Estimated Mixed Logit Choice Models for the Three Samples
SDCE (1) Thur | SDCE (2) Töss | MDCE | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
Variable | (3) Thur | (4) Töss | ||
Mean Estimates of Random Parameters | ||||
Constant | –1.690 (6.010) | –27.741*** (10.103) | –41.346** (16.331) | 5.140 (12.584) |
Length of the river section that would be restored | 1.161** (0.455) | 0.617** (0.255) | 7.828*** (2.142) | 6.905*** (2.114) |
Walking along the river | 3.471*** (1.110) | 2.042*** (0.532) | 26.927*** (6.846) | 2.411 (1.991) |
Swimming in the river | 1.112* (0.609) | 0.923** (0.387) | 9.716*** (2.605) | 4.680** (2.100) |
Barbecuing on the river bank | 1.917*** (0.717) | –0.048 (0.411) | 2.520 (1.701) | 1.280 (1.365) |
High biodiversity | 1.936** (0.838) | 0.752 (0.493) | 15.703*** (4.312) | 11.947*** (3.894) |
Medium biodiversity | 0.979 (0.786) | 0.454 (0.508) | 13.282*** (3.554) | 12.814*** (4.185) |
Price | –0.062*** (0.017) | –0.024*** (0.004) | –0.081*** (0.020) | –0.081*** (0.021) |
Nonrandom Parameters | ||||
Walking attribute × Respondents who walk when visiting the rivers | 3.400*** (1.303) | 2.005*** (0.573) | 2.078 (2.165) | 16.740*** (4.576) |
Swimming attribute × Respondents who swim when visiting the rivers | 2.923*** (0.880) | 1.791*** (0.528) | 7.780*** (2.558) | 6.396** (2.602) |
Barbecuing attribute × Respondents who barbecue when visiting the rivers | 3.985*** (1.046) | 2.101*** (0.617) | 18.774*** (4.835) | 7.586** (3.200) |
ln(Road distance to the Thur + 1) | –7.572** (3.766) | 10.393*** (3.468) | 4.404 (6.091) | –3.248 (4.578) |
Road distance to the Töss | 0.887*** (0.276) | –0.465*** (0.101) | –0.865*** (0.289) | –1.033*** (0.282) |
Road distance to the valued river × Respondents living in urban areas | 0.871*** (0.240) | 0.173*** (0.058) | 5.511*** (1.595) | 0.588*** (0.198) |
Longitudinal distance to the valued river | –0.101 (0.070) | –0.109 (0.077) | –0.805*** (0.222) | –1.053*** (0.295) |
Latitudinal distance to the valued river | –0.829*** (0.270) | 0.106 (0.116) | 0.208 (0.251) | –0.871*** (0.289) |
cosθ | 0.571 (0.714) | –0.792 (0.652) | –7.696*** (2.180) | 0.315 (0.885) |
sinθ | 1.346 (0.845) | 0.562 (0.486) | 2.916*** (1.203) | 3.077*** (1.118) |
Standard Deviations of Random Parameters | ||||
Constant | 7.090*** (1.727) | 4.226*** (0.736) | 6.601*** (1.850) | 7.266*** (1.844) |
Length of the river section that would be restored | 2.340*** (0.580) | 1.389*** (0.310) | 10.456*** (2.663) | 10.684*** (2.571) |
Walking along the river | 8.199*** (2.039) | 4.719*** (0.804) | 39.451*** (9.658) | 27.737*** (7.135) |
Swimming in the river | 4.049*** (1.064) | 3.694*** (0.713) | 31.070*** (7.867) | 9.686*** (2.441) |
Barbecuing on the river bank | 4.973*** (1.448) | 4.863*** (0.774) | 34.740*** (8.600) | 28.724*** (7.532) |
High biodiversity | 6.163*** (1.617) | 2.261*** (0.751) | 22.656*** (5.363) | 3.357** (1.641) |
Medium biodiversity | 2.992** (1.456) | 0.726 (0.676) | 18.480*** (4.695) | 0.091 (2.206) |
Price | 0.055*** (0.016) | 0.026*** (0.004) | 0.076*** (0.019) | 0.102*** (0.026) |
Log-likelihood | –781.67 | –893.08 | –1,004.53 | |
Likelihood ratio test (χ2) | 1,508.37*** | 1,311.94*** | 1,154.94*** | |
Pseudo R2 | 0.491 | 0.423 | 0.365 | |
AIC/Na | 1.155 | 1.304 | 1.467 | |
Number of observations | 1,398 | 1,410 | 1,440 |