Polarization in environmental donations – application to deforestation prevention donation

REFERENCE

1. 1. Alpizar, F.,
   2. Carlsson, F., &
   3. Johansson-Stenman, O.

   (2008). Anonymity, reciprocity, and conformity: Evidence from voluntary contributions to a national park in Costa Rica. Journal of Public Economics, 92(5–6), 1047–1060. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpubeco.2007.11.004

   OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
2. 1. Andreoni, J.

   (1989). Giving with impure altruism: Applications to charity and Ricardian equivalence. Journal of Political Economy, 97(6), 1447–1458.

   OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
3. 1. Andreoni, J., &
   2. Payne, A. A.

   (2013). Charitable Giving. In Handbook of Public Economics (Vol. 5, pp. 1–50). Elsevier. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-444-53759-1.00001-7

   OpenUrl
4. 1. Bartke, S.,
   2. Friedl, A.,
   3. Gelhaar, F., &
   4. Reh, L.

   (2017). Social comparison nudges–Guessing the norm increases charitable giving. Economics Letters, 152, 73–75. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econlet.2016.12.023

   OpenUrl
5. 1. Batson, C. D., &
   2. Shaw, L. L.

   (1991). Evidence for Altruism: Toward a Pluralism of Prosocial Motives. Psychological Inquiry, 2(2), 107–122.

   OpenUrlCrossRef
6. 1. Becker, G. S.

   (1974). A Theory of Social Interactions (Working Paper No. 42; Working Paper Series). National Bureau of Economic Research. https://doi.org/10.3386/w0042
7. 1. Bejarano, H.,
   2. Corgnet, B., &
   3. Gómez-Miñambres, J.

   (2021). Economic stability promotes giftexchange in the workplace. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 187, 374–398.

   OpenUrl
8. 1. Bénabou, R., &
   2. Tirole, J.

   (2006). Incentives and Prosocial Behavior. American Economic Review, 96(5), 1652–1678. https://doi.org/10.1257/aer.96.5.1652

   OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
9. 1. Birch, S.

   (2020). Political polarization and environmental attitudes: A cross-national analysis. Environmental Politics, 29(4), 697–718. https://doi.org/10.1080/09644016.2019.1673997

   OpenUrl
10. 1. Buchanan, J. A.

    (2020). My reference point, not yours. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 171, 297–311. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jebo.2020.01.023

    OpenUrl
11. 1. Buhren, C., &
    2. Kundt, T. C.

    (2015). Imagine being a nice guy: A note on hypothetical vs. incentivized social preferences. Judgment and Decision Making, 10(2), 185+. Gale Academic OneFile.

    OpenUrl
12. 1. Capraro, V.,
    2. Jagfeld, G.,
    3. Klein, R.,
    4. Mul, M., &
    5. de Pol, I. van

    . (2019). Increasing altruistic and cooperative behaviour with simple moral nudges. Scientific Reports, 9(1), 11880. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-019-48094-4

    OpenUrl
13. 1. Carmichael, J. T., &
    2. Brulle, R. J.

    (2017). Elite cues, media coverage, and public concern: An integrated path analysis of public opinion on climate change, 2001–2013. Environmental Politics, 26(2), 232–252. https://doi.org/10.1080/09644016.2016.1263433

    OpenUrl
14. 1. Chapman, D. A., &
    2. Lickel, B.

    (2016). Climate Change and Disasters: How Framing Affects Justifications for Giving or Withholding Aid to Disaster Victims. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 7(1), 13–20. https://doi.org/10.1177/1948550615590448

    OpenUrlCrossRef
15. 1. Croson, R., &
    2. Shang, J. (Yue)

    . (2008). The impact of downward social information on contribution decisions. Experimental Economics, 11(3), 221–233. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10683-007-9191-z

    OpenUrlCrossRef
16. 1. Curtis, P. G.,
    2. Slay, C. M.,
    3. Harris, N. L.,
    4. Tyukavina, A., &
    5. Hansen, M. C.

    (2018). Classifying drivers of global forest loss. Science, 361(6407), 1108–1111. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aau3445

    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
17. 1. Daszak, P.,
    2. Cunningham, A. A., &
    3. Hyatt, A. D.

    (2000). Emerging Infectious Diseases of Wildlife–Threats to Biodiversity and Human Health. Science, 287(5452), 443–449. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.287.5452.443

    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
18. 1. Fehr, E., &
    2. Schmidt, K. M.

    (1999). A Theory of Fairness, Competition, and Cooperation. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 114(3), 817–868.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
19. 1. Fehr, E., &
    2. Schmidt, K. M.

    (2006). Chapter 8 The Economics of Fairness, Reciprocity and Altruism – Experimental Evidence and New Theories. In S.-C. Kolm & J. M. Ythier (Eds.), Handbook of the Economics of Giving, Altruism and Reciprocity (Vol. 1, pp. 615–691). Elsevier. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1574-0714(06)01008-6

    OpenUrlCrossRef
20. 1. Festinger, L.

    (1962). A Theory of Cognitive Dissonance. Stanford University Press.
21. 1. Fischbacher, U.,
    2. Gächter, S., &
    3. Fehr, E.

    (2001). Are people conditionally cooperative? Evidence from a public goods experiment. Economics Letters, 71(3), 397–404.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
22. 1. Gawronski, B., &
    2. Strack, F.

    (2012). Cognitive Consistency: A Fundamental Principle in Social Cognition. Guilford Press.
23. 1. Giovanna, d’Adda,
    2. Capraro, V., &
    3. Tavoni, M.

    (2017). Push, don’t nudge: Behavioral spillovers and policy instruments. Economics Letters, 154(C), 92–95.

    OpenUrl
24. 1. Goff, S. H.,
    2. Waring, T. M., &
    3. Noblet, C. L.

    (2017). Does Pricing Nature Reduce Monetary Support for Conservation?: Evidence From Donation Behavior in an Online Experiment. Ecological Economics, 141, 119–126. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2017.05.027

    OpenUrl
25. 1. Goswami, I., &
    2. Urminsky, O.

    (2016). When should the Ask be a Nudge? The Effect of Default Amounts on Charitable Donations. Journal of Marketing Research, 53(5), 829–846. https://doi.org/10.1509/jmr.15.0001

    OpenUrl
26. 1. Grieco, D.,
    2. Lacetera, N.,
    3. Macis, M., &
    4. Di Martino, D.

    (2018). Motivating Cord Blood Donation with Information and Behavioral Nudges. Scientific Reports, 8(1), 252. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-18679-y

    OpenUrl
27. 1. Guber, D. L.

    (2013). A Cooling Climate for Change? Party Polarization and the Politics of Global Warming. American Behavioral Scientist, 57(1), 93–115. https://doi.org/10.1177/0002764212463361

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
28. 1. Guégan, J.-F.,
    2. Ayouba, A.,
    3. Cappelle, J., &
    4. Thoisy, B. de

    . (2020). Forests and emerging infectious diseases: Unleashing the beast within. Environmental Research Letters, 15(8), 083007. https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/ab8dd7

    OpenUrl
29. 1. Hagmann, D.,
    2. Ho, E. H., &
    3. Loewenstein, G.

    (2019). Nudging out support for a carbon tax. Nature Climate Change, 9(6), 484–489. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41558-019-0474-0

    OpenUrl
30. 1. Hornsey, M. J.,
    2. Harris, E. A.,
    3. Bain, P. G., &
    4. Fielding, K. S.

    (2016). Meta-analyses of the determinants and outcomes of belief in climate change. Nature Climate Change, 6(6), 622–626. https://doi.org/10.1038/nclimate2943

    OpenUrl
31. 1. Johansson-Stenman, O., &
    2. Martinsson, P.

    (2006). Honestly, why are you driving a BMW? Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 60(2), 129–146. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jebo.2004.08.006

    OpenUrlCrossRef
32. 1. Johnson, E. J., &
    2. Goldstein, D.

    (2003). Do Defaults Save Lives? Science, 302(5649), 1338–1339. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1091721

    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
33. 1. Kallbekken, S.,
    2. Sælen, H., &
    3. Hermansen, E. A. T.

    (2013). Bridging the Energy Efficiency Gap: A Field Experiment on Lifetime Energy Costs and Household Appliances. Journal of Consumer Policy, 36(1), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10603-012-9211-z

    OpenUrl
34. 1. Kandel, E., &
    2. Lazear, E. P.

    (1992). Peer pressure and partnerships. Journal of Political Economy, 100(4), 801–817.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
35. 1. Kessler, J. B., &
    2. Milkman, K. L.

    (2016). Identity in Charitable Giving. Management Science, 64(2), 845–859. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.2016.2582

    OpenUrl
36. 1. Klayman, J., &
    2. Ha, Y.-W

    . (1987). Confirmation, disconfirmation, and information in hypothesis testing. Psychological Review, 94(2), 211.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
37. 1. Konow, J.

    (2000). Fair shares: Accountability and cognitive dissonance in allocation decisions. American Economic Review, 90(4), 1072–1091.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
38. 1. Kotchen, M. J.,
    2. Boyle, K. J., &
    3. Leiserowitz, A. A.

    (2013). Willingness-to-pay and policyinstrument choice for climate-change policy in the United States. Energy Policy, 55, 617–625. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2012.12.058

    OpenUrl
39. 1. Krupka, E. L., &
    2. Croson, R. T. A.

    (2016). The differential impact of social norms cues on charitable contributions. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 128, 149–158. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jebo.2016.05.005

    OpenUrl
40. Lake Wobegon effect. (n.d.). Oxford Reference. https://doi.org/10.1093/oi/authority.20110810105237549
41. 1. Leiserowitz, A.

    (2006). Climate Change Risk Perception and Policy Preferences: The Role of Affect, Imagery, and Values. Climatic Change, 77(1), 45–72. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-006-9059-9

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
42. 1. Li, S.,
    2. Hartemink, N.,
    3. Speybroeck, N., &
    4. Vanwambeke, S. O.

    (2012). Consequences of Landscape Fragmentation on Lyme Disease Risk: A Cellular Automata Approach. PLOS ONE, 7(6), e39612. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0039612

    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
43. 1. MacDonald, A. J., &
    2. Mordecai, E. A.

    (2019). Amazon deforestation drives malaria transmission, and malaria burden reduces forest clearing. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 116(44), 22212–22218. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1905315116

    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
44. 1. Maxwell, N. L., &
    2. Lopus, J. S.

    (1994). The Lake Wobegon Effect in Student Self-Reported Data. The American Economic Review, 84(2), 201–205.

    OpenUrlWeb of Science
45. 1. Meier, S.

    (2006). A Survey of Economic Theories and Field Evidence on Pro-Social Behavior Working Papers 06-6, Federal Reserve Bank of Boston.
46. 1. Moutinho, P., &
    2. Schwartzman, S.

    (2005). Tropical deforestation and climate change. Instituto de Pesquisa Ambiental da Amazônia ; Environmental Defense.
47. 1. Olivero, J.,
    2. Fa, J. E.,
    3. Real, R.,
    4. Márquez, A. L.,
    5. Farfán, M. A.,
    6. Vargas, J. M.,
    7. Gaveau, D.,
    8. Salim, M. A.,
    9. Park, D.,
    10. Suter, J.,
    11. King, S.,
    12. Leendertz, S. A.,
    13. Sheil, D., &
    14. Nasi, R.

    (2017). Recent loss of closed forests is associated with Ebola virus disease outbreaks. Scientific Reports, 7(1), 14291. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-14727-9

    OpenUrl
48. 1. Olson, S. H.,
    2. Gangnon, R.,
    3. Silveira, G. A., &
    4. Patz, J. A.

    (2010). Deforestation and Malaria in Mâncio Lima County, Brazil. Emerging Infectious Diseases, 16(7), 1108–1115. https://doi.org/10.3201/eid1607.091785

    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
49. 1. Reijula, S.,
    2. Kuorikoski, J.,
    3. Ehrig, T.,
    4. Katsikopoulos, K., &
    5. Sunder, S.

    (2018). Nudge, Boost, or Design? Limitations of behaviorally informed policy under social interaction. Journal of Behavioral Economics for Policy, 2(1), 99–105.

    OpenUrl
50. 1. Rulli, M. C.,
    2. Santini, M.,
    3. Hayman, D. T. S., &
    4. D’Odorico, P.

    (2017). The nexus between forest fragmentation in Africa and Ebola virus disease outbreaks. Scientific Reports, 7(1), 41613. https://doi.org/10.1038/srep41613

    OpenUrl
51. 1. Schulz, J. F.,
    2. Thiemann, P., &
    3. Thöni, C.

    (2018). Nudging generosity: Choice architecture and cognitive factors in charitable giving. Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Economics, 74, 139–145. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socec.2018.04.001

    OpenUrl
52. 1. Shang, J., &
    2. Croson, R.

    (2009). A Field Experiment in Charitable Contribution: The Impact of Social Information on the Voluntary Provision of Public Goods. The Economic Journal, 119(540), 1422–1439. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0297.2009.02267.x

    OpenUrl
53. 1. Stadelmann, M., &
    2. Schubert, R.

    (2018). How Do Different Designs of Energy Labels Influence Purchases of Household Appliances? A Field Study in Switzerland. Ecological Economics, 144, 112–123. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2017.07.031

    OpenUrl
54. 1. Sugden, R.

    (1984). Reciprocity: The Supply of Public Goods Through Voluntary Contributions. The Economic Journal, 94(376), 772. https://doi.org/10.2307/2232294
55. 1. Sunstein, C.,
    2. Bobadilla-Suarez, S.,
    3. Lazzaro, S., &
    4. Sharot, T.

    (2017). How People Update Beliefs about Climate Change: Good News and Bad News. Cornell Law Review, 102(6), 1431–1443.

    OpenUrl
56. 1. Thaler, R. H., &
    2. Sunstein, C. R.

    (2008). Nudge: Improving Decisions about Health, Wealth, and Happiness. Yale University Press.
57. 1. Tiefenbeck, V.,
    2. Goette, L.,
    3. Degen, K.,
    4. Tasic, V.,
    5. Fleisch, E.,
    6. Lalive, R., &
    7. Staake, T.

    (2018). Overcoming Salience Bias: How Real-Time Feedback Fosters Resource Conservation. Management Science, 64(3), 1458–1476. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.2016.2646

    OpenUrl
58. 1. Unsworth, K. L., &
    2. Fielding, K. S.

    (2014). It’s political: How the salience of one’s political identity changes climate change beliefs and policy support. Global Environmental Change, 27, 131–137. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2014.05.002

    OpenUrlCrossRef
59. 1. Whitman, J. C.,
    2. Zhao, J.,
    3. Roberts, K. H., &
    4. Todd, R. M.

    (2018). Political orientation and climate concern shape visual attention to climate change. Climatic Change, 147(3), 383–394. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-018-2147-9

    OpenUrl
60. WWF. (n.d.). Deforestation and Forest Degradation. World Wildlife Fund. Retrieved April 27, 2021, from https://www.worldwildlife.org/threats/deforestation-and-forest-degradation
61. 1. Zarghamee, H. S.,
    2. Messer, K. D.,
    3. Fooks, J. R.,
    4. Schulze, W. D.,
    5. Wu, S., &
    6. Yan, J.

    (2017). Nudging charitable giving: Three field experiments. Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Economics, 66, 137–149. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socec.2016.04.008

    OpenUrl