Income Elasticity of Willingness to Pay for Better Air Quality

Reference

1. 1. Aaron, H. and
   2. M. McGuire

   (1970). Public goods and income distribution. Econometrica 38:907–919.

   OpenUrlCrossRef
2. 1. Ahtiainen, H.,
   2. J. Artell,
   3. M. Czajkowski,
   4. B. Hasler,
   5. L. Hasselström,
   6. A. Huhtala,
   7. J. Meyerhoff,
   8. JCR. Smart,
   9. T. Söderqvist,
   10. KH Alemu,
   11. D. Angeli,
   12. K. Sahlbo,
   13. V. Fleming-Lehtinen,
   14. K. Hyytiäinen,
   15. A. Karloseva,
   16. Y. Khaleeva,
   17. M. Maar,
   18. L. Martisen,
   19. T. Nommann,
   20. K. Pakalniete,
   21. I. Oskolokaite,
   22. D. Semeniene

   (2014). Benefits of meeting nutrient reduction targets for the Baltic Sea: A contingent valuation study in the nice costal states. Journal of Environmental Economics and Policy, 3(3): 1–28.

   OpenUrl
3. 1. Anderson, G.,
   2. Hao, T. and
   3. Pittau, M.G.

   (2019) More unequal yet more alike, the changing patterns of family formation, generational mobility and household income inequality in China: a counter-factual analysis. The Journal of Economic Inequality 17(3), 359–378.

   OpenUrl
4. 1. Barbier, E. B.,
   2. M. Czajkowski and
   3. N. Hanley

   (2017). Is the income elasticity of the willingness to pay for pollution control constant? Environmental and Resource Economics. 68(2017): 663–682.
5. 1. Bartik, T. J.

   (1988). Evaluating the benefits of non-marginal reductions in pollution using information on defensive expenditure. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management. 15: 111–127.

   OpenUrlCrossRef
6. 1. Barton, D. N.

   (2002) The transferability of benefit transfer: contingent valuation of water quality improvement in Costa Rica, Ecological Economics. 43 (1-2): 147–164.

   OpenUrl
7. 1. Baumgartner, S.,
   2. M. A. Drupp,
   3. J. N. Meya,
   4. J. M. Nunz and
   5. M. F. Quaas

   (2017). Income inequality and willingness to pay for environmental public goods. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management. 85 (2017): 35–61.

   OpenUrl
8. 1. Bergstrom, T.C. and
   2. R. P. Goodman

   (1973). Private demand for public goods. American Economic Review, 63(1973): 280–296.

   OpenUrl
9. 1. Boercherding, T.E. and
   2. R.T. Deacon

   (1972). The demand for services of non-federal governments. American Economic Review. 62(1972): 891–901.

   OpenUrlWeb of Science
10. 1. Brander, L.

    (2004). Guidance manual on value transfer methods for ecosystem services. UNEP, 77 pages.
11. 1. Broberg, T.

    (2010). Income treatment effects in contingent valuation: the case of the Sweden predator policy. Environmental and Resource Economics. 46(1):1–17.

    OpenUrl
12. 1. Buckley, E. and
    2. R. Croson

    (2006) Income and wealth heterogeneity in the voluntary provision of linear public goods. Journal of Public Economics 90(4), 935–955.

    OpenUrlCrossRef
13. 1. Cameroun T. A and
    2. M.D James

    (1987). Efficient estimation methods for closed-end contingent valuation surveys. Review of Economics and Statistics 69(2):269–276

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
14. 1. Cherry, T.L.,
    2. Kroll, S. and
    3. Shogren, J.F.

    (2005) The impact of endowment heterogeneity and origin on public good contributions: evidence from the lab. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization 57(3), 357–365.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
15. 1. Czajkowski, M. and
    2. M. Scasny

    (2010). Study on benefit transfer in an international setting: how to improve welfare estimates in the case of the countries’ income heterogeneity? Ecological Economics, 69 (2010): 2409–2416.

    OpenUrl
16. 1. Deschênes, O. M. Greenstone and
    2. J. Shapiro

    (2017). Defensive investments and the demand for air quality: Evidence form the NOx budget program. American Economic Review, 107(10): 2958–2989.

    OpenUrl
17. 1. Dorfman, R.

    (1977). Incidence of the benefits and costs of environmental programs. American Economic Review, Papers and proceedings. 67(1977): 333–340.

    OpenUrl
18. 1. Drupp, M. A.,
    2. J. N. Meya,
    3. S. Baumgaärtner and
    4. M. F. Quaas

    (2018). Economic inequality and the value of the Nature. Ecological Economics, 150(2018): 340–345.

    OpenUrl
19. 1. Ebert, U.

    (2003). Environmental goods and the distribution of income. Environmental and Resource economics. 25(4): 435–459.

    OpenUrl
20. 1. Flores, N. E. and
    2. R. T. Carson

    (1997). The relationship between the income elasticities of demand and willingness to pay. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 33(1997): 287–295.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
21. 1. Frank, E. G. and
    2. W. Schlenker

    (2016). Balancing economic and ecological goals: what are the trade-offs between economic development and ecosystem conservation? Sciences, 353(6300): 651–652.

    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
22. 1. Ghalwash, T.

    (2008) Demand for environmental quality: an empirical analysis of consumer behavior in Sweden. Environmental and Resource Economics, 41(4): 71–87.

    OpenUrl
23. 1. Hajat, A.,
    2. Hsia, C., &
    3. O’Neill, M. S.

    (2015). Socioeconomic Disparities and Air Pollution Exposure: a Global Review. Current environmental health reports, 2(4), 440–450.

    OpenUrl
24. 1. Hammitt, J.,
    2. J-T. Liu,
    3. J-L. Liu

    (2001). Contingent valuation of a Taiwanese wetland, Environmental and Development Economics. 6: 259–268.

    OpenUrl
25. 1. Hargreaves Heap, S.P.,
    2. A. Ramalingam, and
    3. B.V. Stoddard

    (2016). Endowment inequality in public goods games: A re-examination. Economics Letters 146: 4–7.

    OpenUrl
26. 1. He, J. and
    2. B. Zhang

    (2021). Current air pollution and willingness to pay for better air quality: Revisiting the temporal reliability of the contingent valuation method. Environmental and Resource Economics. 79(1): 135–168.

    OpenUrl
27. 1. He, J.,
    2. F. Moffette,
    3. R. Fournier,
    4. J-P, Revéret,
    5. J. Théau,
    6. J. Dupras,
    7. J-P Boyeret Mathieu Varin

    (2015). Meta-Analysis for the Transfer of Economic Benefits of Ecosystem Services Provided by Wetlands within Two Watersheds in Quebec, Canada, Wetland Ecology and Management, 23(2015): 707–725.

    OpenUrl
28. 1. Hörby, S. and
    2. T. Söderqvist

    (2003). Elasticity of demand and willingness to pay for environmental services in Sweden. Environmental and Resource Economics, 26(3): 361–383.

    OpenUrlCrossRef
29. 1. Horowitz, J.K., and
    2. K.E. McConnell

    (2003). Willingness to accept, willingness to pay and income effect. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organisation. 51: 537–545.

    OpenUrl
30. 1. Jacobson, J. and
    2. N. Hanley

    (2009). Are there income effects on global willingness to pay for biodiversity conservation? Environmental and Resource Economics, 43(2): 137–160.

    OpenUrl
31. 1. Kahn, H.

    (2009). Willingness to pay and demand elasticities for two national parks empirical evidence from two surveys in Pakistan. Environmental Development and Sustainability. 11(2): 293–305.

    OpenUrl
32. 1. Keser, C.,
    2. Markstädter, A.,
    3. Schmidt, M. and
    4. Schnitzler, C.

    (2013) Rich man and Lazarus–Asymmetric Endowments in Public-Goods Experiments. CIRANO Scientifc series, 2013s–32.
33. 1. Kovenock, D. and
    2. E. Sadka

    (1981). Progression under the benefit approach to the theory of taxation. Economics Letters. 8: 95–99.

    OpenUrl
34. 1. Kristöm, B. and
    2. P. Riera

    (1996). Is the income elasticity of environmental improvements less than one? Environmental and Resource Economics, 7 (1996): 45–55.

    OpenUrlCrossRef
35. 1. Liu, S. and
    2. D. I Stern

    (2008). A meta-analysis of contingent valuation studies in costal and bear-shore marine ecosystems. CSIRO working paper series. 2008–15.
36. 1. Liu, T.,
    2. G. He and
    3. A. Lau

    (2018). Avoidance behavior against air pollution: evidence from online search indices for anti-PM2.5 masks and air filters in Chinese cities. Environmental Economics and Policy Studies, 20: 325–363.

    OpenUrl
37. 1. Meya, J. N.

    (2020). Environmental inequality and Economic Valuation. Environmental and Resource Economics. 76(2020): 235–270.

    OpenUrl
38. 1. Meya, J. N.,
    2. M. A. Drupp and
    3. N. Hanley

    (2021). Testing structural benefit transfer: the role of income inequality. Resource and Energy Economics, 64(2021), 101217. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.reseneeco.2021.101217.

    OpenUrl
39. OECD (2018). Cost-benefit analysis and the environment: Further developments and policy use. Éditions OCDE, Paris, https://doi.org/10.1787/9789264085169-en.
40. 1. Pek, C-L.,
    2. C-H. Tee,
    3. P-Y. Ng

    (2010) Ac contingent valuation estimation of hill recreational and services values in Malaysia. MPRA paper No. 23125.
41. 1. Ready, R. C.,
    2. J. Malzubris and
    3. S. Senkane

    (2002). The relationship between environmental values and income in a transition economy: surface water quality in Latvia. Environmental and Development Economics, 7(2002): 147–156.

    OpenUrl
42. 1. Snow, A. and
    2. R. S. Warren

    (1983). Tax progression in Lindahl Equilibrium. Economics Letters 12: 319–326.

    OpenUrl
43. 1. Soderqvist, T. and
    2. H. Scharin

    (2000). The regional willingness to pay for a reduced eutrophication in the Stockholm archipelago. Beijer Discussin Paper No. 128.
44. 1. Walters, A.

    (1975). Noice and Prices, Oxford University Press. Oxford.
45. 1. Wang, H. and
    2. J. He

    (2011). Willingness-to-Pay Estimation with Multiple Bounded Discrete Choice Data, Applied Economics, 43(19-21): 2641–2656. DOI: 10.1080/00036840903299789

    OpenUrlCrossRef
46. 1. Wang, H.,
    2. He, J.,
    3. Kim, Y. and
    4. Kamata, T.

    (2013). Willingness-to-pay for Water Quality Improvements in Chinese Rivers: An Empirical Test on the Ordering Effects of Multiple-Bounded Discrete Choices. Journal of Environmental Management, 131(2013), 265–269.

    OpenUrl
47. 1. Wang, H.,
    2. J. He and
    3. D. Huang

    (2020). Public Distrust and Valuation Biases: Identification and Calibration with Contingent Valuation Studies of Two Air Quality Improvement Programs in China, China Economic Review, 61(2020). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chieco.2020.101424
48. 1. Wang, H.,
    2. J. He,
    3. Kim, Y. and
    4. Kamata, T.

    (2014). Municipal Solid Waste Management in Small Towns: An Economic Analysis Conducted in Yunnan, China. Waste Management & Research, 32(8) 695–706.

    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
49. 1. Zelmer, J.

    (2003). Linear public goods experiments: A meta-analysis. Experimental Economics, 6: 299–310.

    OpenUrlCrossRef
50. 1. Zhang, J. and
    2. Q. Mu

    (2018). Air pollution and defensive expenditures: evidence from particulate-filtering facemasks. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 92: 517–536.

    OpenUrl