It’s the Smell

References

1. 1. Allen, J. L. and
   2. N. M. Howe

   (2016). Landfill lichens: a checklist for freshkills park, staten island, new york. Opuscula Philolichenum 15, 82–91.

   OpenUrl
2. 1. Angrist, J. D. and
   2. J.-S. Pischke

   (2009). Mostly harmless econometrics: An empiricist’s companion. Princeton university press.
3. 1. Anselin, L. and
   2. D. Arribas-Bel

   (2013). Spatial fixed effects and spatial dependence in a single cross-section. Papers in Regional Science 92 (1), 3–17.

   OpenUrl
4. ATSDR (1998). Fresh kills landfill health consultation. Technical report.
5. ATSDR (2000a). Fresh killls landfill public heatlh assessment. Technical report.
6. ATSDR (2000b). Fresh kills landfill petitioned public heatlh assessment. Technical report.
7. 1. Baker, S. R.,
   2. N. Bloom, and
   3. S. J. Davis

   (2016). Measuring economic policy uncertainty. The Quarterly Journal of Economics 131 (4), 1593–1636.
8. 1. Baldauf, M.,
   2. L. Garlappi, and
   3. C. Yannelis

   (2020). Does climate change affect real estate prices? only if you believe in it. The Review of Financial Studies 33 (3), 1256–1295.
9. 1. Bellew, M.

   (2011). Question re: Freshkills. Correspondence to Jeff Chen, email.
10. 1. Benefield, J.,
    2. C. Cain, and
    3. K. Johnson

    (2014). A review of literature utilizing simultaneous modeling techniques for property price and time-on-market. Journal of Real Estate Literature 22 (2), 149–175.
11. 1. Bernstein, A.,
    2. S. B. Billings,
    3. M. T. Gustafson, and
    4. R. Lewis

    (2022). Partisan residential sorting on climate change risk. Journal of Financial Economics.
12. 1. Bian, X.,
    2. R. Brastow,
    3. B. Waller, and
    4. S. Wentland

    (2021). Foreclosure externalities and home liquidity. Real Estate Economics 49 (3), 876–916.
13. 1. Bird, D.

    (1967). Kearing sees a crisis in garbage disposal. The New York Times, 27.
14. 1. Blackburn, K. and
    2. M. Christensen

    (1989). Monetary policy and policy credibility: theories and evidence. Journal of Economic literature 27 (1), 1–45.
15. 1. Bleich, D. H.,
    2. M. C. Findlay III., and
    3. G. M. Phillips

    (1991). An evaluation of the impact of a well-designed landfill on surrounding property values. The Appraisal Journal 59 (2), 247.
16. 1. Bouvier, R. A.,
    2. J. M. Halstead,
    3. K. S. Conway, and
    4. A. B. Manalo

    (2000). The effects of landfills on rural residential property values: Some empirical evidence. Journal of Regional Analysis and Policy 30 (1100-2016-90003).
17. 1. Boyle, M. and
    2. K. Kiel

    (2001). A survey of house price hedonic studies of the impact of environmental externalities. Journal of Real Estate Literature 9 (2), 117–144.
18. 1. Braden, J. B.,
    2. X. Feng, and
    3. D. Won

    (2011). Waste sites and property values: a meta-analysis. Environmental and Resource Economics 50, 175–201.
19. 1. Brasington, D. M. and
    2. D. Hite

    (2005). Demand for environmental quality: a spatial hedonic analysis. Regional science and urban economics 35 (1), 57–82.
20. 1. Brastow, R. T.,
    2. B. D. Waller, and
    3. S. A. Wentland

    (2018). Temporally dynamic externalities and real estate liquidity. Journal of Real Estate Research 40 (2), 199–240.
21. 1. Brogaard, J. and
    2. A. Detzel

    (2015). The asset-pricing implications of government economic policy uncertainty. Management Science 61 (1), 3–18.
22. 1. Burks, E.

    (1970). Hill of landfill backed for S.I. The New York Times, 55.
23. 1. Calonico, S.,
    2. M. D. Cattaneo, and
    3. R. Titiunik

    (2014). Robust nonparametric confidence intervals for regression-discontinuity designs. Econometrica 82 (6), 2295–2326.
24. 1. Carrillo, P. E. and
    2. B. Williams

    (2019). The repeat time-on-the-market index. Journal of Urban Economics 112, 33–49.
25. 1. Cheng, C. and
    2. W. Long

    (2022). The effect of highly publicized police killings on policing: Evidence from large us cities. Journal of Public Economics 206, 104557.
26. 1. Clark, D. E. and
    2. L. A. Nieves

    (1994). An interregional hedonic analysis of noxious facility impacts on local wages and property values. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 27 (3), 235–253.
27. 1. Cornwall, G. and
    2. B. Sauley

    (2021). Indirect effects and causal inference: reconsidering regression discontinuity. Journal of Spatial Econometrics 2 (1), 8.
28. 1. Cornwall, G. J. and
    2. O. Parent

    (2017). Embracing heterogeneity: the spatial autoregressive mixture model. Regional Science and Urban Economics 64, 148–161.
29. 1. Dale, L.,
    2. J. C. Murdoch,
    3. M. A. Thayer, and
    4. P. A. Waddell

    (1999). Do property values rebound from environmental stigmas? evidence from dallas. Land Economics, 311–326.
30. 1. Deaton, B. J. and
    2. J. P. Hoehn

    (2004). Hedonic analysis of hazardous waste sites in the presence of other urban disamenities. Environmental Science & Policy 7 (6), 499–508.
31. 1. Din, A.,
    2. M. Hoesli, and
    3. A. Bender

    (2001). Environmental variables and real estate prices. Urban Studies 38 (11), 1989-2000.
32. 1. Drake, K. D.,
    2. N. C. Goldman, and
    3. F. Murphy

    (2022). Foreign employment, income shifting, and tax uncertainty. The Accounting Review 97 (2), 183–212.
33. 1. Drobetz, W.,
    2. S. El Ghoul,
    3. O. Guedhami, and
    4. M. Janzen

    (2018). Policy uncertainty, investment, and the cost of capital. Journal of Financial Stability 39, 28–45.
34. DSNY, D. o. S. N. Y. (1946). Annual reports. Technical report.
35. DSNY, D. o. S. N. Y. (1951). Annual reports. Technical report.
36. 1. Du, W.,
    2. C. E. Pflueger, and
    3. J. Schreger

    (2020). Sovereign debt portfolios, bond risks, and the credibility of monetary policy. The Journal of Finance 75 (6), 3097–3138.
37. 1. Farber, S.

    (1998). Undesirable facilities and property values: a summary of empirical studies. Ecological Economics 24 (1), 1–14.
38. 1. Friedman, M.

    (1982). Monetary policy: Theory and practice. Journal of Money, Credit and Banking 14 (1), 98-118.
39. 1. Gamper-Rabindran, S. and
    2. C. Timmins

    (2013). Does cleanup of hazardous waste sites raise housing values? evidence of spatially localized benefits. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 65 (3), 345–360.
40. 1. Garrod, G. and
    2. K. Willis

    (1998). Estimating lost amenity due to landfill waste disposal. Resources, Conservation and Recycling 22 (1–2), 83–95.
41. 1. Gindelsky, M.,
    2. J. Moulton, and
    3. S. A. Wentland

    (2019). Valuing housing services in the era of big data: A user cost approach leveraging zillow microdata. In Big Data for 21st Century Economic Statistics. University of Chicago Press.
42. 1. Greenstone, M. and
    2. J. Gallagher

    (2008). Does hazardous waste matter? evidence from the housing market and the superfund program. The Quarterly Journal of Economics 123 (3), 951–1003.
43. 1. Greenstone, M. and
    2. T. Gayer

    (2009). Quasi-experimental and experimental approaches to environmental economics. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 57 (1), 21–44.
44. 1. Guceri, I. and
    2. M. Albinowski

    (2021). Investment responses to tax policy under uncertainty. Journal of Financial Economics 141 (3), 1147–1170.
45. 1. Gulen, H. and
    2. M. Ion

    (2016). Policy uncertainty and corporate investment. The Review of Financial Studies 29 (3), 523–564.
46. 1. Ham, Y.-J.,
    2. D. J. Maddison, and
    3. R. J. Elliott

    (2013). The valuation of landfill disamenities in birmingham. Ecological Economics 85, 116–129.
47. 1. Hanlon, M.,
    2. E. L. Maydew, and
    3. D. Saavedra

    (2017). The taxman cometh: Does tax uncertainty affect corporate cash holdings? Review of Accounting Studies 22 (3), 1198–1228.
48. 1. Havlicek, J.,
    2. R. Richardson, and
    3. L. Davies

    (1971). Measuring the impacts of solid waste disposal site location on property values. Technical report.
49. 1. Hite, D.

    (1998). Information and bargaining in markets for environmental quality. Land Economics, 303–316.
50. 1. Hite, D.,
    2. W. Chern,
    3. F. Hitzhusen, and
    4. A. Randall

    (2001). Property-value impacts of an environmental disamenity: the case of landfills. The Journal of Real Estate Finance and Economics 22 (2), 185–202.
51. 1. Ihlanfeldt, K. R. and
    2. L. O. Taylor

    (2004). Externality effects of small-scale hazardous waste sites: evidence from urban commercial property markets. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 47 (1), 117–139.
52. 1. Imbens, G. W.

    (2004). Nonparametric estimation of average treatment effects under exogeneity: A review. Review of Economics and Statistics 86 (1), 4–29.
53. 1. Imbens, G. W. and
    2. T. Lemieux

    (2008). Regression discontinuity designs: A guide to practice. Journal of Econometrics 142 (2), 615–635.
54. 1. Jackson, T.

    (2001). The effects of environmental contamination on real estate: A literature review. Journal of Real Estate Literature 9 (2), 91–116.
55. 1. Jacob, M.,
    2. K. Wentland, and
    3. S. A. Wentland

    (2021). Real effects of tax uncertainty: Evidence from firm capital investments. Management Science.
56. 1. Jens, C. E.

    (2017). Political uncertainty and investment: Causal evidence from us gubernatorial elections. Journal of Financial Economics 124 (3), 563–579.
57. 1. Julio, B. and
    2. Y. Yook

    (2012). Political uncertainty and corporate investment cycles. The Journal of Finance 67 (1), 45–83.
58. 1. Kang, W.,
    2. K. Lee, and
    3. R. A. Ratti

    (2014). Economic policy uncertainty and firm-level investment. Journal of Macroeconomics 39, 42–53.
59. 1. Kiel, K. and
    2. J. Zabel

    (2001). Estimating the economic benefits of cleaning up superfund sites: The case of woburn, massachusetts. The Journal of Real Estate Finance and Economics 22 (2), 163–184.
60. 1. Kiel, K. A.

    (1995). Measuring the impact of the discovery and cleaning of identified hazardous waste sites on house values. Land Economics, 428–435.
61. 1. Kiel, K. A. and
    2. K. T. McClain

    (1995). House prices during siting decision stages: The case of an incinerator from rumor through operation. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 28 (2), 241–255.
62. 1. Kiel, K. A. and
    2. M. Williams

    (2007). The impact of superfund sites on local property values: Are all sites the same? Journal of Urban Economics 61 (1), 170–192.
63. 1. Kinnaman, T. C.

    (2009). The economics of municipal solid waste management. Waste Management, 2615.
64. 1. Kohlhase, J. E.

    (1991). The impact of toxic waste sites on housing values. Journal of Urban Economics 30 (1), 1–26.
65. 1. LeSage, J. P. and
    2. Y.-Y. Chih

    (2018). A bayesian spatial panel model with heterogeneous coefficients. Regional Science and Urban Economics 72, 58–73.
66. 1. Li, R. Y. M. and
    2. H. C. Y. Li

    (2018). Have housing prices gone with the smelly wind? big data analysis on landfill in hong kong. Sustainability 10 (2), 341.
67. 1. Mastromonaco, R. and
    2. P. Maniloff

    (2018). An examination of geographic heterogeneity in price effects of superfund site remediation. Economics Letters 171, 23–28.
68. 1. Mastromonaco, R. A.

    (2014). Hazardous waste hits Hollywood: Superfund and housing prices in los angeles. Environmental and Resource Economics 59, 207–230.
69. 1. McCallum, B. T.

    (1984). Credibility and monetary policy. Technical report, National Bureau of Economic Research.
70. 1. McCluskey, J. J. and
    2. G. C. Rausser

    (2001). Estimation of perceived risk and its effect on property values. Land Economics 77 (1), 42–55.
71. 1. McCluskey, J. J. and
    2. G. C. Rausser

    (2003a). Hazardous waste sites and housing appreciation rates. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 45 (2), 166–176.
72. 1. McCluskey, J. J. and
    2. G. C. Rausser

    (2003b). Stigmatized asset value: is it temporary or long-term? Review of Economics and Statistics 85 (2), 276–285.
73. 1. Melosi, M. V.

    (2020). Fresh Kills: a history of consuming and discarding in New York City. Columbia University Press.
74. 1. Messer, K. D.,
    2. W. D. Schulze,
    3. K. F. Hackett,
    4. T. A. Cameron, and
    5. G. H. McClelland

    (2006). Can stigma explain large property value losses? the psychology and economics of superfund. Environmental and Resource Economics 33, 299–324.
75. 1. Michaels, R. G. and
    2. V. K. Smith

    (1990). Market segmentation and valuing amenities with hedonic models: the case of hazardous waste sites. Journal of Urban Economics 28 (2), 223–242.
76. 1. Moulton, J. G.,
    2. N. J. Sanders, and
    3. S. A. Wentland

    (2024). Toxic assets: How the housing market responds to environmental information shocks. Land Economics, 100 (1), 68–88.
77. 1. Moulton, J. G.,
    2. B. D. Waller, and
    3. S. A. Wentland

    (2018). Who benefits from targeted property tax relief? evidence from Virginia elections. Journal of Policy Analysis and Management 37 (2), 240–264.
78. 1. Nelson, A. C.,
    2. J. Genereux, and
    3. M. Genereux

    (1992). Price effects of landfills on house values. Land Economics, 359–365.
79. 1. Nelson, A. C.,
    2. J. Genereux, and
    3. M. M. Genereux

    (1997). Price effects of landfills on different house value strata. Journal of Urban Planning and Development 123 (3), 59–67.
80. 1. Nolte, C.,
    2. K. J. Boyle,
    3. A. M. Chaudhry,
    4. C. Clapp,
    5. D. Guignet,
    6. H. Hennighausen,
    7. I. Kushner,
    8. Y. Liao,
    9. S. Mamun,
    10. A. Pollack

    , et al. (2024). Data practices for studying the impacts of environmental amenities and hazards with nationwide property data. Land Economics 100 (1), 200–221.
81. NYCDPR (2008). Fresh kills park: Draft generic environmental impact statement. Technical report.
82. NYSOSC (2005). Staten island: Economic development and the state of the borough economy. 14.
83. 1. Oster, E.

    (2019). Unobservable selection and coefficient stability: Theory and evidence. Journal of Business & Economic Statistics 37 (2), 187–204.
84. 1. Owusu, G.,
    2. E. Nketiah-Amponsah,
    3. S. N. A. Codjoe, and
    4. R. L. Afutu-Kotey

    (2014). How do Ghana’s landfills affect residential property values? A case study of two sites in Accra. Urban Geography 35 (8), 1140–1155.
85. 1. Parmeter, C. F. and
    2. J. C. Pope

    (2013). Quasi-experiments and hedonic property value methods. In Handbook on Experimental Economics and the Environment. Edward Elgar Publishing.
86. 1. Purnick, J.

    (2002). Metro matters: The politics of garbage, forever ripe. The New York Times.
87. 1. Ready, R.

    (2010). Do landfills always depress nearby property values? Journal of Real Estate Research 32 (3), 321–340.
88. 1. Reichert, A.,
    2. M. Small, and
    3. S. Mohanty

    (1992). The impact of landfills on residential property values. Journal of Real Estate Research 7 (3), 297–314.
89. 1. Rosen, S.

    (1974). Hedonic prices and implicit markets: product differentiation in pure competition. Journal of Political Economy 82 (1), 34–55.
90. 1. Seok Lim, J. and
    2. P. Missios

    (2007). Does size really matter? landfill scale impacts on property values. Applied Economics Letters 14 (10), 719–723.
91. 1. Severo, R.

    (1989). A wonder of waste rises on S.I.’. The New York Times, B1.
92. 1. Smith, V. K. and
    2. W. H. Desvousges

    (1986). The value of avoiding a lulu: hazardous waste disposal sites. The Review of Economics and Statistics, 293–299.
93. 1. Smolen, G.,
    2. G. Moore, and
    3. L. Conway

    (1992). Economic effects of hazardous chemical and proposed radioactive waste landfills on surrounding real estate values. Journal of Real Estate Research 7 (3), 283–295.
94. 1. Tanaka, S. and
    2. J. Zabel

    (2018). Valuing nuclear energy risk: Evidence from the impact of the fukushima crisis on us house prices. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 88, 411–426.
95. 1. Taylor, J. B.

    (1982). Establishing credibility: a rational expectations viewpoint. American Economic Review 72 (2), 81–85.
96. 1. Taylor, L. O.,
    2. D. J. Phaneuf, and
    3. X. Liu

    (2016). Disentangling property value impacts of environmental contamination from locally undesirable land uses: Implications for measuring post-cleanup stigma. Journal of Urban Economics 93, 85–98.
97. 1. Thayer, M.,
    2. H. Albers, and
    3. M. Rahmatian

    (1992). The benefits of reducing exposure to waste disposal sites: a hedonic housing value approach. Journal of Real Estate Research 7 (3), 265–282.
98. 1. Turnbull, G. K.,
    2. B. D. Waller,
    3. S. A. Wentland,
    4. W. R. Witschey, and
    5. V. Zahirovic-Herbert

    (2019). This old house: historical restoration as a neighborhood amenity. Land Economics 95 (2), 193-210.
99. 1. Walsh, D. C.

    (1991). The history of waste landfilling in New York City. Groundwater 29 (4), 591–630.
100. 1. Wentland, S.,
     2. J. Moulton, and
     3. G. Cornwall

     (2023). For what it’s worth: Measuring land value in the era of big data and machine learning. BEA Working Paper.
101. 1. Wentland, S.,
     2. B. D. Waller, and
     3. R. T. Brastow

     (2012). Estimating the effect of crime risk on property values and time on market: Evidence from Megan’s law in Virginia. Real Estate Economics.
102. 1. Wong, S. K.,
     2. C. Y. Yiu, and
     3. K. W. Chau

     (2012). Liquidity and information asymmetry in the real estate market. The Journal of Real Estate Finance and Economics 45 (1), 49–62.
103. 1. Wu, J.,
     2. J. Zhang,
     3. S. Zhang, and
     4. L. Zou

     (2020). The economic policy uncertainty and firm investment in Australia. Applied Economics 52 (31), 3354–3378.