Climate Change Adaptation in Government Decisions: Empirical Evidence from Superfund Remedies

References

1. Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry. 2014. “ATSDR Hazardous Waste Site Polygon Data with CIESIN Modifications, Version 2.” NASA Socioeconomic Data and Applications Center (SEDAC), https://sedac.ciesin.columbia.edu/data/set/superfund-atsdr-hazardous-waste-site-ciesin-mod-v2. doi:10.7927/H4DF6P5Z

   OpenUrlCrossRef
2. 1. Barreca, Alan,
   2. Karen Clay,
   3. Olivier Deschenes,
   4. Michael Greenstone, and
   5. Joseph S. Shapiro

   . 2016. “Adapting to Climate Change: The Remarkable Decline in the US Temperature-Mortality Relationship Over the Twentieth Century.” Journal of Political Economy 124 (1): 105–159. doi:10.1086/684582.

   OpenUrlCrossRef
3. 1. Bates, Paul D.,
   2. Niall Quinn,
   3. Christopher Sampson,
   4. Andrew Smith,
   5. Oliver Wing,
   6. Jeison Sosa,
   7. James Savage

   , et al. 2021. “Combined Modeling of US Fluvial, Pluvial, and Coastal Flood Hazard Under Current and Future Climates.” Water Resources Research 57 (2): e2020WR028673. doi:10.1029/2020WR028673.

   OpenUrlCrossRef
4. 1. Bento, Antonio M.,
   2. Noah Miller,
   3. Mehreen Mookerjee, and
   4. Edson Severnini

   . 2023. “Incidental Adaptation: The Role of Non-Climate Regulations.” Environmental & Resource Economics 86 (3): 305–343. doi:10.1007/s10640-023-00793-3

   OpenUrlCrossRef
5. 1. Burda, Martin and
   2. Matthew Harding

   . 2014. “Environmental Justice: Evidence from Superfund Cleanup Durations.” Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization 107: 380–401. doi:10.1016/j.jebo.2014.04.028.

   OpenUrlCrossRef
6. 1. Church, Thomas W. and
   2. Robert T. Nakamura

   . 1993. Cleaning Up the Mess: Implementation Strategies in Superfund. Washington, D.C: Brookings Institution.
7. 1. de Bruin, Kelly C. and
   2. Rob B. Dellink

   . 2011. “How Harmful are Restrictions on Adapting to Climate Change?” Global Environmental Change 21 (1): 34–45. doi:10.1016/j.gloenvcha.-2010.09.008.

   OpenUrlCrossRef
8. 1. Dillon, Gregory K,
   2. James Menakis, and
   3. Frank Fay

   . 2014. “Wildland Fire Potential: A Tool for Assessing Wildfire Risk and Fuels Management Needs.” In: Keane, Robert E. et al. 2015. Proceedings of the Large Wildland Fires Conference; Missoula, MT.
9. 1. Dillon, Gregory K,
   2. James Menakis, and
   3. Frank Fay

   . “Wildfire Hazard Potential,” accessed 12/1/2021, https://www.firelab.org/project/wildfire-hazard-potential.
10. 1. Fankhauser, Sam.

    2017. “Adaptation to Climate Change.” Annual Review of Resource Economics 9 (1): 209–230. doi:10.1146/annurev-resource-100516-033554

    OpenUrlCrossRef
11. 1. Flores, Aaron B.,
    2. Alyssa Castor,
    3. Sara E. Grineski,
    4. Timothy W. Collins, and
    5. Casey Mullen

    . 2021. “Petrochemical Releases Disproportionately Affected Socially Vulnerable Populations Along the Texas Gulf Coast After Hurricane Harvey.” Population and Environment 42 (3): 279–30. doi: 10.1007/s11111-020-00362-6

    OpenUrlCrossRef
12. 1. Gamper-Rabindran, Shanti and
    2. Christopher Timmins

    . 2013. “Does Cleanup of Hazardous Waste Sites Raise Housing Values? Evidence of Spatially Localized Benefits.” Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 65 (3): 345–360. doi:10.1016/j.jeem.-2012.12.001.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
13. 1. Gupta, Shreekant,
    2. George Van Houtven, and
    3. Maureen Cropper

    . 1996. “Paying for Permanence: An Economic Analysis of EPA’s Cleanup Decisions at Superfund Sites.” RAND Journal of Economics 27 (3): 563–582. doi:10.2307/2555844

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
14. 1. Hamilton, James T. and
    2. W. Kip Viscusi

    . 1999. “Environmental Equity at Superfund Sites” Chapter 7 in James T. Hamilton and W. Kip Viscusi, Calculating Risks? The Spatial and Political Dimensions of Hazardous Waste Policy. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, pp. 157–188.
15. 1. Hird, John A.

    1990. “Superfund Expenditures and Cleanup Priorities: Distributive Politics or the Public Interest?” Journal of Policy Analysis and Management 9 (4): 455–83. doi:10.2307/3325258

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
16. Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC). 2014. Climate Change 2014: Impacts, Adaptation, and Vulnerability. Part A: Global and Sectoral Aspects. Cambridge (UK) and New York: Cambridge University Press.
17. 1. Jenkins, Robin,
    2. Elizabeth Kopits, and
    3. David Simpson

    . 2006. Measuring the Social Benefits of EPA Land Cleanup and Reuse Programs. EPA National Center for Environmental Economics Working Paper #06-03.
18. 1. Kolbert, Elizabeth.

    2000. “The River.” The New Yorker 76 (37): 56–62.

    OpenUrl
19. 1. Manson, Steven,
    2. Kugler, Tracy A.,
    3. Schroeder, Jonathan,
    4. Van Riper, David and
    5. Ruggles, Steven.

    2020. “IPUMS National Historical Geographic Information System: Version 15.0.” Minneapolis, MN: IPUMS, https://www.nhgis.org/.
20. 1. Massetti, Emanuele and
    2. Robert Mendelsohn

    . 2018. “Measuring Climate Adaptation: Methods and Evidence.” Review of Environmental Economics and Policy 12 (2): 324–341. doi:10.1093/reep/rey007

    OpenUrlCrossRef
21. 1. Miao, Qing.

    2019. “What Affects Government Planning for Climate Change Adaptation: Evidence from the U.S. States.” Environmental Policy and Governance 29 (5): 376–394. doi:10.1002/eet.1866

    OpenUrlCrossRef
22. 1. Nakamura, Robert T. and
    2. Thomas W. Church

    . 2003. Taming Regulation: Superfund and the Challenge of Regulatory Reform. Washington: Brookings Institution. doi:10.7864/-j.ctvb6v68v

    OpenUrlCrossRef
23. 1. Probst, Katherine N.

    2017. Superfund 2017: Cleanup Accomplishments and the Challenges Ahead. American Council of Engineering Companies.
24. 1. Ray, Aaron D. and
    2. Jessica Grannis

    . 2015. “From Planning to Action: Implementation of State Climate Change Adaptation Plans.” Michigan Journal of Sustainability 3: 5–28. doi:-10.3998/mjs.12333712.0003.001

    OpenUrlCrossRef
25. 1. Regan, Michael.

    2017. “Health Concerns Swirl in Texas Months After Floods from Harvey Spread Toxic Waste,” PBS News, https://www.pbs.org/newshour/nation/health-concerns-swirl-in-texas-months-after-floods-from-harvey-spread-toxic-waste.
26. 1. Runhaar, Hens,
    2. Bettina Wilk,
    3. Åsa Persson,
    4. Caroline Uittenbroek, and
    5. Christine Wamsler

    . 2018. “Mainstreaming Climate Adaptation: Taking Stock about ‘What Works’ from Empirical Research Worldwide” Regional Environmental Change 18 (4): 1201–1210. doi:10.1007/-s10113-017-1259-5

    OpenUrlCrossRef
27. 1. Sigman, Hilary.

    1998. “Liability Funding and Superfund Clean-Up Remedies.” Journal of Environmental Economics & Management 35 (3): 205–224. doi:10.1006/jeem.1998.1034

    OpenUrlCrossRef
28. 1. Sigman, Hilary.

    2001. “The Pace of Progress at Superfund Sites: Policy Goals and Interest Group Influence.” Journal of Law & Economics 44 (1): 315–344. doi: 10.1086/320273

    OpenUrlCrossRef
29. 1. Solatyavari, Leili,
    2. Anna A. Klis, and
    3. Jeremy Groves

    . 2022. “Superfund Cleanup Time and Community Characteristics: A Survival Analysis.” Journal of Environmental Management 320: 115705. doi:10.1016/j.jenvman.2022.115705.

    OpenUrlCrossRef
30. US Environmental Protection Agency. 2013. Climate Change Adaptation Technical Fact Sheet: Groundwater Remediation Systems. US EPA, Report 542-F-13-004
31. US Environmental Protection Agency. 2014. Climate Change Adaptation Technical Fact Sheet: Landfills and Containment as an Element of Site Remediation. US EPA, Report 542-F-14-001
32. US Environmental Protection Agency. 2015. Climate Change Adaptation Technical Fact Sheet: Contaminated Sediment Remedies. US EPA, Report 542-F-15-009
33. US Environmental Protection Agency. 2018. Evaluation of Remedy Resilience at Superfund NPL and SAA Sites. US EPA, Report EP-W-14-001.
34. US Environmental Protection Agency. 2020. Superfund Remedy Report. US EPA, Report EPA-542-R-20-001.
35. US Environmental Protection Agency. 2022. Superfund Site Boundaries. https://edg.epa.gov/-data/PUBLIC/OLEM/OLEM-OSRTI/NPL_Boundaries.zip.
36. US Government Accountability Office. 2019. Superfund: EPA should Take Additional Actions to Manage Risks from Climate Change. Washington, DC: US GAO.
37. 1. Viscusi, W. Kip and
    2. James T. Hamilton

    . 1999. “Are Risk Regulators Rational? Evidence from Hazardous Waste Cleanup Decisions.” American Economic Review 89 (4): 1010–1027. doi: 10.1257/aer.89.4.1010

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
38. 1. Zachry, Brian C.,
    2. William J. Booth,
    3. Jamie R. Rhome, and
    4. Tarah M. Sharon

    . 2015. “A National View of Storm Surge Risk and Inundation.” Weather, Climate, and Society 7 (2): 109–117. doi:10.1175/WCAS-D-14-00049.1.

    OpenUrlCrossRef