<?xml version='1.0' encoding='UTF-8'?><xml><records><record><source-app name="HighWire" version="7.x">Drupal-HighWire</source-app><ref-type name="Journal Article">17</ref-type><contributors><authors><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Wendland, Kelly J.</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Baumann, Matthias</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Lewis, David J.</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Sieber, Anika</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Radeloff, Volker C.</style></author></authors><secondary-authors></secondary-authors></contributors><titles><title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Protected Area Effectiveness in European Russia: A Postmatching Panel Data Analysis</style></title><secondary-title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Land Economics</style></secondary-title></titles><dates><year><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">2015</style></year><pub-dates><date><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">2015-02-01 00:00:00</style></date></pub-dates></dates><pages><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">149-168</style></pages><doi><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">10.3368/le.91.1.149</style></doi><volume><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">91</style></volume><issue><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">1</style></issue><abstract><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">We estimate the impact of strict and multiple-use protected areas on forest disturbance in European Russia between 1985 and 2010. We construct a spatial panel dataset that includes five periods of change. We match protected areas to control observations and compare coefficients from fixed-versus random-effects models. We find that protected areas have few statistically significant impacts on disturbance, with little difference across parks closer to or farther from major cities or roads. Random-effects estimates differ qualitatively and quantitatively from those of fixed effects in our study, serving as a cautionary note for evaluations where time-invariant unobservables are important. (JEL C14, Q23)</style></abstract></record></records></xml>