The Role of Social Norms and Economic Incentives in Encouraging the Adoption of Native Gardens

References

1. 1. Abrahamse, W., &
   2. Steg, L.

   (2013). Social influence approaches to encourage resource conservation: A meta-analysis. Global Environmental Change, 23(6), 1773–1785. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.GLOENVCHA.2013.07.029

   OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
2. 1. Ahn, S.,
   2. Luo, Q.,
   3. Mendoza, S., &
   4. Norwood, F. B.

   (2024). Rethinking the traditional American lawn: Perspectives of U.S. households in a nationwide survey. Urban Forestry & Urban Greening, 99, 128460. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ufug.2024.128460

   OpenUrl
3. 1. Allcott, H.

   (2011). Social norms and energy conservation. Journal of Public Economics, 95(9–10), 1082–1095. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpubeco.2011.03.003

   OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
4. 1. Banerjee, S.,
   2. Savani, M., &
   3. Shreedhar, G.

   (2021). Public support for ‘soft’ versus ‘hard’ public policies: Review of the evidence. Journal of Behavioral Public Administration, 4(2). https://doi.org/10.30636/jbpa.42.220
5. 1. Burkhardt, J.,
   2. Chan, N. W.,
   3. Bollinger, B., &
   4. Gillingham, K. T.

   (2022). Conformity and Conservation: Evidence from Home Landscaping and Water Conservation. American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 104(1), 228–248. https://doi.org/10.1111/AJAE.12224

   OpenUrl
6. 1. Daly, A.,
   2. Hess, S., &
   3. Train, K.

   (2012). Assuring finite moments for willingness to pay in random coefficient models. Transportation, 39(1). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11116-011-9331-3
7. 1. Dannenberg, A.,
   2. Gutsche, G.,
   3. Batzke, M. C. L.,
   4. Christens, S.,
   5. Engler, D.,
   6. Mankat, F.,
   7. Möller, S.,
   8. Weingärtner, E.,
   9. Ernst, A.,
   10. Lumkowsky, M., von
   11. Wangenheim, G.,
   12. Hornung, G., &
   13. Ziegler, A.

   (2024). The Effects of Norms on Environmental Behavior. Review of Environmental Economics and Policy, 18(1), 165–187. https://doi.org/10.1086/727588

   OpenUrl
8. 1. Davies, Z. G.,
   2. Fuller, R. A.,
   3. Loram, A.,
   4. Irvine, K. N.,
   5. Sims, V., &
   6. Gaston, K. J.

   (2009). A national scale inventory of resource provision for biodiversity within domestic gardens. Biological Conservation, 142(4). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2008.12.016
9. 1. Doll, C.,
   2. Burton, M.,
   3. Pannell, D., &
   4. Rollins, C.

   (2023). Are greenspaces too green? Landscape preferences and water use in urban parks. Ecological Economics, 211, 107896. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2023.107896

   OpenUrl
10. 1. Doll, C.,
    2. Rollins, C.,
    3. Burton, M.,
    4. Pannell, D.,
    5. Rehdanz, K., &
    6. Meyerhoff, J.

    (2023). Encouraging ecological landscape designs on underutilized urban lands: Homeowner preferences for verge conversion programs. Urban Forestry & Urban Greening, 87, 128049. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ufug.2023.128049

    OpenUrl
11. 1. Doll, C.,
    2. Rollins, C.,
    3. Burton, M.,
    4. Pannell, D.,
    5. Rehdanz, K., &
    6. Meyerhoff, J.

    (2024). Public preferences for water-conserving groundcovers on verges. Water Resources and Economics, 46, 100239. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wre.2024.100239

    OpenUrl
12. 1. Dillman, D.A.

    (2007). Mail and Internet Surveys: The Tailored Design Method (Second Edition). John Wiley & Sons.
13. 1. Doremus, H.

    (2003). A policy portfolio approach to biodiversity protection on private lands. Environmental Science and Policy, 6(3). https://doi.org/10.1016/S1462-9011(03)00036-4
14. 1. Farrow, K.,
    2. Grolleau, G., &
    3. Ibanez, L.

    (2017). Social Norms and Pro-environmental Behavior: A Review of the Evidence. In Ecological Economics (Vol. 140). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2017.04.017
15. 1. Ferraro, P. J.,
    2. Miranda, J. J., &
    3. Price, M. K.

    (2011). The Persistence of Treatment Effects with Norm-Based Policy Instruments: Evidence from a Randomized Environmental Policy Experiment. American Economic Review, 101(3), 318–322. https://doi.org/10.1257/aer.101.3.318

    OpenUrlCrossRef
16. 1. Garbuzov, M., &
    2. Ratnieks, F. L. W.

    (2014). Quantifying variation among garden plants in attractiveness to bees and other flower-visiting insects. Functional Ecology, 28(2). https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2435.12178
17. 1. Goddard, M. A.,
    2. Dougill, A. J., &
    3. Benton, T. G.

    (2013). Why garden for wildlife? Social and ecological drivers, motivations and barriers for biodiversity management in residential landscapes. Ecological Economics, 86, 258–273. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.ECOLECON.2012.07.016

    OpenUrlCrossRef
18. Government of Western Australia Department of Water and Environmental Regulation. (2019). Waterwise Perth Action Plan. https://www.wa.gov.au/system/files/2020-06/Waterwise-perth-action-plan.pdf
19. Government of Western Australia Department of Water and Environmental Regulation. (2021). Gnangara Groundwater Allocation Plan: Draft for Public Comment.
20. 1. Griesoph, A.,
    2. Hoffmann, S.,
    3. Merk, C.,
    4. Rehdanz, K., &
    5. Schmidt, U.

    (2021). Guess What ...1—How Guessed Norms Nudge Climate-Friendly Food Choices in Real-Life Settings. Sustainability, 13(15), 8669. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13158669

    OpenUrl
21. 1. Grilli, G., &
    2. Curtis, J.

    (2021). Encouraging pro-environmental behaviours: A review of methods and approaches. In Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews (Vol. 135). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2020.110039
22. 1. Hanley, N.,
    2. Wright, R. E., &
    3. Adamowicz, V.

    (1998). Using Choice Experiments to Value the Environment. Environmental and Resource Economics, 11(4), 413–428.

    OpenUrlCrossRef
23. 1. Hensher, D. A., &
    2. Greene, W. H.

    (2003). The mixed logit model: The state of practice. Transportation, 30(2), 133–176. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1022558715350/METRICS

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
24. 1. Hunt, S.,
    2. Maher, J.,
    3. Swapan, M. S. H., &
    4. Zaman, A.

    (2022). Street Verge in Transition: A Study of Community Drivers and Local Policy Setting for Urban Greening in Perth, Western Australia. Urban Science 2022, Vol. 6, Page 15, 6(1), 15. https://doi.org/10.3390/URBANSCI6010015

    OpenUrl
25. 1. Hurd, B. H.,
    2. St. Hilaire, R., &
    3. White, J. M.

    (2006). Residential landscapes, homeowner attitudes, and water-wise choices in New Mexico. HortTechnology, 16(2). https://doi.org/10.21273/horttech.16.2.0241
26. 1. Ikin, K.,
    2. Knight, E.,
    3. Lindenmayer, D. B.,
    4. Fischer, J., &
    5. Manning, A. D.

    (2013). The influence of native versus exotic streetscape vegetation on the spatial distribution of birds in suburbs and reserves. Diversity and Distributions, 19(3), 294–306. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1472-4642.2012.00937.x

    OpenUrl
27. 1. Johnston, R. J.,
    2. Ndebele, T., &
    3. Newburn, D. A.

    (2022). Modeling transaction costs in household adoption of landscape conservation practices. American Journal of Agricultural Economics. https://doi.org/10.1111/AJAE.12319
28. 1. Larson, K. L., &
    2. Brumand, J.

    (2014). Paradoxes in Landscape Management and Water Conservation : Examining Neighborhood Norms and Institutional Forces Paradoxes in Landscape Management and Water Conservation : Cities and the Environment, 7(1).
29. 1. Larson, K. L.,
    2. Hoffman, J., &
    3. Ripplinger, J.

    (2017). Legacy effects and landscape choices in a desert city. Landscape and Urban Planning, 165. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2017.04.014
30. 1. Ligtermoet, E.,
    2. Ramalho, C. E.,
    3. Foellmer, J., &
    4. Pauli, N.

    (2022). Greening urban road verges highlights diverse views of multiple stakeholders on ecosystem service provision, challenges and preferred form. Urban Forestry & Urban Greening, 74, 127625. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ufug.2022.127625

    OpenUrl
31. 1. Ligtermoet, E.,
    2. Ramalho, C. E.,
    3. Martinus, K.,
    4. Chalmer, L., &
    5. Pauli, N.

    (2021). Stakeholder perspectives on the role of the street verge in delivering ecosystem services: A study from the Perth metropolitan region. www.nespurban.edu.au
32. 1. Lucas, K.,
    2. Brooks, M.,
    3. Darnton, A., &
    4. Jones, J. E.

    (2008). Promoting pro-environmental behaviour: existing evidence and policy implications. Environmental Science and Policy, 11(5). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2008.03.001
33. 1. Madrian, B. C.

    (2014). Applying insights from behavioral economics to policy design. Annual Review of Economics, 6. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-economics-080213-041033
34. 1. Marshall, A. J.,
    2. Grose, M. J., &
    3. Williams, N. S. G.

    (2019). From little things: More than a third of public green space is road verge. Urban Forestry & Urban Greening, 44, 126423. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.UFUG.2019.126423

    OpenUrl
35. 1. Mayer, P., &
    2. Lander, P.

    (2015). Outdoor Water Efficiency Offers Large Potential Savings, But Research on Effectiveness Remains Scarce. Journal of the American Water Works Association.
36. 1. Murphy, H., & van
    2. Leeuwen, S.

    (2021). Australia state of the environment 2021: biodiversity.
37. 1. Nassauer, J. I.,
    2. Wang, Z., &
    3. Dayrell, E.

    (2009). What will the neighbors think? Cultural norms and ecological design. Landscape and Urban Planning, 92(3-4), 282–292. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2009.05.010

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
38. 1. Niemiec, R. M.,
    2. Champine, V.,
    3. Vaske, J. J., &
    4. Mertens, A.

    (2020). Does the Impact of Norms Vary by Type of Norm and Type of Conservation Behavior? A Meta-Analysis. In Society and Natural Resources (Vol. 33, Issue 8). https://doi.org/10.1080/08941920.2020.1729912
39. 1. Perry, G. L. W.,
    2. Richardson, S. J.,
    3. Harré, N.,
    4. Hodges, D.,
    5. Lyver, P. O. B.,
    6. Maseyk, F. J. F.,
    7. Taylor, R.,
    8. Todd, J. H.,
    9. Tylianakis, J. M.,
    10. Yletyinen, J., &
    11. Brower, A.

    (2021). Evaluating the Role of Social Norms in Fostering Pro-Environmental Behaviors. Frontiers in Environmental Science, 9. https://doi.org/10.3389/fenvs.2021.620125
40. 1. Peterson, M. N.,
    2. Thurmond, B.,
    3. McHale, M.,
    4. Rodriguez, S.,
    5. Bondell, H. D., &
    6. Cook, M.

    (2012). Predicting native plant landscaping preferences in urban areas. Sustainable Cities and Society, 5(1), 70–76. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.SCS.2012.05.007

    OpenUrl
41. 1. Rose, J., &
    2. Bliemer, M.

    (n.d.). Ngene. http://www.choice-metrics.com/download.html
42. 1. Savari, M.,
    2. Damaneh, H. E.,
    3. Damaneh, H. E., &
    4. Cotton, M.

    (2023). Integrating the norm activation model and theory of planned behaviour to investigate farmer pro-environmental behavioural intention. Scientific Reports, 13(1). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-32831-x
43. 1. Shaw, A.,
    2. Miller, K. K., &
    3. Wescott, G.

    (2017). Australian native gardens: Is there scope for a community shift? Landscape and Urban Planning, 157. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2016.07.009
44. 1. Siebert, R.,
    2. Toogood, M., &
    3. Knierim, A.

    (2006). Factors affecting european farmers’ participation in biodiversity policies. Sociologia Ruralis, 46(4). https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9523.2006.00420.x
45. 1. Sok, J., van der
    2. Lans, I. A.,
    3. Hogeveen, H.,
    4. Elbers, A. R. W., & Oude
    5. Lansink, A. G. J. M.

    (2018). Farmers’ Preferences For Bluetongue Vaccination Scheme Attributes: An Integrated Choice and Latent Variable Approach. Journal of Agricultural Economics, 69(2). https://doi.org/10.1111/1477-9552.12249
46. StataCorp. (2019). Stata Statistical Software: Release 16. StataCorp LLC.
47. 1. Steg, L.,
    2. Bolderdijk, J. W.,
    3. Keizer, K., &
    4. Perlaviciute, G.

    (2014). An Integrated Framework for Encouraging Pro-environmental Behaviour: The role of values, situational factors and goals. In Journal of Environmental Psychology (Vol. 38). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2014.01.002
48. 1. Steg, L., &
    2. Vlek, C.

    (2009). Encouraging pro-environmental behaviour: An integrative review and research agenda. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 29(3). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2008.10.004
49. 1. Thaler, R. H., &
    2. Sunstein, C. R.

    (2008). Nudge: Improving decisions about health, wealth, and happiness. In Nudge: Improving Decisions about Health, Wealth, and Happiness. https://doi.org/10.1016/s1477-3880(15)30073-6
50. 1. Threlfall, C. G.,
    2. Williams, N. S. G.,
    3. Hahs, A. K., &
    4. Livesley, S. J.

    (2016). Approaches to urban vegetation management and the impacts on urban bird and bat assemblages. Landscape and Urban Planning, 153, 28–39. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2016.04.011

    OpenUrl
51. 1. Vickers, A.

    (2006). New directions in lawn and landscape water conservation. In Journal / American Water Works Association (Vol. 98, Issue 2). https://doi.org/10.1002/j.1551-8833.2006.tb07586.x
52. 1. Walker, J., &
    2. Ben-Akiva, M.

    (2002). Generalized random utility model. Mathematical Social Sciences, 43(3), 303–343. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0165-4896(02)00023-9

    OpenUrlCrossRef
53. 1. Zmyslony, J., &
    2. Gagnon, D.

    (1998). Residential management of urban front-yard landscape: A random process? Landscape and Urban Planning, 40(4), 295–307. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0169-2046(97)00090-X

    OpenUrl