Estimating the Impact of Critical-Habitat Designation on the Values of Developed and Undeveloped Parcels

References

1. 1. Angrist, J., and
   2. J.-S. Pischke

   . 2009. Mostly Harmless Econometrics. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
2. 1. Ardeshiri, Ali,
   2. Ken Willis, and
   3. Mahyar Ardeshiri

   . 2018. “Exploring Preference Homogeneity and Heterogeneity for Proximity to Urban Public Services.” Cities 81: 190–202. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2018.04.008.

   OpenUrl
3. 1. Armstrong, A.

   2002. “Critical Habitat Designations under the Endangered Species Act: Giving Meaning to the Requirements for Habitat Protection.” South Carolina Environmental Law Journal 10: 53.

   OpenUrl
4. 1. Armsworth, Paul R.,
   2. Gretchen C. Daily,
   3. Peter Kareiva, and
   4. James N. Sanchirico

   . 2006. “Land Market Feedbacks Can Undermine Biodiversity Conservation.” PNAS 103 (14): 5403–8. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0505278103.

   OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
5. 1. Auffhammer, Maximilian,
   2. Maya Duru,
   3. Edward Rubin, and
   4. David L. Sunding

   . 2020. “The Economic Impact of Critical-Habitat Designation: Evidence from Vacant-Land Transactions.” Land Economics 96 (2): 188–206. https://doi.org/10.3368/le.96.2.188.

   OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
6. 1. Bishop, Kelly C.,
   2. Nicolai V. Kuminoff,
   3. H. Spencer Banzhaf,
   4. Kevin J. Boyle,
   5. Kathrine von Gravenitz,
   6. Jaren C. Pope,
   7. V. Kerry Smith, and
   8. Christopher D. Timmins

   . “Best practices for using hedonic property value models to measure willingness to pay for environmental quality.” Review of Environmental Economics and Policy (2020).
7. 1. Black, Katie Jo.

   2018. “Wide Open Spaces: Estimating the Willingness to Pay for Adjacent Preserved Open Space.” Regional Science and Urban Economics 71: 110–21. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.regsciurbeco.2018.06.001.

   OpenUrl
8. 1. Bošković, Branko, and
   2. Linda Nøstbakken

   . 2017. “The Cost of Endangered Species Protection: Evidence from Auctions for Natural Resources.” Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 81: 174–92.

   OpenUrl
9. 1. Callaway, Brantly, and
   2. Pedro H. C. Sant’Anna

   . 2019. “Difference-in-Differences with Multiple Time Periods.” http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3148250.
10. 1. De Chaisemartin, C., and
    2. X. d’Haultfoeuille

    . 2020. “Two-Way Fixed Effects Estimators with Heterogeneous Treatment Effects.” American Economic Review 110 (9): 2964–96.

    OpenUrlCrossRef
11. Colorado Natural Heritage Program. 2019. The Colorado Ownership, Management and Protection Map (COMaP). https://comap.cnhp.colostate.edu.
12. 1. Cunningham, Scott.

    2021. Causal Inference. The Mixtape. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
13. 1. Dahal, Ram P.,
    2. Robert K. Grala,
    3. Jason S. Gordon,
    4. Ian A. Munn,
    5. Daniel R. Petrolia, and
    6. J. Reid Cummings

    . 2019. “A Hedonic Pricing Method to Estimate the Value of Waterfronts in the Gulf of Mexico.” Urban Forestry & Urban Greening 41: 185–94. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ufug.2019.04.004.

    OpenUrl
14. 1. Daw, J. R., and
    2. L. A. Hatfield

    . 2018. “Matching and Regression to the Mean in Difference-in-Differences Analysis.” Health Services Research 53 (6): 4138–56. https://doi.org/10.1111/1475-6773.12993.

    OpenUrlPubMed
15. Endangered Species Act of 1973, As Amended through the 108th Congress. (n.d.). 44.
16. ESRI. 2009. North America Water Polygons. https://hub.arcgis.com/datasets/esri::usa-detailed-water-bodies/explore?location=31.308641%2C-113.614487%2C4.59.
17. 1. Ferraro, P. J., &
    2. Miranda, J. J.

    (2017). Panel data designs and estimators as substitutes for randomized controlled trials in the evaluation of public programs. Journal of the Association of Environmental and Resource Economists, 4(1), 281–317.

    OpenUrl
18. 1. Fois, M.,
    2. G. Fenu, and
    3. G. Bacchetta

    . 2019. “Estimating Land Market Values from Real Estate Offers: A Replicable Method in Support of Biodiversity Conservation Strategies.” Ambio 48: 313–23. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13280-018-1074-3.

    OpenUrl
19. 1. Fosburgh, Kate.

    2022. Economic Analysis of the Critical Habitat Designation Process for Endangered and Threatened Species Under the Endangered Species Act of 1973. Bowdoin College Honors Project. https://digitalcommons.bowdoin.edu/honorsprojects/329/
20. 1. Garibaldi, L. A.,
    2. F. J. Oddi,
    3. F. E. Miguez

    , et al. 2021. “Working Landscapes Need at Least 20% Native habitat.” Conservation Letters 14 (2): e12773. https://doi.org/10.1111/conl.12773.

    OpenUrl
21. 1. Geoghegan, Jacqueline.

    2002. “The Value of Open Spaces in Residential Land Use.” Land Use Policy 19 (1): 91–98. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0264-8377(01)00040-0.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
22. 1. Geoghegan, Jacqueline,
    2. Lisa A. Wainger,
    3. Nancy E. Bockstael

    . 1997. Spatial landscape indices in a hedonic framework: an ecological economics analysis using GIS. Ecological Economics 23 (3): 251–264. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0921-8009(97)00583-1.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
23. 1. Goodman-Bacon, Andrew.

    2018. “Difference-in-Differences with Variation in Treatment Timing.” NBER Working Paper No. 25018, National Bureau of Economic Research, Cambridge, MA, September.
24. 1. Gonzalez, Robert M.

    2021. Cell Phone Access and Election Fraud: Evidence from a Spatial Regression Discontinuity Design in Afghanistan. American Economic Journal: Applied Economics 13:2, 1–51.

    OpenUrl
25. 1. Hanley, Nick,
    2. Simanti Banerjee,
    3. Gareth D. Lennox,
    4. Paul R. Armsworth

    . 2012. “How Should We Incentivize Private Landowners to ‘Produce’ More Biodiversity?” Oxford Review of Economic Policy 28 (1): 93–113. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxrep/grs002.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
26. Harvard Forest. 2020. New England Protected Open Space.
27. 1. Homer, C.,
    2. J. Dewitz,
    3. L. Yang,
    4. S. Jin,
    5. P. Danielson,
    6. G. Xian,
    7. J. Coulston,
    8. N. Herold,
    9. J. Wickham, and
    10. K. Megown

    . 2015. “Completion of the 2011 National Land Cover Database for the Conterminous United States—Representing a Decade of Land Cover Change Information.” Photogramm. Eng. Remote Sensing 81: 345–54.

    OpenUrl
28. 1. Kiel, K.

    2005. “Environmental Regulations and the Housing Market: A Review of the Literature.” Cityscape 8 (1): 187–207. https://www.jstor.org/stable/20868574.

    OpenUrl
29. 1. Klick, Jonathan, and
    2. J. B. Ruhl

    . 2020. “The Costs of Critical Habitat or Owl’s Well That Ends Well.” Faculty Scholarship at Penn Law 2231. https://scholarship.law.upenn.edu/faculty_scholarship/2231.
30. 1. Kling, R.W.,
    2. T. S. Findley,
    3. E. Gahramanov

    , et al. 2015. “Hedonic Valuation of Land Protection Methods: Implications for Cluster Development.” Journal of Economics and Finance 39: 782–806. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12197-014-9279-1.

    OpenUrl
31. 1. Kolstad, Charles D., and
    2. Frances C. Moore

    . 2020. “Estimating the Economic Impacts of Climate Change Using Weather Observations.” Review of Environmental Economics and Policy 14 (1): 1–24.

    OpenUrl
32. 1. Kremen, Claire, and
    2. Adina M. Merenlender

    . 2018. “Landscapes That Work for Biodiversity and People.” Science 362 (6412): eaau6020.

    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
33. 1. Langpap, C.

    (2022). Interest Groups, Litigation, and Agency Decisions: Evidence from the Endangered Species Act. Journal of the Association of Environmental and Resource Economists, 9(1), 1–26. https://doi.org/10.1086/715813

    OpenUrl
34. 1. List, J. A.,
    2. M. Margolis, and
    3. D. E. Osgood

    . 2006. “Is the Endangered Species Act Endangering Species?” NBER Working Paper No. 12777, National Bureau of Economic Research, Cambridge, MA.
35. 1. Ma, S., and
    2. S. M. Swinton

    . 2012. “Hedonic Valuation of Farmland Using Sale Prices versus Appraised Values.” Land Economics 88 (1): 1–15.

    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
36. 1. Melstrom, R. T.

    2021. “The Effect of Land Use Restrictions Protecting Endangered Species on Agricultural Land Values.” American Journal of Agricultural Economics 103: 162–84. https://doi.org/10.1111/ajae.12127.

    OpenUrl
37. Microsoft. 2018. US Building Footprints. Accessed February 2, 2020. https://github.com/microsoft/USBuildingFootprints.
38. 1. Morancho, Aurelia Bengochea.

    2003. “A Hedonic Valuation of Urban Green Areas.” Landscape and Urban Planning 66 (1): 35–41

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
39. 1. Newburn, David A. and
    2. Peter Berck

    . 2006. Modeling Suburban and Rural-Residential Development Beyond the Urban Fringe. Land Economics Nov 2006, 82 (4) 481–499; DOI: 10.3368/le.82.4.481

    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
40. 1. Nolte, C.

    2020. “High-Resolution Land Value Maps Reveal Underestimation of Conservation Costs in the United States.” Proceedings of the National Academy of Science 117: 29577–29583.

    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
41. 1. Nolte, C.,
    2. K. Boyle,
    3. A. Chaudhry,
    4. C. Clapp,
    5. D. Guignet,
    6. H. Hennighausen,
    7. I. Kushner,
    8. Y. Liao

    . 2023. “Studying the Impacts of Environmental Amenities and Hazards with Nationwide Property Data: Best Data Practices for Interpretable and Reproducible Analyses.” This issue (Also available from SSRN: https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=3900806.)
42. 1. Quigley, John M., and
    2. Aaron M. Swoboda

    . 2007. “The Urban Impacts of the Endangered Species Act: A General Equilibrium Analysis.” Journal of Urban Economics 61 (2): 299–318.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
43. 1. Sander, Heather,
    2. Stephen Polasky, and
    3. Robert G. Haight

    . 2010. “The Value of Urban Tree Cover: A Hedonic Property Price Model in Ramsey and Dakota Counties, Minnesota, USA.” Ecological Economics 69 (8): 1646–56.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
44. 1. Sander, H. A., and
    2. S. Polasky

    . 2009. “The Value of Views and Open Space: Estimates from a Hedonic Pricing Model for Ramsey County, Minnesota, USA.” Land Use Policy 26 (3): 837–45.

    OpenUrlCrossRef
45. 1. Seo, Kihwan,
    2. Aaron Golub, and
    3. Michael Kuby

    . 2014. “Combined Impacts of Highways and Light Rail Transit on Residential Property Values: A Spatial Hedonic Price Model for Phoenix, Arizona.” Journal of Transport Geography 41: 53–62. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2014.08.003.

    OpenUrl
46. 1. Shenoy, Ajay.

    2018. Regional development through place-based policies: Evidence from a spatial discontinuity. Journal of Development Economics 130, 173–189.

    OpenUrl
47. 1. Sunding, David L.

    2003. “Economic Impacts of Critical Habitat Designation for the Coastal California Gnatcatcher.” California Resource Management Institute Working Paper, California Resource Management Institute.
48. 1. Sunding, D.,
    2. A. Swoboda, and
    3. D. Zilberman

    . 2003. “The Economic Costs of Critical Habitat Designation: Framework and Application to the Case of California Vernal Pools.” California Resource Management Institute.
49. Trust for Public Land & Ducks Unlimited. 2020. The National Conservation Easement Database https://www.conservationeasement.us/.
50. US Census Bureau (USCB). 2019. 2019 TIGER/Line Shapefiles. https://www.census.gov/cgi-bin/geo/shapefiles/index.php.
51. US Department of the Interior. US Fish and Wildlife Service (USDOIFWS). 2000. Endangered and Threatened Wildlife and Plants; Proposed Determination of Critical Habitat for the Peninsular Bighorn Sheep. Proposed rule. 65 Federal Register 129 (July 5).
52. US Department of the Interior. US Fish and Wildlife Service (USDOIFWS). 2001. Endangered and Threatened Wildlife and Plants; Final Determination of Critical Habitat for Peninsular Bighorn Sheep. Final rule. 66 Federal Register 22 (February 1).
53. US Department of the Interior. US Fish and Wildlife Service (USDOIFWS). 2005. Endangered and Threatened Wildlife and Plants; Designation of Critical Habitat for the Pacific Coast Population of the Western Snowy Plover. Final rule. 70 Federal Register 188 (September 29).
54. US Department of the Interior. US Fish and Wildlife Service (USDOIFWS). 2008. Endangered and Threatened Wildlife and Plants; Designation of Critical Habitat for the Peninsular Ranges Population of Desert Bighorn Sheep (Ovis canadensis nelsoni). Proposed rule. 73 Federal Register 166 (August 26).
55. US Department of the Interior. US Fish and Wildlife Service (USDOIFWS). 2009. Endangered and Threatened Wildlife and Plants; Designation of Critical Habitat for Peninsular Bighorn Sheep and Determination of a Distinct Population Segment of Desert Bighorn Sheep. Final rule. 74 Federal Register 70 (April 14).
56. US Department of the Interior. US Fish and Wildlife Service (USDOIFWS). 2013. Endangered and Threatened Wildlife and Plants; Designation of Critical Habitat for Gunnison Sage-Grouse. Proposed Rule. 78 Federal Register 8 (January 11).
57. US Department of the Interior. US Fish and Wildlife Service (USDOIFWS). 2014. Endangered and Threatened Wildlife and Plants; Designation of Critical Habitat for Gunnison Sage-Grouse. Final rule. 79 Federal Register 224 (November 20).
58. US Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS). 2017. Critical Habitat. What Is It? https://www.fws.gov/endangered/esa-library/pdf/critical_habitat.pdf.
59. US Fish and Wildlife Service. (USFWS). 2018. National Wetlands Inventory: Seamless Wetlands Data. https://www.fws.gov/wetlands/data/data-download.html.
60. US Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS). 2021A. Proposed critical habitat and draft economic analysis for yellow lance mussel. Frequently Asked Questions. https://www.fws.gov/story/2021-02/proposed-critical-habitat-and-draft-economic-analysis-yellow-lance-mussel
61. US Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS). 2021B. USFWS Refined Range Maps for Threatened and Endangered Species. Accessed February 19, 2021. https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/report/table/critical-habitat.html.
62. US Geological Survey (USGS) 2017a. National Elevation Dataset. https://lta.cr.usgs.gov/NED.
63. US Geological Survey. (USGS) 2017b. National Hydrography Dataset (NHD) USGS National Map. https://nhd.usgs.gov/NHD_High_Resolution.html.
64. US Geological Survey (USGS). 2018. Protected Areas Database of the United States (PAD-US).
65. 1. Wallace, James E.

    1995. “Financing Affordable Housing in the United States.” Housing Policy Debate 6 (4): 785–814.

    OpenUrl
66. 1. Wentland, Scott A.,
    2. Zachary H. Ancona,
    3. Kenneth J. Bagstad,
    4. James Boyd,
    5. Julie L. Hass,
    6. Marina Gindelsky,
    7. Jeremy G. Moulton

    . 2020. Accounting for land in the United States: Integrating physical land cover, land use, and monetary valuation. Ecosystem Services 46: 101178. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoser.2020.101178.

    OpenUrlCrossRef
67. 1. Wu, J.,
    2. R. M. Adams, and
    3. A. J. Plantinga

    . 2004. “Amenities in an Urban Equilibrium Model: Residential Development in Portland, Oregon.” Land Economics 80 (1): 19–32.

    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
68. 1. Yagerman, Katherine Simmons.

    1990. “Protecting Critical Habitat under the Federal Endangered Species Act.” Environmental Law 20 (4): 811.

    OpenUrl
69. 1. Zabel, J. E.,
    2. Paterson, R.

    , 2006. “The Effects of Critical Habitat Designation on Housing Supply: An Analysis of California Housing Construction Activity.” Journal of Regional Science 46 (1): 67–95.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
70. Zillow. 2019. ZTRAX: Zillow Transaction and Assessor Dataset, 2019-Q4. http://www.zillow.com/ztrax.