Taxation, Fiscal Redistribution and Local Land Use Regulation

References

1. 1. Agrawal, David R

   (2015). “The tax gradient: Spatial aspects of fiscal competition”. American Economic Journal: Economic Policy 7.2, pp. 1–29.

   OpenUrl
2. 1. Agrawal, David R,
   2. William H Hoyt, and
   3. John Douglas Wilson

   (2022). “Local policy choice: theory and empirics”. Journal of Economic Literature 60.4, pp. 1378–1455.

   OpenUrl
3. 1. Agrawal, David R and
   2. Gregory A Trandel

   (2019). “Dynamics of policy adoption with state dependence”. Regional Science and Urban Economics 79, p. 103471.

   OpenUrl
4. 1. Anas, Alex and
   2. Hyok-Joo Rhee

   (2006). “Curbing excess sprawl with congestion tolls and urban boundaries”. Regional Science and Urban Economics 36.4, pp. 510–541.

   OpenUrlCrossRef
5. 1. Blöchliger, Hansjörg et al.

   (2017). “Local taxation, land use regulation, and land use: A survey of the evidence”. OECD Economics Department Working Papers.
6. 1. Brueckner, Jan K

   (1995). “Strategic control of growth in a system of cities”. Journal of Public Economics 57.3, pp. 393–416.

   OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
7. 1. Brueckner, Jan K

   (1998). “Testing for strategic interaction among local governments: The case of growth controls”. Journal of Urban Economics 44.3, pp. 438–467.

   OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
8. 1. Brueckner, Jan K

   (2000). “Urban sprawl: diagnosis and remedies”. International Regional Science Review 23.2, pp. 160–171.

   OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
9. 1. Brueckner, Jan K and
   2. Hyun-A Kim

   (2003). “Urban sprawl and the property tax”. International Tax and Public Finance 10.1, pp. 5–23.

   OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
10. 1. Bucovetsky, Sam and
    2. Michael Smart

    (2006). “The efficiency consequences of local revenue equalization: Tax competition and tax distortions”. Journal of Public Economic Theory 8.1, pp. 119–144.

    OpenUrlCrossRef
11. 1. Buettner, Thiess

    (2001). “Local business taxation and competition for capital: the choice of the tax rate”. Regional Science and Urban Economics 31.2-3, pp. 215–245.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
12. 1. Buettner, Thiess

    (2006). “The incentive effect of fiscal equalization transfers on tax policy”. Journal of Public Economics 90.3, pp. 477–497.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
13. 1. Buettner, Thiess,
    2. Wolfram Scheffler, and
    3. Axel von Schwerin

    (2014). “Die Hebesatzpolitik bei der Gewerbesteuer nach den Unternehmensteuerreformen”. Perspektiven der Wirtschaftspolitik 15.4, pp. 346–354.

    OpenUrl
14. 1. Burchfield, Marcy et al.

    (2006). “Causes of sprawl: A portrait from space”. The Quarterly Journal of Economics 121.2, pp. 587–633.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
15. 1. Calonico, Sebastian,
    2. Matias D Cattaneo, and
    3. Max H Farrell

    (2020). “Optimal bandwidth choice for robust bias-corrected inference in regression discontinuity designs”. Econometrics Journal 23.2, pp. 192–210.

    OpenUrl
16. 1. Calonico, Sebastian,
    2. Matias D Cattaneo, and
    3. Rocio Titiunik

    (2014). “Robust data-driven inference in the regression-discontinuity design”. Stata Journal 14.4, pp. 909–946.

    OpenUrl
17. 1. Cattaneo, Matias D,
    2. Michael Jansson, and
    3. Xinwei Ma

    (2020). “Simple local polynomial density estimators”. Journal of the American Statistical Association 115.531, pp. 1449–1455.

    OpenUrl
18. 1. Dahlby, Bev and
    2. Ergete Ferede

    (2016). “The stimulative effects of intergovernmental grants and the marginal cost of public funds”. International Tax and Public Finance 23.1, pp. 114–139.

    OpenUrl
19. 1. Dahlby, Bev and
    2. Neil Warren

    (2003). “Fiscal incentive effects of the Australian equalisation system”. Economic Record 79.247, pp. 434–445.

    OpenUrlCrossRef
20. 1. Egger, Peter,
    2. Marko Koethenbuerger, and
    3. Michael Smart

    (2010). “Do fiscal transfers alleviate business tax competition? Evidence from Germany”. Journal of Public Economics 94.3-4, pp. 235–246.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
21. 1. Eugster, Beatrix and
    2. Raphaël Parchet

    (2019). “Culture and taxes”. Journal of Political Economy 127.1, pp. 296–337.

    OpenUrl
22. Federal Government (Bundesregierung) (2016). German Sustainable Development Strategy. Tech. rep. Berlin.
23. 1. Ferede, Ergete

    (2017). “The incentive effects of equalization grants on tax policy: Evidence from Canadian provinces”. Public Finance Review 45.6, pp. 723–747.

    OpenUrl
24. 1. Gelman, Andrew and
    2. Guido Imbens

    (2019). “Why High-Order Polynomials Should Not Be Used in Regression Discontinuity Designs”. Journal of Business & Economic Statistics 37.3, pp. 447–456.

    OpenUrl
25. 1. Götze, Vera and
    2. Thomas Hartmann

    (2021). “Why municipalities grow: The influence of fiscal incentives on municipal land policies in Germany and the Netherlands”. Land Use Policy 109, p. 1056–81.

    OpenUrl
26. 1. Gunlicks, Arthur

    (2003). The Länder and German Federalism. Manchester University Press.
27. 1. Han, Li and
    2. James Kai-Sing Kung

    (2015). “Fiscal incentives and policy choices of local governments: Evidence from China”. Journal of Development Economics 116, pp. 89–104.

    OpenUrl
28. 1. Hansen, Benjamin,
    2. Keaton Miller, and
    3. Caroline Weber

    (2020). “Federalism, partial prohibition, and cross-border sales: evidence from recreational marijuana”. Journal of Public Economics 187, p. 104–159.

    OpenUrl
29. 1. Hindriks, Jean,
    2. Susana Peralta, and
    3. Shlomo Weber

    (2008). “Competing in taxes and investment under fiscal equalization”. Journal of Public Economics 92.12, pp. 2392–2402.

    OpenUrl
30. 1. Isen, Adam

    (2014). “Do local government fiscal spillovers exist? Evidence from counties, municipalities, and school districts”. Journal of Public Economics 110, pp. 57–73.

    OpenUrl
31. 1. Keen, Michael and
    2. Kai A Konrad

    (2013). “The theory of international tax competition and coordination”. Handbook of Public Economics 5, pp. 257–328.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
32. 1. Köthenbürger, Marko

    (2002). “Tax competition and fiscal equalization”. International Tax and Public Finance 9.4, pp. 391–408.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
33. 1. Langer, Sebastian and
    2. Artem Korzhenevych

    (2018). “The effect of industrial and commercial land consumption on municipal tax revenue: Evidence from Bavaria”. Land Use Policy 77, pp. 279–287.

    OpenUrl
34. 1. Lee, David S and
    2. Thomas Lemieux

    (2010). “Regression discontinuity designs in economics”. Journal of Economic Literature 48.2, pp. 281–355.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
35. 1. Matheson, Thornton

    (2005). “Does fiscal redistribution discourage local public investment? Evidence from transitional Russia”. Economics of Transition 13.1, pp. 139–162.

    OpenUrl
36. 1. McCrary, Justin

    (2008). “Manipulation of the running variable in the regression discontinuity design: A density test”. Journal of Econometrics 142.2, pp. 698–714.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
37. 1. Melchiorri, Michele et al.

    (2019). “Principles and applications of the global human settlement layer as baseline for the land use efficiency indicator SDG 11.3.1”. ISPRS International Journal of Geo-Information 8.2, pp. 95–115.

    OpenUrl
38. Ministry of Finance of Bavaria (Bayerisches Staatsministerium der Finanzen) (2022). “Der kommunale Finanzausgleich in Bayern”.
39. 1. Nechyba, Thomas J and
    2. Randall P Walsh

    (2004). “Urban sprawl”. Journal of Economic Perspectives 18.4, pp. 177–200.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
40. 1. Nilsson, Kjell et al.

    (2013). “Introduction”. Periurban futures: Scenarios and models for land use change in Europe. Ed. by Kjell Nilsson et al. Springer Science & Business Media, pp. 1–12.
41. 1. Oates, Wallace E and
    2. Robert M Schwab

    (1988). “Economic competition among jurisdictions: efficiency enhancing or distortion inducing?” Journal of Public Economics 35.3, pp. 333–354.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
42. 1. Quigley, John M and
    2. Larry A Rosenthal

    (2005). “The effects of land use regulation on the price of housing: What do we know? What can we learn?” Cityscape, pp. 69–137.
43. 1. Smart, Michael

    (2007). “Raising taxes through equalization”. Canadian Journal of Economics/Revue Canadienne d’Économique 40.4, pp. 1188–1212.

    OpenUrl
44. 1. Song, Yan and
    2. Yves Zenou

    (2006). “Property tax and urban sprawl: Theory and implications for US cities”. Journal of Urban Economics 60.3, pp. 519–534.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
45. 1. Taugourdeau, Emmanuelle and
    2. Abderrahmane Ziad

    (2011). “On the existence of Nash equilibria in an asymmetric tax competition game”. Regional Science and Urban Economics 41.5, pp. 439–445.

    OpenUrl
46. 1. Tiebout, Charles M

    (1956). “A pure theory of local expenditures”. Journal of Political Economy 64.5, pp. 416–424.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
47. 1. Wassmer, Robert W

    (2002). “Fiscalisation of land use, urban growth boundaries and non-central retail sprawl in the western United States”. Urban Studies 39.8, pp. 1307–1327.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
48. 1. Wildasin, David

    (1986). Urban Public Finance. Harwood.
49. 1. Wilson, John Douglas

    (1991). “Tax competition with interregional differences in factor endowments”. Regional Science and Urban Economics 21.3, pp. 423–451.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
50. 1. Wilson, John Douglas

    (1999). “Theories of tax competition”. National Tax Journal, pp. 269–304.