Enrollment Restrictions and Conservation Practice Adoptions by Midwestern Farmers

References

1. 1. Alberini, A. and
   2. Segerson, K.

   (2002). Assessing voluntary programs to improve environmental quality. Environmental and Resource Economics, 22(1):157–184.

   OpenUrl
2. 1. Alpizar, F.,
   2. Nordén, A.,
   3. Pfaff, A., and
   4. Robalino, J.

   (2013). Effects of exclusion from a conservation policy: Negative behavioral spillovers from targeted incentives. Duke Environmental and Energy Economics Working Paper EE, pages 13–06.
3. 1. Arbuthnot, J.

   (1977). The roles of attitudinal and personality variables in the prediction of environmental behavior and knowledge. Environment and Behavior, 9(2):217–232.

   OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
4. 1. Arnold, M. A.,
   2. Duke, J. M., and
   3. Messer, K. D.

   (2013). Adverse selection in reverse auctions for ecosystem services. Land Economics, 89(3):387–412.

   OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
5. 1. Banerjee, S.

   (2018). Improving spatial coordination rates under the agglomeration bonus scheme: a laboratory experiment with a pecuniary and a non-pecuniary mechanism (nudge). American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 100(1):172–197.

   OpenUrlCrossRef
6. 1. Berman, S. L. and
   2. Wittig, M. A.

   (2004). An intergroup theories approach to direct political action among african americans. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 7(1):19–34.

   OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
7. 1. Borner, J.,
   2. Baylis, K.,
   3. Corbera, E.,
   4. Ezzine-de Blas, D.,
   5. Honey-Rosés, J.,
   6. Persson, U. M., and
   7. Wunder, S.

   (2017). The effectiveness of payments for environmental services. World Development, 96:359–374.

   OpenUrl
8. 1. Bottazzi, P.,
   2. Wiik, E.,
   3. Crespo, D., and
   4. Jones, J. P.

   (2018). Payment for environmental “selfservice”: Exploring the links between farmers’ motivation and additionality in a conservation incentive programme in the Bolivian Andes. Ecological Economics, 150:11–23.

   OpenUrl
9. 1. Broch, S. W. and
   2. Vedel, S. E.

   (2012). Using choice experiments to investigate the policy relevance of heterogeneity in farmer agri-environmental contract preferences. Environmental and Resource Economics, 51(4):561–581.

   OpenUrl
10. 1. Brunsting, S. and
    2. Postmes, T.

    (2002). Social movement participation in the digital age: Predicting offline and online collective action. Small Group Research, 33(5):525–554.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
11. 1. Canales, E.,
    2. Bergtold, J. S.,
    3. Williams, J., and
    4. Peterson, J.

    (2015). Estimating farmers’ risk attitudes and risk premiums for the adoption of conservation practices under different contractual arrangements: A stated choice experiment.
12. 1. Cisneros, E.,
    2. Börner, J.,
    3. Pagiola, S., and
    4. Wunder, S.

    (2022). Impacts of conservation incentives in protected areas: The case of Bolsa Floresta, Brazil. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 111:102572.

    OpenUrl
13. 1. Claassen, R.,
    2. Duquette, E. N., and
    3. Smith, D. J.

    (2018). Additionality in US agricultural conservation programs. Land Economics, 94(1):19–35.

    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
14. 1. Claassen, R.,
    2. Horowitz, J.,
    3. Duquette, E., and
    4. Ueda, K.

    (2014). Additionality in US agricultural conservation and regulatory offset programs. USDA-ERS Economic Research Report, (170).
15. 1. Clot, S. and
    2. Stanton, C. Y.

    (2014). Present bias predicts participation in payments for environmental services: evidence from a behavioral experiment in uganda. Ecological Economics, 108:162–170.

    OpenUrl
16. 1. Dessart, F. J.,
    2. Barreiro-Hurlé, J.,
    3. Van Bavel, R.

    , et al. (2019). Behavioural factors affecting the adoption of sustainable farming practices: a policy-oriented review. European Review of Agricultural Economics, 46(3):417–471.

    OpenUrlCrossRef
17. 1. Diaz, R. J. and
    2. Rosenberg, R.

    (2008). Spreading dead zones and consequences for marine ecosystems. Science, 321(5891):926–929.

    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
18. 1. Dillman, D. A.,
    2. Smyth, J. D., and
    3. Christian, L. M.

    (2014). Internet, phone, mail, and mixedmode surveys: the tailored design method. John Wiley & Sons.
19. 1. Du, X.,
    2. Xi, M., and
    3. Kong, L.

    (2019). Split application of reduced nitrogen rate improves nitrogen uptake and use efficiency in sweetpotato. Scientific Reports, 9(1):1–11.

    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
20. 1. Ducos, G.,
    2. Dupraz, P., and
    3. Bonnieux, F.

    (2009). Agri-environment contract adoption under fixed and variable compliance costs. Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, 52(5):669–687.

    OpenUrl
21. 1. Duke, J. M.,
    2. Dundas, S. J., and
    3. Messer, K. D.

    (2013). Cost-effective conservation planning: Lessons from economics. Journal of Environmental Management, 125:126–133.

    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
22. 1. Engel, S.

    et al. (2016). The devil in the detail: a practical guide on designing payments for environmental services. International Review of Environmental and Resource Economics, 9(1–2):131–177.

    OpenUrl
23. 1. Faccioli, M.,
    2. Tingley, D. M.,
    3. Mancini, M. C., and
    4. Bateman, I. J.

    (2024). Who should benefit from environmental policies? social preferences and nonmarket values for the distribution of environmental improvements. American Journal of Agricultural Economics.
24. 1. Fleming, P.,
    2. Lichtenberg, E., and
    3. Newburn, D. A.

    (2018). Evaluating impacts of agricultural cost sharing on water quality: Additionality, crowding in, and slippage. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 92:1–19.

    OpenUrl
25. 1. Flood, P.

    (1993). An expectancy value analysis of the willingness to attend union meetings. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 66(3):213–223.

    OpenUrl
26. 1. Glebe, T. W.

    (2022). The influence of contract length on the performance of sequential conservation auctions. American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 104(2):739–764.

    OpenUrl
27. 1. Gren, M. and
    2. Aklilu, A. Z.

    (2016). Policy design for forest carbon sequestration: A review of the literature. Forest Policy and Economics, 70:128–136.

    OpenUrl
28. 1. Haab, T. C. and
    2. McConnell, K. E.

    (2002). Valuing environmental and natural resources: the econometrics of non-market valuation. Edward Elgar Publishing.
29. 1. Hornsey, M. J.,
    2. Blackwood, L.,
    3. Louis, W.,
    4. Fielding, K.,
    5. Mavor, K.,
    6. Morton, T.,
    7. O’Brien, A.,
    8. Paasonen, K.-E.,
    9. Smith, J., and
    10. White, K. M.

    (2006). Why do people engage in collective action? revisiting the role of perceived effectiveness. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 36(7):1701–1722.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
30. 1. Horowitz, J. K. and
    2. Just, R. E.

    (2013). Economics of additionality for environmental services from agriculture. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 66(1):105–122.

    OpenUrlCrossRef
31. 1. Howard, G.

    (2020). Additionality violations in agricultural payment for service programs: Experimental evidence. Land Economics, 96(2):244–264.

    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
32. 1. Hudson, D. and
    2. Lusk, J.

    (2004). Risk and transactions cost in contracting: Results from a choicebased experiment. Journal of Agricultural & Food Industrial Organization, 2(1).
33. IDALS and CALS (2017). Iowa nutrient reduction strategy: A science and technology-based framework to assess and reduce nutrients to Iowa waters and the Gulf of Mexico.
34. 1. Ito, J.

    (2022). Program design and heterogeneous treatment effects of payments for environmental services. Ecological Economics, 191:107235.

    OpenUrl
35. 1. Jack, B. K.,
    2. Kousky, C., and
    3. Sims, K. R.

    (2008). Designing payments for ecosystem services: Lessons from previous experience with incentive-based mechanisms. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 105(28):9465–9470.

    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
36. 1. Kaczan, D.,
    2. Pfaff, A.,
    3. Rodriguez, L., and
    4. Shapiro-Garza, E.

    (2017). Increasing the impact of collective incentives in payments for ecosystem services. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 86:48–67.

    OpenUrl
37. 1. Krishnan, P. and
    2. Patnam, M.

    (2014). Neighbors and extension agents in ethiopia: Who matters more for technology adoption? American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 96(1):308–327.

    OpenUrlCrossRef
38. 1. Kuhfuss, L.,
    2. Préget, R.,
    3. Thoyer, S., and
    4. Hanley, N.

    (2016). Nudging farmers to enrol land into agri-environmental schemes: the role of a collective bonus. European Review of Agricultural Economics, 43(4):609–636.

    OpenUrlCrossRef
39. 1. Maertens, A. and
    2. Barrett, C. B.

    (2013). Measuring social networks’ effects on agricultural technology adoption. American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 95(2):353–359.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
40. 1. Markowitz, E. M.,
    2. Goldberg, L. R.,
    3. Ashton, M. C., and
    4. Lee, K.

    (2012). Profiling the “proenvironmental individual”: A personality perspective. Journal of Personality, 80(1):81–111.

    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
41. 1. Mason, C. F. and
    2. Plantinga, A. J.

    (2013). The additionality problem with offsets: Optimal contracts for carbon sequestration in forests. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 66(1):1–14.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
42. 1. Matta, J. R.,
    2. Alavalapati, J. R., and
    3. Mercer, D. E.

    (2009). Incentives for biodiversity conservation beyond the best management practices: are forestland owners interested? Land Economics, 85(1):132–143.

    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
43. 1. McFadden, D.

    (1974). The measurement of urban travel demand. Journal of Public Economics, 3(4):303–328.

    OpenUrlCrossRef
44. 1. Messer, K. D. and
    2. Allen III, W. L.

    (2018). The science of strategic conservation: protecting more with less. Cambridge University Press.
45. 1. Mezzatesta, M.,
    2. Newburn, D. A., and
    3. Woodward, R. T.

    (2013). Additionality and the adoption of farm conservation practices. Land Economics, 89(4):722–742.

    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
46. 1. Pannell, D. J. and
    2. Claassen, R.

    (2020). The roles of adoption and behavior change in agricultural policy. Applied Economic Perspectives and Policy, 42(1):31–41.

    OpenUrl
47. 1. Plastina, A.,
    2. Liu, F., and
    3. Sawadgo, W.

    (2018). Additionality in cover-crop cost-share programs in Iowa: A matching assessment.
48. 1. Plastina, A. and
    2. Wongpiyabovorn, O.

    (2021). How to grow and sell carbon credits in US agriculture. Ag Decision Maker File A1–76. extension. iastate. edu/agdm.
49. 1. Preza-Fontes, G.,
    2. Christianson, L. E.,
    3. Greer, K.,
    4. Bhattarai, R., and
    5. Pittelkow, C. M.

    (2022). Inseason split nitrogen application and cover cropping effects on nitrous oxide emissions in rainfed maize. Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment, 326:107813.

    OpenUrl
50. 1. Rabalais, N. N.,
    2. Turner, R. E.,
    3. Gupta, B. K. S.,
    4. Platon, E., and
    5. Parsons, M. L.

    (2007). Sediments tell the history of eutrophication and hypoxia in the northern Gulf of Mexico. Ecological Applications, 17(sp5):S129–S143.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
51. 1. Reimer, A.

    (2015). Ecological modernization in US agri-environmental programs: Trends in the 2014 farm bill. Land Use Policy, 47:209–217.

    OpenUrlCrossRef
52. 1. Richards, K. R. and
    2. Huebner, G. E.

    (2012). Evaluating protocols and standards for forest carbon-offset programs, part A: additionality, baselines and permanence. Carbon Management, 3(4):393–410.

    OpenUrl
53. 1. Ruseva, T.,
    2. Marland, E.,
    3. Szymanski, C.,
    4. Hoyle, J.,
    5. Marland, G., and
    6. Kowalczyk, T.

    (2017). Additionality and permanence standards in California’s forest offset protocol: A review of project and program level implications. Journal of Environmental Management, 198:277–288.

    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
54. 1. Saari, U. A.,
    2. Damberg, S.,
    3. Frömbling, L., and
    4. Ringle, C. M.

    (2021). Sustainable consumption behavior of europeans: The influence of environmental knowledge and risk perception on environmental concern and behavioral intention. Ecological Economics, 189:107155.

    OpenUrl
55. 1. Scarpa, R. and
    2. Rose, J. M.

    (2008). Design efficiency for non-market valuation with choice modelling: how to measure it, what to report and why. Australian Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, 52(3):253–282.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
56. 1. Scavia, D.,
    2. Bertani, I.,
    3. Obenour, D. R.,
    4. Turner, R. E.,
    5. Forrest, D. R., and
    6. Katin, A.

    (2017). Ensemble modeling informs hypoxia management in the northern Gulf of Mexico. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 114(33):8823–8828.

    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
57. 1. Sun, H.,
    2. Berg, E., and
    3. Zhu, Z.

    (2021). Bivariate small-area estimation for binary and gaussian variables based on a conditionally specified model. Biometrics.
58. 1. Train, K. E.

    (2009). Discrete choice methods with simulation. Cambridge University Press.
59. 1. Tran-Nam, Q. and
    2. Tiet, T.

    (2022). The role of peer influence and norms in organic farming adoption: Accounting for farmers’ heterogeneity. Journal of Environmental Management, 320:115909.

    OpenUrlPubMed
60. 1. Triana, J. S. A.,
    2. Chu, M. L., and
    3. Stein, J. A.

    (2021). Assessing the impacts of agricultural conservation practices on freshwater biodiversity under changing climate. Ecological Modelling, 453:109604.

    OpenUrl
61. U.S. Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service. (2022). Conservation spending remained roughly level in recent years, a trend projected to continue through 2023.
62. USDA (2022). USDA to invest $1 billion in climate-smart commodities, expanding markets. Accessed on August 6, 2023.
63. 1. Vegh, T. and
    2. Murray, B.

    (2020). Incentivizing the reduction of pollution at US dairies: Addressing additionality when multiple environmental credit payments are combined. Journal of Agriculture, Food Systems, and Community Development, 9(2):123–139.

    OpenUrl
64. 1. Wallander, S.,
    2. Ferraro, P., and
    3. Higgins, N.

    (2017). Addressing participant inattention in federal programs: a field experiment with the conservation reserve program. American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 99(4):914–931.

    OpenUrl
65. 1. Wan, C.,
    2. Shen, G. Q., and
    3. Yu, A.

    (2014). The role of perceived effectiveness of policy measures in predicting recycling behaviour in hong kong. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 83:141–151.

    OpenUrl
66. 1. Whitmarsh, L. and
    2. O’Neill, S.

    (2010). Green identity, green living? the role of proenvironmental self-identity in determining consistency across diverse pro-environmental behaviours. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 30(3):305–314.

    OpenUrlCrossRef
67. 1. Wilson, R. S.,
    2. Howard, G., and
    3. Burnett, E. A.

    (2014). Improving nutrient management practices in agriculture: The role of risk-based beliefs in understanding farmers’ attitudes toward taking additional action. Water Resources Research, 50(8):6735–6746.

    OpenUrlCrossRefGeoRef
68. 1. Wongpiyabovorn, O. and
    2. Plastina, A.

    (2023). Financial support for conservation practices: EQIP and CSP.
69. 1. Wu, S.,
    2. Palm-Forster, L. H., and
    3. Messer, K. D.

    (2021). Impact of peer comparisons and firm heterogeneity on nonpoint source water pollution: An experimental study. Resource and Energy Economics, 63:101142.

    OpenUrlCrossRef
70. 1. Wyss, A. M.,
    2. Knoch, D., and
    3. Berger, S.

    (2022). When and how pro-environmental attitudes turn into behavior: The role of costs, benefits, and self-control. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 79:101748.

    OpenUrl
71. 1. Zhang, X. and
    2. Khachatryan, H.

    (2023). Does the perceived effectiveness of voluntary conservation programs affect household adoption of sustainable landscaping practices? Land, 12(7): 1429.

    OpenUrl