kunreuther, and
   3. E. Michel-Kerjan

   . 2019. “Protecting against Disaster Risks: Why Insurance and Prevention May Be Complements.” Journal of Risk and Uncertainty 59 (2): 151–69. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11166-019-09312-6.

   OpenUrl
9. ↵
   1. Carson, R. T., and
   2. T. Groves

   . 2007. “Incentive and Informational Properties of Preference Questions.” Environmental and Resource Economics 37 (1): 181–210. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10640-007-9124-5.

   OpenUrlCrossRef
10. ↵
    1. Carson, R. T., and
    2. J. J. Louviere

    . 2011. “A Common Nomenclature for Stated Preference Elicitation Approaches.” Environmental and Resource Economics 49 (4): 539–59. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10640-010-9450-x.

    OpenUrl
11. ↵
    1. Downton, W., and
    2. R. A. Pielke

    . 2001. “Discretion without Accountability: Politics, Flood Damage, and Climate.” Natural Hazards Review (November): 157–66.
12. ↵
    1. Eisensee, T., and
    2. D. Strömberg

    . 2007. “News Droughts, News Floods, and U.S. Disaster Relief.” Quarterly Journal of Economics 122 (2): 693–728.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
13. ↵
    1. Entorf, H., and
    2. A. Jensen

    . 2020. “Willingness-to-Pay for Hazard Safety: A Case Study on the Valuation of Flood Risk Reduction in Germany.” Safety Science 128: 104657. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssci.2020.104657.

    OpenUrl
14. ↵
    1. Fan, Q., and
    2. M. Davlasheridze

    . 2016. “Flood Risk, Flood Mitigation, and Location Choice: Evaluating the National Flood Insurance Program’s Community Rating System.” Risk Analysis 36 (6): 1125–47. https://doi.org/10.1111/risa.12505.

    OpenUrl
15. ↵
    GDV. 2016. “7 Gründe, warum eine Pflichtversicherung gegen Naturgefahren falsch wäre” [7 Reasons Why Mandatory Insurance against Natural Hazards Would Be Wrong]. Available at https://www.deutsche-versicherungsboerse.de/pressespiegel/7-Gr%C3%BCnde-warum-eine-Pflichtversicherung-gegen-Naturgefahren-falsch-w%C3%A4re-pw_1290132.html.
16. 1. Geys, B.,
    2. F. Heinemann, and
    3. A. Kalb

    . 2010. “Voter Involvement, Fiscal Autonomy and Public Sector Efficiency: Evidence from German Municipalities.” European Journal of Political Economy 26 (2): 265–78. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejpoleco.2009.11.002.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
17. ↵
    1. Hole, A. R.

    2007. “Fitting Mixed Logit Models by Using Maximum Simulated Likelihood.” Stata Journal 7: 388–401.

    OpenUrl
18. ↵
    1. Huber, D., and
    2. J. Gulledge

    . 2011. “Extreme Weather and Climate Change: Understanding the Link and Managing the Risk.” Arlington, VA: Center for Climate and Energy Solutions. Available at http://www.c2es.org/publications/extreme-weather-and-climate-change.
19. ↵
    1. Hudson, P.,
    2. W. J. W. Botzen, and
    3. J. C. J. H. Aerts

    . 2019. “Flood Insurance Arrangements in the European Union for Future Flood Risk under Climate and Socioeconomic Change.” Global Environmental Change 58: 101966. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.GLOENVCHA.2019.101966.

    OpenUrl
20. ↵
    1. Hudson, P.,
    2. W. J. W. Botzen,
    3. J. Czajkowski, and
    4. H. Kreibich

    . 2017. “Moral Hazard in Natural Disaster Insurance Markets: Empirical Evidence from Germany and the United States.” Land Economics 93 (2): 179–208. https://doi.org/10.3368/le.93.2.179.

    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
21. ↵
    1. Johnston, R. J.,
    2. K. J. Boyle,
    3. W. Adamowicz,
    4. J. Bennett,
    5. R. Brouwer,
    6. T. A. Cameron,
    7. W. M. Hanemann

    , et al. 2017. “Contemporary Guidance for Stated Preference Studies.” Journal of the Association of Environmental and Resource Economists 4 (2): 319–405. https://doi.org/10.1086/691697.

    OpenUrlCrossRef
22. ↵
    1. Kousky, C.

    2019. “The Role of Natural Disaster Insurance in Recovery and Risk Reduction.” Annual Review of Resource Economics 11 (1): 399–418. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-resource-100518-094028.

    OpenUrl
23. ↵
    1. Kriesel, W., and
    2. C. Landry

    . 2004. “Participation in the National Flood Insurance Program: An Empirical Analysis for Coastal Properties.” Journal of Risk and Insurance 71 (3): 405–20.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
24. ↵
    1. Kunreuther, H.

    2006. “Disaster Mitigation and Insurance: Learning from Katrina.” Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science 604 (1): 208–27. https://doi.org/10.1177/0002716205285685.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
25. ↵
    1. Landry, C. E.,
    2. D. Turner, and
    3. D. Petrolia

    . 2021. “Flood Insurance Market Penetration and Expectations of Disaster Assistance.” Environmental and Resource Economics 79 (2): 357–86. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10640-021-00565-x.

    OpenUrl
26. ↵
    1. Li, J., and
    2. C. E. Landry

    . 2018. “Flood Risk, Local Hazard Mitigation, and the Community Rating System of the National Flood Insurance Program.” Land Economics 94 (2): 175–98. https://doi.org/10.3368/le.94.2.175.

    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
27. ↵
    1. Lloyd-Smith, P.,
    2. W. Adamowicz, and
    3. D. Dupont

    . 2019. “Incorporating Stated Consequentiality Questions in Stated Preference Research.” Land Economics 95 (3): 293–306. https://doi.org/10.3368/le.95.3.293.

    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
28. ↵
    1. Lloyd-Smith, P.,
    2. C. Schram,
    3. W. Adamowicz, and
    4. D. Dupont

    . 2018. “Endogeneity of Risk Perceptions in Averting Behavior Models.” Environmental and Resource Economics 69 (2): 217–46. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10640-016-0075-6.

    OpenUrl
29. ↵
    1. Miller, G. J.

    2005. “The Political Evolution of Principal-Agent Models.” Annual Review of Political Science 8 (1): 203–25. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.polisci.8.082103.104840.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
30. ↵
    1. Miller, S.,
    2. R. Muir-Wood, and
    3. A. Boissonnade

    . 2008. “An Exploration of Trends in Normalized Weather-Related Catastrophe Losses.” In Climate Extremes and Society, edited by H. F. Diaz and R. J. Murnane, 25–247. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511535840.015.
31. ↵
    1. Mol, J. M.,
    2. W. J. W. Botzen, and
    3. J. E. Blasch

    . 2020. “Behavioral Motivations for Self-Insurance under Different Disaster Risk Insurance Schemes.” Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization 180: 967–91. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jebo.2018.12.007.

    OpenUrl
32. ↵
    1. Osberghaus, D.

    2015. “The Determinants of Private Flood Mitigation Measures in Germany: Evidence from a Nationwide Survey.” Ecological Economics 110: 36–50. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2014.12.010.

    OpenUrl
33. ↵
    1. Osberghaus, D.

    2021. “Poorly Adapted but Nothing to Lose? A Study on the Flood Risk: Income Relationship with a Focus on Low-Income Households.” Climate Risk Management 31: 100268. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.crm.2020.100268.

    OpenUrl
34. ↵
    1. Osberghaus, D.,
    2. M. Achtnicht,
    3. P. Bubeck,
    4. M. Frondel,
    5. V. C. Kükenthal,
    6. T. Larysch, and
    7. A. Thieken

    . 2020. “Klimawandel in Deutschland: Risikowahrnehmung und Anpassung in privaten Haushalten 2020” [Climate Change in Germany: Risk Perception and Adaptation in Private Households 2020]. Mannheim, Germany: ZEW. Available at https://www.zew.de/publikationen/klimawandel-in-deutschland-risikowahrnehmung-und-anpassung-in-pri vaten-haushalten-2020.
35. ↵
    1. Oulahen, G.

    2015. “Flood Insurance in Canada: Implications for Flood Management and Residential Vulnerability to Flood Hazards.” Environmental Management 55 (3): https://doi.org/10.1007/s00267-014-0416-6.
36. ↵
    1. Paudel, Y.

    2012. “A Comparative Study of Public: Private Catastrophe Insurance Systems: Lessons from Current Practices.” Geneva Papers on Risk and Insurance: Issues and Practice 37 (2): 257–85. https://doi.org/10.1057/gpp.2012.16.

    OpenUrl
37. ↵
    1. Potrafke, N.

    2013. “Evidence on the Political Principal-Agent Problem from Voting on Public Finance for Concert Halls.” Constitutional Political Economy 24 (3): 215–38. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10602-013-9141-z.

    OpenUrl
38. ↵
    1. Raschky, P. A.,
    2. R. Schwarze,
    3. M. Schwindt, and
    4. F. Zahn

    . 2013. “Uncertainty of Governmental Relief and the Crowding Out of Flood Insurance.” Environmental and Resource Economics 54 (2): 179–200. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10640-012-9586-y.

    OpenUrl
39. ↵
    1. Raschky, P., and
    2. H. Weck-Hannemann

    . 2007. “Charity Hazard: A Real Hazard to Natural Disaster Insurance?” Environmental Hazards 7 (4): 321–29. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envhaz.2007.09.002.

    OpenUrlCrossRef
40. ↵
    1. Rojas, R.,
    2. L. Feyen, and
    3. P. Watkiss

    . 2013. “Climate Change and River Floods in the European Union: Socioeconomic Consequences and the Costs and Benefits of Adaptation.” Global Environmental Change 23 (6): 1737–51. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2013.08.006.

    OpenUrl
41. ↵
    1. Schwarze, R., and
    2. G. G. Wagner

    . 2007. “The Political Economy of Natural Disaster Insurance: Lessons from the Failure of a Proposed Compulsory Insurance Scheme in Germany.” European Environment 17 (6): 403–15. https://doi.org/10.1002/eet.456.

    OpenUrl
42. ↵
    1. Seifert, I.,
    2. W. J. W. Botzen,
    3. H. Kreibich, and
    4. J. C. J. H. Aerts

    . 2013. “Influence of Flood Risk Characteristics on Flood Insurance Demand: A Comparison between Germany and the Netherlands.” Natural Hazards and Earth System Sciences 13 (7): 1691–705. https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-13-1691-2013.

    OpenUrlCrossRef
43. ↵
    1. Spegel, E.

    2017. “Valuing the Reduction of Floods: Public Officials’ versus Citizens’ Preferences.” Climate Risk Management 18: 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.crm.2017.08.003.

    OpenUrl
44. ↵
    1. Tesselaar, M.,
    2. W. J. W. Botzen,
    3. P. J. Robinson,
    4. J. C. J. H. Aerts, and
    5. F. Zhou

    . 2022. “Charity Hazard and the Flood Insurance Protection Gap: An EU Scale Assessment under Climate Change.” Ecological Economics 193: 107289. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2021.107289.

    OpenUrl
45. ↵
    1. Thieken, A. H.,
    2. T. Petrow,
    3. H. Kreibich, and
    4. B. Merz

    . 2006. “Insurability and Mitigation of Flood Losses in Private Households in Germany.” Risk Analysis 26 (2): 383–95. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1539-6924.2006.00741.x.

    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
46. ↵
    1. Tversky, A., and
    2. D. Kahneman

    . 1986. “Rational Choice and the Framing of Decisions Rational Choice and the Framing of Decisions.” Journal of Business 59 (4, Part 2): S251–78.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
47. ↵
    1. Vossler, C. A., and
    2. S. B. Watson

    . 2013. “Understanding the Consequences of Consequentiality: Testing the Validity of Stated Preferences in the Field.” Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization 86: 137–47. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jebo.2012.12.007.

    OpenUrlCrossRef
48. ↵
    1. Winsemius, H. C.,
    2. J. C. J. H. Aerts,
    3. L. P. H. van Beek,
    4. M. F. P. Bierkens,
    5. A. Bouwman,
    6. B. Jongman,
    7. J. C. J. Kwadijk

    , et al. 2016. “Global Drivers of Future River Flood Risk.” Nature Climate Change 6 (4): 381–85. https://doi.org/10.1038/nclimate2893.

    OpenUrl
49. ↵
    1. Zhai, G.,
    2. T. Sato,
    3. T. Fukuzono,
    4. S. Ikeda, and
    5. K. Yoshida

    . 2006. “Willingness to Pay for Flood Risk Reduction and its Determinants in Japan.” Journal of the American Water Resources Association 42 (4): 927–40. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1752-1688.2006.tb04505.x.

    OpenUrl