Technology, Management, and Input Choices to Increase Abatement and Output

References

1. ↵
   1. Allison, P. D.

   1999. “Comparing Logit and Probit Coefficients Across Groups.” Sociological methods and Research 28 (2): 186–208. https://doi.org/10.1177/0049124199028002003.

   OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
2. ↵
   1. Angrist, J. D., and
   2. J.-S. Pischke

   . 2009. Mostly Harmless Econometrics: An Empiricist’s Companion. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
3. ↵
   1. Anton, W. R. Q.,
   2. G. Deltas, and
   3. M. Khanna

   . 2004. “Incentives for Environmental Self-Regulation and Implications for Environmental Performance.” Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 48 (1): 632–54. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeem.2003.06.003.

   OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
4. ↵
   1. Arimura, T. H.,
   2. N. Darnall, and
   3. H. Katayama

   . 2009. “Is ISO 14001 a Gateway to More Advanced Voluntary Action? A Case for Green Supply Chain Management.” Discussion Paper. Washington, DC: Resources for the Future.
5. ↵
   1. Arimura, T. H.,
   2. A. Hibiki, and
   3. H. Katayama

   . 2008. “Is a Voluntary Approach an Effective Environmental Policy Instrument? A Case for Environmental Management Systems.” Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 55 (3): 281–95. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeem.2007.09.002.

   OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
6. ↵
   1. Ayres, R. U., and
   2. A. V. Kneese

   . 1969. “Production, Consumption, and Externalities.” American Economic Review 59 (3): 282–97.

   OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
7. ↵
   1. Ballot, G.,
   2. F. Fakhfakh,
   3. F. Galia, and
   4. A. Salter

   . 2015. “The Fateful Triangle: Complementarities in Performance between Product, Process and Organizational Innovation in France and the UK.” Research Policy 44 (1): 217–32. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2014.07.003.

   OpenUrl
8. ↵
   1. Bansal, P., and
   2. K. Roth

   . 2000. “Why Companies Go Green: A Model of Ecological Responsiveness.” Academy of Management Journal 43 (4): 717–36. https://doi.org/10.5465/1556363.

   OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
9. ↵
   1. Barney, J. B.

   2001. “Resource-Based Theories of Competitive Advantage: A Ten-Year Retrospective on the Resource-Based View.” Journal of Management 27 (6): 643–50. https://doi.org/10.1177/014920630102700602.

   OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
10. ↵
    1. Bennear, L. S.

    2007. “Are Management-Based Regulations Effective? Evidence from State Pollution Prevention Programs.” Journal of Policy Analysis and Management 26 (2): 327–48. https://doi.org/10.1002/pam.20250.

    OpenUrlCrossRef
11. ↵
    1. Bi, X., and
    2. M. Khanna

    . 2017. “Inducing Pollution Prevention Adoption: Effectiveness of the 33/50 Voluntary Environmental Program.” Journal of Environmental Planning and Management 60 (11–12): 2234–54. https://doi.org/10.1080/09640568.2016.1273099.

    OpenUrl
12. ↵
    1. Black, D. A.,
    2. M. C. Berger, and
    3. F. A. Scott

    . 2000. “Bounding Parameter Estimates with Nonclassical Measurement Error.” Journal of the American Statistical Association 95 (451): 739–48.

    OpenUrlCrossRef
13. ↵
    1. Bound, J.,
    2. C. Brown, and
    3. N. Mathiowetz

    . 2001. “Measurement Error in Survey Data.” In Handbook of Econometrics. Vol. 5, edited by J. J. Heckman and E. Leamer, 3705–3843. Amsterdam: Elsevier.

    OpenUrl
14. ↵
    1. Clarke, D.,
    2. J. P. Romano, and
    3. M. Wolf

    . 2020. “The Romano-Wolf Multiple-Hypothesis Correction in Stata.” Stata Journal 20 (4): 812–43. https://doi.org/10.1177/1536867X209763.

    OpenUrl
15. ↵
    1. Coglianese, C., and
    2. J. Nash

    . 2006. The Promise and Performance of Management-Based Strategies. Washington, DC: Resources for the Future.
16. ↵
    1. Cohen, W. M., and
    2. D. A. Levinthal

    . 1990. “Absorptive Capacity: A New Perspective on Learning and Innovation.” Administrative Science Quarterly 35 (1): 128–52. https://doi.org/10.2307/2393553.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
17. ↵
    1. Cordano, M., and
    2. I. H. Frieze

    . 2000. “Pollution Reduction Preferences of US Environmental Managers: Applying Ajzen’s Theory of Planned Behavior.” Academy of Management Journal 43 (4): 627–41. https://doi.org/10.2307/1556358.

    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
18. ↵
    1. Dasgupta, S.,
    2. H. Hettige, and
    3. D. Wheeler

    . 2000. “What Improves Environmental Compliance? Evidence from Mexican Industry.” Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 39 (1): 39–66. https://doi.org/10.1006/jeem.1999.1090.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
19. ↵
    1. DeCanio, S. J.,
    2. C. Dibble, and
    3. K. Amir-Atefi

    . 2000. “The Importance of Organizational Structure for the Adoption of Innovations.” Management Science 46 (10): 1285–99.

    OpenUrl
20. ↵
    1. Delmas, M., and
    2. I. Montiel

    . 2008. “The Diffusion of Voluntary International Management Standards: Responsible Care, ISO 9000, and ISO 14001 in the Chemical Industry.” Policy Studies Journal 36 (1): 65–93. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1541-0072.2007.00254.x.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
21. ↵
    1. Delmas, M. A., and
    2. M. W. Toffel

    . 2008. “Organizational Responses to Environmental Demands: Opening the Black Box.” Strategic Management Journal 29 (10): 1027–1055.

    OpenUrlCrossRef
22. ↵
    1. Deltas, G.,
    2. D. R. Harrington, and
    3. M. Khanna

    . 2014. “Green Management and the Nature of Pollution Prevention Innovation.” Applied Economics 46 (4–6): 465–82. https://doi.org/10.1080/00036846.2013.857004.

    OpenUrl
23. ↵
    1. Dierickx, I., and
    2. K. Cool

    . 1989. “Asset Stock Accumulation and Sustainability of Competitive Advantage.” Management Science 35 (12): 1504–11. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.35.12.1504.

    OpenUrl
24. ↵
    1. Dion, C.,
    2. P. Lanoie, and
    3. B. Laplante

    . 1998. “Monitoring of Pollution Regulation: Do Local Conditions Matter?” Journal of Regulatory Economics 13 (1): 5–18. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1007970031068.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
25. ↵
    1. Environment Canada

    . 2019a. “List of Pollution Prevention Planning Notices and Their Performance.” Available at https://www.canada.ca/en/environment-climate-change/services/pollution-prevention/planning-notices/list.html#shr-pg0.
26. ↵
    1. Environment Canada

    . 2019b. Pollution Prevention Plans under the Canadian Environmental Protection Act: Guidelines. 3rd ed. Available at https://www.canada.ca/en/environment-climate-change/services/pollution-prevention/planning-notices/guidelines.html.
27. ↵
    1. Esbenshade, J.

    2004. “Codes of Conduct: Challenges and Opportunities for Workers’ Rights.” Social Justice 31 (3): 40–59.

    OpenUrl
28. ↵
    1. Ferrón Vílchez, V., and
    2. N. Darnall

    . 2016. “Two Are Better Than One: The Link between Management Systems and Business Performance.” Business Strategy and the Environment 25 (4): 221–40. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.1864.

    OpenUrlCrossRef
29. ↵
    1. Forsund, F. R.

    2009. “Good Modelling of Bad Outputs: Pollution and Multiple-Output Production.” International Review of Environmental and Resource Economics 3 (1): 1–38. https://doi.org/10.1561/101.00000021.

    OpenUrl
30. ↵
    1. Frondel, M.,
    2. J. Horbach, and
    3. K. Rennings

    . 2007. “End-of-Pipe or Cleaner Production? An Empirical Comparison of Environmental Innovation Decisions across OECD Countries.” Business Strategy and the Environment 16 (8): 571. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.496.

    OpenUrl
31. ↵
    1. Frondel, M.,
    2. J. Horbach, and
    3. K. Rennings

    . 2008. “What Triggers Environmental Management and Innovation? Empirical Evidence for Germany.” Ecological Economics 66 (1): 153–60. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2007.08.016.

    OpenUrl
32. ↵
    1. Gangadharan, L.

    2006. “Environmental Compliance by Firms in the Manufacturing Sector in Mexico.” Ecological Economics 59 (4): 477–86. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2005.10.023.

    OpenUrl
33. ↵
    1. Gerstlberger, W.,
    2. M. P. Knudsen,
    3. B. Dachs, and
    4. M. Schröter

    . 2016. “Closing the Energy-Efficiency Technology Gap in European Firms? Innovation and Adoption of Energy Efficiency Technologies.” Journal of Engineering and Technology Management 40: 87–100. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jengtecman.2016.04.004.

    OpenUrl
34. ↵
    1. Grepperud, S.

    2007. “Environmental Voluntary Behaviour and Crowding-Out Effects: Regulation or Laissez-Faire?” European Journal of Law and Economics 23: 135–49.

    OpenUrl
35. ↵
    1. Griliches, Z., and
    2. J. A. Hausman

    . 1986. “Errors in Variables in Panel Data.” Journal of Econometrics 31 (1): 93–118. https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-4076(86)90058-8.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
36. ↵
    1. Gupta, M. C.

    1995. “Environmental Management and its Impact on the Operations Function.” International Journal of Operations and Production Management 15: 34–51.

    OpenUrl
37. ↵
    1. Hamschmidt, J., and
    2. T. Dyllick

    . 2001. “ISO 14001: Profitable? Yes! But Is It Eco-effective?” Available at https://link.gale.com/apps/doc/A92688906/AONE?u=mlin_oweb&sid=googleScholar&xid=6ffa3523.
38. ↵
    1. Harrington, D. R.,
    2. M. Khanna, and
    3. G. Deltas

    . 2008. “Striving to Be Green: The Adoption of Total Quality Environmental Management.” Applied Economics 40 (23): 2995–3007. https://doi.org/10.1080/00036840600994005.

    OpenUrlCrossRef
39. ↵
    1. Henriques, I., and
    2. P. Sadorsky

    . 1996. “The Determinants of an Environmentally Responsive Firm: An Empirical Approach.” Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 30 (3): 381–95. https://doi.org/10.1006/jeem.1996.0026.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
40. ↵
    1. Horbach, J.,
    2. C. Rammer, and
    3. K. Rennings

    . 2012. “Determinants of Eco-innovations by Type of Environmental Impact: The Role of Regulatory Push/Pull, Technology Push and Market Pull.” Ecological Economics 78: 112–22. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2012.04.005.

    OpenUrlCrossRef
41. 1. Hottenrott, H., and
    2. S. Rexhäuser

    . 2013. “Policy-Induced Environmental Technology and Inventive Efforts: Is There a Crowding Out?” DICE Discussion Paper 128. Düsseldorf, Germany: Institute for Competition Economics, Heinrich Heine University.
42. ↵
    1. Jaffe, A. B., and
    2. K. Palmer

    . 1997. “Environmental Regulation and Innovation: A Panel Data Study.” Review of Economics and Statistics 79 (4): 610–19.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
43. ↵
    1. Khanna, M., and
    2. W. R. Q. Anton

    . 2002. “Corporate Environmental Management: Regulatory and Market-Based Incentives.” Land Economics 78(4): 539–58. https://doi.org/10.2307/3146852.

    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
44. ↵
    1. Khanna, M.,
    2. G. Deltas, and
    3. D. R. Harrington

    . 2009. “Adoption of Pollution Prevention Techniques: The Role of Management Systems and Regulatory Pressures.” Environmental and Resource Economics 44 (1): 85–106. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10640-009-9263-y.

    OpenUrl
45. ↵
    1. Khanna, M., and
    2. S. Kumar

    . 2011. “Corporate Environmental Management and Environmental Efficiency.” Environmental and Resource Economics 50 (2): 227–42. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10640-011-9469-7.

    OpenUrl
46. ↵
    1. King, A. A., and
    2. M. J. Lenox

    . 2001. “Who Adopts Management Standards Early? An Examination of ISO 14001 Certifications.” Academy of Management Proceedings 2001 (1): A1–A6. https://doi.org/10.5465/apbpp.2001.6133789.

    OpenUrlCrossRef
47. ↵
    1. Leonard-Barton, D.

    1992. “Core Capabilities and Core Rigidities: A Paradox in Managing New Product Development.” Strategic Management Journal 13 (S1): 111–25. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.4250131009.

    OpenUrlCrossRef
48. ↵
    1. Lyon, T. P., and
    2. J. W. Maxwell

    . 2007. “Environmental Public Voluntary Programs Reconsidered.” Policy Studies Journal 35 (4): 723–50. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1541-0072.2007.00245.x.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
49. ↵
    1. Lyon, T. P., and
    2. J. W. Maxwell

    . 2008. “Corporate Social Responsibility and the Environment: A Theoretical Perspective.” Review of Environmental Economics and Policy 2 (2). https://doi.org/10.1093/reep/ren004.
50. ↵
    1. Murty, S.,
    2. R. R. Russell, and
    3. S. B. Levkoff

    . 2012. “On Modeling Pollution-Generating Technologies.” Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 64 (1): 117–35. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeem.2012.02.005.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
51. ↵
    1. Nakamura, M.,
    2. T. Takahashi, and
    3. I. Vertinsky

    , I. 2001. “Why Japanese Firms Choose to Certify: A Study of Managerial Responses to Environmental Issues.” Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 42 (1): 23–52. https://doi.org/10.1006/jeem.2000.1148.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
52. ↵
    1. Nash, J., and
    2. J. R. Ehrenfeld

    . 2001. “Factors That Shape EMS Outcomes in Firms in Regulating from the Inside: Can Environmental Management Systems Achieve Policy Goals?” In Regulating from the Inside: Can Environmental Management Systems Achieve Policy Goals?, edited by C. Coglianese and J. Nash, 61–81. Washington, DC: Resources for the Future.
53. ↵
    1. Oates, W., and
    2. W. Baumol

    . 1975. “The Instruments for Environmental Policy.” In Economic Analysis of Environmental Problems, 95–132. Cambridge, MA: National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
54. ↵
    1. OECD, Eurostat
    2. European Union

    . 1997. Proposed Guidelines for Collecting and Interpreting Technological Innovation Data: Oslo Manual. Paris: Organisation for Economic Co-operation Development.
55. ↵
    1. O’Rourke, D.

    2003. “Outsourcing Regulation: Analyzing Nongovernmental Systems of Labor Standards and Monitoring.” Policy Studies Journal 31 (1): 1–29.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
56. ↵
    1. Ozusaglam, S.,
    2. E. Kesidou, and
    3. C. Y. Wong

    . 2018. “Performance Effects of Complementarity between Environmental Management Systems and Environmental Technologies.” International Journal of Production Economics 197: 112–22. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2017.12.026.

    OpenUrl
57. ↵
    1. Papke, L. E., and
    2. J. M. Wooldridge

    . 2008. “Panel Data Methods for Fractional Response Variables with an Application to Test Pass Rates.” Journal of Econometrics 145 (1): 121–33. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeconom.2008.05.009.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
58. ↵
    1. Potoski, M., and
    2. A. Prakash

    . 2005. “Covenants with Weak Swords: ISO 14001 and Facilities’ Environmental Performance.” Journal of Policy Analysis and Management 24 (4): 745–69. https://doi.org/10.1002/pam.20136.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
59. ↵
    1. Potoski, M., and
    2. A. Prakash

    . 2013. “Do Voluntary Programs Reduce Pollution? Examining ISO 14001’s Effectiveness across Countries.” Policy Studies Journal 41 (2): 273–94. https://doi.org/10.1111/psj.12017.

    OpenUrl
60. ↵
    1. Ramirez Harrington, D.

    2012. “Two-Stage Adoption of Different Types of Pollution Prevention (P2) Activities.” Resource and Energy Economics 34 (3): 349–73. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.reseneeco.2012.02.002.

    OpenUrl
61. ↵
    1. Ramirez Harrington, D.

    2013. “Effectiveness of State Pollution Prevention Programs and Policies.” Contemporary Economic Policy 31 (2): 255–78. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1465-7287.2011.00312.x.

    OpenUrl
62. ↵
    1. Rennings, K.,
    2. A. Ziegler,
    3. K. Ankele, and
    4. E. Hoffmann

    . 2006. “The Influence of Different Characteristics of the EU Environmental Management and Auditing Scheme on Technical Environmental Innovations and Economic Performance.” Ecological Economics 57 (1): 45–59. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2005.03.013.

    OpenUrl
63. ↵
    1. Rivera, J., and
    2. P. De Leon

    . 2004. “Is Greener Whiter? Voluntary Environmental Performance of Western Ski Areas.” Policy Studies Journal 32 (3): 417–37. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1541-0072.2004.00073.x.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
64. ↵
    1. Romano, J. P., and
    2. M. Wolf

    . 2016. “Efficient Computation of Adjusted p-Values for Resampling-Based Stepdown Multiple Testing.” Statistics and Probability Letters 113: 38–40. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.spl.2016.02.012.

    OpenUrl
65. ↵
    1. Roper, S., and
    2. N. Hewitt-Dunda

    . 2015. “Knowledge Stocks, Knowledge Flows and Innovation: Evidence from Matched Patents and Innovation Panel Data.” Research Policy 44 (7): 1327–40. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2015.03.003.

    OpenUrl
66. ↵
    1. Sanderson, E., and
    2. F. Windmeijer

    . 2016. “A Weak Instrument F-Test in Linear IV Models with Multiple Endogenous Variables.” Journal of Econometrics 190 (2): 212–21. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeconom.2015.06.004.

    OpenUrlPubMed
67. ↵
    1. Sarkis, J., and
    2. J. J. Cordeiro

    . 2001. “An Empirical Evaluation of Environmental Efficiencies and Firm Performance: Pollution Prevention versus End-of-Pipe Practice.” European Journal of Operational Research 135 (1): 102–13. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0377-2217(00)00306-4.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
68. ↵
    1. Shadbegian, R. J., and
    2. W. B. Gray

    . 2006. “Assessing Multi-dimensional Performance: Environmental and Economic Outcomes.” Journal of Productivity Analysis 26 (3): 213–34. http://doi.org/10.1007/s11123-006-0017-3.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
69. ↵
    1. Short, J. L., and
    2. M. W. Toffel

    . 2010. “Making Self-Regulation More Than Merely Symbolic: The Critical Role of the Legal Environment.” Administrative Science Quarterly 55 (3): 361–96. https://doi.org/10.2189/asqu.2010.55.3.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
70. ↵
    1. Stock, J. H., and
    2. M. Yogo

    . 2005. “Testing for Weak Instruments in Linear IV Regression.” In Identification and Inference for Econometric Models: Essays in Honor of Thomas J. Rothenberg, edited by D. W. K. Andrews and J. H. Stock, 80–108. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
71. ↵
    1. Wagner, M.

    2007. “On the Relationship between Environmental Management, Environmental Innovation and Patenting: Evidence from German Manufacturing Firms.” Research Policy 36 (10): 1587–1602. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2007.08.004.

    OpenUrl
72. ↵
    1. Welch, T. E.

    2018. Moving beyond Environmental Compliance: A Handbook for Integrating Pollution Prevention with ISO 14000. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press.
73. ↵
    1. Wooldridge, J. M.

    2002. Econometric Analysis of Cross Section and Panel Data. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
74. ↵
    1. Zhou, P.,
    2. B. W. Ang, and
    3. K. L. Poh

    . 2008. “A Survey of Data Envelopment Analysis in Energy and Environmental Studies.” European Journal of Operational Research 189 (1): 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2007.04.042.

    OpenUrl
75. ↵
    1. Ziegler, A., and
    2. J. S. Nogareda

    , J. S. 2009. “Environmental Management Systems and Technological Environmental Innovations: Exploring the Causal Relationship.” Research Policy 38 (5): 885–93. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2009.01.020.

    OpenUrl