The Economic Benefits of Nature-Based Solutions for Climate Risk

References

1. 1. Bergstrom, J. C., &
   2. Taylor, L. O.

   (2006). Using meta-analysis for benefits transfer: Theory and practice. Ecological Economics, 60(2), 351–360. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2006.06.015

   OpenUrl
2. 1. Bockarjova, M.,
   2. Botzen, W. J. W., &
   3. Koetse, M. J.

   (2020). Economic valuation of green and blue nature in cities: A meta-analysis. Ecological Economics, 169, 106448. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2019.106480

   OpenUrl
3. 1. Brander, L.M. de Groot, R,
   2. Guisado Goñi, V.,
   3. van 't Hoff, V.,
   4. Schägner, P.,
   5. Solomonides, S.,
   6. McVittie, A.,
   7. Eppink, F.,
   8. Sposato, M.,
   9. Do, L.,
   10. Ghermandi, A., and
   11. Sinclair, M.

   (2024). Ecosystem Services Valuation Database (ESVD). Foundation for Sustainable Development and Brander Environmental Economics.
4. 1. Brander, L. M., &
   2. Koetse, M. J.

   (2011). The value of urban open space: Meta-analyses of contingent valuation and hedonic pricing results. Journal of Environmental Management, 92(10), 2763-2773. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2011.06.019

   OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
5. 1. Brander, L.M.

   (2013). Guidance manual on value transfer methods for ecosystem services. doi:10.13140/2.1.4203.8569.

   OpenUrlCrossRef
6. 1. Brouwer, R.

   (2000). Environmental value transfer: state of the art and future prospects. Ecological Economics, 32(1), 137–152. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0921-8009(99)00070-1

   OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
7. 1. Coventry, P. A.,
   2. Brown, J. E.,
   3. Pervin, J.,
   4. Brabyn, S.,
   5. Pateman, R.,
   6. Breedvelt, J., &
   7. White, P. C.

   (2021). Nature-based outdoor activities for mental and physical health: Systematic review and meta-analysis. SSM - Population Health, 16, 100917. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssmph.2021.100917

   OpenUrlPubMed
8. CPB Netherlands Bureau for Economic Policy Analysis. (2022). De waarde van de leefomgeving: De invloed van omgevingskenmerken op huizenprijzen. The Hague: CPB.
9. 1. Dalhuisen, J. M.,
   2. Florax, R. J. G. M.,
   3. de Groot, H. L. F., &
   4. Nijkamp, P.

   (2003). Price and Income Elasticities of Residential Water Demand: A Meta-Analysis. Land Economics, 79(2), 292–308. https://doi.org/10.2307/3146872

   OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
10. 1. Filho, W. L.,
    2. Tripathi, S. K.,
    3. Andrade Guerra, J. B. S. O.,
    4. Giné-Garriga, R.,
    5. Orlovic Lovren, V., &
    6. Willats, J.

    (2021). A global meta-analysis for estimating local ecosystem service value functions. Science of the Total Environment, 783, 146722. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.146722

    OpenUrlPubMed
11. 1. Glass, G. V.

    (1976). Primary, secondary, and meta-analysis of research. Educational Researcher, 5(10), 3-8. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X005010003

    OpenUrlCrossRef
12. 1. Haidich, A. B.

    (2010). Meta-analysis in medical research. Hippokratia, 14(Suppl 1), 29-37. Retrieved from https://www.hippokratia.gr/index.php/hippo/article/view/123 [Accessed April 2nd, 2025].

    OpenUrlPubMed
13. IPCC Climate Change (2021) The Physical Science Basis. Contribution of Working Group I to the Sixth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change [Masson-Delmotte, V., P. Zhai, A. Pirani, S.L. Connors, C. Péan, S. Berger, N. Caud, Y. Chen, L. Goldfarb, M.I. Gomis, M. Huang, K. Leitzell, E. Lonnoy, J.B.R. Matthews, T.K. Maycock, T. Waterfield, O. Yelekçi, R. Yu, and B. Zhou (eds.)]. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, United Kingdom and New York, NY, USA, In press, doi:10.1017/9781009157896

    OpenUrlCrossRef
14. 1. Jensen, J. L. W. V.

    (1906). Sur les fonctions convexes et les inégalités entre les valeurs moyennes. Acta Mathematica, 30, 175–193. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02418571

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
15. 1. Jones, P., &
    2. Doberstein, B.

    (2022). Encouraging co-benefits in climate-affected hazard adaptation: Developing and testing a scorecard for project design and evaluation. International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction, 63, 102487. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijdrr.2021.102487

    OpenUrl
16. 1. Kaul, S.,
    2. Boyle, K. J.,
    3. Kuminoff, N. V.,
    4. Parmeter, C. F., &
    5. Pope, J. C.

    (2013). What can we learn from benefit transfer errors? Empirical evidence from 20 years of research. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 66(3), 90–104. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeem.2013.05.001

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
17. Millennium Ecosystem Assessment (2005). Ecosystems and human well-being: wetlands and water synthesis. World Resources Institute, Washington, DC.
18. 1. Morrison, M., &
    2. Bennett, J.

    (2000). Choice modelling, non-use values and benefit transfer. Economic Analysis and Policy, 30(1), 13-32. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0313-5926(00)50002-7

    OpenUrlCrossRef
19. Munich Re. (2022). Natural catastrophe review: Series of disasters in 2021 dominated by US weather extremes. Retrieved from https://www.munichre.com/en/company/media-relations/media-information-and-corporate-news/media-information/2022/natural-catastrophe-review-2021.html [Accessed April 2nd, 2025].
20. Munich Re. (2022). Natural catastrophe review: Series of disasters in 2021 dominated by US weather extremes. Retrieved from https://www.munichre.com/en/company/media-relations/media-information-and-corporate-news/media-information/2022/natural-catastrophe-review-2021.html [Accessed November 10th, 2024].
21. 1. Naumann, S.

    (2020). The underinvestment in nature-based solutions: Evidence from a systematic review. Journal of Environmental Management, 260, 110076. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2020.110076

    OpenUrl
22. 1. Nelson, J. P., &
    2. Kennedy, P. E.

    (2009). The Use (and Abuse) of Meta-Analysis in Environmental and Natural Resource Economics: An Assessment. Environmental and Resource Economics, 42(3), 345–377. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10640-008-9253-5

    OpenUrlCrossRef
23. 1. Nobel, A.,
    2. Lizin, S.,
    3. Brouwer, R.,
    4. Bruns, S. B.,
    5. Stern, D. I., &
    6. Malina, R.

    (2020). Are biodiversity losses valued differently when they are caused by human activities? A meta-analysis of the non-use valuation literature. Environmental Research Letters, 15(7), 073003. https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/ab8ec2

    OpenUrl
24. 1. Ojijo, A., &
    2. Steiger, R.

    (2024). Resident perceptions of tourism development and land-use change in protected areas: Evidence from East Africa. Journal of Sustainable Tourism, 32(5), 845–861. https://doi.org/10.1108/TR-10-2023-0713

    OpenUrl
25. 1. Page, M. J.,
    2. McKenzie, J. E.,
    3. Bossuyt, P. M.,
    4. Boutron, I.,
    5. Hoffmann, T. C.,
    6. Mulrow, C. D., … &
    7. Moher, D.

    (2021). The PRISMA 2020 statement: An updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. BMJ, 372, n71. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.n71

    OpenUrlFREE Full Text
26. 1. Reynaud, A., &
    2. Lanzanova, D.

    (2017). A Global Meta-Analysis of the Value of Ecosystem Services Provided by Lakes. Ecological economics : the journal of the International Society for Ecological Economics, 137, 184–194. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2017.03.001

    OpenUrlPubMed
27. 1. Selivanov, A., &
    2. Hlaváčková, P.

    (2021). Valuation of ecosystem services: A review of methodologies and case studies. Ecological Indicators, 125, 107496. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2021.107496

    OpenUrl
28. 1. Spash, C. L., &
    2. Vatn, A.

    (2006). Transferring environmental value estimates: Issues and alternatives. Ecological Economics, 60(2), 379–388. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2006.06.010

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
29. 1. Stanley, T. D.

    (2013). Meta-regression methods for detecting and estimating empirical effects in the presence of publication selection. Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics, 75(1), 103-127. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0084.2011.00652.x

    OpenUrl
30. 1. Stanley, T. D., &
    2. Doucouliagos, H.

    (2014). Meta-regression approximations to reduce publication selection bias. Research Synthesis Methods, 5(1), 60-78. https://doi.org/10.1002/jrsm.1095

    OpenUrlPubMed
31. 1. Sudmeier-Rieux, K.,
    2. Arce-Mojica, T.,
    3. Boehmer, H. J.,
    4. Doswald, N.,
    5. Emerton, L.,
    6. Friess, D. A., &
    7. Walz, Y.

    (2021). Ecosystem-based disaster risk reduction: An overview of risk and policy. International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction, 50, 101798. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijdrr.2020.101798

    OpenUrl
32. 1. Su, J.,
    2. Friess, D.A. &
    3. Gasparatos, A.

    (2021) A meta-analysis of the ecological and economic outcomes of mangrove restoration. Nat Commun 12, 5050. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-021-25349-1

    OpenUrlPubMed
33. 1. Staccione, A.,
    2. Garcìa Alvarez, G.,
    3. Tesselaar, M.,
    4. Arneth, A., and
    5. Botzen, W. J. W.

    (2023). Methods for assessing risk reduction and co-benefits by nature-based solutions. Open Science Framework Registries: https://doi.org/10.17605/OSF.IO/FUT97, 2023.
34. 1. Tantiwat, W.,
    2. Gan, C., &
    3. Yang, W.

    (2021). The Estimation of the Willingness to Pay for Air-Quality Improvement in Thailand. Sustainability, 13(21), 12313. https://doi.org/10.3390/su132112313

    OpenUrl
35. The International Disaster Database (2022). EM-DAT: The International Disaster Database. Retrieved from https://www.emdat.be/ [Accessed April, 1st 2025]
36. TEEB (2011). The Economics of Ecosystems and Biodiversity in National and International Policy Making. Edited by Patrick ten Brink. Earthscan, London & Washington.
37. 1. Travisi, C. M., &
    2. Nijkamp, P.

    (2004). Are Italians willing to pay for agricultural environmental safety? A stated choice approach. European Association of Agricultural Economists Seminar Proceedings, 84th Seminar, Zeist, The Netherlands, February 8–11. https://doi.org/10.22004/ag.econ.24988
38. 1. Van Zanten, Boris Ton;
    2. Gutierrez Goizueta, Gonzalo;
    3. Brander, Luke Mckinnon;
    4. Gonzalez Reguero, Borja;
    5. Griffin, Robert;
    6. Macleod, Kavita Kapur;
    7. Alves Beloqui, Alida Ivana;
    8. Midgley, Amelia;
    9. Herrera Garcia, Luis Diego;
    10. Jongman, Brenden

    . 2023. Assessing the Benefits and Costs of Nature-Based Solutions for Climate Resilience: A Guideline for Project Developers. © World Bank. http://hdl.handle.net/10986/39811
39. 1. Whitehead, J. C., &
    2. Haab, T. C.

    (2013). Contingent valuation methodology. In Handbook on Contingent Valuation (pp. 93-116). Edward Elgar Publishing. https://doi.org/10.4337/9781781006151.00013