To Tell or Not to Tell: Preference Elicitation with and without Emphasis on Scientific Uncertainty

References

1. ↵
   1. Aanesen, M.,
   2. J. Falk-Andersson,
   3. K. Vondolia,
   4. S. Navrud,
   5. T. Borch, and
   6. D. Tinch

   . 2018. “Valuing Coastal Recreation and the Visual Intrusion from Commercial Activities in Arctic Norway.” Ocean and Coastal Management 153: 157–67.

   OpenUrl
2. ↵
   1. Abolofia, J.,
   2. F. Asche, and
   3. J. E. Wilen

   . 2017. “The Cost of Lice: Quantifying the Impact of Parasitic Sea Lice on Farmed Salmon.” Marine Resource Economics 32 (3): 329–49.

   OpenUrlCrossRef
3. ↵
   1. Bateman, I., and
   2. J. Mawby

   . 2004. “First Impressions Count: Interviewer Appearance and Information Effects in Stated Preference Studies.” Ecological Economics 49 (1): 47–55.

   OpenUrlCrossRef
4. ↵
   1. Berke, P., and
   2. W. Lyles

   . 2013. “Public Risks and the Challenges to Climate-Change Adaptation: A Proposed Framework for Planning in the Age of Uncertainty.” Cityscape 15 (1): 181–208.

   OpenUrl
5. ↵
   1. Bjørkan, M., and
   2. S. M. Eilertsen

   . 2020. “Local Perception of Aquaculture: A Case Study of Legitimacy from Northern Norway.” Ocean and Coastal Management 195: doi.org/10.1016/j.ocecoaman.2020.105276.
6. ↵
   1. Brattland, C., and
   2. T. Eythorsson

   . 2016. “Fiskesløyfa: Spildrafiskernes bruk av sjøen og hvordan den endres av oppdrettsvirksomhet.” [In Norwegian.] Ottar 312: 23–33.

   OpenUrl
7. ↵
   1. Caliendo, M., and
   2. S. Kopeinig

   . 2005. “Some Practical Guidance for the Implementation of Propensity Score Matching.” Discussion Paper 485. Berlin: German Institute for Economic Research.
8. ↵
   ChoiceMetrics. 2021. Ngene: User Manual and Reference Guide. Sydney.
9. ↵
   1. Czajkowski, M.,
   2. N. Hanley, and
   3. J. LaRiviere

   . 2016. “Controlling for Effects of Information in a Public Good Discrete Choice Model.” Environment and Resource Economics 63: 523–44.

   OpenUrl
10. ↵
    European Commission. 2017. “Council Conclusion on Blue Growth: Note from the General Sectretariat of the Council to the Delegations.” Note 9826/17. Available at https://data.consil ium.europa.eu/doc/document/ST-10662-2017-INIT/en/pdf.
11. ↵
    1. Glenk, K., and
    2. S. Colombo

    . 2011. “How Sure Can You Be? A Framework for Considering Delivery Uncertainty in Benefit Assessments Based on Stated Preferences Methods.” Journal of Agricultural Economics 62 (1): 35–46.

    OpenUrl
12. ↵
    1. Hanley, N., and
    2. M. Czajkowski

    , 2020. “The Role of Stated Preference Valuation Methods in Understanding Choices and Informing Policy.” Review of Environmental Economics and Policy 13 (2): 248–66.

    OpenUrl
13. ↵
    1. Hess, S., and
    2. D. Palma

    . 2019. “Package Apollo: Tools for Choice Models Estimation and Applications.” Available at https://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/apollo/apollo.pdf.
14. ↵
    1. Hill, R. C.,
    2. W. E. Griffiths, and
    3. G. C. Lim

    . 2018. Principles of Econometrics. 5th ed. New York: Wiley.
15. ↵
    1. Hoevenagel, R., and
    2. J. W. van der Linden

    . 1993. “Effects of Different Descriptions of the Ecological Good on Willingness to Pay Values.” Ecological Economics 7: 223–38.

    OpenUrlCrossRef
16. ↵
    1. Johnsen, J. P., and
    2. B. Hersoug

    , eds. 2012. Kampen om plass på kysten. [In Norwegian.] Oslo: Universitetsforlaget.
17. ↵
    1. Johnston, R. J.,
    2. K. J. Boyle,
    3. V. Adamovicz,
    4. J. Bennett,
    5. R. Brouwer,
    6. T. A. Cameron,
    7. W. Haneman

    , et al. 2017. “Contemporary Guidance for Stated Preference Studies.” Journal of the American Association of Environmental and Resource Economists 4 (2): 319–405.

    OpenUrl
18. ↵
    1. Krøvel, A. V.,
    2. B. Gjerstad,
    3. K. Skoland,
    4. K. M. Lindland,
    5. S. Hynes, and
    6. E. Ravagnan

    . 2019. “Exploring Attitudes toward Aquaculture in Norway: Is There a Difference between the Norwegian General Public and Local Communities Where the Industry Is Established?” Marine Policy 108. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpol.2019.103648.
19. ↵
    1. Lancaster, K. J.

    1966. “A New Approach to Consumer Theory.” Journal of Political Economy 74 (2): 132–57.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
20. ↵
    1. Lie, A.,
    2. M. Tjora,
    3. H. Lindhjem,
    4. S. Navrud,
    5. M. Aanesen, and
    6. G. Kipperberg

    2021. “Costs and Benefits of Environmental Mitigation Measures in Norwegian Salmon Aquaculture” [Kostnader og nytte ved miljøtiltak i norsk lakseoppdrett]. Samfunnsøkonomen 6: 17–32.

    OpenUrl
21. ↵
    1. Lundhede, T.,
    2. J. B. Jacobsen,
    3. N. Hanley,
    4. N. Strange, and
    5. B. J. Thorsen

    . 2015. “Incorporating Outcome Uncertainty and Prior Outcome Beliefs in Stated Preferences.” Land Economics 91 (2): 296–316. https://doi.org/10.3368/le.91.2.296.

    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
22. ↵
    1. Makriyannis, C.,
    2. R. J. Johnston, and
    3. A. W. Whelchel

    . 2018. “Are Choice Experiment Treatment of Outcome Uncertainty Sufficient? An Application to Climate Risk Reductions.” Agricultural and Resource Economics Review 47 (3): 419–51.

    OpenUrl
23. ↵
    1. McFadden, D.

    1974. “The Measurement of Urban Travel.” Journal of Public Economics 3 (4): 303–28.

    OpenUrlCrossRef
24. ↵
    Ministry of Trade, Industry and Fisheries. 2015. “Forutsigbar og miljømessig bærekraftig vekst i norsk lakse- og ørret oppdrett” [Predictable and Sustainable Growth in Norwegian Aquaculture of Salmon and Trout]. Oslo: Mld.St. 16.
25. ↵
    1. Munro, A., and
    2. N. Hanley

    . 2001. “Information, Uncertainty and Contingent Valuation.” In Valuing Environmental Preferences: Theory and Practice of the Contingent Valuation Method in the US, EU and Developing Countries, edited by Ian J. Bateman and Kenneth G. Willis, 258–79. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
26. ↵
    1. Needham, K.,
    2. M. Czajkowski,
    3. N. Hanley, and
    4. J. LaRiviere

    . 2018. “What Is the Causal Impact of Information and Knowledge in Stated Preferences Studies?” Resource and Energy Economics 54: 69–89.

    OpenUrl
27. ↵
    1. Nikitina, E.

    2019. “Opportunity Cost of Environmental Conservation in the Presence of Externalities: Application to the Farmed and Wild Salmon Trade-Off in Norway.” Environmental and Resource Economics 73 (2): 679–96.

    OpenUrl
28. ↵
    1. Olafsen, T.,
    2. U. Winther, and
    3. J. Skjermo

    . 2012. “Verdiskaping basert på produktive hav i 2050” [Added Value from Productive Seas in 2050]. Oslo: Det kongelige norske videnskabers selskap og Norges tekniske vitenskapsakademi.
29. ↵
    1. Rose, J. M., and
    2. L. Masiero

    . 2010. “A Comparison of the Impacts of Aspects of Prospect Theory on WTP/WTA Estimated in Preference and WTP/WTA Space.” European Journal of Transport and Infrastructure Research 10 (4). https://doi.org/10.18757/ejtir.2010.10.4.2898.
30. ↵
    1. Savini, F.

    2017. “Planning, Uncertainty and Risk: The Neoliberal Logics of Amsterdam Urbanism.” Environment and Planning A: Economy and Space 49 (4): 857–75.

    OpenUrl
31. ↵
    1. Svåsand, T.,
    2. E. S. Grefsrud,
    3. Ø. Karlsen,
    4. B. O. Kvamme,
    5. K. S. Glover,
    6. V. Husa, and
    7. T. S. Kristiansen

    , eds. 2017. “Risikorapport norsk fiskeoppdrett 2017.” [(Risk Assessment in Norwegian Aquaculture]. Fisken og havet special issue 2-2017. Available at https://www.hi.no/hi/nettrapporter/risikorapport-norsk-fiskeoppdrett/2017/risikorapport_2017.
32. ↵
    1. Swait, J., and
    2. J. Louviere

    . 1993. “The Role of the Scale Parameter in the Estimation and Comparison of Multinomial Logit Models.” Journal of Marketing Research 30 (3): 305–14.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
33. ↵
    1. Taranger, G. L.,
    2. Ø. Karlsen,
    3. R. J. Bannister,
    4. K. A. Glover,
    5. V. Husa,
    6. E. Karlsbakk,
    7. B. O. Kvamme

    , et al. 2015. “Risk Assessment of the Environmental Impact of Norwegian Atlantic Salmon Farming.” ICES Journal of Marine Science 72 (3): 997–1021.

    OpenUrlCrossRef
34. ↵
    1. Torres, K.,
    2. M. Faccioli, and
    3. A. R. Font

    . 2017. “Waiting or Acting Now? The Effect on Willingness-to-Pay of Delivering Inherent Uncertainty Information in Choice Experiments.” Ecological Economics 131: 231–40.

    OpenUrl
35. ↵
    1. Train, K. E.

    2009. Discrete Choice Methods with Simulation. 2nd ed. New York: Cambridge University Press.
36. ↵
    1. Train, K. E., and
    2. M. Weeks

    . 2005. “Discrete Choice Models in Preference Space and Willingness-to-Pay Space.” In Applications of Simulation Methods in Environmental and Resource Economics, edited by R. Scarpa and A. Alberini, 1–16. Dordrecht, Netherlands: Springer.
37. ↵
    Tromsø Municipality. 2015. “Kystplan for kommunene Balsfjord, Karlsøy, Målselv, Lyngen og Tromsø.” [In Norwegian.] Tromsø, Norway.
38. ↵
    1. Uglem, I.,
    2. E. M. Ulvan,
    3. K. Toledo-Guedes,
    4. E. Hegstad,
    5. S. Blakstad,
    6. B. Buserud, and
    7. B. S. Saether

    . 2017. “Does a Diet Including Pellets from Salmon Cage Farms Affect the Taste of Wild Saithe (Pollachius virens Linnaeus, 1758)?” Journal of Applied Ichthyology 33 (3): 364–76.

    OpenUrl
39. ↵
    1. Varian, H. R.

    2014. Intermediate Microeconomics: A Modern Approach. 9th ed. New York: W. W. Norton.
40. ↵
    Vitenskapelig råd for lakseforvaltning. 2021. “Status for norske laksebestander i 2021.” [In Norwegian.] Scientific Council for Salmon Management Report 16. Available at https://brage.nina.no/nina-xmlui/handle/11250/2830680.
41. ↵
    1. Wieglus, J.,
    2. L. R. Gerber,
    3. E. Sala, and
    4. J. Bennett

    . 2009. “Including Risk in Stated-Preference Economic Valuations: Experiments on Choice for Marine Recreation.” Journal of Environmental Management 90: 3401–9.

    OpenUrlPubMed
42. ↵
    1. Zawojska, E.,
    2. A. Bartczak, and
    3. M. Czajkowski

    . 2019. “Disentangling the Effects of Policy and Payment Consequentiality and Risk Attitudes on Stated Preferences.” Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 93: 63–84.

    OpenUrl