Spatial Bioinvasion Externalities with Heterogeneous Landowner Preferences

References

1. Amezaga, J.M., Santamaría, L. and Green, A.J., 2002. Biotic wetland connectivity-supporting a new approach for wetland policy. Acta oecologica, 23(3), pp.213-222.
2. Atallah, S.S., Huang, J.C., Leahy, J. and Bennett, K.P., 2023. Family forest landowner preferences for managing invasive species: Control methods, ecosystem services, and neighborhood effects. Journal of the Agricultural and Applied Economics Association (1-16).
3. Atallah, S. S., M. I. Gómez, and J. M. Conrad. 2017. “Specification of spatial dynamic externalities and implications for strategic behavior in disease control.” Land Economics 93 (2): 209–229.
4. Atallah, S. S., M.I. Gómez, J. M. Conrad, and J. P. Nyrop. 2015. “A plant-level, spatial, bioeconomic model of plant disease diffusion and control: Grapevine leafroll disease.” American Journal of Agricultural Economics 97 (1): 199-218.
5. Burnett, K.M., 2006. Introductions of invasive species: failure of the weaker link. Agricultural and Resource Economics Review, 35(1), pp.21-28.
6. Butler, B. J. Family Forest Owners of the United States, Gen. Tech. Rep. NRS-27. Newtown Square, PA: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Northern Research Station (2008).
7. Butler, B.J. and Ma, Z., 2011. Family forest owner trends in the Northern United States. Northern Journal of Applied Forestry, 28(1), pp.13-18.
8. Catling, P. M., and Z. S. Porebski. 1994. “The history of invasion and current status of glossy buckthorn, Rhamnus frangula, in southern Ontario.” Canadian Field Naturalist 108 (3): 305-310.
9. Cornes, R. 1993. “Dyke maintenance and other stories: Some neglected types of public goods.” The Quarterly Journal of Economics 108 (1): 259-271.
10. Costello, C. and Kaffine, D. 2017. “Natural resource federalism: Preferences versus connectivity for patchy resources.” Environmental and Resource Economics 71(1), 99-126.
11. Cronk, Kip, 2017. “CISMAs work together to manage invasive species”. Michigan State University Extension, Michigan Sea Grant - March 27, 2017. Retrieved from https://www.canr.msu.edu/news/cismas_work_together_to_manage_invasive_species_msg17_cronk17.
12. Cunard, C. and T. D. Lee. 2009. “Is patience a virtue? Succession, light, and the death of invasive glossy buckthorn (Frangula alnus).” Biological Invasions 11, (3): 577-586.
13. Cygan 2014. “Integrated Pest Management for Woody Invasive Plants.” New Hampshire Department of Agriculture, Markets & Food. Retrieved from: https://www.agriculture.nh.gov/publications-forms/documents/integrated-pest-management-woody-plants.pdf.
14. Dangerfield C.E., A.E. Whalley, N. Hanley, J.R. Healey and C.A. Gilligan. 2016. “The effects of variation in management objectives on responses to forest diseases under uncertainty”. Working paper.
15. Epanchin-Niell, R. S., and J. E. Wilen. 2012. “Optimal spatial control of biological invasions.” Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 63 (2): 260-270.
16. Fagan, M. E. and D. R. Peart. 2004. “Impact of the invasive shrub glossy buckthorn (Rhamnus frangula L.) on juvenile recruitment by canopy trees.” Forest Ecology and Management 194, (1): 95-107.
17. Fenichel, E. P., T. J. Richards, and D. W. Shanafelt. 2014. “The control of invasive species on private property with neighbor-to-neighbor spillovers.” Environmental and Resource Economics 59:2 (2014) 231-255.
18. Fletcher, L.S., Kittredge Jr, D. and Stevens, T., 2009. Forest landowners' willingness to sell carbon credits: a pilot study. Northern Journal of Applied Forestry, 26(1), pp.35-37.
19. Frappier, B., R. T. Eckert, and T. D. Lee. 2003. “Potential impacts of the invasive exotic shrub Rhamnus frangula L. (glossy buckthorn) on forests of southern New Hampshire.” Northeastern Naturalist 10, (3): 277-296.
20. Godwin, H. 1943. “Frangula alnus Miller.” Journal of Ecology 31 (1): 77-92.
21. Hall, K.M., Albers, H.J., Taleghan, M.A. and Dietterich, T.G., 2017. Optimal Spatial-Dynamic Management of Stochastic Species Invasions. Environmental and Resource Economics 70 (2):403-427.
22. Hepp, T.E., Vimmerstedt, J.P., Smalley, G.W. and McNab, W.H., 2015. Estimating yields of unthinned eastern white pine plantations from current stocking in the Southern Appalachians. Forest Science, 61(1), pp.114-122.
23. Horie, T., R. G. Haight, F. R. Homans, and Robert C. Venette. 2013. “Optimal strategies for the surveillance and control of forest pathogens: a case study with oak wilt.” Ecological Economics 86: 78-85.
24. Ingle, B.S., 2013. Collaborative Partnerships and Invasive Species Management: Filling the Voids in Management (Master’s Thesis, The Ohio State University).Jardine, S.L. and Sanchirico, J.N., 2018. Estimating the cost of invasive species control. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 87, pp.242-257.
25. Jones, B.A., McDermott, S.M. and Chermak, J.M., 2016. PLAN or get SLAM’ed: Optimal management of invasive species in the presence of indirect health externalities. Journal of environmental management, 180, pp.538-550.
26. Kleijnen, J.P. and Wan, J., 2007. Optimization of simulated systems: OptQuest and alternatives. Simulation Modelling Practice and Theory, 15(3), pp.354-362.
27. Koskela, E. and Ollikainen, M., 1999. Optimal public harvesting under the interdependence of public and private forests. Forest Science, 45(2), pp.259-271.
28. Lee, T. 2017. Control of glossy buckthorn. Presentation at the ‘The economics and spatial ecology of managing invasive plants in forests with heterogeneous landownership’ project meeting, 11 October 2017, Durham, New Hampshire, USA.
29. Lee, T. D. and J. H. Thompson. 2012. “Effects of logging history on invasion of eastern white pine forests by exotic glossy buckthorn (Frangula alnus P. Mill).” Forest Ecology and Management 265: 201-210.
30. Macpherson, M.F., Kleczkowski, A., Healey, J.R. and Hanley, N., 2018. The effects of disease on optimal forest rotation: a generalisable analytical framework. Environmental and Resource Economics, 70(3), pp.565-588.
31. Macpherson, M.F., Kleczkowski, A., Healey, J.R., Quine, C.P. and Hanley, N., 2017. The effects of invasive pests and pathogens on strategies for forest diversification. Ecological Modelling, 350, pp.87-99.
32. Mehmood, S.R. and Zhang, D., 2001. Forest parcelization in the United States: a study of contributing factors. Journal of Forestry, 99(4), pp.30-34.
33. New Hampshire Department of Revenue Administration (NHDRA). 2016. Property Average Stumpage Values. Retrieved from revenue.nh.gov/mun-prop/property/stumpage-values.htm. Last accessed 09/17/2020.
34. Rosenberger, R.S., Bell, L.A., Champ, P.A. and White, E.M. 2013. Estimating the economic value of recreation losses in Rocky Mountain National Park due to a mountain pine beetle outbreak. Western Economics Forum.
35. Sanford, N. L., R. A. Harrington, and J. H. Fownes. 2003. “Survival and growth of native and alien woody seedlings in open and understory environments.” Forest Ecology and Management 183, (1): 377-385.
36. Sims, C., Finnoff, D. and Shogren, J.F., 2018. Taking One for the Team: Is Collective Action More Responsive to Ecological Change?. Environmental and Resource Economics, 70(3), pp.589-615.
37. Sims, C., Aadland, D. and Finnoff, D., 2010. A dynamic bioeconomic analysis of mountain pine beetle epidemics. Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, 34(12), pp.2407-2419.
38. Smalley, G.W., Torreano, S.J., Swinney, B.H., Fulkerson, M.R., Barry, R.W., Conrad, J.L. and McNab, H., 2016. Structure and productivity of an eastern white pine plantation on two mid-Cumberland Plateau landtypes at ages 33 and 44. e-Res. Pap. SRS-57. Asheville, NC: US Department of Agriculture, Forest Service. Southern Research Station., 57, pp.1-8.
39. Trakhtenbrot, A., Nathan, R., Perry, G. and Richardson, D.M., 2005. The importance of long-distance dispersal in biodiversity conservation. Diversity and Distributions, 11(2), pp.173-181.
40. Urquhart, J. and Courtney, P. 2011. Seeing the owner behind the trees: a typology of small-scale private woodland owners in England. Forest Policy and Economics, 13 (7), pp.535-544.
41. U.S. Department of Agriculture Natural Resource Conservation Service. 2011. Invasive species and pests. Retrieved from https://www.nrcs.usda.gov/wps/portal/nrcs/main/national/plantsanimals/invasive/. Last accessed 10/22/2018.
42. U.S. Forest Service. “Who owns America's trees, woods, and forests?” Results from the US Forest Service 2011-2013 national woodland owner survey. NRS-INF-31-15. Newtown Square, PA: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Northern Research Station, (2015): 12.
43. Walsh, R.G., Olienyk, J.P. 1981. Recreation demand effects of mountain pine beetle damage to the quality of forest recreation resources in the Colorado Front Range. Fort Collins, CO: Colorado State University. 87 p.
44. Webster, C. R., M. A. Jenkins, and S. Jose. 2006. “Woody invaders and the challenges they pose to forest ecosystems in the eastern United States.” Journal of Forestry 104 (7): 366-374.
45. White, A.E., Lutz, D.A., Howarth, R.B. and Soto, J.R., 2018. Small-scale forestry and carbon offset markets: An empirical study of Vermont Current Use forest landowner willingness to accept carbon credit programs. PloS one, 13(8), p.e0201967.