Table 4

Regency-Level Effects of Oil Palm Expansion on Sectoral Shares of Women (2000–2005–2010–2015)

Share of Women Working (1)Share of Women in Nonagricultural Sector (2)Share of Women in Agricultural Family Labor (3)Share of Women in Agricultural Wage Labor (4)Share of Women in Nonagricultural Self-Employment (5)Share of Women in Nonagricultural Wage Labor (6)
Instrumental variable
 Share of smallholder oil palm area in regency (0–1)−2.910**−0.162−3.188**0.942−0.6390.438
(1.184)(0.630)(1.284)(0.626)(0.454)(0.286)
R-squared0.1550.4020.1060.0720.1150.558
 Kleibergen Wald F-statistic23.53223.53223.53223.53223.53223.532
 Observations827827827827827827
OLS model
 Share of smallholder oil palm area in regency (0–1)−0.731**0.339***−0.613**−0.0110.186**0.114
(0.348)(0.129)(0.301)(0.190)(0.093)(0.075)
R-squared0.2350.4090.2160.1160.1850.564
 Observations827827827827827827

Note: The data sources are SAKERNAS and Tree Crop Statistics. The dependent variables are shares ranging between 0 and 1. The IV and OLS estimates are reported with spatial HAC standard errors using a 100 km cutoff. The instrument is the maximum attainable oil palm yield per regency × the national oil palm expansion. We control for the mean age of working-age women, national oil palm expansion, regency fixed effects, year dummies, region trends, initial levels of population density, forest cover, hospital density, and electrification × the time trend. Initial levels are based on data from 2000.

  • * p < 0.10;

  • ** p < 0.05;

  • *** p < 0.01.