Linking Forests to Airsheds

References

1. 1. Adhikari, D.,
   2. Thacher, J. A.,
   3. Chermak, J. M., &
   4. Berrens, R. P.

   (2017). Linking forest to faucets in a distant municipal area: Public support for forest restoration and water security in Albuquerque, New Mexico. Water Economics and Policy, 3(01), 1650019. https://doi.org/10.1142/S2382624X16500193

   OpenUrl
2. 1. Balcombe, K., &
   2. Fraser, I.

   (2009). Dichotomous-choice contingent valuation with ‘don’t know’ responses and misreporting. Journal of Applied Econometrics, 24(7), 1137-1152.

   OpenUrl
3. 1. Basumatary, J.,
   2. Dhote, M., &
   3. Bansod, S. D.

   (2025). GIS-Based Delineation of Air Basins, Airsheds, and Air Zones. In Smart Buildings and Cities with Remote Sensing and GIS, Chapter 18, pp. 297-312. Chapman and Hall/CRC, Boca Raton, FL, USA.
4. 1. Bernheim, B. D., &
   2. Rangel, A.

   (2009). Beyond revealed preference: choice-theoretic foundations for behavioral welfare economics. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 124(1), 51-104.

   OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
5. 1. Boman, M.

   (2022). The sample median as an estimator of population mean true willingness to pay under valuation uncertainty: a synthesis and analysis of the literature. Applied Economics, 54(55), 6393-6405.

   OpenUrl
6. 1. Boyle, K. J.

   (2017). Contingent valuation in practice. In A primer on nonmarket valuation, 2nd edition, Chapter 4, pp. 83-131. Springer, Dordrecht, Netherlands.
7. 1. Bruce, E. D.,
   2. Folorunsho, A.,
   3. Jaisawal, N.,
   4. Gaw, E., &
   5. Li, Y.

   (2025). Intra-Continental Transport of Western Wildfire Smoke Heightens Health Risks Across North America. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 22(2), 226. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph22020226

   OpenUrl
8. 1. Cameron, T. A.

   (1988). A new paradigm for valuing non-market goods using referendum data: maximum likelihood estimation by censored logistic regression. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 15(3), 355-379.

   OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
9. 1. Carson, R. T., &
   2. Groves, T.

   (2007). Incentive and informational properties of preference questions. Environmental and Resource Economics, 37(1), 181-210.

   OpenUrlCrossRef
10. 1. Carson, R. T., &
    2. Groves, T.

    (2011). Incentive and information properties of preference questions: commentary and extensions. In The International Handbook on Non-Market Environmental Valuation, Chapter 15, pp. 300-321. Edward Elgar, Cheltenham, United Kingdom.
11. 1. Carson, R. T.,
    2. Groves, T., &
    3. List, J. A.

    (2014). Consequentiality: A theoretical and experimental exploration of a single binary choice. Journal of the Association of Environmental and Resource Economists, 1(1/2), 171-207.

    OpenUrlCrossRef
12. 1. Champ, P. A.,
    2. Moore, R., &
    3. Bishop, R. C.

    (2009). A comparison of approaches to mitigate hypothetical bias. Agricultural and Resource Economics Review, 38(2), 166-180.

    OpenUrlWeb of Science
13. 1. Cramer, J. S., &
    2. Ridder, G.

    (1991). Pooling states in the multinomial logit model. Journal of Econometrics, 47(2-3), 267-272.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
14. 1. Crockett, J. L., &
    2. Westerling, A. L.

    (2018). Greater temperature and precipitation extremes intensify Western US droughts, wildfire severity, and Sierra Nevada tree mortality. Journal of Climate, 31(1), 341-354.

    OpenUrl
15. 1. Cropper, M. L.,
    2. Hu, M.,
    3. Park, Y., &
    4. Muller, N. Z.

    (2025). Geographic Resolution in Environmental Policy: EPA′s Shift from Regions to Counties Under the Clean Air Act (No. w33412). National Bureau of Economic Research. https://doi.org/10.3386/w33412
16. 1. Crowley, C.,
    2. Miller, A.,
    3. Richardson, R., &
    4. Malcom, J.

    (2023). Increasing damages from wildfires warrant investment in wildland fire management. Department of the Interior, 1-16. US Government.
17. 1. Cumming, R. G.

    (1990). Is probability sampling always better? A comparison of results from a quota and a probability sample survey. Australian and New Zealand Journal of Public Health, 14(2), 132-137.

    OpenUrl
18. 1. Deville, J. C.

    (1991). A theory of quota surveys. Survey Methodology, 17(2), 163-181.

    OpenUrl
19. 1. Gellman, J.,
    2. Walls, M., &
    3. Wibbenmeyer, M.

    (2022). Wildfire, smoke, and outdoor recreation in the western United States. Forest Policy and Economics, 134, 102619. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.forpol.2021.102619

    OpenUrl
20. 1. Gould, C. F.,
    2. Heft-Neal, S.,
    3. Johnson, M.,
    4. Aguilera, J.,
    5. Burke, M., &
    6. Nadeau, K.

    (2024). Health effects of wildfire smoke exposure. Annual Review of Medicine, 75(1), 277-292.

    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
21. 1. Groves, R. M.,
    2. Fowler Jr, F. J.,
    3. Couper, M. P.,
    4. Lepkowski, J. M.,
    5. Singer, E., &
    6. Tourangeau, R.

    (2011). FAQs About Survey Methodology. In Survey methodology. Chapter 12, pp. 409-410. John Wiley & Sons, Hoboken, NJ, USA.
22. 1. Guttikunda, S. K.

    (2024). Designating Airsheds in India for Urban and Regional Air Quality Management. Air, 2(3), 247-257.

    OpenUrl
23. 1. Haab, T. C., &
    2. McConnell, K. E.

    (1997). Referendum models and negative willingness to pay: alternative solutions. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 32(2), 251-270.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
24. 1. Haab, T. C., &
    2. McConnell, K. E.

    (2002). The Distribution of Willingness to Pay. In Valuing Environmental and Natural Resources: The Econometrics of Non-Market Valuation. Chapter 4, pp. 84-113. Edward Elgar, Cheltenham, United Kingdom and Northampton, MA, USA.
25. 1. Haab, T.,
    2. Lewis, L. Y., &
    3. Whitehead, J.

    (2020). State of the art of contingent valuation. In Oxford Research Encyclopedia of Environmental Science. Oxford University Press, Oxford, United Kingdom. https://doi.org/10.1093/acrefore/9780199389414.013.450
26. 1. Halstead, J. M.,
    2. Luloff, A. E., &
    3. Stevens, T. H.

    (1992). Protest bidders in contingent valuation. Northeastern Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, 21(2), 160-169.

    OpenUrl
27. 1. Hanemann, M.,
    2. Krosnick, J.,
    3. Wichgers, L.,
    4. Wooldridge, J.,
    5. Lampron, S.,
    6. Schneider, D.,
    7. Shaeffer, E. M.,
    8. Tompson, T., &
    9. Visser, P.

    (2025). Ben Franklin’s Whistle, Cost Expectations, and the Choice of Valuation Format. Environmental and Resource Economics, 88, 1375-1406.

    OpenUrl
28. 1. Harrison, G. W.

    (2007). Making choice studies incentive compatible. In Valuing Environmental Amenities using Stated Choice Studies, Chapter 4, pp. 67-110. Springer, Dordrecht, Netherlands.
29. 1. Herriges, J.,
    2. Kling, C.,
    3. Liu, C. C., &
    4. Tobias, J.

    (2010). What are the consequences of consequentiality? Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 59(1), 67-81.

    OpenUrlCrossRef
30. 1. Higuera-Mendieta, I., &
    2. Burke, M.

    (2025). The air pollution benefits of low severity fire [Preprint]. EarthArXiv. https://doi.org/10.31223/X52M9N
31. 1. Hjerpe, E. E.,
    2. Colavito, M. M.,
    3. Waltz, A. E., &
    4. Meador, A. S.

    (2024). Return on investments in restoration and fuel treatments in frequent-fire forests of the American west: A metaanalysis. Ecological Economics, 223, 108244. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2024.108244

    OpenUrl
32. 1. Huang, R.,
    2. Hu, Y.,
    3. Russell, A. G.,
    4. Mulholland, J. A., &
    5. Odman, M. T.

    (2019). The impacts of prescribed fire on PM2. 5 air quality and human health: application to asthma-related emergency room visits in Georgia, USA. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 16(13), 2312. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph16132312

    OpenUrl
33. 1. Jaffe, D. A.,
    2. O’Neill, S. M.,
    3. Larkin, N. K.,
    4. Holder, A. L.,
    5. Peterson, D. L.,
    6. Halofsky, J. E., &
    7. Rappold, A. G.

    (2020). Wildfire and prescribed burning impacts on air quality in the United States. Journal of the Air & Waste Management Association, 70(6), 583-615.

    OpenUrlPubMed
34. 1. Johnston, R. J.,
    2. Boyle, K. J.,
    3. Adamowicz, W. (Vic),
    4. Bennett, J.,
    5. Brouwer, R.,
    6. Cameron, T. A.,
    7. Hanemann, W. M.,
    8. Hanley, N.,
    9. Ryan, M.,
    10. Scarpa, R.,
    11. Tourangeau, R., &
    12. Vossler, C. A.

    (2017). Contemporary Guidance for Stated Preference Studies. Journal of the Association of Environmental and Resource Economists, 4(2), 319-405.

    OpenUrlCrossRef
35. 1. Jones, B. A.,
    2. Thacher, J. A.,
    3. Chermak, J. M., &
    4. Berrens, R. P.

    (2016). Wildfire smoke health costs: a methods case study for a Southwestern US ‘mega-fire’. Journal of Environmental Economics and Policy, 5(2), 181-199.

    OpenUrl
36. 1. Jones, B. A.

    (2018). Willingness to pay estimates for wildfire smoke health impacts in the US using the life satisfaction approach. Journal of Environmental Economics and Policy, 7(4), 403-419.

    OpenUrl
37. 1. Jones, B. A., &
    2. Berrens, R. P.

    (2021). Prescribed burns, smoke exposure, and infant health. Contemporary Economic Policy, 39(2), 292-309.

    OpenUrl
38. 1. Jones, B. A.,
    2. McDermott, S.,
    3. Champ, P. A., &
    4. Berrens, R. P.

    (2022). More smoke today for less smoke tomorrow? We need to better understand the public health benefits and costs of prescribed fire. International Journal of Wildland Fire, 31(10), 918-926.

    OpenUrl
39. 1. Kolden, C. A.

    (2019). We’re not doing enough prescribed fire in the Western United States to mitigate wildfire risk. Fire, 2(2), 30. https://doi.org/10.3390/fire2020030

    OpenUrl
40. 1. Krinsky, I., &
    2. Robb, A. L.

    (1986). On approximating the statistical properties of elasticities. The Review of Economics and Statistics, 715-719.
41. 1. Kriström, B.

    (1990). A non-parametric approach to the estimation of welfare measures in discrete response valuation studies. Land Economics, 66(2), 135-139.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
42. 1. Lades, L. K.,
    2. Zawojska, E.,
    3. Johnston, R. J.,
    4. Hanley, N.,
    5. Delaney, L., &
    6. Czajkowski, M.

    (2025). Anomalies or expected behaviors? Understanding stated preferences and welfare implications in light of contemporary behavioral economics. Review of Environmental Economics and Policy, 19(1), 48-68.

    OpenUrl
43. 1. Liu, J. C.,
    2. Pereira, G.,
    3. Uhl, S. A.,
    4. Bravo, M. A., &
    5. Bell, M. L.

    (2015). A systematic review of the physical health impacts from non-occupational exposure to wildfire smoke. Environmental Research, 136, 120-132.

    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
44. 1. Liu, J. C.,
    2. Wilson, A.,
    3. Mickley, L. J.,
    4. Dominici, F.,
    5. Ebisu, K.,
    6. Wang, Y.,
    7. Sulprizio, M. P.,
    8. Peng, R. D.,
    9. Yue, X.,
    10. Son, J.-Y.,
    11. Anderson, G. B., &
    12. Bell, M. L.

    (2017). Wildfire-specific fine particulate matter and risk of hospital admissions in urban and rural counties. Epidemiology, 28(1), 77-85.

    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
45. 1. Loomis, J. B.

    (2014). Strategies for overcoming hypothetical bias in stated preference surveys. Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, 34-46.
46. 1. Meyerhoff, J., &
    2. Liebe, U.

    (2006). Protest beliefs in contingent valuation: explaining their motivation. Ecological Economics, 57(4), 583-594.

    OpenUrlCrossRef
47. 1. Miller, R. K.,
    2. Field, C. B., &
    3. Mach, K. J.

    (2020). Barriers and enablers for prescribed burns for wildfire management in California. Nature Sustainability, 3(2), 101-109.

    OpenUrl
48. 1. Mockrin, M. H.,
    2. Helmers, D.,
    3. Martinuzzi, S.,
    4. Hawbaker, T. J., &
    5. Radeloff, V. C.

    (2022). Growth of the wildland-urban interface within and around US National Forests and Grasslands, 1990–2010. Landscape and Urban Planning, 218, 104283. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2021.104283

    OpenUrl
49. 1. Mohr, T. M.,
    2. Groothuis, P. A.,
    3. Whitehead, J. C.,
    4. Cockerill, K.,
    5. Anderson Jr, W. P., &
    6. Gu, C.

    (2023). Discrete and continuous measures of consequentiality. Journal of Environmental Economics and Policy, 12(3), 342-362.

    OpenUrl
50. 1. Navarro, K. M.,
    2. Schweizer, D.,
    3. Balmes, J. R., &
    4. Cisneros, R.

    (2018). A review of community smoke exposure from wildfire compared to prescribed fire in the United States. Atmosphere, 9(5), 185. https://doi.org/10.3390/atmos9050185

    OpenUrl
51. 1. Nelson, M. D.,
    2. Liknes, G. C., &
    3. Butler, B. J.

    (2010). Map of forest ownership in the conterminous United States.[Scale 1: 7,500,000]. Res. Map NRS-2. Newtown Square, PA: US Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Northern Research Station., 2, 1-2.

    OpenUrl
52. 1. Parks, S. A.,
    2. Holsinger, L. M.,
    3. Panunto, M. H.,
    4. Jolly, W. M.,
    5. Dobrowski, S. Z., &
    6. Dillon, G. K.

    (2018). High-severity fire: evaluating its key drivers and mapping its probability across western US forests. Environmental Research Letters, 13(4), 044037. https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/aab791

    OpenUrl
53. 1. Parks, S. A.,
    2. Guiterman, C. H.,
    3. Margolis, E. Q.,
    4. Lonergan, M.,
    5. Whitman, E.,
    6. Abatzoglou, J. T.,
    7. Falk, D. A.,
    8. Johnston, J. D.,
    9. Daniels, L. D.,
    10. Lafon, C. W.,
    11. Loehman, R. A.,
    12. Kipfmueller, K. F.,
    13. Naficy, C. E.,
    14. Parisien, M.-A.,
    15. Portier, J.,
    16. Stambaugh, M. C.,
    17. Williams, A. P.,
    18. Wion, A. P., &
    19. Yocom, L. L.

    (2025). A fire deficit persists across diverse North American forests despite recent increases in area burned. Nature Communications, 16(1), 1493. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-025-56333-8

    OpenUrlPubMed
54. 1. Poe, G. L.,
    2. Clark, J. E.,
    3. Rondeau, D., &
    4. Schulze, W. D.

    (2002). Provision point mechanisms and field validity tests of contingent valuation. Environmental and Resource Economics, 23, 105-131.

    OpenUrlCrossRef
55. 1. Preisler, H. K.,
    2. Westerling, A. L.,
    3. Gebert, K. M.,
    4. Muñoz-Arriola, F., &
    5. Holmes, T. P.

    (2011). Spatially explicit forecasts of large wildland fire probability and suppression costs for California. International Journal of Wildland Fire, 20(4), 508-517.

    OpenUrl
56. 1. Raab, H.,
    2. Moyer, J.,
    3. Afrin, S.,
    4. Garcia-Menendez, F., &
    5. Ward-Caviness, C. K.

    (2023). Prescribed fires, smoke exposure, and hospital utilization among heart failure patients. Environmental Health, 22(1), 86. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12940-023-01032-4

    OpenUrlPubMed
57. 1. Richardson, L.,
    2. Loomis, J. B., &
    3. Champ, P. A.

    (2013). Valuing morbidity from wildfire smoke exposure: a comparison of revealed and stated preference techniques. Land Economics, 89(1), 76-100.

    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
58. 1. Sanderfoot, O. V.,
    2. Bassing, S. B.,
    3. Brusa, J. L.,
    4. Emmet, R. L.,
    5. Gillman, S. J.,
    6. Swift, K., &
    7. Gardner, B.

    (2022). A review of the effects of wildfire smoke on the health and behavior of wildlife. Environmental Research Letters, 16(12), 123003. https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/ac30f6

    OpenUrl
59. 1. Schultz, C. A.,
    2. McCaffrey, S. M., &
    3. Huber-Stearns, H. R.

    (2019). Policy barriers and opportunities for prescribed fire application in the western United States. International Journal of Wildland Fire, 28(11), 874-884.

    OpenUrl
60. 1. Schweizer, D.,
    2. Cisneros, R.,
    3. Traina, S.,
    4. Ghezzehei, T. A., &
    5. Shaw, G.

    (2017). Using National Ambient Air Quality Standards for fine particulate matter to assess regional wildland fire smoke and air quality management. Journal of Environmental Management, 201, 345-356.

    OpenUrlPubMed
61. 1. Segerson, K.

    (2017). Valuing environmental goods and services: an economic perspective. In: A Primer on Nonmarket Valuation, 2nd edition, Chapter 1, pp. 1-25. Springer, Dordrecht, Netherlands.
62. 1. Shrestha, A.,
    2. Grala, R. K.,
    3. Grado, S. C.,
    4. Roberts, S. D.,
    5. Gordon, J. S., &
    6. Adhikari, R. K.

    (2021). Nonindustrial private forest landowner willingness to pay for prescribed burning to lower wildfire hazards. Forest Policy and Economics, 127, 102451. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.forpol.2021.102451

    OpenUrl
63. 1. Stephens, S. L.,
    2. McIver, J. D.,
    3. Boerner, R. E. J.,
    4. Fettig, C. J.,
    5. Fontaine, J. B.,
    6. Hartsough, B. R.,
    7. Kennedy, P. L., &
    8. Schwilk, D. W.

    (2012). The effects of forest fuel-reduction treatments in the United States. BioScience, 62(6), 549-560.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
64. 1. Tripathi, S. N.,
    2. Yadav, S., &
    3. Sharma, K.

    (2024). Air pollution from biomass burning in India. Environmental Research Letters, 19(7), 073007. https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/ad4a90

    OpenUrl
65. 1. Turnbull, B. W.

    (1976). The empirical distribution function with arbitrarily grouped, censored and truncated data. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society: Series B (Methodological), 38(3), 290-295.

    OpenUrlWeb of Science
66. US Bureau of Labor Statistics. (2025). CPI inflation calculator.
67. US Census Bureau. (2021). American Community Survey, 1-year estimates (ACS 2021), Subject Table S1101: Households and Families [Data set]. US Department of Commerce.
68. US Department of Health and Human Services, Office of the Assistant Secretary for Planning and Evaluation. (2016). Guidelines for regulatory impact analysis. https://aspe.hhs.gov/sites/default/files/private/pdf/242926/HHS_RIAGuidance.pdf
69. US Government Accountability Office. (n.d.). Antideficiency Act resources. https://www.gao.gov/legal/appropriations-law/resources
70. US Environmental Protection Agency. (2021). Comparative assessment of the impacts of prescribed fire versus wildfire (CAIF): A case study in the western US.
71. US Environmental Protection Agency. (2025). About air data reports. https://www.epa.gov/outdoor-air-quality-data/about-air-data-reports
72. 1. Wang, P. W.,
    2. Ya, J.,
    3. Zhong, L. S., &
    4. Mei, R.

    (2016). Respondent uncertainty and reliability in contingent valuation—A case of the Dalai Lake protected area. Limnologica, 58, 59-68.

    OpenUrl
73. 1. Wen, J.,
    2. Heft-Neal, S.,
    3. Baylis, P.,
    4. Boomhower, J., &
    5. Burke, M.

    (2023). Quantifying fire-specific smoke exposure and health impacts. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 120(51), e2309325120. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2309325120

    OpenUrlPubMed
74. 1. Whitehead, J. C.,
    2. Haab, T.,
    3. Lewis, L.,
    4. Richardson, L., &
    5. Schuhmann, P.

    (2024). A meta-analysis of single-bound contingent valuation: Willingness to pay estimates, determinants of reliability and split-sample hypothesis tests [Unpublished manuscript].
75. 1. Wear, D. N.,
    2. Wibbenmeyer, M., &
    3. Zhu, Y.

    (2025). The Costs of Achieving Forest Resilience in California (No. 25-03). Resources for the Future.
76. 1. Zirnhelt, N.,
    2. Angle, R. P.,
    3. Bates-Frymel, D. L.,
    4. Gilbert, M.,
    5. Melancon, S.,
    6. Suzuki, N., &
    7. Freedman, R.

    (2014). Airshed management. Air Quality Management: Canadian Perspectives on a Global Issue, Chapter 17, pp. 329-348. Springer, Dordrecht, Netherlands.