Combining Aggregate Demand and Discrete Choice Data with Application to Deer License Demand in Indiana

References

1. 1. Caudell, J. N. and
   2. O. D. L. Vaught

   . 2019. “Indiana White-Tailed Deer Report.” Department of Natural Resources, Bloomington, Indiana.
2. 1. Dillman, D. A.,
   2. J. D. Smyth, and
   3. L. M. Christian

   . 2014. Internet, Phone, Mail, and Mixed-Mode Surveys: The Tailored Design Method. Fourth ed. Wiley: Hoboken, New Jersey.
3. 1. Erickson, D. C. Reeling, and
   2. J. G. Lee

   . 2019. “The Effect of Chronic Wasting Disease on Resident Deer Hunting License Demand in Wisconsin.” Animals 9(12):1096.

   OpenUrl
4. 1. Greene, W.H.

   2012. Econometric Analysis. 7 ed. Pearson: Boston.
5. 1. Hausman, J. and
   2. D. McFadden

   . 1984. “Specification Tests for the Multinomial Logit Model.” Econometrica 52(5):1219–1240.

   OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
6. 1. Holmes, T.P. and
   2. W. L Adamowicz

   . 2003. “Attribute-Based Methods.” In Champ, P.A., K.J. Boyle, and T.C. Brown (Eds.) A Primer on Nonmarket Valuation. Kluwer: Dordrecht.
7. 1. Imbens, G. W., and
   2. T. Lancaster

   . 1994. “Combining Micro and Macro Data in Microeconometric Models.” The Review of Economic Studies 61(4): 655–680.

   OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
8. 1. Klaiber, H.A. and
   2. R.H. von Haefen

   . 2019. “Do Random Coefficients and Alternative Specific Constants Improve Policy Analysis? An Empirical Investigation of Model Fit and Prediction.” Environmental and Resource Economics 73:75–91.

   OpenUrl
9. 1. Loomis, J.,
   2. C. Pierce, and
   3. M. Manfredo

   . 2000. “Using the Demand for Hunting Licenses to Evaluation Contingent Valuation Estimates of Willingness to Pay.” Applied Economics Letters 7(7):435–438.

   OpenUrl
10. 1. Louviere, J.J.,
    2. D.A. Hensher, and
    3. J.D. Swait

    . 2000. Stated Choice Methods: Analysis and Application. Cambridge University Press.
11. 1. Mackenzie, J.

    1990. “Conjoint Analysis of Deer Hunting.” Northeastern Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics 19(2):109–117.

    OpenUrl
12. 1. Michaud, H.H.

    1957. “History of the Early Development of Game Regulations in Indiana.” Proceedings of the Indiana Academy of Science 67:256–259.

    OpenUrl
13. 1. Mingie, J.C.,
    2. N.C. Poudyal,
    3. J.M. Bowker,
    4. M.T. Mengak, and
    5. J.P. Siry

    . 2017. “Big Game Hunter Preferences for Hunting Club Attributes: A Choice Experiment.” Forest Policy and Economics 78:98–106.

    OpenUrl
14. 1. Naidoo, R. and
    2. W. Adamowicz

    . 2005. “Biodiversity and Nature-Based Tourism at Forest Reserves in Uganda.” Environment and Development Economics 10(2):159–178.

    OpenUrl
15. 1. Phaneuf, D.J.,
    2. L.O. Taylor, and
    3. J.B. Braden

    . 2013. “Combining Revealed and Stated Preference Data to Estimate Preferences for Residential Amenities: A GMM Approach.” Land Economics 89(1):30–52.

    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
16. SAS Institute, Inc. 2014. SAS/QC® 13.2 User’s Guide. SAS Institute, Inc.: Cary, NC
17. 1. Serenari, C.,
    2. J. Shaw,
    3. R. Myers, and
    4. D.T. Cobb

    . 2019. “Explaining Deer Hunter Preferences for Regulatory Changes using Choice Experiments.” The Journal of Wildlife Management 83(2):446–456.

    OpenUrl
18. 1. Schroeder, S.A.,
    2. D.C. Fulton,
    3. L. Cornicelli, and
    4. S.S. Merchant

    . 2018. “Discrete Choice Modeling of Season Choice for Minnesota Turkey Hunters.” The Journal of Wildlife Management 82(2):457–465.

    OpenUrl
19. 1. Train, K.E.

    2009. Discrete Choice Methods with Simulation (2^nd ed.). Cambridge University Press.
20. 1. Vossler, C.A.,
    2. M. Doyon, and
    3. D. Rondeau

    . 2012. “Truth in Consequentiality: Theory and Field Evidence on Discrete Choice Experiments.” American Economic Journal: Microeconomics 4(4):145–171.

    OpenUrlCrossRef
21. 1. Whitehead, J.C.,
    2. S.K. Pattanayak,
    3. G.L. Van Houtven, and
    4. B.R. Gelso

    . 2008. “Combining Revealed and Stated Preference Data to Estimate the Nonmarket Value of Ecological Services: An Assessment of the State of the Science.” Journal of Economic Surveys 22(5):872–908.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science