The demand for public flood protection under a compulsory private flood insurance scheme

References

1. 1. Andor, M.,
   2. Osberghaus, D., &
   3. Simora, M.

   (2020). Natural Disasters and Governmental Aid: Is there a Charity Hazard? Ecological Economics, 169, 106534. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2019.106534

   OpenUrl
2. 1. Atreya, A.,
   2. Ferreira, S., &
   3. Michel-Kerjan, E.

   (2015). What drives households to buy flood insurance? New evidence from Georgia. Ecological Economics, 117(C), 153–161.

   OpenUrl
3. 1. Bin, O.,
   2. Kruse, J. B., &
   3. Landry, C. E.

   (2008). Flood Hazards, Insurance Rates, and Amenities: Evidence From the Coastal Housing Market. Journal of Risk and Insurance, 75(1), 63–82. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1539-6975.2007.00248.x

   OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
4. 1. Borsky, S., &
   2. Hennighausen, H. B.

   (forthcoming). Public flood risk mitigation and the homeowner’s insurance demand response. Land Economics.
5. 1. Botzen, W. J. W.,
   2. Aerts, J. C. J. H., &
   3. van den Bergh, J. C. J. M.

   (2009). Willingness of homeowners to mitigate climate risk through insurance. Ecological Economics, 68(8), 2265–2277. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2009.02.019

   OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
6. 1. Botzen, W. J. W., &
   2. Van Den Bergh, J. C. J. M.

   (2008). Insurance Against Climate Change and Flooding in the Netherlands: Present, Future, and Comparison with Other Countries. Risk Analysis, 28(2), 413–426. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1539-6924.2008.01035.x

   OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
7. 1. Botzen, W. J. W., &
   2. Van Den Bergh, J. C. J. M.

   (2009). Managing natural disaster risks in a changing climate. Environmental Hazards, 8(3), 209–225. https://doi.org/10.3763/ehaz.2009.0023

   OpenUrl
8. 1. Botzen, W. J. W., &
   2. van den Bergh, J. C. J. M.

   (2012). Monatary valuation of insurance against flood risk under climate change. International Economic Review, 53(3), 1005–1025.

   OpenUrlCrossRef
9. 1. Botzen, W. J. W.,
   2. Kunreuther, H., &
   3. Michel-Kerjan, E.

   (2019). Protecting against disaster risks: Why insurance and prevention may be complements. Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, 59(2), 151–169. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11166-019-09312-6

   OpenUrl
10. 1. Carson, R. T., &
    2. Groves, T.

    (2007). Incentive and informational properties of preference questions. Environmental and Resource Economics, 37(1), 181–210. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10640-007-9124-5
11. 1. Carson, R. T., &
    2. Louviere, J. J.

    (2011). A Common Nomenclature for Stated Preference Elicitation Approaches. Environmental and Resource Economics, 49(4), 539–559. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10640-010-9450-x

    OpenUrl
12. 1. Downton, W., &
    2. Pielke, R. A.

    (2001). Discretion without accountability: Politics, flood damage, and climate. Nat. Hazards Rev, 157–166.
13. 1. Eisensee, T., &
    2. Strömberg, D.

    (2007). News Droughts, News Floods, and U. S. Disaster Relief. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 122(2), 693–728.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
14. 1. Entorf, H., &
    2. Jensen, A.

    (2020). Willingness-to-pay for hazard safety – A case study on the valuation of flood risk reduction in Germany. Safety Science, 128, 104657. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssci.2020.104657

    OpenUrl
15. 1. Fan, Q., &
    2. Davlasheridze, M.

    (2016). Flood Risk, Flood Mitigation, and Location Choice: Evaluating the National Flood Insurance Program’s Community Rating System. Risk Analysis, 36(6), 1125–1147. https://doi.org/10.1111/risa.12505

    OpenUrl
16. GDV (2016). 7 Gründe, warum eine Pflichtversicherung gegen Naturgefahren falsch wäre. Gesamtverband der deutschen Versicherungswirtschaft (Association of the German Insurance Industry), https://www.gdv.de/de/themen/news/7-gruende-warum-eine-pflichtversicherung-gegen-naturgefahren-falsch-waere-13552, accessed 17.1.2022.
17. 1. Geys, B.,
    2. Heinemann, F., &
    3. Kalb, A.

    (2010). Voter involvement, fiscal autonomy and public sector efficiency: Evidence from German municipalities. European Journal of Political Economy, 26(2), 265–278. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejpoleco.2009.11.002

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
18. 1. Hole, A. R.

    (2007). Fitting mixed logit models by using maximum simulated likelihood. Stata Journal, 7, 388–401.

    OpenUrl
19. 1. Huber, D., &
    2. Gulledge, J.

    (2011). Extreme Weather and Climate Change: Understanding the Link and Managing the Risk.
20. 1. Hudson, P.,
    2. Botzen, W. J. W.,
    3. Czajkowski, J., &
    4. Kreibich, H.

    (2017). Moral Hazard in Natural Disaster Insurance Markets: Empirical Evidence from Germany and the United States. Land Economics, 93(2), 179–208. https://doi.org/10.3368/le.93.2.179

    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
21. 1. Hudson, P.,
    2. Botzen, W. J. W., &
    3. Aerts, J. C. J. H.

    (2019). Flood insurance arrangements in the European Union for future flood risk under climate and socioeconomic change. Global Environmental Change, 58, 101966. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.GLOENVCHA.2019.101966

    OpenUrl
22. 1. Johnston, R. J.,
    2. Boyle, K. J.,
    3. Vic Adamowicz, W.,
    4. Bennett, J.,
    5. Brouwer, R.,
    6. Ann Cameron, T.,
    7. Michael Hanemann, W.,
    8. Hanley, N.,
    9. Ryan, M.,
    10. Scarpa, R.,
    11. Tourangeau, R., &
    12. Vossler, C. A.

    (2017). Contemporary guidance for stated preference studies. Journal of the Association of Environmental and Resource Economists, 4(2), 319–405. https://doi.org/10.1086/691697

    OpenUrl
23. 1. Kousky, C.

    (2019). The Role of Natural Disaster Insurance in Recovery and Risk Reduction. Annual Review of Resource Economics, 11(1), 399–418. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-resource-100518-094028

    OpenUrl
24. 1. Kousky, C.,
    2. Michel-Kerjan, E. O., &
    3. Raschky, P. A.

    (2018). Does federal disaster assistance crowd out flood insurance? Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 87, 150–164. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeem.2017.05.010

    OpenUrl
25. 1. Kunreuther, H.

    (2006). Disaster Mitigation and Insurance: Learning from Katrina. The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 604(1), 208–227. https://doi.org/10.1177/0002716205285685

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
26. 1. Kriesel, W., &
    2. Landry, C.

    (2004). Participation in the National Flood Insurance Program: An Empirical Analysis for Coastal Properties. The Journal of Risk and Insurance, 71(3), 405–420.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
27. 1. Landry, C. E.,
    2. Turner, D.,
    3. Petrolia, D., &
    4. Turner, D.

    (2021). Flood Insurance Market Penetration and Expectations of Disaster Assistance. Environmental & Resource Economics, 79(2), pages 357–386. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10640-021-00565-x

    OpenUrl
28. 1. Li, J., &
    2. Landry, C. E.

    (2018). Flood Risk, Local Hazard Mitigation, and the Community Rating System of the National Flood Insurance Program. Land Economics, 94(2), 175–198. http://le.uwpress.org/content/94/2/175.abstract

    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
29. 1. Lloyd-Smith, P.,
    2. Schram, C.,
    3. Adamowicz, W., &
    4. Dupont, D.

    (2018). Endogeneity of Risk Perceptions in Averting Behavior Models. Environmental and Resource Economics, 69(2), 217–246. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10640-016-0075-6

    OpenUrl
30. 1. Lloyd-Smith, P.,
    2. Adamowicz, W., &
    3. Dupont, D.

    (2019). Incorporating stated consequentiality questions in stated preference research. Land Economics, 95(3), 293–306. https://doi.org/10.3368/LE.95.3.293

    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
31. 1. Miller, G. J.

    (2005). The Political Evolution of Principal-Agent Models. Annual Review of Political Science, 8(1), 203–225. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.polisci.8.082103.104840

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
32. 1. Miller, S.,
    2. Muir-Wood, R., &
    3. Boissonnade, A.

    (2008). An exploration of trends in normalized weather-related catastrophe losses. In H. F. Diaz & R. J. Murnane (Eds.), Climate Extremes and Society (pp. 225–247). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511535840.015
33. 1. Mol, J. M.,
    2. Botzen, W. J. W., &
    3. Blasch, J. E.

    (2020). Behavioral motivations for selfinsurance under different disaster risk insurance schemes. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, 180, 967–991. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jebo.2018.12.007

    OpenUrl
34. 1. Oulahen, G.

    (2015). Flood Insurance in Canada: Implications for Flood Management and Residential Vulnerability to Flood Hazards. Environmental Management, 55(3). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00267-014-0416-6
35. 1. Osberghaus, D.

    (2015). The determinants of private flood mitigation measures in Germany — Evidence from a nationwide survey. Ecological Economics, 110, 36–50. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2014.12.010

    OpenUrl
36. 1. Osberghaus, D.,
    2. Achtnicht, M.,
    3. Bubeck, P.,
    4. Frondel, M.,
    5. Kükenthal, V. C.,
    6. Larysch, T., &
    7. Thieken, A.

    (2020). Klimawandel in Deutschland: Risikowahrnehmung und Anpassung in privaten Haushalten 2020. https://www.zew.de/publikationen/klimawandel-in-deutschland-risikowahrnehmung-und-anpassung-in-privaten-haushalten-2020
37. 1. Osberghaus, D.

    (2021). Poorly adapted but nothing to lose? A study on the flood risk – income relationship with a focus on low-income households. Climate Risk Management, 31, 100268. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.crm.2020.100268

    OpenUrl
38. 1. Paudel, Y.

    (2012). A Comparative Study of Public—Private Catastrophe Insurance Systems: Lessons from Current Practices. The Geneva Papers on Risk and Insurance - Issues and Practice, 37(2), 257–285. https://doi.org/10.1057/gpp.2012.16

    OpenUrl
39. 1. Potrafke, N.

    (2013). Evidence on the political principal-agent problem from voting on public finance for concert halls. Constitutional Political Economy, 24(3), 215–238. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10602-013-9141-z

    OpenUrl
40. 1. Raschky, P. A.,
    2. Schwarze, R.,
    3. Schwindt, M., &
    4. Zahn, F.

    (2013). Uncertainty of Governmental Relief and the Crowding out of Flood Insurance. Environmental and Resource Economics, 54(2), 179–200. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10640-012-9586-y

    OpenUrl
41. 1. Raschky, P., &
    2. Weck-Hannemann, H.

    (2007). Charity hazard—A real hazard to natural disaster insurance? Environmental Hazards, 7(4), 321–329. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envhaz.2007.09.002

    OpenUrlCrossRef
42. 1. Rojas, R.,
    2. Feyen, L., &
    3. Watkiss, P.

    (2013). Climate change and river floods in the European Union: Socio-economic consequences and the costs and benefits of adaptation. Global Environmental Change, 23(6), 1737–1751. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2013.08.006

    OpenUrl
43. 1. Schwarze, R., &
    2. Wagner, G. G.

    (2007). The political economy of natural disaster insurance: Lessons from the failure of a proposed compulsory insurance scheme in Germany. European Environment, 17(6), 403–415. https://doi.org/10.1002/eet.456

    OpenUrl
44. 1. Seifert, I.,
    2. Botzen, W. J. W.,
    3. Kreibich, H., &
    4. Aerts, J. C. J. H.

    (2013). Influence of flood risk characteristics on flood insurance demand: A comparison between Germany and the Netherlands. Natural Hazards and Earth System Sciences, 13(7), 1691–1705. https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-13-1691-2013

    OpenUrlCrossRef
45. 1. Spegel, E.

    (2017). Valuing the reduction of floods: Public officials’ versus citizens’ preferences. Climate Risk Management, 18, 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.crm.2017.08.003

    OpenUrl
46. 1. Tesselaar, M.,
    2. Botzen, W. J. W.,
    3. Robinson, P. J.,
    4. Aerts, J. C. J. H., &
    5. Zhou, F.

    (2022). Charity hazard and the flood insurance protection gap: An EU scale assessment under climate change. Ecological Economics, 193, 107289. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2021.107289

    OpenUrl
47. 1. Thieken, A. H.,
    2. Petrow, T.,
    3. Kreibich, H., &
    4. Merz, B.

    (2006). Insurability and Mitigation of Flood Losses in Private Households in Germany. Risk Analysis, 26(2), 383–395. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1539-6924.2006.00741.x

    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
48. 1. Tversky, A., &
    2. Kahneman, D.

    (1986). Rational Choice and the Framing of Decisions Rational Choice and the Framing of Decisions. The Journal of Business, 59(4, Part 2), S251–S278.

    OpenUrlCrossRef
49. 1. Vossler, C. A., &
    2. Watson, S. B.

    (2013). Understanding the consequences of consequentiality: Testing the validity of stated preferences in the field. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, 86, 137–147. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jebo.2012.12.007

    OpenUrlCrossRef
50. 1. Winsemius, H. C.,
    2. Aerts, J. C. J. H.,
    3. van Beek, L. P. H.,
    4. Bierkens, M. F. P.,
    5. Bouwman, A.,
    6. Jongman, B.,
    7. Kwadijk, J. C. J.,
    8. Ligtvoet, W.,
    9. Lucas, P. L.,
    10. van Vuuren, D. P., &
    11. Ward, P. J.

    (2016). Global drivers of future river flood risk. Nature Climate Change, 6(4), 381–385. https://doi.org/10.1038/nclimate2893

    OpenUrl
51. 1. Zhai, G.,
    2. Sato, T.,
    3. Fukuzono, T.,
    4. Ikeda, S., &
    5. Yoshida, K.

    (2006). Willingness to Pay for Flood Risk Reduction and its Determinants in Japan. JAWRA Journal of the American Water Resources Association, 42(4), 927–940. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1752-1688.2006.tb04505.x

    OpenUrl