Toward a timber asset account for the United States

References

1. 1. Alfsen, K.H.,
   2. Bye, T., and
   3. Lorentsen, L.

   1987. Natural Resource Accounting and Analysis: The Norwegian Experience 1978-1986. Social and Economic Studies No. 65. Oslo: Statistics Norway (Central Bureau of Statistics of Norway).
2. 1. Arrow, K.J.,
   2. Dasgupta, P.,
   3. Goulder, L.H.,
   4. Mumford, K.J. and
   5. Oleson, K.

   , 2012. Sustainability and the measurement of wealth. Environment and Development Economics, 17(3), pp.317-353.

   OpenUrl
3. 1. Bagstad, K.J.,
   2. Ingram, J.C.,
   3. Lange, G.M.,
   4. Masozera, M.,
   5. Ancona, Z.H.,
   6. Bana, M.,
   7. Kagabo, D.,
   8. Musana, B.,
   9. Nabahungu, N.L.,
   10. Rukundo, E. and
   11. Rutebuka, E.

   , 2020. Towards ecosystem accounts for Rwanda: Tracking 25 years of change in flows and potential supply of ecosystem services. People and Nature, 2(1), pp.163-188.

   OpenUrl
4. 1. Bagstad, K.J.,
   2. Ingram, J.C.,
   3. Shapiro, C.D.,
   4. La Notte, A.,
   5. Maes, J.,
   6. Vallecillo, S.,
   7. Casey, C.F.,
   8. Glynn, P.D.,
   9. Heris, M.P.,
   10. Johnson, J.A.,
   11. Lauer, C.,
   12. Matuszak, J.,
   13. Oleson, K.L.L.,
   14. Posner, S.M.,
   15. Rhodes, C., and
   16. Voigt, B.

   2021. Lessons learned from development of natural capital accounts in the United States and European Union. Ecosystem Services 52: 101359.

   OpenUrl
5. 1. Bullard, Steven H. and
   2. Monaghan, Tom

   , “What’s the monetary value of your premerchantable timber?” (1999). Faculty Publications. 95.
6. 1. Chambers, M.

   2023. Proof of Concept for a U.S. Air Emissions Physical Flows Account. BEA Working Paper Series, WP2023-2. <https://www.bea.gov/sites/default/files/papers/BEA-WP2023-2.pdf>
7. 1. Costanza, R.,
   2. d’Arge, R.,
   3. de Groot, R.,
   4. Farber, S.,
   5. Grasso, M.,
   6. Hannon, B.,
   7. Limburg, K.,
   8. Naeem, S.,
   9. O’Neill, R.V.,
   10. Paruelo, J.,
   11. Raskin, R.G.,
   12. Sutton, P., and
   13. van den Belt, M.

   1997. The value of the world’s ecosystem services and natural capital. Nature 387(6630): 253-260.

   OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
8. 1. Crookston, N.L. and
   2. Dixon, G.E.

   2005. The forest vegetation simulator: A review of its structure, content, and applications. Computers and Electronics in Agriculture 49(1): 60-80.

   OpenUrl
9. 1. Cubbage, F.W.,
   2. Kanieski, B.,
   3. Rubilar, R.,
   4. Bussoni, A.,
   5. Morales, V.,
   6. Balmelli, G.,
   7. Mac Donagh, P.,
   8. Lord, R.,
   9. Hernández, C.,
   10. Zhang, P.,
   11. Huang, J.,
   12. Korhonen, J.,
   13. Yao, R.,
   14. Hall, P.,
   15. De La Torre, R.,
   16. Balteiro, L.D.,
   17. Carrero, O.,
   18. Monges, E.,
   19. Thu, H.T.T.,
   20. Frey, G.,
   21. Howard, M.,
   22. Chavet, M.,
   23. Mochan, S.,
   24. Hoeflich, V.A.,
   25. Chudy, R.P.,
   26. Maas, D.,
   27. Chizmar, S., and
   28. Abt, R.

   2020. Global timber investments, 2005 to 2017. Forest Policy and Economics 112: 102037.

   OpenUrl
10. 1. Cubbage, F.,
    2. Rubilar, R.,
    3. Mac Donagh, P.,
    4. Da Silva, B.K.,
    5. Bussoni, A.,
    6. Morales, V.,
    7. Balmelli, G.,
    8. Hoeflich, V.A.,
    9. Lord, R.,
    10. Hernández, C. and
    11. Zhang, P.

    , 2022. Comparative global timber investment costs, returns, and applications, 2020. Journal of Forest Business Research, 1(1), pp.90-121.

    OpenUrl
11. 1. Dixon, G.E.

    2002. Essential FVS: A User’s Guide to the Forest Vegetation Simulator. Internal Report. Fort Collins, CO: USDA Forest Service, Forest Management Service Center.
12. 1. Eurostat

    . 2024. Forests, Forestry and Logging Statistics. Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union. Available at: https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/statistics-explained/
13. 1. FAO and UNSD

    , 2020. System of Environmental-Economic Accounting for Agriculture, Forestry and Fisheries: SEEA AFF. FAO, Rome, Italy, available online at: <http://www.fao.org/3/ca7735en/CA7735EN.pdf>.
14. 1. Faustmann, M.

    , 1995. Calculation of the value of which forest land and immature stands possess for forestry (Originally published in German Journal of Forest Research in 1849). J. For. Econ. 1, 7-44.

    OpenUrl
15. 1. Fenichel, E.P.

    , 2024. A new era of economic measurement for the environment and natural capital. Review of Environmental Economics and Policy, 18(2), pp.321-330.

    OpenUrl
16. 1. Fenichel, E. P., and
    2. Y. Hashida

    . 2019. Choices and the value of natural capital. Oxford Review of Economic Policy 35 (1): 120–37.

    OpenUrl
17. 1. Fisher, I.

    1906. The Nature of Capital and Income. New York: Macmillan.
18. 1. Fixler, D.,
    2. Hass, J.L.,
    3. Highfill, T.,
    4. Wentland, K.M. and
    5. Wentland, S.A.

    , 2023. Accounting for Environmental Activity: Measuring Public Environmental Expenditures and the Environmental Goods and Services Sector in the US (No. w31574). National Bureau of Economic Research.
19. 1. Forest Products Laboratory

    1936. Southern yellow pine. Technical note; 214
20. 1. Georgia Forestry Commission

    . 2019. Georgia Forest Facts. Dry Branch, GA: Georgia Forestry Commission. Available at: https://gatrees.org/
21. 1. Georgia Forestry Commission (GFC)

    , 2025, Georgia’s forest industry is a global leader: Georgia Forestry Commission webpage, accessed online 7/22/2025, at https://gatrees.org/forest-industry/
22. 1. Georgia Institute of Technology, Enterprise Innovation Institute

    . 2019. Economic Benefits of the Forest Industry in Georgia: 2018. Atlanta, GA: Georgia Institute of Technology.
23. 1. Greene, J. and
    2. Jacobson, M.

    , 1998. Understanding Loss Deductions for Timber. The Consultant, Fall 1999.
24. 1. Heris, M.,
    2. Bagstad, K.J.,
    3. Rhodes, C.,
    4. Troy, A.,
    5. Middel, A.,
    6. Hopkins, K.G. and
    7. Matuszak, J.

    , 2021. Piloting urban ecosystem accounting for the United States. Ecosystem Services, 48, p.101226.

    OpenUrl
25. 1. Hyde, W.F.

    , 2019. Timber valuation. In Valuation of Wildland Resource Benefits (pp. 131-141). Routledge.
26. 1. Irland, L.C.,
    2. Sendak, P.E., and
    3. Widmann, R.H.

    2001. Hardwood pulpwood stumpage price trends in the northeast. General Technical Report NE-286. Newtown Square, PA: USDA Forest Service, Northeastern Research Station.
27. 1. Lambert, S.G.;
    2. Gray, J.;
    3. McCollum, J.M.;
    4. Brandeis, T.J.;
    5. Brown, M.

    2023. Georgia’s Forests, 2019. Resour. Bull. SRS-236. Asheville, NC: U.S. Department of Agriculture Forest Service, Southern Research Station. 109 p. https://doi.org/10.2737/SRS-RB-236.
28. 1. Lange, G.M.

    2004. Manual for Environmental and Economic Accounts for Forestry: A Tool for Cross-Sectoral Policy Analysis. Working Paper. Rome: Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, Forestry Department.
29. 1. Li, Yanshu,
    2. Dickens D.E.,
    3. Clabo D.

    , November 11, 2024. After Hurricane Helene: How to Claim Timber Casualty Losses and Defer Taxes on Salvage Timber Sales. University of Georgia, Warnell School of Forestry and Natural Resources.
30. 1. May, Dennis M.

    1990. Stocking, Forest Type, and Stand Size Class - The Southern Forest Inventory and Analysis Unit’s Calculation of Three Important Stand Descriptors. Gen. Tech. Rep. SO-77. New Orleans, LA: U.S. Dept of Agriculture, Forest Service, Southern Forest Experiment Station. 7 p. https://research.fs.usda.gov/treesearch/1658
31. 1. Mayo, J.H.,
    2. Straka, T.J.

    , 2005. The holding value premium in standing timber valuation. Appraisal Journal 73, 98-106.

    OpenUrl
32. 1. Mei, B.,
    2. Clutter, M.L.

    , 2023. Forestland Investment: Valuation and Analysis. Routledge, New York, NY.
33. 1. Muller, N.Z.,
    2. Fenichel, E.P., and
    3. Bohman, M.

    (eds.). 2025. Measuring and Accounting for Environmental Public Goods: A National Accounts Perspective. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
34. 1. Obst, C.G.

    , 2015. Reflections on natural capital accounting at the national level: Advances in the system of environmental-economic accounting. Sustainability Accounting, Management and Policy Journal, 6(3), pp.315-339.

    OpenUrl
35. 1. OECD

    , 2025. Measuring Natural Resources in the National Accounts: A Compilation Guide, OECD Publishing, Paris, https://doi.org/10.1787/420c7c2a-en.
36. 1. Oswalt, S.N.,
    2. Smith, W.B.,
    3. Miles, P.D. and
    4. Pugh, S.A.

    , 2019. Forest resources of the United States, 2017: A technical document supporting the Forest Service 2020 RPA Assessment. Gen. Tech. Rep. WO-97. Washington, DC: US Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Washington Office., 97.
37. 1. Reams, Gregory A.;
    2. Smith, William D.;
    3. Hansen, Mark H.;
    4. Bechtold, William A.;
    5. Roesch, Francis A.;
    6. Moisen, Gretchen G.

    2005. The forest inventory and analysis sampling frame. Gen. Tech. Rep. SRS-80. Asheville, NC: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Southern Research Station. 21-36. https://research.fs.usda.gov/treesearch/20376
38. 1. Sendak, P.E.

    1994. Northeastern regional timber stumpage prices: 1961-91. Research Paper NE-683. Radnor, PA: USDA Forest Service, Northeastern Forest Experiment Station.
39. 1. Straka, T.J. and
    2. Bullard, S.H.

    1996. Land expectation value calculation in timberland valuation. The Appraisal Journal 64(4): 399-405.

    OpenUrl
40. 1. Straka, T.J.

    , 2009. Appraising Damaged Timber. Journal of ASFMRA, pp.51-60.
41. 1. Schlosser WE.

    2025. The phantom of the recession: how real timber prices and harvest timing define forestland value, 2021–2025 and beyond. Understanding inflation-adjusted timber economics in a cycle of hidden decline. J.For.Bus.Res. 4(1): 73-95. https://doi.org/10.62320/jfbr.v4i1.68

    OpenUrl
42. 1. Schumacher, F.X. and
    2. Coile, T.S.

    1960. Growth and yields of natural stands of the Southern Pines. Durham, North Carolina. T.S. Coile, Inc. Reprinted in 1986.
43. 1. United Nations, European Commission, International Monetary Fund, Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, and World Bank

    . System of National Accounts 2008. (SNA2008) New York: United Nations, 2009.
44. 1. United Nations, European Commission, International Monetary Fund, Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, and World Bank

    . System of National Accounts 2025. (SNA2025) New York: United Nations, 2025.
45. 1. United Nations, European Commission, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, International Monetary Fund, Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, and The World Bank

    . System of Environmental-Economic Accounting 2012: Central Framework. (SEEA-CF) New York: United Nations, 2014a.
46. 1. United Nations Statistical Commission (UNSC), Committee of Experts on Environmental-Economic Accounting (UNCEEA)

    . 2026. Results of the 2025 Global Assessment of Environmental-Economic Accounting and Supporting Statistics. New York: United Nations. https://unstats.un.org/UNSDWebsite/statcom/session_57/documents/BG-3f-Global_Assessment_2025_UNSC-E.pdf
47. 1. University of Arkansas Monticello

    , “2023 U.S. Forestry Economic Contribution by State.”
48. 1. US Department of Agriculture Forest Service

    . 2024. Forest Inventory and Analysis National Core Field Guide for the Nationwide Forest Inventory. 550 pp. https://research.fs.usda.gov/understory/nationwide-forest-inventory-field-guide. Accessed 04.23.2025.
49. 1. Warnell, K.J.,
    2. Russell, M.,
    3. Rhodes, C.,
    4. Bagstad, K.J.,
    5. Olander, L.P.,
    6. Nowak, D.J.,
    7. Poudel, R.,
    8. Glynn, P.D.,
    9. Hass, J.L.,
    10. Hirabayashi, S. and
    11. Ingram, J.C.

    , 2020. Testing ecosystem accounting in the United States: A case study for the Southeast. Ecosystem services, 43, p.101099.

    OpenUrlPubMed
50. 1. Warziniack, T.,
    2. Arabi, M.,
    3. Froemke, P.,
    4. Ghosh, R.,
    5. Heidari, H.,
    6. Rasmussen, S. and
    7. Swartzentruber, R.

    , 2023. Water Resources. In: US Department of Agriculture, Forest Service. 2023. Future of America’s Forest and Rangelands: Forest Service 2020 Resources Planning Act Assessment. Gen. Tech. Rep. WO-102. Washington, DC, pp.9-1.
51. 1. Wentland, S.A.,
    2. Ancona, Z.H.,
    3. Bagstad, K.J.,
    4. Boyd, J.,
    5. Hass, J.L.,
    6. Gindelsky, M. and
    7. Moulton, J.G.

    , 2020. Accounting for land in the United States: Integrating physical land cover, land use, and monetary valuation. Ecosystem Services, 46, p.101178.

    OpenUrl
52. 1. Wentland, S.,
    2. G. Cornwall, and
    3. J. Moulton

    . 2023. For What It’s Worth: Measuring Land Value in the Era of Big Data and Machine Learning, BEA Working Paper Series, WP2023-4. https://www.bea.gov/sites/default/files/papers/BEA-WP2023-4.pdf
53. 1. Wielgus, E.,
    2. Mandinyenya, B.,
    3. Wieprecht, S. and
    4. Heurich, M.

    , 2023. Bringing the Black rhino back: Key factors for reintroduction success. Global Ecology and Conservation, 48, p.e02756.

    OpenUrl
54. 1. World Bank

    . 2021. The Changing Wealth of Nations 2021: Managing Assets for the Future. Washington, DC: World Bank.