Table 2

Postmatching Regression Results

[3a]
ln(n-1)
[3b]
ln(nnRH-1)
[5a]
log(p)
[5b]
log(p)
[5c]
log(p)
Intercept0.232** (0.112)−0.003 (0.136)
Hedonic Characteristics
Soil quality0.009*** (0.001)0.011*** (0.001)0.013*** (0.001)0.013*** (0.001)0.013*** (0.001)
Lot size20.002*** (0.000)0.002*** (0.000)0.001*** (0.000)0.001*** (0.000)0.001*** (0.000)
Share grassland−0.003*** (0.001)−0.004*** (0.001)−0.007*** (0.001)−0.007*** (0.001)−0.007*** (0.001)
Share other land−0.017*** (0.003)−0.019*** (0.003)−0.010*** (0.002)−0.010*** (0.002)−0.010*** (0.002)
Participant Class
No. participants: 2−1.215*** (0.050)−1.207*** (0.055)−1.170*** (0.049)
No. participants: 3−1.139*** (0.050)−1.086*** (0.054)−1.112*** (0.048)
No. participants: 4−1.125*** (0.052)−1.074*** (0.057)−1.113*** (0.049)
No. participants: 5−1.047*** (0.053)−1.030*** (0.057)−1.041*** (0.050)
No. participants: 6–8−0.998*** (0.053)−1.032*** (0.053)−0.998*** (0.050)
No. participants: 9+−0.970*** (0.056)−1.021*** (0.057)−0.968*** (0.054)
Tenant Support Effects with RFR
LGSA−0.093** (0.041)−0.338*** (0.043)−0.164*** (0.017)
LGSA: no. participants: 2−0.159*** (0.045)
LGSA: no. participants: 3−0.233*** (0.030)
LGSA: no. participants: 4−0.224*** (0.036)
LGSA: no. participants: 5−0.173*** (0.036)
LGSA: no. participants: 6–8−0.092*** (0.029)
LGSA: no. participants: 9+−0.039       (0.032)
LGSA: tenant exercised RFR−0.168*** (0.018)
LGSA: tenant won by own bid−0.382*** (0.030)
LGSA: tenant rejected RFR−0.056*** (0.019)
WeightsYesYesYesYesYes
Treated observations926929926926926
Control observations590590590590590
Pseudo R-squared/R-squared0.2920.3260.8740.8760.876
θ14.104 (2.214)8.143 (1.003)
  • Note: Heteroskedasticity-consistent standard errors are in parentheses (White 1980). Parameter estimates for county and year dummy variables are reported in Appendix B. For [3a] and [3b], the pseudo R-squared is specified as the squared correlation coefficient between observed and fitted values. RFR, right of first refusal.

  • *p = < 0.1; **p = < 0.05; ***p = < 0.01.