Total Economic Valuation of Great Lakes Recreational Fisheries

References

1. 1. Boyle, Kevin J.,
   2. Robert Paterson,
   3. Richard Carson,
   4. Christopher Leggett,
   5. Barbara Kanninen,
   6. John Molenar, and
   7. James Neumann

   . 2016. “Valuing Shifts in the Distribution of Visibility in National Parks and Wilderness Areas in the United States.” Journal of Environmental Management 173: 10–22.

   OpenUrlPubMed
2. 1. Campbell, Danny,
   2. David A. Hensher, and
   3. Riccardo Scarpa

   . 2011. “Non-Attendance to Attributes in Environmental Choice Analysis: A Latent Class Specification.” Journal of Environmental Planning and Management 54(8): 1061–76.

   OpenUrl
3. 1. Carson, Richard T., and
   2. Theodore Groves

   . 2007. “Incentive and Informational Properties of Preference Questions.” Environmental and Resource Economics 37(1): 181–210.

   OpenUrlCrossRef
4. 1. Cornicelli, Lou,
   2. John Whitehead,
   3. Laura Bragg,
   4. Thomas Z. Lange, and
   5. Rob Southwick

   . 2022. “Economic Aspects of the Great Lakes Recreational Fisheries and Factors Driving Change.” Great Lakes Fishery Commission Project Completion Report, Project ID – 2020_ALL_440910, September.
5. 1. Desvousges, William,
   2. Kristy Mathews, and
   3. Kenneth Train

   . 2012. “Adequate Responsiveness to Scope in Contingent Valuation.” Ecological Economics 84: 121–28.

   OpenUrlCrossRef
6. 1. Dugstad, Anders,
   2. Kristine M. Grimsrud,
   3. Gorm Kipperberg,
   4. Henrik Lindhjem, and
   5. Ståle Navrud

   . 2021. “Scope Elasticity of Willingness to Pay in Discrete Choice Experiments.” Environmental and Resource Economics 80(1): 21–57.

   OpenUrl
7. 1. Fifer, Simon,
   2. John Rose, and
   3. Stephen Greaves

   . 2014. “Hypothetical Bias in Stated Choice Experiments: Is It a Problem? And If So, How Do We Deal with It?” Transportation Research Part A : Policy and Practice 61: 164–77.

   OpenUrl
8. 1. Giguere, Christopher,
   2. Chris Moore, and
   3. John C. Whitehead

   . 2020. “Valuing Hemlock Woolly Adelgid Control in Public Forests: Scope Effects with Attribute Nonattendance.” Land Economics 96(1): 25–42.

   OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
9. 1. Haab, Timothy C.,
   2. Matthew G. Interis,
   3. Daniel R. Petrolia, and
   4. John C. Whitehead

   . 2013. “From Hopeless to Curious? Thoughts on Hausman’s ‘Dubious to Hopeless’ Critique of Contingent Valuation.” Applied Economic Perspectives and Policy 35(4), 593–612.

   OpenUrlCrossRef
10. 1. Hanemann, W. Michael.

    1984. “Welfare Evaluations in Contingent Valuation Experiments with Discrete Responses.” American Journal of Agricultural Economics 66(3): 332–41.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
11. 1. Hanemann, W. Michael.

    1989. “Welfare Evaluations in Contingent Valuation Experiments with Discrete Response Data: Reply.” American Journal of Agricultural Economics 71(4): 1057–61.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
12. 1. Hausman, Jerry.

    2012. “Contingent Valuation: From Dubious to Hopeless.” Journal of Economic Perspectives 26(4): 43–56.

    OpenUrlCrossRef
13. 1. Hess, Stephane,
    2. Amanda Stathopoulos,
    3. Danny Campbell,
    4. Vikki O’Neill, and
    5. Sebastian Caussade

    . 2013. “It’s Not That I Don’t Care, I Just Don’t Care Very Much: Confounding Between Attribute Non-Attendance and Taste Heterogeneity.” Transportation 40: 583–607.

    OpenUrlCrossRef
14. 1. Howard, Gregory,
    2. Brian E. Roe,
    3. Erik C. Nisbet, and
    4. Jay F. Martin

    . 2017. “Hypothetical Bias Mitigation Techniques in Choice Experiments: Do Cheap Talk and Honesty Priming Effects Fade with Repeated Choices?” Journal of the Association of Environmental and Resource Economists 4(2): 543–73.

    OpenUrl
15. 1. Howard, Gregory,
    2. John C. Whitehead, and
    3. Jacob Hochard

    . 2021. “Estimating Discount Rates Using Referendum-Style Choice Experiments: An Analysis of Multiple Methodologies.” Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 105: 102399.

    OpenUrl
16. 1. Hunt, Len M.,
    2. Daniel J. Phaneuf,
    3. Joshua K. Abbott, and
    4. Eli P. Fenichel

    . 2020. “Per Trip Changes to the Economic Value of Ontario, Canada Anglers Fishing the Laurentian Great Lakes under Target Species Transitions.” Human Dimensions of Wildlife : 1–16.
17. 1. Johnston, Robert J.,
    2. Kevin J. Boyle,
    3. Wiktor Adamowicz,
    4. Jeff Bennett,
    5. Roy Brouwer,
    6. Trudy Ann Cameron,
    7. W. Michael Hanemann

    , et al. 2017. “Contemporary Guidance for Stated Preference Studies.” Journal of the Association of Environmental and Resource Economists 4(2): 319–405.

    OpenUrlCrossRef
18. 1. Knoche, Scott, and
    2. Frank Lupi

    . 2016. “Demand for Fishery Regulations: Effects of Angler Heterogeneity and Catch Improvements on Preferences for Gear and Harvest Restrictions.” Fisheries Research 181: 163–71.

    OpenUrl
19. 1. Koetse, Mark J.

    2017. “Effects of Payment Vehicle Non-Attendance in Choice Experiments on Value Estimates and the WTA–WTP Disparity Journal of Environmental Economics and Policy 6(3): 225–45.

    OpenUrl
20. 1. Kragt, Marit E.

    2013. “Stated and Inferred Attribute Attendance Models: A Comparison with Environmental Choice Experiments.” Journal of Agricultural Economics 64(3): 719–36.

    OpenUrlCrossRef
21. 1. Lauber, T. Bruce,
    2. Richard C. Stedman,
    3. Nancy A. Connelly,
    4. Richard C. Ready,
    5. Lars G. Rudstam, and
    6. Gregory L. Poe

    . 2020. “The Effects of Aquatic Invasive Species on Recreational Fishing Participation and Value in the Great Lakes: Possible Future Scenarios.” Journal of Great Lakes Research 46(3): 656–65.

    OpenUrl
22. 1. Lew, Daniel K., and
    2. John C. Whitehead

    . 2020. “Attribute Non-Attendance as an Information Processing Strategy in Stated Preference Choice Experiments: Origins, Current Practices, and Future Directions.” Marine Resource Economics 35(3), 285–317.

    OpenUrl
23. 1. Lindhjem, Henrik, and
    2. Ståle Navrud

    . 2011. “Using Internet in Stated Preference Surveys: A Review and Comparison of Survey Modes.” International Review of Environmental and Resource Economics 5(4): 309–51.

    OpenUrlCrossRef
24. 1. Mohr, Tanga M.,
    2. Peter A. Groothuis,
    3. John C. Whitehead,
    4. Kristan Cockerill, William P. Anderson Jr., and
    5. Chuanhui Gu

    . 2023. “Discrete and Continuous Measures of Consequentiality.” Journal of Environmental Economics and Policy 12(3): 342–62.

    OpenUrl
25. 1. Penn, Jerrod M., and
    2. Wuyang Hu

    . 2018. “Understanding Hypothetical Bias: An Enhanced MetaAnalysis.” American Journal of Agricultural Economics 100(4): 1186–1205.

    OpenUrl
26. 1. Penn, Jerrod M., and
    2. Wuyang Hu

    . 2023. “Adjusting and Calibrating Elicited Values Based on Follow-Up Certainty Questions: A Meta-Analysis.” Environmental and Resource Economics 84(4): 919–46.

    OpenUrl
27. 1. Raynor, Jennifer L., and
    2. Daniel J. Phaneuf

    . 2020. “Can Native Species Compete with Valuable Exotics? Valuing Ecological Changes in the Lake Michigan Recreational Fishery.” Journal of Great Lakes Research 46(3): 643–55.

    OpenUrl
28. 1. Ready, Richard C.,
    2. Patricia A. Champ, and
    3. Jennifer L. Lawton

    . 2010. “Using Respondent Uncertainty to Mitigate Hypothetical Bias in a Stated Choice Experiment.” Land Economics 86(2): 363–81.

    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
29. 1. Ready, Richard C.,
    2. Gregory L. Poe,
    3. T. Bruce Lauber,
    4. Nancy A. Connelly,
    5. Richard C. Stedman, and
    6. Lars G. Rudstam

    . 2018. “The Potential Impact of Aquatic Nuisance Species on Recreational Fishing in the Great Lakes and Upper Mississippi and Ohio River Basins.” Journal of Environmental Management 206: 304–18.

    OpenUrlPubMed
30. 1. Sandstrom-Misty, Kaitlynn,
    2. Frank Lupi,
    3. Hyunjung Kim, and
    4. Joseph A. Herriges

    . 2023. “Comparing Water Quality Valuation across Probability and Non-Probability Samples.” Applied Economic Perspectives and Policy 45(2): 744–61.

    OpenUrl
31. 1. Scarpa, Riccardo,
    2. Roberto Zanoli,
    3. Valeria Bruschi, and
    4. Stefania Naspetti

    . 2012. “Inferred and Stated Attribute Non-Attendance in Food Choice Experiments.” American Journal of Agricultural Economics 95(1): 165–80.

    OpenUrl
32. 1. Taylor, Laura O.,
    2. Mark D. Morrison, and
    3. Kevin J. Boyle

    . 2010. “Exchange Rules and the Incentive Compatibility of Choice Experiments.” Environmental and Resource Economics 47(2): 197–220.

    OpenUrl
33. 1. Vossler, Christian A.,
    2. Maurice Doyon, and
    3. Daniel Rondeau

    . 2012. “Truth in Consequentiality: Theory and Field Evidence on Discrete Choice Experiments.” American Economic Journal: Microeconomics 4(4): 145–71.

    OpenUrlCrossRef
34. 1. Vossler, Christian A.,
    2. David A. Keiser,
    3. Catherine L. Kling, and
    4. Daniel J. Phaneuf

    . 2025. “Information Scripts and the Incentive Compatibility of Discrete Choice Experiments.” Journal of the Association of Environmental and Resource Economists 12(2): 459–92.

    OpenUrl
35. 1. Whitehead, John C.

    2016. “Plausible Responsiveness to Scope in Contingent Valuation.” Ecological Economics 128: 17–22.

    OpenUrl
36. 1. Whitehead, John C.,
    2. Peter A. Groothuis,
    3. Rob Southwick, and
    4. Pat Foster-Turley

    . 2009. “Measuring the Economic Benefits of Saginaw Bay Coastal Marsh with Revealed and Stated Preference Methods.” Journal of Great Lakes Research 35(3): 430–37.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
37. 1. Whitehead, John C., and
    2. Thomas J. Hoban

    . 1999. “Testing for Temporal Reliability in Contingent Valuation with Time for Changes in Factors Affecting Demand.” Land Economics 75(4): 453–65.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
38. 1. Whitehead, John C.,
    2. Andrew Ropicki,
    3. John Loomis,
    4. Sherry Larkin,
    5. Tim Haab, and
    6. Sergio Alvarez

    . 2023. “Estimating the Benefits to Florida Households from Avoiding Another Gulf Oil Spill Using the Contingent Valuation Method: Internal Validity Tests with Probability-Based and Opt-In Samples.” Applied Economic Perspectives and Policy 45(2): 705–20.

    OpenUrl
39. 1. Zhang, Wendong, and
    2. Brent Sohngen

    . 2018. “Do U.S. Anglers Care about Harmful Algal Blooms? A Discrete Choice Experiment of Lake Erie Recreational Anglers.” American Journal of Agricultural Economics 100(3): 868–88.

    OpenUrl