Research ArticleArticles

Estimating the Ex Ante Recreational Loss of an Oil Spill Using Revealed and Stated Preference Data

Ana Faria Lopes and John C. Whitehead
Land Economics, November 2023, 99 (4) 490-508; DOI: https://doi.org/10.3368/le.99.4.102022-0084R

References

  1. ↵
    1. Abildtrup, J.,
    2. S. B. Olsen, and
    3. A. Stenger
    . 2015. “Combining RP and SP Data While Accounting for Large Choice Sets and Travel Mode: An Application to Forest Recreation.” Journal of Environmental Economics and Policy 4 (2): 177–201. https://doi.org/10.1080/21606544.2014.986210.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  2. ↵
    1. Adamowicz, W.,
    2. J. Louviere, and
    3. M. Williams
    . 1994. “Combining Revealed and Stated Preference Methods for Valuing Environmental Amenities.” Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 26 (3): 271–92. https://doi.org/10.1006/jeem.1994.1017.
    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
  3. ↵
    1. Adamowicz, W.,
    2. J. Swait,
    3. P. Boxall,
    4. J. Louviere, and
    5. M. Williams
    . 1997. “Perceptions versus Objective Measures of Environmental Quality in Combined Revealed and Stated Preference Models of Environmental Valuation.” Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 32 (1): 65–84.
    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
  4. ↵
    1. Aldy, J. E.
    2014. “The Labor Market Impacts of the 2010 Deepwater Horizon Oil Spill and Offshore Oil Drilling Moratorium.” Working Paper 20409. Cambridge, MA: National Bureau of Economic Research.
  5. ↵
    1. Alvarez, S.,
    2. S. L. Larkin,
    3. J. C. Whitehead, and
    4. T. Haab
    . 2014. “A Revealed Preference Approach to Valuing Non-market Recreational Fishing Losses from the Deepwater Horizon Oil Spill.” Journal of Environmental Management 145: 199–209. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2014.06.031.
    OpenUrl
  6. ↵
    1. Azevedo, C. D.,
    2. J. A. Herriges, and
    3. C. L. Kling
    . 2003. “Combining Revealed and Stated Preferences: Consistency Tests and Their Interpretations.” American Journal of Agricultural Economics 85 (3): 525–37.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  7. ↵
    1. Bin, O.,
    2. C. Dumas,
    3. B. Poulter, and
    4. J. Whitehead
    . 2007. Measuring the Impacts of Climate Change on North Carolina Coastal Resources. Washington, DC: National Commission on Energy Policy. Available at https://libres.uncg.edu/ir/uncw/listing.aspx?id=743.
  8. ↵
    1. Bishop, R. C.,
    2. K. J. Boyle,
    3. R. T. Carson,
    4. D. Chapman,
    5. W. M. Hanemann,
    6. B. Kanninen,
    7. R. J. Kopp
    , et al. 2017. “Putting a Value on Injuries to Natural Assets: The BP Oil Spill.” Science 356 (6335): 253–54. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aam8124.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  9. ↵
    1. Bonnieux, F., and
    2. P. Rainelli
    . 2003. Lost Recreation and Amenities: The Erika Spill Perspectives. Rennes, France: INRA.
  10. ↵
    1. Boxall, P. C.,
    2. J. Englin, and
    3. W. L. Adamowicz
    . 2003. “Valuing Aboriginal Artifacts: A Combined Revealed-Stated Preference Approach.” Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 45 (2): 213–30. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0095-0696(02)00063-3.
    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
  11. ↵
    1. Bradley, M., and
    2. A. Daly
    . 1994. “Use of the Logit Scaling Approach to Test for Rank-Order and Fatigue Effects in Stated Preference Data.” Transportation 21 (2): 167–84. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01098791.
    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
  12. ↵
    1. Bujosa, A.,
    2. A. Riera,
    3. R. L. Hicks, and
    4. K. E. McConnell
    . 2015. “Densities Rather than Shares: Improving the Measurement of Congestion in Recreation Demand Models.” Environmental and Resource Economics 61 (2): 127–40. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10640-014-9785-9.
    OpenUrl
  13. ↵
    1. Cano-Urbina, J.,
    2. C. M. Clapp, and
    3. K. Willardsen
    . 2019. “The Effects of the BP Deepwater Horizon Oil Spill on Housing Markets.” Journal of Housing Economics 43: 131–56.
    OpenUrl
  14. ↵
    1. Carson, R. T.,
    2. R. C. Mitchell,
    3. M. Hanemann,
    4. R. J. Kopp,
    5. S. Presser, and
    6. P. A. Ruud
    . 2003. “Contingent Valuation and Lost Passive Use: Damages from the Exxon Valdez Oil Spill.” Environmental and Resource Economics 25 (3): 257–86.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  15. ↵
    1. Casey, J. F.,
    2. J. R. Kahn, and
    3. A. A. F. Rivas
    . 2008. “Willingness to Accept Compensation for the Environmental Risks of Oil Transport on the Amazon: A Choice Modeling Experiment.” Ecological Economics 67 (4): 552–59. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2008.01.006.
    OpenUrl
  16. ↵
    1. Cha, W., and
    2. R. T. Melstrom
    . 2018. “Catch-and-Release Regulations and Paddlefish Angler Preferences.” Journal of Environmental Management 214: 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2018.02.054.
    OpenUrl
  17. ↵
    1. Chen, M.
    2013. “Valuation of Public Great Lakes Beaches in Michigan.” Ph.D. dissertation, Michigan State University.
  18. ↵
    1. Cheng, L., and
    2. F. Lupi
    . 2016. “Combining Revealed and Stated Preference Methods for Valuing Water Quality Changes to Great Lakes Beaches.” Paper presented at the Agricultural and Applied Economics Association 2016 Annual Meeting, Boston, MA, July 31–August 2.
  19. ↵
    1. Daly, A.,
    2. S. Hess, and
    3. K. Train
    . 2012. “Assuring Finite Moments for Willingness to Pay in Random Coefficient Models.” Transportation 39 (1): 19–31. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11116-011-9331-3.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  20. ↵
    1. Domínguez Alvarez, R., and
    2. M. L. Loureiro
    . 2013. “Environmental Accidents and Stigmatized Fish Prices: Evidence from the Prestige Oil Spill in Galicia.” Economia Agraria y Recursos Naturales 13 (2): 103–26. https://doi.org/10.22004/ag.econ.162311.
    OpenUrl
  21. ↵
    1. Egan, A. L.,
    2. J. Rolfe,
    3. S. Cassells, and
    4. B. L. Chilvers
    . 2022. “Potential Changes in the Recreational Use Value for Coastal Bay of Plenty, New Zealand Due to Oil Spills: A Combined Approach of the Travel Cost and Contingent Behaviour Methods.” Ocean & Coastal Management 228: 106306. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ocecoaman.2022.106306.
    OpenUrl
  22. ↵
    1. English, E.,
    2. R. H. von Haefen,
    3. J. Herriges,
    4. C. Leggett,
    5. F. Lupi,
    6. K. McConnell,
    7. M. Welsh,
    8. A. Domanski, and
    9. N. Meade
    . 2018. “Estimating the Value of Lost Recreation Days from the Deepwater Horizon Oil Spill.” Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 91: 26–45. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeem.2018.06.010.
    OpenUrl
  23. ↵
    1. Glasgow, G., and
    2. K. Train
    . 2018. “Lost Use-Value from Environmental Injury When Visitation Drops at Undamaged Sites.” Land Economics 94 (1): 87–96. https://doi.org/10.3368/le.94.1.87.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  24. ↵
    1. Grijalva, T. C.,
    2. R. Berrens,
    3. A. K. Bohara, and
    4. W. D. Shaw
    . 2002. “Testing the Validity of Contingent Behavior Trip Responses.” American Journal of Agricultural Economics 84 (2): 401–14.
    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
  25. ↵
    1. Haab, T. C., and
    2. K. E. McConnell
    . 2002. Valuing Environmental and Natural Resources: The Econometrics of Non-market Valuation. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar.
  26. ↵
    1. Haener, M. K.,
    2. P. C. Boxall, and
    3. W. L. Adamowicz
    . 2001. “Modeling Recreation Site Choice: Do Hypothetical Choices Reflect Actual Behavior?” American Journal of Agricultural Economics 83 (3): 629–42. https://doi.org/10.1111/0002-9092.00183.
    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
  27. ↵
    1. Hanemann, W. M.
    1984. “Welfare Evaluations in Contingent Valuation Experiments with Discrete Responses.” American Journal of Agricultural Economics 66 (3): 332–41. https://doi.org/10.2307/1240800.
    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
  28. ↵
    1. Hausman, J.,
    2. G. K. Leonard, and
    3. D. McFadden
    . 1995. “A Utility-Consistent, Combined Discrete Choice and Count Data Model: Assessing Recreational Use Losses Due to Natural Resource Damage.” Journal of Public Economics 56 (1): 1–30.
    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
  29. ↵
    1. Hensher, D. A.
    2012. “Accounting for Scale Heterogeneity within and between Pooled Data Sources.” Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice 46 (3): 480–86. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tra.2011.11.007.
    OpenUrl
  30. ↵
    1. Hensher, D. A., and
    2. M. Bradley
    . 1993. “Using Stated Response Choice Data to Enrich Revealed Preference Discrete Choice Models.” Marketing Letters 4 (2): 139–51. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00994072.
    OpenUrl
  31. ↵
    1. Hensher, D. A.,
    2. J. M. Rose, and
    3. W. H. Greene
    . 2008. “Combining RP and SP Data: Biases in Using the Nested Logit ‘Trick’: Contrasts with Flexible Mixed Logit Incorporating Panel and Scale Effects.” Journal of Transport Geography 16 (2): 126–33. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2007.07.001.
    OpenUrl
    1. Hess, S., and
    2. D. Palma
    . 2019. Apollo: A Flexible, Powerful and Customisable Freeware Package for Choice Model Estimation and Application. R package version 0.0.7. Available at http://www.ApolloChoiceModelling.com.
  33. ↵
    1. Hess, S., and
    2. J. M. Rose
    . 2012. “Can Scale and Coefficient Heterogeneity Be Separated in Random Coefficients Models?” Transportation 39 (6): 1225–39. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11116-012-9394-9.
    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
  34. ↵
    1. Hess, S., and
    2. K. Train
    . 2017. “Correlation and Scale in Mixed Logit Models.” Journal of Choice Modelling 23: 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jocm.2017.03.001.
    OpenUrl
  35. ↵
    1. Hicks, R. L., and
    2. I. E. Strand
    . 2000. “The Extent of Information: Its Relevance for Random Utility Models.” Land Economics 76 (3): 374–85. https://doi.org/10.2307/3147035.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  36. ↵
    1. Hindsley, P.,
    2. C. E. Landry,
    3. K. Schnier,
    4. J. C. Whitehead, and
    5. M. Zarei
    . 2022. “Joint Estimation of Angler Revealed Preference Site Selection and Stated Preference Choice Experiment Recreation Data Considering Attribute Non-attendance.” Journal of Environmental Economics and Policy 12 (1): 44–62. https://doi.org/10.1080/21606544.2022.2077840.
    OpenUrl
  37. ↵
    1. Jeon, Y., and
    2. J. A. Herriges
    . 2010. “Convergent Validity of Contingent Behavior Responses in Models of Recreation Demand.” Environmental and Resource Economics 45 (2): 223–50. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10640-009-9313-5.
    OpenUrl
  38. ↵
    1. Jeon, Y., and
    2. J. A. Herriges
    . 2017. “Combining Revealed Preference Data with Stated Preference Data: A Latent Class Approach.” Environmental and Resource Economics 68 (4): 1053–86. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10640-016-0060-0.
    OpenUrl
  39. ↵
    1. Kipperberg, G.,
    2. Y. Onozaka,
    3. L. T. Bui,
    4. M. Lohaugen,
    5. G. Refsdal, and
    6. S. Sæland
    . 2019. “The Impact of Wind Turbines on Local Recreation: Evidence from Two Travel Cost Method: Contingent Behavior Studies.” Journal of Outdoor Recreation and Tourism 25: 66–75. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jort.2018.11.004.
    OpenUrl
  40. ↵
    1. Klaiber, H. A., and
    2. R. H. von Haefen
    . 2018. “Do Random Coefficients and Alternative Specific Constants Improve Policy Analysis? An Empirical Investigation of Model Fit and Prediction.” Environmental and Resource Economics 73: 75–91. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10640-018-0250-z.
    OpenUrl
  41. ↵
    1. Landry, C. E.,
    2. T. Allen,
    3. T. Cherry, and
    4. J. C. Whitehead
    . 2012. “Wind Turbines and Coastal Recreation Demand.” Resource and Energy Economics 34 (1): 93–111. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.reseneeco.2011.10.001.
    OpenUrl
  42. ↵
    1. Laurans, Y.,
    2. A. Rankovic,
    3. R. Billé,
    4. R. Pirard, and
    5. L. Mermet
    . 2013. “Use of Ecosystem Services Economic Valuation for Decision Making: Questioning a Literature Blindspot.” Journal of Environmental Management 119: 208–19. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2013.01.008.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  43. ↵
    1. Leggett, C.,
    2. N. Scherer,
    3. M. Curry, and
    4. R. Bailey
    . 2014. “Assessing the Economic Benefits of Reductions in Marine Debris: A Pilot Study of Beach Recreation in Orange County, California.” Industrial Economics Report. Marine Debris Division, NOAA.
  44. ↵
    1. Lew, D. K., and
    2. D. M. Larson
    . 2008. “Valuing a Beach Day with a Repeated Nested Logit Model of Participation, Site Choice, and Stochastic Time Value.” Marine Resource Economics 23 (3): 233–52. https://doi.org/10.1086/mre.23.3.42629616.
    OpenUrl
  45. ↵
    1. Loomis, J. B.
    1997. “Panel Estimators to Combine Revealed and Stated Preference Dichotomous Choice Data.” Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics 22 (2): 1–13.
    OpenUrl
  46. ↵
    1. Lopes, A. F., and
    2. P. Mariel
    . 2021. “On the Validity and Reliability of Coastal Quality Change Estimates: Evidence from Norway.” Coastal Management 49 (2): 157–82. https://doi.org/10.1080/08920753.2021.1875284.
    OpenUrl
  47. ↵
    1. Loureiro, M. L., and
    2. J. B. Loomis
    . 2013. “International Public Preferences and Provision of Public Goods: Assessment of Passive Use Values in Large Oil Spills.” Environmental and Resource Economics 56 (4): 521–34. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10640-012-9556-4.
    OpenUrl
  48. ↵
    1. Loureiro, M. L.,
    2. A. Ribas,
    3. E. López, and
    4. E. Ojea
    . 2006. “Estimated Costs and Admissible Claims Linked to the Prestige Oil Spill.” Ecological Economics 59 (1): 48–53. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2005.10.001
    OpenUrl
  49. ↵
    1. Lundhede, T. H.,
    2. S. B. Olsen,
    3. J. B. Jacobsen, and
    4. B. J. Thorsen
    . 2009. “Handling Respondent Uncertainty in Choice Experiments: Evaluating Recoding Approaches against Explicit Modelling of Uncertainty.” Journal of Choice Modelling 2 (2): 118–47. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1755-5345(13)70007-1.
    OpenUrl
  50. ↵
    1. Lupi, F.,
    2. D. J. Phaneuf, and
    3. R. H. von Haefen
    . 2020. “Best Practices for Implementing Recreation Demand Models.” Review of Environmental Economics and Policy 14 (2). https://doi.org/10.1093/reep/reaa007.
  51. ↵
    1. Mariel, P., and
    2. J. Meyerhoff
    . 2018. “A More Flexible Model or Simply More Effort? On the Use of Correlated Random Parameters in Applied Choice Studies.” Ecological Economics 154: 419–29. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2018.08.020.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  52. ↵
    1. Matthews, Y.,
    2. R. Scarpa, and
    3. D. Marsh
    . 2018. “Cumulative Attraction and Spatial Dependence in a Destination Choice Model for Beach Recreation.” Tourism Management 66: 318–28. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tourman.2017.12.009.
    OpenUrl
  53. ↵
    1. Morikawa, T.
    1994. “Correcting State Dependence and Serial Correlation in the RP/SP Combined Estimation Method.” Transportation 21 (2): 153–65. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01098790.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  54. ↵
    1. Murdock, J.
    2006. “Handling Unobserved Site Characteristics in Random Utility Models of Recreation Demand.” Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 51 (1): 1–25. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeem.2005.04.003.
    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
  55. ↵
    1. Parsons, G. R.
    2008. “Monetary Values and Restoration Equivalents for Lost Recreational Services on the Gulf Coast of Texas Due to Oil Spills and Other Environmental Disruptions.” Final Report. Durham, NH: Coastal Response Research Center.
  56. ↵
    1. Parsons, G. R.,
    2. D. M. Massey, and
    3. T. Tomasi
    . 1999. “Familiar and Favorite Sites in a Random Utility Model of Beach Recreation.” Marine Resource Economics 14 (4): 299–315. https://doi.org/10.1086/mre.14.4.42629275.
    OpenUrl
  57. ↵
    1. Parsons, G. R., and
    2. S. Stefanova
    . 2011. “Gauging the Value of Short-Term Site Closures in a Travel-Cost RUM Model of Recreation Demand with a Little Help from Stated Preference Data.” In Preference Data for Environmental Valuation: Combing Revealed and Stated Preference Approaches, edited by J. Whitehead, T. Haab, and J.-C. Huang. London: Routledge, Taylor & Frances. Available at https://works.bepress.com/george_parsons/26/.
  58. ↵
    1. Revelt, D., and
    2. K. Train
    . 1998. “Mixed Logit with Repeated Choices: Households’ Choices of Appliance Efficiency Level.” Review of Economics and Statistics 80 (4): 647–57. https://doi.org/10.1162/003465398557735.
    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
  59. ↵
    1. Scott, A.
    1965. “The Valuation of Game Resources: Some Theoretical Aspects.” Canadian Fisheries Report 4: 27–47.
    OpenUrl
  60. ↵
    1. Simões, P.,
    2. E. Barata, and
    3. L. Cruz
    . 2013. “Joint Estimation Using Revealed and Stated Preference Data: An Application Using a National Forest.” Journal of Forest Economics 19 (3): 249–66. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfe.2013.03.001.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  61. ↵
    1. Small, K. A., and
    2. H. S. Rosen
    . 1981. “Applied Welfare Economics with Discrete Choice Models.” Econometrica 49 (1): 105–30. https://doi.org/10.2307/1911129.
    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
  62. ↵
    1. Stafford, T. M.
    2018. “Accounting for Outside Options in Discrete Choice Models: An Application to Commercial Fishing Effort.” Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 88: 159–79. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeem.2017.10.006.
    OpenUrl
  63. ↵
    1. Stratus Consulting
    . 2010. Appendix J: Damage Estimate for Shoreline Recreation. Washington, DC: Cosco Busan Natural Resource Damage Assessment.
  64. ↵
    1. Sveen, G.
    2018. “Jærstrendene er nå av de mest besøkte naturattraksjonene i Norge.” Stavanger Aftenbladet, October 18: 3. Available at https://www.aftenbladet.no/article/sa-p62Pqo.html.
  65. ↵
    1. Swait, J., and
    2. J. Louviere
    . 1993. “The Role of the Scale Parameter in the Estimation and Comparison of Multinomial Logit Models.” Journal of Marketing Research 30 (3): 305–14. https://doi.org/10.2307/3172883.
    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
  66. ↵
    1. Truong, T.,
    2. W. Adamowicz, and
    3. P. C. Boxall
    2018. “Modelling the Effect of Chronic Wasting Disease on Recreational Hunting Site Choice Preferences and Choice Set Formation over Time.” Environmental and Resource Economics 70 (1): 271–95. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10640-017-0120-0.
    OpenUrl
  67. ↵
    1. Tuhkanen, H.,
    2. E. Piirsalu,
    3. T. Nõmman,
    4. A. Karlõševa,
    5. S. Nõmmann,
    6. M. Czajkowski, and
    7. N. Hanley
    . 2016. “Valuing the Benefits of Improved Marine Environmental Quality under Multiple Stressors.” Science of the Total Environment 551–52: 367–75. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2016.02.011.
    OpenUrl
  68. ↵
    1. von Haefen, R. H., and
    2. D. J. Phaneuf
    . 2008. “Identifying Demand Parameters in the Presence of Unobservables: A Combined Revealed and Stated Preference Approach.” Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 56 (1): 19–32. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeem.2008.01.002.
    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
  69. ↵
    1. Whitehead, J. C.,
    2. T. Haab,
    3. S. L. Larkin,
    4. J. B. Loomis,
    5. S. Alvarez, and
    6. A. Ropicki
    . 2018. “Estimating Lost Recreational Use Values of Visitors to Northwest Florida due to the Deepwater Horizon Oil Spill Using Cancelled Trip Data.” Marine Resource Economics 33 (2): 119–32. https://doi.org/10.1086/697560.
    OpenUrl
  70. ↵
    1. Whitehead, J. C., and
    2. D. K. Lew
    . 2020. “Estimating Recreation Benefits through Joint Estimation of Revealed and Stated Preference Discrete Choice Data.” Empirical Economics 58 (4): 2009–29. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00181-019-01646-z.
    OpenUrl
  71. ↵
    1. Whitehead, J. C.,
    2. S. K. Pattanayak,
    3. G. L. van Houtven, and
    4. B. R. Gelso
    . 2008. “Combining Revealed and Stated Preference Data to Estimate the Nonmarket Value of Ecological Services: An Assessment of the State of the Science.” Journal of Economic Surveys 22 (5): 872–908. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6419.2008.00552.x.
    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
  72. ↵
    1. Winkler, D. T., and
    2. B. L. Gordon
    . 2013. “The Effect of the BP Oil Spill on Volume and Selling Prices of Oceanfront Condominiums.” Land Economics 89 (4): 614–31. https://doi.org/10.3368/le.89.4.614.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  73. ↵
    1. Yeh, C.-Y.,
    2. T. C. Haab, and
    3. B. L. Sohngen
    . 2006. “Modeling Multiple-Objective Recreation Trips with Choices over Trip Duration and Alternative Sites.” Environmental & Resource Economics 34 (2): 189–209. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10640-005-6205-1.
    OpenUrl
  74. ↵
    1. Yi, D., and
    2. J. A. Herriges
    . 2017. “Convergent Validity and the Time Consistency of Preferences: Evidence from the Iowa Lakes Recreation Demand Project.” Land Economics 93 (2): 269–91. https://doi.org/10.3368/le.93.2.269.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  75. ↵
    1. Zimmer, N. M. P.,
    2. P. C. Boxall, and
    3. W. L. Adamowicz
    . 2012. ‘The Impacts of Chronic Wasting Disease and Its Management on Recreational Hunters.” Canadian Journal of Agricultural Economics/Revue canadienne d’agroeconomie 60 (1): 71–92. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-7976.2011.01232.x.
    OpenUrl
Back to top

In this issue

Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Email Article
Citation Tools
Estimating the Ex Ante Recreational Loss of an Oil Spill Using Revealed and Stated Preference Data
Ana Faria Lopes, John C. Whitehead
Land Economics Nov 2023, 99 (4) 490-508; DOI: 10.3368/le.99.4.102022-0084R
Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
Bookmark this article

Jump to section

Keywords