Discretionary Exemptions from Environmental Regulation: Flexibility for Good or for Ill

References

1. 1. Ackerman, B.,
   2. Hassler, W.T.

   , 1981. Clean Coal/Dirty Air: or How the Clean Air Act Became a Multibillion-Dollar Bail-Out for High-Sulfur Coal Producers. Yale University Press, New Haven, CT.
2. 1. Aldy, J.E.

   , 2017. Energy Market Shock Absorbers, Policy Digest. Kleinman Center for Energy Policy, University of Pennsylvania.
3. 1. Arguedas, C.,
   2. Earnhart, D.,
   3. Rousseau, S.

   , 2017. Non-uniform implementation of uniform standards. Journal of Regulatory Economics 51, 159–183.

   OpenUrl
4. 1. Bannon, R.D.,
   2. Bannon, A.L.

   , 1996. Congress Passes Fiduciary Exemption from Environmental Liability. ACTEC Notes 22, 222.

   OpenUrl
5. 1. Banzhaf, H.S.,
   2. Chupp, B.A.

   , 2012. Fiscal federalism and interjurisdictional externalities: New results and an application to US Air pollution. Journal of Public Economics 96, 449–464.

   OpenUrl
6. 1. Battigalli, P.,
   2. Maggi, G.

   , 2002. Rigidity, Discretion, and the Costs of Writing Contracts. The American Economic Review 92, 798–817.

   OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
7. 1. Beavis, B.,
   2. Walker, M.

   , 1983a. Achieving environmental standards with stochastic discharges. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 10, 103–111.

   OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
8. 1. Beavis, B.,
   2. Walker, M.

   , 1983b. Random wastes, imperfect monitoring and environmental quality standards. Journal of Public Economics 21, 377–387.

   OpenUrl
9. 1. Berry, J.M.,
   2. Portney, K.E.

   , 2013. Sustainability and Interest Group Participation in City Politics. Sustainability 5, 2077–2097.

   OpenUrl
10. 1. Coate, S.

    , 2001. An Efficiency Approach to the Evaluation of Policy Changes. The Economic Journal 110, 437–455.

    OpenUrl
11. 1. Cohen, J.E.

    , 1994. A Constitutional Safety Valve: The Variance in Zoning and Land-Use Based Environmental Controls. Boston College Environmental Affairs Law Review 22, 307.

    OpenUrl
12. 1. Cropper, M.L.,
    2. Evans, W.N.,
    3. Berardi, S.J.,
    4. Ducla-Soares, M.M.,
    5. Portney, P.R.

    , 1992. The Determinants of Pesticide Regulation: A Statistical Analysis of EPA Decision Making. Journal of Political Economy 100, 175–197.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
13. 1. Deily, M.E.,
    2. Gray, W.B.

    , 1991. Enforcement of pollution regulations in a declining industry. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 21, 260–274.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
14. 1. Diver, C.S.

    , 1983. The Optimal Precision of Administrative Rules. Yale Law Journal, 65–110.
15. 1. Earnhart, D.

    , 2004a. The Effects of Community Characteristics on Polluter Compliance Levels. Land Economics 80, 408–432.

    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
16. 1. Earnhart, D.

    , 2004b. Panel Data Analysis of Regulatory Factors Shaping Environmental Performance. The Review of Economics and Statistics 86, 391–401.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
17. 1. Earnhart, D.

    , 2004c. Regulatory factors shaping environmental performance at publicly-owned treatment plants. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 48, 655–681.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
18. 1. Earnhart, D.

    , 2007. Effects of permitted effluent limits on environmental compliance levels. Ecological Economics 61, 178–193.

    OpenUrl
19. 1. Earnhart, D.

    , 2016. Effluent Limits and Monitoring: Do Regulators Inspect Polluters Facing Tighter Limits Less Frequently?, University of Kansas Working Paper.
20. 1. Ehrlich, I.,
    2. Posner, R.A.

    , 1974. An Economic Analysis of Legal Rulemaking. The Journal of Legal Studies 3, 257–286.

    OpenUrl
21. 1. Environmental Protection Agency

    , 1995. Interim Economic Guidance for Water Quality Standards, Washington, DC.
22. 1. Environmental Protection Agency

    , 2013. Discharger-specific Variances on a Broader Scale: Developing Credible Rationales for Variances that Apply to Multiple Dischargers, Washington, DC.
23. 1. Environmental Protection Agency

    , 2017. Renewable Fuel Standard Exemptions for Small Refineries, Washington, DC.
24. 1. Epstein, R.A.

    , 1995. Simple rules for a complex world. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA.
25. 1. Field, B.C.,
    2. Field, M.K.

    , 2017. Environmental Economics. McGraw-Hill.
26. 1. Fleurbaey, M.,
    2. Abi-Rafeh, R.

    , 2016. The Use of Distributional Weights in Benefit–Cost Analysis: Insights from Welfare Economics. Review of Environmental Economics and Policy 10, 286–307.

    OpenUrlCrossRef
27. 1. Friedman, E.,
    2. Wickelgren, A.L.

    , 2014. A New Angle on Rules versus Standards. American Law and Economics Review 16, 499–549.

    OpenUrlCrossRef
28. 1. Fuller, L.L.

    , 1941. Consideration and Form. Columbia Law Review 41, 799–824.

    OpenUrlCrossRef
29. 1. Goulder, L.H.,
    2. Parry, I.W.H.

    , 2008. Instrument Choice in Environmental Policy. Review of Environmental Economics and Policy 2, 152–174.

    OpenUrlCrossRef
30. 1. Hahn, R.W.

    , 2000. The Impact of Economics on Environmental Policy. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 39, 375–399.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
31. 1. Hall, J.C.,
    2. Shultz, C.,
    3. Stephenson, E.F.

    , 2018. The political economy of local fracking bans. Journal of Economics and Finance 42, 397–408.

    OpenUrl
32. 1. Hendren, N.

    , 2020. Measuring economic efficiency using inverse-optimum weights. Journal of Public Economics 187, 104198.

    OpenUrl
33. 1. Hird, J.A.

    , 1990. Superfund Expenditures and Cleanup Priorities: Distributive Politics or the Public Interest? Journal of Policy Analysis and Management 9, 455–483.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
34. 1. Hoagland, P.,
    2. Farrow, S.

    , 1996. Planning versus reality: Political and scientific determinants of outer continental shelf lease sales, in: Congleton, R. (Ed.), The political economy of environmental protection. University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA, pp. 145–166.
35. 1. Johnston, J.S.

    , 1995. Bargaining under Rules Versus Standards. Journal of Law, Economics and Organization, 256–281.
36. 1. Kang, K.,
    2. Silveira, B.S.

    , 2018. Understanding Disparities in Punishment: Regulator Preferences and Expertise.
37. 1. Kaplow, L.

    , 1992. Rules Versus Standards: An Economic Analysis. Duke Law Journal, 557–629.
38. 1. Kaplow, L.

    , 1999. General characteristics of rules, Encyclopedia of law and economics.
39. 1. Kaplow, L.

    , 2019. Optimal regulation with exemptions. International Journal of Industrial Organization 66, 1–39.

    OpenUrl
40. 1. Lévêque, F.

    , 1996. Environmental policy in Europe : industry, competition, and the policy process. Edward Elgar Publishing, Cheltenham, UK.
41. 1. Levkovich, O.,
    2. Rouwendal, J.,
    3. Brugman, L.

    , 2018. Spatial Planning and Segmentation of the Land Market: The Case of the Netherlands. Land Economics 94, 137–154.

    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
42. 1. Magat, W.,
    2. Krupnick, A.J.,
    3. Harrington, W.

    , 1986. Rules in the making: A statistical analysis of regulatory agency behavior. RFF Press, Washington, DC, USA.
43. 1. Maloney, M.T.,
    2. McCormick, R.E.

    , 1982. A Positive Theory of Environmental Quality Regulation. The Journal of Law and Economics 25, 99–123.

    OpenUrlCrossRef
44. 1. McFadden, D.

    , 1976. The Revealed Preferences of a Government Bureaucracy: Empirical Evidence. The Bell Journal of Economics 7, 55–72.

    OpenUrlCrossRef
45. 1. Montgomery, W.D.

    , 1972. Markets in licenses and efficient pollution control programs. Journal of economic theory 5, 395–418.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
46. 1. Nadaï, A.

    , 1996. From Environment to Competition—the EU Regulatory Process in Pesticide Regulation, in: Lévêque, F. (Ed.), Environmental Policy in Europe: Industry Competition and the Policy Process. Edward Elgar Publishing, Cheltenham, UK, pp. 53–73.
47. 1. Nolte, C.,
    2. Gobbi, B.,
    3. le Polain de Waroux, Y.,
    4. Piquer-Rodríguez, M.,
    5. Butsic, V.,
    6. Lambin, E.F.

    , 2017. Decentralized Land Use Zoning Reduces Large-scale Deforestation in a Major Agricultural Frontier. Ecological Economics 136, 30–40.

    OpenUrl
48. 1. Oates, W.E.,
    2. Portney, P.R.

    , 2003. The political economy of environmental policy, in: Mäler, K.-G., Vincent, J.R. (Eds.), Handbook of environmental economics. Elsevier, Amsterdam, pp. 325–354.
49. 1. Oliss, P.

    , 1994. Mandatory minimum sentencing: Discretion, the safety valve, and the sentencing guidelines. University of Cincinnati Law Review 63, 1851–1892.

    OpenUrl
50. 1. Owens, D.W.

    , 2004. The Zoning Variance: Reappraisal and Recommendations for Reform of a Much-Maligned Tool. Columbia Journal of Environmental Law 29, 279.

    OpenUrl
51. 1. Pashigian, B.P.

    , 1985. Environmental Regulation: Whose Self-Interests Are Being Protected? Economic Inquiry 23, 551–584.

    OpenUrlWeb of Science
52. 1. Peltzman, S.

    , 1976. Toward a More General Theory of Regulation. The Journal of Law & Economics 19, 211–240.

    OpenUrl
53. 1. Prendergast, C.

    , 2007. The Motivation and Bias of Bureaucrats. American Economic Review 97, 180–196.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
54. 1. Raff, Z.,
    2. Earnhart, D.

    , 2018. Effect of Cooperative Enforcement Strategies on Wastewater Management. Economic Inquiry 56, 1357–1379.

    OpenUrl
55. 1. Schick, A.

    , 1975. The Battle of the Budget. Proceedings of the Academy of Political Science 32, 51–70.

    OpenUrl
56. 1. Shertzer, A.,
    2. Twinam, T.,
    3. Walsh, R.P.

    , 2018. Zoning and the economic geography of cities. Journal of Urban Economics 105, 20–39.

    OpenUrl
57. 1. Sigman, H.

    , 2001. The Pace of Progress at Superfund Sites: Policy Goals and Interest Group Influence. The Journal of Law and Economics 44, 315–343.

    OpenUrl
58. 1. Stavins, R.N.

    , 2007. Market-based environmental policies: what can we learn from US experience (and related research)?, in: J. Freeman and C. D. Kolstad (Ed.), Moving to markets in environmental regulation: Lessons from twenty years of experience. Oxford University Press, New York, pp. 19–47.
59. 1. Stender, B.

    , 2018. When the Exemption Becomes the Rule: Problems That Waterkeeper v. EPA Poses for Advocates of Reporting Requirements and Potential Solutions. Ecology Law Quarterly 45, 395–417.

    OpenUrl
60. 1. Stigler, G.J.

    , 1971. The Theory of Economic Regulation. The Bell Journal of Economics and Management Science 2, 3–21.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
61. 1. Swanson, A.,
    2. Hsu, T.

    , 2018. Companies Get First Tariff Waivers, but Many More Are Left in Limbo, The New York Times. The New York Times Company, New York, NY.
62. 1. Twinam, T.

    , 2018. The long-run impact of zoning: Institutional hysteresis and durable capital in Seattle, 1920–2015. Regional Science and Urban Economics 73, 155–169.

    OpenUrl
63. 1. US Department of Energy

    , 2011. Small Refinery Exemption Study: An Investigation into Disproportionate Economic Hardship. US Department of Energy, Office of Policy and International Affairs.
64. 1. Wilcher, L.S.,
    2. Page, R.W.

    , 1990. Memorandum: Clean Water Act Section 404 Regulatory Program and Agricultural Activities. United States Environmental Protection Agency and United States Department of the Army.
65. 1. Yackee, J.W.,
    2. Yackee, S.W.

    , 2006. A Bias Towards Business? Assessing Interest Group Influence on the U.S. Bureaucracy. The Journal of Politics 68, 128–139.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
66. 1. Yuknis, E.M.

    , 2011. Would a God Squad Exemption under the Endangered Species Act Solve the California Water Crisis? Boston College Environmental Affairs Law Review 38, 567–596.

    OpenUrl
67. 1. Zhang, W.,
    2. Wrenn, D.H.,
    3. Irwin, E.G.

    , 2017. Spatial Heterogeneity, Accessibility, and Zoning: An Empirical Investigation of Leapfrog Development. Journal of Economic Geography 17, 547–570.

    OpenUrl