Photovoltaics and the Solar Rebound: Evidence from Germany

References

1. 1. Altonji, J. G.,
   2. T. E. Elder, and
   3. C. R. Taber

   . 2005. “An Evaluation of Instrumental Variable Strategies for Estimating the Effects of Catholic Schooling.” Journal of Human Resources 40 (4): 791–821.

   OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
2. 1. Anderson, T. W. and
   2. C. Hsiao

   . 1982. “Formulation and Estimation of Dynamic Models Using Panel Data.” Journal of Econometrics 18 (1): 47–82.

   OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
3. 1. Andor, M.,
   2. M. Frondel, and
   3. C. Vance

   . 2015. “Installing Photovoltaics in Germany: A License to Print Money?” Economic Analysis and Policy 48: 106–116.

   OpenUrl
4. 1. Angrist, J.,
   2. V. Lavy, and
   3. A. Schlosser

   . 2010. “Multiple Experiments for the Causal Link Between the Quantity and Quality of Children.” Journal of Labor Economics 28 (4): 773–824.

   OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
5. 1. Arellano, M. and
   2. S. Bond

   . 1991. “Some Tests of Specification for Panel Data: Monte Carlo Evidence and an Application to Employment Equations.” Review of Economic Studies 58 (2): 277–297.

   OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
6. 1. Arellano, M. and
   2. O. Bover

   . 1995. “Another Look at the Instrumental Variable Estimation of Error-Components Models”. Journal of Econometrics 68 (1): 29–51.

   OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
7. 1. Baltagi, Badi H.

   2005. Econometric Analysis of Panel Data. New York: John Wiley & Sons.
8. 1. Barton-Henry, K.,
   2. L. Wenz, and
   3. A. Levermann

   . 2021. “Decay Radius of Climate Decision for Solar Panels in the City of Fresno”, USA. Scientific Reports 11 (1): 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-87714-w.

   OpenUrl
9. BDEW. 2016. Renewable Energies and the EEG: Facts, Figures, Graphics. Plants, Installed Capacity, Power Generation, Market Integration of Renewable Energies, EEG Payments and Regional Distribution of EEG Plants. German Association of Energy and Water Industries. Available at https://www.bdew.de/service/publikationen/energie-info-erneuerbare-energien-und-das-eeg-zahlen-fakten-grafiken-2016/.
10. 1. Beppler, R. C.,
    2. D. C. Matisoff, and
    3. M. E. Oliver

    . 2021. “Electricity Consumption Changes Following Solar Adoption: Testing for a Solar Rebound.” Economic Inquiry.
11. 1. Binswanger, M.

    2001. “Technological Progress and Sustainable Development: What About the Rebound Effect?” Ecological Economics 36 (1): 119–132.

    OpenUrlCrossRef
12. 1. Blackwell, M.,
    2. S. Iacus,
    3. G. King, and
    4. G. Porro

    . 2009. CEM: “Coarsened Exact Matching in Stata.” Stata Journal 9 (4): 524–546.

    OpenUrl
13. 1. Blundell, R. and
    2. S. Bond

    . 1998. “Initial Conditions and Moment Restrictions in Dynamic Panel Data Models.” Journal of Econometrics 87 (1): 115–143.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
14. BMWK. 2014. Market Analysis Photovoltaic Roof Systems. Federal Ministry for Economic Affairs and Climate Action. Available at https://www.bmwk.de/Redaktion/DE/Downloads/M-O/marktanalyse-photovoltaik-dachanlagen.pdf?___blob=publicationFile&v=1.
15. BMWK. 2022. Time Series for the Development of Renewable Energy Sources in Germany. Federal Ministry for Economic Affairs and Climate Action. Available at https://www.erneuerbare-energien.de/EE/Redaktion/DE/Downloads/zeitreihen-zur-entwicklung-der-erneuerbaren-energien-in-deutschland-1990-2021-en.pdf;jsessionid=D2C25443EC59F1EF40564C1AC86DFE4F?_blob=publicationFile&v=17.
16. BNetzA. 2020. EEG Register Data and Reference Values for Payment. Federal Network Agency. Available at https://www.bundesnetzagentur.de/DE/Fachthemen/ElektrizitaetundGas/ErneuerbareEnergien/ZahlenDatenInformationen/EEG_Registerdaten/ArchivDatenMeldgn/start.html.
17. BNetzA and Bundeskartellamt. 2021. Monitoring Report 2020. Federal Network Agency and Federal Cartel Office. Available at https://www.bundesnetzagentur.de/SharedDocs/Downloads/EN/Areas/ElectricityGas/CollectionCompanySpecificData/Monitoring/MonitoringReport2020.pdf;jsessionid=1597E79B64D8B45C0D2C88409772F244?__blob=publicationFile&v=2.
18. 1. Boccard, N. and
    2. A. Gautier

    . 2021. “Solar Rebound: The Unintended Consequences of Subsidies.” Energy Economics 100:105334.
19. 1. Bollinger, B. and
    2. K. Gillingham

    . 2012. “Peer Effects in the Diffusion of Solar Photovoltaic Panels.” Marketing Science 31 (6): 900–912.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
20. 1. Bound, J. and
    2. D. A. Jaeger

    . 2000. “Do Compulsory School Attendance Laws Alone Explain the Association Between Quarter of Birth and Earnings?” Research in Labor Economics 19 (4): 83–108.

    OpenUrlCrossRef
21. 1. Caird, S.,
    2. R. Roy, and
    3. H. Herring

    . 2008. “Improving the Energy Performance of UK Households: Results from Surveys of Consumer Adoption and Use of Low-and Zero-Carbon Technologies.” Energy Efficiency 1 (2): 149–166.

    OpenUrl
22. 1. Cameron, A. C., and
    2. P. K. Trivedi

    . 2005. Microeconometrics: Methods and Applications. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
23. CEER. 2013. Status Review of Renewable and Energy Efficiency Support Schemes in Europe.
24. Council of European Energy Regulators. Available at https://www.ceer.eu/documents/104400/-/-/fb65b156-71a6-b717-a3ec-585b138aa3ae.
25. 1. Chan, N. W. and
    2. K. Gillingham

    . 2015. “The Microeconomic Theory of the Rebound Effect and Its Welfare Implications.” Journal of the Association of Environmental and Resource Economists 2 (1): 133–159.

    OpenUrlCrossRef
26. 1. Clark, A. E.,
    2. E. Diener,
    3. Y. Georgellis, and
    4. R. E. Lucas

    . 2008. “Lags and Leads in Life Satisfaction: A Test of the Baseline Hypothesis.” Economic Journal 118 (529): F222–F243.

    OpenUrl
27. 1. Deng, G. and
    2. P. Newton

    . 2017. “Assessing the Impact of Solar PV on Domestic Electricity Consumption: Exploring the Prospect of Rebound Effects.” Energy Policy 110: 313–324.

    OpenUrl
28. 1. Dusonchet, L. and
    2. E. Telaretti

    . 2015. “Comparative Economic Analysis of Support Policies for Solar PV in the most Representative EU Countries.” Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 42: 986–998.

    OpenUrl
29. 1. Dütschke, E.,
    2. M. Frondel,
    3. J. Schleich, and
    4. C. Vance

    . 2018. “Moral Licensing - Another Source of Rebound?” Frontiers in Energy Research 6 (38): 1–10.

    OpenUrl
30. 1. Ferraro, P. J. and
    2. J. J. Miranda

    . 2017. “Panel Data Designs and Estimators as Substitutes for Randomized Controlled Trials in the Evaluation of Public Programs.” Journal of the Association of Environmental and Resource Economists 4 (1): 281–317.

    OpenUrl
31. 1. Frondel, M.,
    2. A. Gerster, and
    3. C. Vance

    . 2020. “The Power of Mandatory Quality Disclosure: Evidence from the German Housing Market.” Journal of the Association of Environmental and Resource Economists 7 (1): 181–208.

    OpenUrl
32. 1. Frondel, M. and
    2. G. Kussel

    . 2019. „Switching on Electricity Demand Response: Evidence for German households.” Energy Journal 40 (5): 1–15.

    OpenUrl
33. 1. Frondel, M.,
    2. G. Kussel, and
    3. S. Sommer

    . 2019. “Heterogeneity in the Price Response of Residential Electricity Demand: A Dynamic Approach for Germany.” Resource and Energy Economics 57: 119–134.

    OpenUrl
34. 1. Frondel, M.,
    2. F. Martinez Flores, and
    3. C. Vance

    . 2017. “Heterogeneous Rebound Effects in Individual Mobility: Evidence from German Households.” Journal of Transport Economics and Policy 51 (2): 95–114.

    OpenUrl
35. 1. Frondel, M.,
    2. J. Peters, and
    3. C. Vance

    . 2008. “Identifying the Rebound - Evidence from a German Household Panel.” Energy Journal 29 (4): 145–163.

    OpenUrl
36. 1. Frondel, M.,
    2. N. Ritter, and
    3. C. Vance

    . 2012. “Heterogeneity in the Rebound Effect: Further Evidence for Germany.” Energy Economics 34 (2): 461–467.

    OpenUrlCrossRef
37. 1. Frondel, M. and
    2. C. Vance

    . 2013. “Re-Identifying the Rebound: What about Asymmetry?” Energy Journal 34 (4): 43–54.

    OpenUrl
38. GRECS. 2022. “German Residential Energy Consumption Survey (GRECS)” Available at https://www.rwi-essen.de/GRECS/.
39. 1. Greene, William H.

    2012. Econometric Analysis. 7th edition. Harlow: Pearson Education Limited.
40. 1. Havas, L.,
    2. J. Ballweg,
    3. C. Penna, and
    4. D. Race

    . 2015. “Power to Change: Analysis of Household Participation in a Renewable Energy and Energy Efficiency Programme in Central Australia.” Energy Policy 87: 325–333.

    OpenUrl
41. 1. Heckman, J. J.,
    2. H. Ichimura, and
    3. P.E. Todd

    . 1997. “Matching as an Econometric Evaluation Estimator: Evidence from Evaluating a Job Training Programme.” Review of Economic Studies 64 (4): 605–654.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
42. 1. Hondo, H. and
    2. K. Baba

    . 2010. “Socio-Psychological Impacts of the Introduction of Energy Technologies: Change in Environmental Behavior of Households with Photovoltaic Systems.” Applied Energy 87 (1): 229–235.

    OpenUrl
43. 1. Iacus, S. M.,
    2. G. King, and
    3. G. Porro

    . 2012. “Causal Inference without Balance Checking: Coarsened Exact Matching.” Political Analysis 20 (1): 1–24.

    OpenUrlCrossRef
44. ISE. 2021. Recent Facts about Photovoltaics in Germany. Fraunhofer Institute for Solar Energy Systems. Available at https://www.ise.fraunhofer.de/content/dam/ise/en/documents/publications/studies/recent-facts-about-photovoltaics-in-germany.pdf.
45. 1. Jacksohn, A.,
    2. P. Grösche,
    3. K. Rehdanz, and
    4. C. Schröder

    . 2019. “Drivers of Renewable Technology Adoption in the Household Sector.” Energy Economics 81: 216–226.

    OpenUrl
46. 1. Keirstead, J.

    2007. “Behavioural Responses to Photovoltaic Systems in the UK Domestic Sector.” Energy Policy 35 (8): 4128–4141.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
47. 1. Kleibergen, F. and
    2. R. Paap

    . 2006. “Generalized Reduced Rank Tests Using the Singular Value Decomposition.” Journal of Econometrics 133 (1): 97–126.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
48. 1. La Nauze, A.

    2019. “Power From the People: Rooftop Solar and a Downward – Sloping Supply of Electricity.” Journal of the Association of Environmental and Resource Economists 6 (6): 1135–1168.

    OpenUrl
49. 1. Masson, G.,
    2. J. I. Briano, and
    3. M. J. Baez

    . 2016. “Review and Analysis of PV Self-Consumption Policies.” IEA Photovoltaic Power Systems Programme (PVPS) 1 (28).
50. 1. McKenna, E.,
    2. J. Pless, and
    3. S. J. Darby

    . 2018. “Solar Photovoltaic Self-Consumption in the UK Residential Sector: New Estimates from a Smart Grid Demonstration Project.” Energy Policy 118: 482–491.

    OpenUrl
51. 1. Motlagh, O.,
    2. P. Paevere,
    3. T. S. Hong, and
    4. G. Grozev

    . 2015. “Analysis of Household Electricity Consumption Behaviours: Impact of Domestic Electricity Generation.” Applied Mathematics and Computation 270: 165–178.

    OpenUrl
52. 1. Nelson, T.,
    2. P. Simshauser, and
    3. S. Kelley

    . 2011. “Australian Residential Solar Feed-In Tariffs: Industry Stimulus or Regressive Form of Taxation?” Economic Analysis and Policy 41 (2): 113–129.

    OpenUrl
53. 1. Nickell, S.

    1981. “Biases in Dynamic Models with Fixed Effects.” Econometrica 49 (6): 1417–1426.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
54. 1. Nikodinoska, D. and
    2. C. Schröder

    . 2016. “On the Emissions–Inequality and Emissions–Welfare Trade-Offs in Energy Taxation: Evidence on the German Car Fuels Tax.” Resource and Energy Economics 44: 206–233.

    OpenUrl
55. 1. Oberst, C. A.,
    2. H. Schmitz, and
    3. R. Madlener

    . 2019. “Are Prosumer Households that much Different? Evidence from Stated Residential Energy Consumption in Germany.” Ecological Economics 158: 101–115.

    OpenUrl
56. 1. Oliver, M. E.,
    2. J. Moreno-Cruz, and
    3. R. C. Beppler

    . 2019. “Microeconomics of the Rebound Effect for Residential Solar Photovoltaic Systems.” CESifo Working Paper 7635.
57. 1. Qiu, Y. L.,
    2. Kahn, M. E., and
    3. B. Xing

    . 2019. “Quantifying the Rebound Effects of Residential Solar Panel Adoption.” Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 96: 310–341.

    OpenUrl
58. 1. Roodman, David.

    2009a. “A Note on the Theme of Too Many Instruments.” Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics, 71 (1): 135–158.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
59. 1. Roodman, David.

    2009b. “How to do xtabond2: An Introduction to Difference and System GMM in Stata.” Stata Journal 9 (1): 86–136.

    OpenUrl
60. 1. Rosenbaum, P. R. and
    2. D. B. Rubin

    . 1983. “The Central Role of the Propensity Score in Observational Studies for Causal Effects.” Biometrika 70 (1): 41–55.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
61. 1. Rubin, D. B.

    2001. “Using Propensity Scores to Help Design Observational Studies: Application to the Tobacco Litigation.” Health Services and Outcomes Research Methodology 2 (3-4): 169–188.

    OpenUrlCrossRef
62. 1. Ruf, H.

    2018. “Limitations for the Feed-In Power of Residential Photovoltaic Systems in Germany – An Overview of the Regulatory Framework.” Solar Energy 159:588–600.
63. 1. Sekitou, M.,
    2. K. Tanaka, and
    3. S. Managi

    . 2018. “Household Electricity Demand after the Introduction of Solar Photovoltaic Systems.” Economic Analysis and Policy 57: 102–110.

    OpenUrl
64. 1. Smith, J. A., and
    2. P.E. Todd

    . 2005. “Does Matching Overcome Lalonde’s Critique of Nonexperimental Estimators?” Journal of Econometrics 125 (1-2): 305–353.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
65. 1. Spiller, E.,
    2. P. Sopher,
    3. N. Martin,
    4. M. Mirzatuny, and
    5. X. Zhang

    . 2017. “The Environmental Impacts of Green Technologies in TX.” Energy Economics 68: 199–214.

    OpenUrl
66. 1. Stock, J. H. and
    2. M. Yogo

    . 2005. “Testing for Weak Instruments in Linear IV Regression.” In Identification and Inference for Econometric Models: Essays in Honor of Thomas Rothenberg, edited by Donald W.K. Andrews and James H. Stock, 80–108. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
67. 1. Toroghi, S. O. and
    2. M. E. Oliver

    . 2019. “Framework for Assessment of the Direct Rebound Effect for Residential Photovoltaic Systems.” Applied Energy 251: 113391.

    OpenUrl
68. TSO. 2017. “EEG-Facility Master Data. Transmission System Operators.” Transmission System Operators. Available at https://www.netztransparenz.de/EEG/Anlagenstammdaten.
69. TSO. 2019. Medium-Term Forecast for Germany-Wide Electricity Generation from EEG-Supported Power Plants for the Calendar Years 2020 to 2024. Transmission System Operators. Available at https://www.netztransparenz.de/portals/1/2019-10-11_Endbericht_enervis.pdf.
70. 1. van Kippersluis, H. and
    2. C. A. Rietveld

    . 2018. “Beyond Plausibly Exogenous.” The Econometrics Journal 21 (3): 316–331.

    OpenUrl
71. 1. Wooldridge, Jeffrey M.

    2010. Econometric Analysis of Cross Section and Panel Data. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
72. ZSW, Bosch & Partner 2019. Preparation of and Support in The Preparation of a Progress Report in Accordance with Section 97 of the German Renewable Energy Sources Act. Subproject IIC: Solar Radiation Energy - Final Report. Center for Solar Energy and Hydrogen Research Baden-Wuerttemberg. Available at https://www.erneuerbare-energien.de/EE/Redaktion/DE/Downloads/bmwi_de/zsv-boschundpartner-vorbereitung-begleitung-eeg.pdfjsessionid=7895DE13E1D592B3D1571D9F954B4686?blob=publicationFile&v=7.