<?xml version='1.0' encoding='UTF-8'?><xml><records><record><source-app name="HighWire" version="7.x">Drupal-HighWire</source-app><ref-type name="Journal Article">17</ref-type><contributors><authors><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Fuller, Kate Binzen</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Janzen, Joseph P.</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Munkhnasan, B.</style></author></authors><secondary-authors></secondary-authors></contributors><titles><title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Farmland Rental Rates: Does Organic Certification Matter?</style></title><secondary-title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Land Economics</style></secondary-title></titles><dates><year><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">2021</style></year><pub-dates><date><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">2021-02-01 00:00:00</style></date></pub-dates></dates><pages><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">80-106</style></pages><doi><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">10.3368/le.97.1.030119-0032R2</style></doi><volume><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">97</style></volume><issue><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">1</style></issue><abstract><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">We estimate U.S. organic farmers’ marginal willingness to pay to rent an acre of certified organic land relative to conventional farmland. Using a selection-on-observables design and farm-level data on farmland rental rates, organic status, and many conditioning variables, we address the role of profitability in mediating the effect of organic status. We find a 26% rental rate premium for organic farmland not driven by higher profits on organic farms. This premium is a modest incentive for landowners but a barrier for tenants to convert to organic farming practices, which may explain limited growth in U.S. organic acreage.</style></abstract></record></records></xml>