A Contingent Valuation Test for Measuring the Construct Validity of Willingness-To-Pay Estimates Derived from Choice-Experiments

References

1. 1. Balcombe, K.,
   2. Chalak, A.,
   3. Fraser, I.

   2009. “Model selection for the mixed logit with Bayesian estimation.” Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 57(2): 226–237.

   OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
2. 1. Ben-Akiva, M. and
   2. Swait, J.

   1986. “The Akaike likelihood ratio index.” Transportation Science 20(2): 133–136.

   OpenUrlCrossRef
3. 1. Bierlaire, M.

   2018. “PandasBiogeme: a short introduction.” Technical report TRANSP-OR 181219. Transport and Mobility Laboratory, ENAC, EPFL.
4. 1. Bishop, R. C. and
   2. Boyles, K. J.

   2019. “Reliability and validity in nonmarket valuation.” Environmental and Resource Economics 72:559–582.

   OpenUrl
5. 1. Cameron, T., and
   2. James, M.

   1987. “Efficient Estimation Methods for Closed-Ended Contingent Valuation Survey Data.” Review of Economics and Statistics 69:269–276.

   OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
6. 1. Carson, R. T. and
   2. Czajkowski, M.

   (2019). “A new baseline model for estimating willingness to pay from discrete choice models.” Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 95: 57–61.

   OpenUrl
7. 1. Coffie, U.,
   2. Burton, M. P.,
   3. Gibson, F. L. and
   4. Hailu, A.

   2016. “Choice of rice production practices in Ghana: a comparison of willingness to pay and preference space estimates.” Journal of Agricultural Economics 67(3): 799–819.

   OpenUrl
8. 1. Crastes dit Sourd, R.,
   2. Beaumais, O.,
   3. Arkoun, O.,
   4. Laroutis, D.,
   5. Mahieu, P. A.,
   6. Rulleau, B., ... &
   7. Gaillard, D.

   2014. “Erosive runoff events in the European Union: Using discrete choice experiment to assess the benefits of integrated management policies when preferences are heterogeneous.” Ecological Economics 102, 105–112.

   OpenUrl
9. 1. Daly, A.,
   2. Hess, S.,
   3. Kenneth, T.

   2012. “Assuring finite moments for willingness to pay in random coefficient models.” Transportation 39(1):19–31.

   OpenUrlCrossRef
10. 1. Felsenstein, J.

    1981. “Evolutionary trees from DNA sequences: a maximum likelihood approach.” Journal of Molecular Evolution 17(6): 368–376.

    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
11. 1. Fiebig, D. G.,
    2. Keane, M. P.,
    3. Louviere, J.,
    4. Wasi, N.

    2010. “The generalized multinomial logit model: accounting for scale and coefficient heterogeneity.” Marketing Science 29(3): 393–421.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
12. 1. Frontulo, V.,
    2. Corsi, A.,
    3. Novelli, S.,
    4. Gullino, P., and
    5. Larcher, F.

    2020. “The visual impact of agricultural sheds on rural landscapes: the willingness to pay for mitigation solutions and treatment effects.” Land Use Policy 91: 104337.

    OpenUrl
13. 1. Giergiczny, M.,
    2. Valasiuk, S.,
    3. Czajkowski, M.,
    4. De Salvo, M.,
    5. Signorello, G.

    2012. “Including cost income ratio into utility function as a way of dealing with ‘exploding’ implicit prices in mixed logit models.” Journal of Forest Economics 18(4): 370–380.

    OpenUrl
14. 1. Ghosh, S.,
    2. Maitra, B.,
    3. & Das, S. S.

    2013. “Effect of distributional assumption of random parameters of mixed logit model on willingness-to-pay values.” Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences 104, 601–610.

    OpenUrl
15. 1. Green, D.,
    2. Jacowitz, K. E.
    3. Kahneman, D. and
    4. McFadden, D.

    1998. “Referendum contingent valuation, anchoring, and willingness to pay for public goods.” Resource and Energy Economics 20(2):85–116

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
16. 1. Hanley, N.

    1989. “Valuing non-market goods using contingent valuation.” Journal of Economic Surveys 3(3):235–252.

    OpenUrlCrossRef
17. 1. Hanley, N.,
    2. Kriström, B.,
    3. Shogren J. F.

    2009. “Coherent arbitrariness: on value uncertainty for environmental goods.” Land Economics 85(1):41–50.

    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
18. 1. Hensher, D. A. and
    2. Greene, W. H.

    2011. “Valuation of travel time savings in WTP and preference space in the presence of taste and scale heterogeneity.” Journal of Transport Economics and Policy 45(3): 505–525.

    OpenUrl
19. 1. Hess, S.,
    2. Daly, A.,
    3. Dekker, T.,
    4. Ojeda Cabral, M. and
    5. Batley, R.

    2017. “A framework for capturing heterogeneity, heteroskedasticity, non-linearity, reference dependence and design artefacts in value of time research.” Transportation Research Part B: Methodological 96: 126–149.

    OpenUrl
20. 1. Hess, S. and
    2. Palma, D.

    2019. “Apollo: a flexible, powerful and customizable freeware package for choice model estimation and application.” Journal of Choice Modelling 32: 100170.

    OpenUrl
21. 1. Hole, A. R. and
    2. Kolstad, J.

    2012. “Mixed logit estimation of willingness to pay distributions: a comparison of models in preference and WTP space using data from a health-related choice experiment.” Empirical Economics 42(2): 445–469.

    OpenUrl
22. 1. Hole, A. R.

    2007. “Fitting mixed logit models by using maximum simulated likelihood.” The Stata Journal 7(3), 388–401.

    OpenUrl
23. 1. Hole, A. R.

    2015. “MIXLOGITWTP: Stata module to estimate mixed logit models in WTP space.” Statistical Software Components S458037, Boston College Department of Economics, revised 20 April 2016.
24. 1. Johnson, F. R.,
    2. Lancsar, E.,
    3. Marshall, D.,
    4. Kilambi, V.,
    5. Mühlbacher, A.,
    6. Regier, D. A., ... and
    7. Bridges, J. F.

    2013. “Constructing experimental designs for discrete-choice experiments: report of the ISPOR conjoint analysis experimental design good research practices task force.” Value in Health, 16(1), 3–13.

    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
25. 1. Johnston, R. J.,
    2. Boyle, K. J.,
    3. Adamowicz, W.,
    4. Bennett, J.,
    5. Brouwer, R.,
    6. Cameron, T. A.,
    7. Hannemann, W. M.,
    8. Hanley, N.,
    9. Scarpa, R.,
    10. Tourangeau, R.,
    11. Vossler, C. A.

    2017. “Contemporary guidance for stated preference studies.” Journal of the Association of Environmental and Resource Economists 4(2): 319–405.

    OpenUrl
26. 1. Kataria, M.

    2009. “Willingness to pay for environmental improvements in hydropower regulated rivers.” Energy Economics 31(1): 69–76.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
27. 1. Krueger, R.,
    2. Rashidi, T. H and
    3. Dixit, V. V.

    2019. “Autonomous driving and residential location preferences: evidence from a stated choice survey.” Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies 108: 255–268.

    OpenUrl
28. 1. Lewis, D. J.,
    2. Dundas, S. J.,
    3. Kling, D. M.,
    4. Lew, D. K. and
    5. Hacker, S. D.

    2019. “The non-market benefits of early and partial gains in managing threatened salmon.” PLOS ONE 14(8).
29. 1. Louviere, J. J.,
    2. Hensher, D. A., and
    3. Swait, J. D.

    2000. “Stated choice methods: analysis and applications.” Cambridge University Press.
30. 1. Mabit, S. L.,
    2. Caussade, S.,
    3. Hess, S.

    , 2006. “Representation of taste heterogeneity in willingness to pay indicators using parameterization in willingness to pay space”. In: Proceedings ETC 2006.
31. 1. Martínez-Camblor, P.,
    2. De Uña-Álvarez, J.,
    3. Corral, N.

    2008. “K-Sample test based on the common area of kernel density estimators.” Journal of Statistical Planning and Inference 138(12): 4006–4020.

    OpenUrl
32. 1. Martínez-Camblor, P.,
    2. De Uña-Álvarez, J.

    2009. “Non-parametric k-sample tests: Density functions vs distribution functions.” Computational Statistics and Data Analysis 53(9): 3344–3357.

    OpenUrl
33. 1. Rose, J. M and
    2. Masiero, L.

    2010. “A comparison of the impacts of aspects of prospect theory on WTP/WTA estimated in preference and WTP/WTA space.” European Journal of Transport and Infrastructure Research 10(4): 330–346.

    OpenUrl
34. 1. Rowe, R. D.,
    2. Schulze, W. D.,
    3. Breffle, W. S.

    1996. “A test for payment card biases.” Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 31: 178–185.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
35. 1. Scarpa, R.,
    2. Campbell, D.
    3. Hutchinson, W. G.

    2007. “Benefit estimates for landscape improvements: sequential Bayesian design and respondents’ rationality in a choice experiment study.” Land Economics 83(4):617–634.

    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
36. 1. Scarpa, R.,
    2. Thiene, M.,
    3. Train K.

    2008. “Utility in willingness to pay space: a tool to address confounding random scale effects in destination choice to the Alps.” American Journal of Agricultural Economics 90(4): 994–1010.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
37. 1. Scarpa, R.
    2. Franceschinis C. and
    3. Thiene, M.

    2017. “A Monte Carlo Evaluation of the Logit-Mixed Logit under Asymmetry and Multimodality”. Working Papers in Economics 17/23, University of Waikato.
38. 1. Sonnier, G.,
    2. Ainslie, A.,
    3. Otter, T.

    2007. “Heterogeneity distributions of willingness-to-pay in choice models.” Quantitative Marketing Economics 5(3): 313–331.

    OpenUrlCrossRef
39. 1. Street, D. J.,
    2. Burgess, L.

    2007. The construction of optimal stated choice experiments: theory and methods, Hoboken, Wiley.
40. 1. Thiene, M.,
    2. Scarpa, R.

    2009. “Deriving and testing efficient estimates of WTP distributions in destination choice models.” Environmental and Resource Economics 44:379–395

    OpenUrlCrossRef
41. 1. Train, K.,
    2. Weeks, M.

    2005. “Discrete choice models in preference space and willingness-to-pay space.” In: Scarpa R, Alberini A (eds) Application of simulation methods in environmental and resource economics. Springer, Dordrecht: 1–16.
42. 1. Train, K.

    2009. Discrete choice models with simulations. Cambridge University Press, New York.
43. 1. Train, K.

    2016 “Mixed logit with a flexible mixing distribution.” Journal of Choice Modelling 19:40–53.

    OpenUrl
44. 1. Vermeulen, B.,
    2. Goos, P.,
    3. Scarpa, R. and
    4. Vandebroek, M. L.

    2011. “Bayesian Conjoint Choice Designs to Measure the WTP.” Environmental and Resource Economics 48:129–149.

    OpenUrl
45. 1. Vossler, C. A. and
    2. Watson S. B.

    2013. “Understanding the Consequences of Consequentiality: Testing the Validity of Stated Preferences in the Field.” Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization 86: 137–147.

    OpenUrl
46. 1. Vossler, C. A.,
    2. Doyon M. and
    3. Rondeau D.

    2012. “Truth in Consequentiality: Theory and Field Evidence on Discrete Choice Experiments.” American Economic Journal: Microeconomics 4(4): 145–171.

    OpenUrlCrossRef
47. 1. Vossler, C. A. and
    2. Holladay, S.

    2018. “Alternative value elicitation formats in contingent valuation: mechanism design and convergent validity.” Journal of Public Economics 165, 133–145.

    OpenUrl
48. 1. Vuong, Q.

    , 1989. “Likelihood ratio tests for model selection and non-nested hypotheses.” Econometrica 57:307–333

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science