Effective targeting and additionality. Evaluating the D.L. 701 reforms for afforesting erodible land in Southern Chile

References

1. 1. Abadie, Alberto;
   2. Imbens, Guido W

   . (2008). On the Failure of the Bootstrap for Matching Estimators Econometrica 76 (6), pp. 1537–1557. DOI: 10.3982/ECTA6474.

   OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
2. 1. Albaugh, Janine M.,
   2. Dye, Peter J.

   ; (2013). Eucalyptus and Water Use in South Africa. International Journal of Forestry Research 2013. DOI:10.1155/2013/852540.

   OpenUrlCrossRef
3. 1. Alix-Garcia, Jennifer;
   2. Shapiro, Elizabeth;
   3. Sims , Katharine;

   (2012). Forest conservation and slippage. Evidence from Mexico’s National payments for ecosystem services program. Land Economics 84 (4), pp. 613–638.

   OpenUrl
4. 1. Amacher Gregory S.;
   2. Ollikainen Markku;
   3. Koskela, Erkki

   . (2009). Economics of forest resources. Cambridge Mass.: MIT Press.
5. 1. Babcock, Bruce A.;
   2. Lakshminarayan, P. G.;
   3. Wu, JunJie;
   4. Zilberman, David

   (1997): Targeting Tools for the Purchase of Environmental Amenities. In Land Economics 73 (3), p. 325. DOI: 10.2307/3147171.

   OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
6. 1. Barbier Edward B.

   . (2010). Poverty, development, and environment In Envir. Dev. Econ. 15 (6), pp. 635–660. DOI: 10.1017/S1355770X1000032X.

   OpenUrlCrossRef
7. 1. Brown Alice E.;
   2. Zhang Lu;
   3. McMahon, Thomas A.;
   4. Western Andrew W.,
   5. Vertessy, Robert A.

   . (2005). A review of paired catchment studies for determining changes in water yield resulting from alterations in vegetation. In Journal of Hydrology 310 (1), pp. 28–61. DOI: 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2004.12.010.

   OpenUrlCrossRefGeoRefWeb of Science
8. 1. Calder, Ian R.

   (1998). Water resource and land use issues. Colombo: Internat. Water Management Inst (SWIM paper, 3).
9. 1. Caliendo, Marco;
   2. Kopeinig, Sabine

   . (2008): Some practical guidance for the implementation of propensity score matching In J Economic Surveys 22 (1), pp. 31–72.DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-6419.2007.00527.x.

   OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
10. 1. Camus, Pablo;
    2. Hajek, Ernst R.

    . (1998): Historia ambiental de Chile. [Santiago de Chile]: Departamento de Ecología, Facultad de Ciencias Biológicas, Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile.
11. 1. Centro de Información de Recursos Naturales

    (2010a): Determinación de la erosión actual y potencial de los suelos de Chile. With assistance of Juan Pablo Flores, Marión Espinosa, Eduardo Martínez, Gabriel Henríquez, Pablo Avendaño, Patricio Torres et al. Santiago, Chile (Publicación CIREN, 139). Available online at http://bibliotecadigital.ciren.cl/handle/123456789/2016.pdf [25 June 2018].
12. 1. Centro de Información de Recursos Naturales

    (2010b): Determinación de la erosión actual y potencial de los suelos de Chile. Región de la Araucanía. Síntesis de resultados. With assistance of Juan Pablo Flores, Eduardo Martínez, Marión Espinosa, Gabriel Henríquez, Pablo Avendaño, Patricio Torres, Isaac Ahumada. Edited by Juan Pablo Flores. Santiago, Chile (149). Available online at www.ciren.cl.pdf [25 June 2018].
13. 1. Claassen, Roger;
    2. Duquette Eric N.;
    3. Smith, David J.

    . (2018). Additionality in U.S. Agricultural Conservation Programs. In Land Economics. 94 (1), pp. 19–35. DOI: 10.3368/le.94.1.19.

    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
14. 1. Clark, R

    . (1996). Methodologies for the economic analysis of soil erosion and conservation. Centre for social and economic research on the global environment (CSERGE) Working Paper GEC 96-13 Norwich, U.K.
15. 1. Consultorías agrarias profesionales

    (2005) Evaluación de impacto programa bonificacion forestal DL 701. Informe final. With assistance of Ministerio de Agricultura, Conaf. Santiago, Chile. Available online at http://www.dipres.gob.cl/597/articles-873141063_informe_final.pdf
16. 1. Corporación Nacional Forestal; Comisón Nacional del Medio Ambiente; Banco Internacional de Reconstrucción y Fomento

    (1999) Catastro y evaluación de recursos vegetacionales nativos de Chile. Informe nacional con variables ambientales. Ministerio de Agricultura, Chile. Santiago, Chile. Available online at http://bibliotecadigital.ciren.cl/handle/123456789/10656.pdf
17. 1. Corporación Nacional Forestal, Chile

    (2009). Catastro de Uso del Suelo y Vegetación. Período 1993-2007. Monitoreo y Actualización Región de la Araucanía. Corporación Nacional Forestal (CONAF). Available online at http://www.conaf.cl/cms/editorweb/catastro/actualizacion_Araucania.pdf
18. 1. Dasgupta, Partha

    .(2003). Population, poverty, and the natural environment. Handbook of Environmental Economics: Elsevier. Available online at https://ideas.repec.org/h/eee/envchp/1-05.html.pdf
19. 1. Donoso, Claudio

    . (2008). Ecología forestal. El bosque y su medio ambiente. 6th ed. Santiago, Chile: Editorial Universitaria.
20. 1. Duncan, M. J.

    . (1995): Hydrological impacts of converting pasture and gorse to pine plantation, and forest harvesting, Nelson, New Zealand. In Journal of Hydrology 34 (1), pp. 15–41.

    OpenUrl
21. 1. Dye, Peter;
    2. Versfeld, Dirk

    . 2007. Managing the hydrological impacts of South African plantation forests: An overview In Forest Ecology and Management 251 (1), pp. 121–128. DOI: 10.1016/j.foreco.2007.06.013.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
22. 1. Mac-Clure, Elizalde R.

    . 1958. La Sobrevivencia de Chile. La Conservación de sus Recursos Naturales Renovables. 2 ed. Santiago, Chile. .
23. 1. Endlicher, W.

    . 1998: El Problema de la Erosión del Suelo en la Cordillera de la Costa de la Octava Región In Revista de Geografía Norte Grande 15, pp.11–27.

    OpenUrl
24. 1. Evaristo, Jaivime;
    2. McDonnell, Jeffrey J.

    . (2019). Global analysis of streamflow response to forest management In Nature 570 (7762), pp. 455–461. DOI: 10.1038/s41586-019-1306-0.

    OpenUrlCrossRef
25. 1. Ferraro, Paul

    . (2004). Targeting conservation investments in heterogeneous landscapes. A distance-function approach and application to watershed management. In American Journal of Agricultural Economics 86 (4), pp. 905–918.

    OpenUrlCrossRef
26. 1. Friedman, Jorge;
    2. Yévenes, Carlos
    3. Nanno Mulder,
    4. Sebastián Faúndez,
    5. Pérez, Esteban;
    6. Velásquez, Mario;
    7. Baizán, Fernando;
    8. Reinecke, Gerhard

    . (2012). Openness, Wage Gaps and Unions in Chile. A Micro-Econometric Analysis. Chapter 4 In L. Lippoldt (Ed.):Policy Priorities for International Trade and Jobs, pp. 145–174.
27. 1. García-Ruiz, José M.;
    2. Lana-Renault, Noemí

    . (2011). Hydrological and erosive consequences of farmland abandonment in Europe, with special reference to the Mediterranean region – A review In Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment 140 (3–4), pp. 317–388. DOI: 10.1016/j.agee.2011.01.003.

    OpenUrlCrossRef
28. 1. Grainger, Alan

    . (1988). Estimating areas of degraded tropical lands requiring replenishment of forest cover In International Tree Crops Journal 5 (1–2), pp. 31–61. DOI: 10.1080/01435698.1988.9752837.

    OpenUrl
29. 1. Hartman, Richard

    . (1976). The harvesting decision when a standing forest has value. In Economic Inquiry 14 (1), pp. 52–58.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
30. 1. Heckman, J. J.;
    2. Ichimura, H,;
    3. Todd, P. E.

    . (1997). Matching As An Econometric Evaluation Estimator: Evidence from Evaluating a Job Training Programme. In Rev Econ Studies 64 (4), pp. 605–654. DOI: 10.2307/2971733.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
31. 1. Horowitz, John K.
    2. Just, Richard E.

    2013. Economics of additionality for environmental services from agriculture. In Journal of Environmental Economics and Management.66 (1), pp. 105–122. DOI: 10.1016/j.jeem.2013.04.002.

    OpenUrlCrossRef
32. 1. Huber, Anton;
    2. Iroumé, Andrés,
    3. Bathurst, James

    . (2008). Effect of Pinus radiata plantations on water balance in Chile. In Hydrol. Process. 22 (1), pp. 142–148. DOI: 10.1002/hyp.6582.

    OpenUrlCrossRef
33. 1. Imbens, Guido W.;
    2. Wooldridge, Jeffrey M

    . 2009. Recent Developments in the Econometrics of Program Evaluation. In Journal of Economic Literature47 (1), pp. 5–86. DOI: 10.1257/jel.47.1.5.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
34. 1. Instituto Nacional de Estadísticas, Chile

    2004 Censos de población y vivienda. Censo nacional de población y vivienda 2002. Santiago, Chile. Available online at https://www.ine.cl/estadisticas/censos/censos-de-poblacion-y-vivienda.pdf
35. 1. Jacobs, Keri;
    2. Thurman, Walter;
    3. Marra, Michele,

    . (2014). The effect of conservation priority areas on bidding behavior in the conservation reserve program. In Land Economics 90 (1), pp. 1–25.

    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
36. 1. Lara, A.;
    2. Araya L.; ,
    3. Capella, J.;
    4. Fierro, M.;
    5. Cavieres, A.;

    . (1989): Evaluación de la destrucción y disponibilidad de los recursos forestales nativos en la VII y VIII Región. Informe Técnico, Comité Prodefensa Fauna y Flora. Santiago, Chile.
37. 1. Laroze, André;
    2. Claro, Edmundo

    (2009): Estudio de opinión para la renovación del DL 701. Edited by Ministerio de Agricultura, Chile. Oficina de Estudios y Políticas Agrarias (ODEPA). Santiago, Chile. Available online at https://www.odepa.gob.cl/odepaweb/publicaciones/doc/2190.pdf
38. 1. Lewis, David J.;
    2. Plantinga, Andrew J.;
    3. Wu, JunJie

    (2009): Targeting Incentives to Reduce Habitat Fragmentation In American Journal of Agricultural Economics 91 (4), pp. 1080–1096. DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-8276.2009.01310.x.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
39. 1. Lima, W. P.;
    2. Laprovitera, R.;
    3. Ferraz, S.F.B.; ,
    4. Rodrigues, C. B.;
    5. Silva, M. M.

    . (2012): Forest Plantations and Water Consumption: A Strategy for Hydrosolidarity. In International Journal of Forestry Research 2012 (1), pp. 1–8. DOI: 10.1155/2012/908465.

    OpenUrlCrossRef
40. 1. Lubowski, Ruben;
    2. Platinga, Andrew;
    3. Stavins Robert

    . (2008). What drives land-use change in the United States? A national analysis of landowner decisions. In Land Economics 84 (4), pp. 529–550.

    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
41. 1. Maclaren, J. P.

    . (1996): Environmental effects of planted forests in New Zealand: the implications of continued afforestation of pasture: New Zealand Forest Research Institute (FRI bulletin, 198). Available online at https://books.google.cl/books?id=zzHxAAAAMAAJ.pdf .
42. 1. Meza-Lopehandía Matías G.

    . (2006). Territorio indígena en el derecho chileno. Biblioteca del Congreso Nacional de Chile (BCN). Santiago, Chile. Available online at https://www.bcn.cl/obtienearchivo?id=repositorio/10221/22372/1/FINAL%20-%20Territorio%20ind%C3%ADgena%20en%20el%20derechos%20chileno.pdf.
43. 1. Mezzatesta, Mariano; ,
    2. Newburn, Davis;
    3. Woodward, Richard T.

    2013: Additionality and the adoption of farm conservation practices In Land Economics 89 (4), pp. 722–742.

    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
44. 1. Ministerio de Agricultura, Chile

    (5/16/1998): Modifica el Decreto Ley N° 701, de 1974, sobre fomento forestal. Ley 19,561, revised 9/4/1998. Source: Biblioteca del Congreso Nacional de Chile. Available online 962 at https://www.leychile.cl/Navegar/index_html?idNorma=99208.pdf .
45. 1. Ministerio de Agricultura, Chile

    (2011): Informe del estado del medio ambiente. Santiago, Chile. Available online at http://bibliotecadigital.ciren.cl/handle/123456789/6883.pdf .
46. 1. Niklitschek, Mario

    . (2007): Trade liberalization and land use changes. Explaining the expansion of afforested land in Chile. In Forest Science 53 (3), pp. 385–394.

    OpenUrl
47. 1. Niklitschek, Mario;
    2. Bobenrieth, Eugenio

    . (1992): Incentivos económicos para una explotación eficiente del bosque In Cuadernos de Economía 88, pp. 463–480.

    OpenUrl
48. 1. Niklitschek, Mario E.;
    2. Trincado, Guillermo

    . (2011). A cost effective stratified two-stage sampling design to estimate the forest land area of southern Chile. In Can. J. For. Res. 41 (7), pp. 1509–1521. DOI: 10.1139/x11-040.

    OpenUrlCrossRef
49. 1. Nusser, S. M.;
    2. Goebel, J. J.

    . (1997): The National Resources Inventory: a long term monitoring program. In Environmental and Ecological Statistics. 4 (3), pp. 181–204. DOI: 10.1023/A:1018574412308.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
50. 1. Papke, Leslie E.;
    2. Wooldridge, Jeffrey M.

    . (1996). Econometric methods for fractional response variables with an application to 401(k) plan participation rates. In J. Appl. Econ. 11 (6), pp. 619–632. DOI: 10.1002/(SICI)1099-1255(199611)11:6<619::AIDJAE418>3.0.CO;2-1.

    OpenUrlCrossRef
51. (2014): Evaluación de resultados del decreto ley N° 701 de 1974, Ministerio de Agricultura. Informe final. With assistance of Corporación Nacional Forestal, Chile (CONAF). Pontificie Universidad Católica de Chile, Facultad de Agronomía e Ingeniería Forestal. Santiago, Chile. Available online at http://www.dipres.gob.cl/597/articles-141195_informe_final.pdf .
52. 1. Pufahl, A.;
    2. Weiss, C. R.

    . (2009). Evaluating the effects of farm programmes: results 986 from propensity score matching. In American Journal of Agricultural Economics 36 (1), pp. 79–101. DOI: 10.1093/erae/jbp001.

    OpenUrlCrossRef
53. 1. Ribaudo, Marc;
    2. Horan, Richard;
    3. Smith, Mark

    . (1999). Economics of Water Quality Protection From Nonpoint Sources. Theory and Practice. Agricultural Economic Report. Resource Economics Division, Economic Research Service, U.S. Department of Agriculture. United States (782). Available online at https://www.ers.usda.gov/publications/pub-details/?pubid=41066.pdf .
54. 1. Robalino, Juan;
    2. Pfaff, Alexander

    . (2013): Ecopayments and deforestation in Costa Rica. A nationwide analysis of PSA’s initial years. In Land Economics 89 (3), pp. 432–448.

    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
55. 1. Rosenbaum, Paul R.;
    2. Rubin, Donald B

    . (1983). The central role of the propensity score in observational studies for causal effects. In Biometrika 70 (1), pp. 41–55. DOI: 10.1093/biomet/70.1.41.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
56. 1. Schlatter, Juan;
    2. Gerding, Victor

    . (1995). Método de clasificación de sitios para la producción forestal, ejemplo en Chile. In Bosque 16 (2), pp. 13–20. Available online at http://mingaonline.uach.cl/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0717-92001995000200002&lng=es&nrm=iso>. ISSN 0717-9200

    OpenUrl
57. 1. Senado de Chile

    . (2002). Informe de la Comisión de Constitución, Legislación, Justicia y Reglamento, recaído en el encargo que le hiciera el Senado respecto del conflicto mapuche en relación con el orden público y la seguridad ciudadana en determinadas regiones. Senado de Chile (Boletín N° 680-12, 12).
58. 1. Servicio de Impuestos Internos

    (2018) Cartografía digital SII Mapas. Servicio de Impuestos Internos (SII). Santiago, Chile. Available online at www.sii.cl.pdf .
59. 1. Smith, Jeffrey;
    2. Todd, Petra

    . (2005); Does matching overcome LaLonde's critique 1009 of nonexperimental estimators? In Journal of Econometrics 125 (1-2), pp. 305–353. DOI: 10.1016/j.jeconom.2004.04.011.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
60. 1. Smith, R. E.;
    2. Scott, D. F.

    . (1992): The effects of afforestation on low flows in various regions of South Africa. In Water SA 18 (3), pp. 185–194.

    OpenUrl
61. 1. Southgate, Douglas;
    2. Macke, Robert

    (1989). The Downstream Benefits of Soil Conservation in Third World Hydroelectric Watersheds. In Land Economics 65 (1), p. 38. DOI: 10.2307/3146262.

    OpenUrlCrossRef
62. 1. Toro, Jorge;
    2. Gessel, Stanley

    . (1999); Radiata pine plantation in Chile. In New Forests 18 (1), pp. 33–44. DOI: 10.1023/A:1006597823190.

    OpenUrlCrossRef
63. 1. UNESCO

    (2013): Soil Erosion and Sediment Production on Watershed Landscapes. Processes and Control. Edited by Peter Ffolliott, Daniel Neary, Kenneth Brooks, Roberto Pizarro, Pablo García (Documento Técnico del PHI-LAC, N° 32, 32). Available online at http://www.unesco.org.uy/phi.pdf .
64. 1. Wischmeier, W. H.;
    2. Smith, D. D.

    . (1978): Predicting rainfall erosion losses. A guide to conservation planning. Maryland, USA
65. 1. Wooldridge, Jeffrey M.

    . (2010): Econometric analysis of cross section and panel data. 2nd ed. Cambridge Mass.: MIT Press.
66. 1. World Bank

    (2008) World Development Report 2008. Agriculture for Development. World Bank.Washington DC, USA. Available online at https://openknowledge.worldbank.org/handle/10986/5990.pdf
67. 1. Wu, JunJie; ,
    2. Adams, Richard M.; ,
    3. Kling, Catherine L; ,
    4. Tanaka, Katsuya

    . (2004). From Microlevel Decisions to Landscape Changes: An Assessment of Agricultural Conservation Policies. In American Journal of Agricultural Economics86 (1), pp. 26–41. DOI: 10.1111/j.0092-5853.2004.00560.x.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
68. 1. Xu, J.;
    2. Tao, R,
    3. Xu, Z.;
    4. Bennett, M. T.

    . (2010): China's Sloping Land Conversion Program: Does Expansion Equal Success? In Land Economics 86 (2), pp. 219–244. DOI: 10.3368/le.86.2.219.

    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
69. 1. Yang, Wanhong;
    2. Madhu, Khanna;
    3. Farnsworth, Richard

    . (2005). Effectiveness of conservation programs in Illinois anb gains from targeting In American Journal of Agricultural Economics 87 (5), pp. 1248–1255.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
70. 1. Zhang, L.;
    2. Dawes, W. R.;
    3. Walker, G. R.

    . (2001): Response of mean annual evapotranspiration to vegetation changes at catchment scale. In Water Resources Research 37 (3), pp. 701–708. DOI: 10.1029/2000WR900325.

    OpenUrlCrossRefGeoRefWeb of Science