Neighborhood Spillovers from Residential Energy Retrofit Programs

References

1. 1. Agarwal,
   2. Sumit,
   3. Wenlan Qian, and
   4. Xin Zou,

   “Thy neighbor’s misfortune: Peer effect on consumption,” American Economic Journal: Economic Policy, 2021, 13 (2), 1–25.

   OpenUrl
2. 1. Allcott,
   2. Hunt,

   “Social norms and energy conservation,” Journal of Public Economics, 2011, 95 (9-10), 1082–1095.

   OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
3. 1. Allcott, and
   2. Todd Rogers,

   “The short-run and long-run effects of behavioral interventions: Experimental evidence from energy conservation,” American Economic Review, 2014, 104 (10), 3003–3037.

   OpenUrlCrossRef
4. 1. Angelucci,
   2. Manuela and
   3. Giacomo De Giorgi,

   “Indirect effects of an aid program: how do cash transfers affect ineligibles’ consumption?,” American economic review, 2009, 99 (1), 486–508.

   OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
5. 1. Bandiera,
   2. Oriana,
   3. Niklas Buehren,
   4. Robin Burgess,
   5. Markus Goldstein,
   6. Selim Gulesci,
   7. Imran Rasul, and
   8. Munshi Sulaiman,

   “Women’s empowerment in action: evidence from a randomized control trial in Africa,” American Economic Journal: Applied Economics, 2020, 12 (1), 210–259.

   OpenUrl
6. 1. Bayer,
   2. Patrick,
   3. Kyle Mangum, and
   4. James W Roberts,

   “Speculative fever: Investor contagion in the housing bubble,” American Economic Review, 2021, 111 (2), 609–651.

   OpenUrl
7. 1. Bigler,
   2. Simon and
   3. Benjamin Janzen,

   “Social Spillovers in Residential Solar Adoption,” Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 2023.
8. 1. Bollinger,
   2. Bryan and
   3. Kenneth Gillingham,

   “Peer effects in the diffusion of solar photovoltaic panels,” Marketing Science, 2012, 31 (6), 900–912.

   OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
9. 1. Bollinger,
   2. Jesse Burkhardt, and
   3. Kenneth T Gillingham,

   “Peer effects in residential water conservation: Evidence from migration,” American Economic Journal: Economic Policy, 2020, 12 (3), 107–133.

   OpenUrl
10. 1. Borusyak,
    2. Kirill,
    3. Xavier Jaravel, and
    4. Jann Spiess,

    “Revisiting event-study designs: robust and efficient estimation,” Review of Economic Studies, 2024, p. rdae007.
11. 1. Brock,
    2. William A and
    3. Steven N Durlauf,

    “Interactions-based models,” in “Handbook of econometrics,” Vol. 5, Elsevier, 2001, pp. 3297–3380.
12. 2. Butts,
    3. Kyle,

    “Difference-in-differences estimation with spatial spillovers,” arXiv preprint arXiv:2105.03737, 2021.
13. 1. Butts,

    “JUE insight: Difference-in-differences with geocoded microdata,” Journal of Urban Economics, 2023, 133, 103493.

    OpenUrl
14. 1. Callaway,
    2. Brantly and
    3. Pedro HC Sant’Anna,

    “Difference-in-differences with multiple time periods,” Journal of Econometrics, 2021, 225 (2), 200–230.

    OpenUrlCrossRef
15. 1. Card,
    2. David,
    3. Alexandre Mas,
    4. Enrico Moretti, and
    5. Emmanuel Saez,

    “Inequality at work: The effect of peer salaries on job satisfaction,” American Economic Review, 2012, 102 (6), 2981–3003.

    OpenUrlCrossRef
16. 1. Carlana,
    2. Michela,

    “Implicit stereotypes: Evidence from teachers’ gender bias,” The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 2019, 134 (3), 1163–1224.

    OpenUrlCrossRef
17. 1. Chaisemartin,
    2. Clement De and
    3. Xavier d’Haultfoeuille’ ,

    “Two-way fixed effects estimators with heterogeneous treatment effects,” American Economic Review, 2020, 110 (9), 2964–2996.

    OpenUrlCrossRef
18. 1. Crepon,
    2. Bruno,
    3. Esther Duflo,
    4. Marc Gurgand,
    5. Roland Rathelot, and
    6. Philippe Zamora’,

    “Do labor market policies have displacement effects? Evidence from a clustered randomized experiment,” The quarterly journal of economics, 2013, 128 (2), 531–580.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
19. 1. Dahl,
    2. Gordon B,
    3. Katrine V Løken, and
    4. Magne Mogstad,

    “Peer effects in program participation,” American Economic Review, 2014, 104 (7), 2049–2074.

    OpenUrlCrossRef
20. 1. Duflo,
    2. Esther and
    3. Emmanuel Saez,

    “The role of information and social interactions in retirement plan decisions: Evidence from a randomized experiment,” Quarterly Journal of Economics, 2003, 118 (3), 815–842.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
21. 1. Ferraro,
    2. Paul J and
    3. Michael K Price,

    “Using nonpecuniary strategies to influence behavior: Evidence from a large-scale field experiment,” Review of Economics and Statistics, 2013, 95 (1), 64–73.

    OpenUrlCrossRef
22. 1. Ferraro,
    2. Juan Jose Miranda, and
    3. Michael K Price,

    “The persistence of treatment effects with normbased policy instruments: evidence from a randomized environmental policy experiment,” American Economic Review, 2011, 101 (3), 318–322.

    OpenUrlCrossRef
23. 1. Fowlie,
    2. Meredith,
    3. Catherine Wolfram, and
    4. Anna Spurlock,

    “Default effects and followon behavior: Evidence from an electricity pricing program,” American Economic Journal: Applied Economics, 2021, 13 (2), 284–310.

    OpenUrl
24. 2. Fowlie,
    3. Michael Greenstone, and
    4. Catherine Wolfram,

    “Are the non-monetary costs of energy efficiency investments large? Understanding low take-up of a free energy efficiency program,” American Economic Review, 2015, 105 (5), 201–204.

    OpenUrl
25. 2. Fowlie,
    3. Michael Greenstone, and
    4. Catherine Wolfram,

    “Do energy efficiency investments deliver? Evidence from the weatherization assistance program,” Quarterly Journal of Economics, 2018, 133 (3), 1597–1644.

    OpenUrl
26. 1. Goodman-Bacon,
    2. Andrew,

    “Difference-in-differences with variation in treatment timing,” Journal of Econometrics, 2021, 225 (2), 254–277.

    OpenUrlCrossRef
27. Government of Canada, “Budget 2021,” Technical Report 2021.
28. 1. Graziano,
    2. Marcello and
    3. Kenneth Gillingham,

    “Spatial patterns of solar photovoltaic system adoption: the influence of neighbors and the built environment,” Journal of Economic Geography, 2015, 15 (4), 815–839.

    OpenUrlCrossRef
29. 1. Hartmann,
    2. Wesley R,
    3. Puneet Manchanda,
    4. Harikesh Nair,
    5. Matthew Bothner,
    6. Peter Dodds,
    7. David Godes,
    8. Kartik Hosanagar, and
    9. Catherine Tucker,

    “Modeling social interactions: Identification, empirical methods and policy implications,” Marketing letters, 2008, 19, 287–304.

    OpenUrl
30. 1. Havnes,
    2. Tarjei and
    3. Magne Mogstad,

    “No child left behind: Subsidized child care and children’s long-run outcomes,” American Economic Journal: Economic Policy, 2011, 3 (2), 97–129.

    OpenUrl
31. 1. Heutel,
    2. Garth and
    3. Erich Muehlegger,

    “Consumer learning and hybrid vehicle adoption,” Environmental and Resource Economics, 2015, 62 (1), 125–161.

    OpenUrl
32. 1. Huang,
    2. Christine Zhuowei,

    “Green Neighbors, Greener Neighborhoods: Peer Effects in Residential Green Investments,” Available at SSRN 4765799, 2024.
33. IEA, “World Energy Outlook 2017,” 2017. International Energy Agency.
34. 1. Imbens,
    2. Guido W and
    3. Jeffrey M Wooldridge,

    “Recent developments in the econometrics of program evaluation,” Journal of Economic Literature, 2009, 47 (1), 5–86.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
35. 1. Irwin,
    2. Nicholas B,

    “Sunny days: Spatial spillovers in photovoltaic system adoptions,” Energy Policy, 2021, 151, 112192.

    OpenUrl
36. 1. Jayachandran,
    2. Seema,
    3. Joost De Laat,
    4. Eric F Lambin,
    5. Charlotte Y Stanton,
    6. Robin Audy, and
    7. Nancy E Thomas,

    “Cash for carbon: A randomized trial of payments for ecosystem services to reduce deforestation,” Science, 2017, 357 (6348), 267–273.

    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
37. 1. Kuhn,
    2. Peter,
    3. Peter Kooreman,
    4. Adriaan Soetevent, and
    5. Arie Kapteyn,

    “The effects of lottery prizes on winners and their neighbors: Evidence from the Dutch postcode lottery,” American Economic Review, 2011, 101 (5), 2226–2247.

    OpenUrlCrossRef
38. 1. List,
    2. John A,
    3. Robert D Metcalfe,
    4. Michael K Price, and
    5. Florian Rundhammer,

    “Harnessing policy complementarities to conserve energy: Evidence from a natural field experiment,” Econometrica, 2020, 88 (5), 2037–2074.

    OpenUrl
39. 1. Manski,
    2. Charles F,

    “Identification of endogenous social effects: The reflection problem,” Review of Economic Studies, 1993, 60 (3), 531–542.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
40. 1. Marshall,
    2. Guillermo,

    “Hassle costs and price discrimination: An empirical welfare analysis,” American Economic Journal: Applied Economics, 2015, 7 (3), 123–146.

    OpenUrl
41. 1. Narayanan,
    2. Sridhar and
    3. Harikesh S Nair,

    “Estimating causal installed-base effects: A biascorrection approach,” Journal of Marketing Research, 2013, 50 (1), 70–94.

    OpenUrlCrossRef
42. Natural Resources Canada, “Natural Resources Canada Briefing Note on the ecoEnergy Retrofit Homes Program,” Technical Report 2012.
43. 1. Nauze,
    2. Adrien,

    “Peer Effects in Green Electricity Adoption,” Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 2023.
44. 1. Nolan,
    2. Jessica M,
    3. P Wesley Schultz,
    4. Robert B Cialdini,
    5. Noah J Goldstein, and
    6. Vladas Griskevicius,

    “Normative social influence is underdetected,” Personality and social psychology bulletin, 2008, 34 (7), 913–923.

    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
45. 1. Noll,
    2. Daniel,
    3. Colleen Dawes, and
    4. Varun Rai,

    “Solar community organizations and active peer effects in the adoption of residential PV,” Energy Policy, 2014, 67, 330–343.

    OpenUrlCrossRef
46. 1. Papineau,
    2. Maya,
    3. Nicholas Rivers, and
    4. Kareman Yassin,

    “Household benefits from energy efficiency retrofits: Implications for net zero housing policy,” Energy Economics, 2025, p. 108245.
47. 1. Sacerdote,
    2. Bruce,

    “Peer effects with random assignment: Results for Dartmouth roommates,” Quarterly Journal of Economics, 2001, 116 (2), 681–704.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
48. 1. Schultz,
    2. P Wesley,
    3. Jessica M Nolan,
    4. Robert B Cialdini,
    5. Noah J Goldstein, and
    6. Vladas Griskevicius,

    “The constructive, destructive, and reconstructive power of social norms,” Psychological science, 2007, 18 (5), 429–434.

    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
49. 1. Sun,
    2. Liyang and
    3. Sarah Abraham,

    “Estimating dynamic treatment effects in event studies with heterogeneous treatment effects,” Journal of Econometrics, 2021, 225 (2), 175–199.

    OpenUrlCrossRef
50. 1. Tebbe,
    2. Sebastian,

    “Peer effects in electric car adoption: Evidence from Sweden,” Externalities and Coordination Failures, 2023, pp. 1–129.
51. The city of Medicine Hat: City Clerk Department, “Medicine Hat CENSUS REPORT 2012,” Technical Report 2012.
52. 1. Tiebout,
    2. Charles M,

    “A pure theory of local expenditures,” Journal of Political Economy, 1956, 64 (5), 416–424.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
53. 1. Towe,
    2. Charles and
    3. Chad Lawley,

    “The contagion effect of neighboring foreclosures,” American Economic Journal: Economic Policy, 2013, 5 (2), 313–335.

    OpenUrl
54. 1. Wolske,
    2. Kimberly S,
    3. Kenneth T Gillingham, and
    4. P Wesley Schultz,

    “Peer influence on household energy behaviours,” Nature Energy, 2020, 5 (3), 202–212.

    OpenUrl