Plot Enrollment in the Sloping Land Conversion Program (SLCP) by the end of 2002, Binomial Logit Marginal Effects
| Explanatory Variablesa | Levels | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| All (n = 2,004) | Autonomy (n = 1,066) | No Autonomy (n = 938) | |
| 1999 Plot Characteristics | |||
| Plot size (ha) | 0.313**** | 0.444**** | 0.137*** |
| 1999 income/ha (RMB) | −0.000*** | −0.000*** | −0.000 |
| Plot affected by a disaster in 1999 (1 = yes) | 0.459**** | 0.449**** | 0.359**** |
| Slope > 25° | 0.247**** | 0.274**** | 0.123**** |
| Slope 15°–25° | 0.091** | 0.082 | 0.060* |
| High-quality land | −0.034 | −0.062 | −0.004 |
| Low-quality land | 0.053** | 0.127*** | 0.000 |
| Land rights | |||
| Responsibility or ration land | 0.109*** | 0.163** | 0.023 |
| Contract land | 0.201* | 0.274* | 0.021 |
| Other | −0.062 | −0.194**** | −0.012 |
| Irrigation | |||
| Surfacewater | −0.129**** | −0.125* | −0.064**** |
| Groundwater | −0.067 | −0.198**** | 0.073 |
| Other | 0.037 | −0.170** | 0.172 |
| Distance | |||
| To nearest road (km) | −0.014* | −0.043** | −0.001 |
| To nearest gully or ditch (km) | 0.014*** | 0.019*** | 0.003 |
| To home (km) | 0.041**** | 0.095**** | 0.009* |
| 1999 Household Characteristics | |||
| Household head age | −0.001 | −0.001 | 0.000 |
| Household head years of education | −0.006* | −0.014** | 0.000 |
| Household population | −0.013 | −0.008 | −0.001 |
| Household per capita income (RMB) | 0.000** | 0.000*** | 0.000 |
| Nonagricultural share of household head per capita income | −0.067** | −0.051 | −0.028 |
| Household per capita land (ha) | −0.166 | −0.198 | −0.012 |
| Household labor | 0.010 | −0.004 | 0.004 |
| Nonagricultural share of laborb | 0.075* | 0.054 | 0.018 |
| 1999 Village Characteristics | |||
| Village population | 0.000 | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Village per capita income (RMB) | 0.001**** | 0.001**** | 0.000** |
| Village per capita agricultural land (ha) | 0.865** | 0.553 | 0.960*** |
| Share of village population in nonfarm wage work | 1.178**** | 0.778 | 1.349*** |
| Village leader years of education | 0.015** | 0.010 | −0.001 |
| Village secretary years of education | 0.006 | −0.011 | 0.055*** |
| Village leader age | 0.010* | 0.017* | −0.016*** |
| Village secretary age | 0.007* | 0.004 | 0.020*** |
| Institutional Factors | |||
| Number of Years village has been implementing the SLCP | 0.149**** | 0.175** | −0.008 |
| Share of village agricultural land with slope > 15° | 0.294** | 0.434 | 0.069 |
| Village leader worked previously at a forestry department (1 = yes) | 0.052 | 0.098 | −0.038 |
| Village secretary worked previously at a forestry department (1 = yes) | 0.384**** | 0.296 | 0.592*** |
| Number of villagers working in the county-level forestry department | 0.010 | 0.102 | −0.189*** |
| Pseudo-R2 | 0.386 | 0.399 | 0.419 |
| % correctly predicted | 84.6 | 82.0 | 89.3 |
↵* Significant at 10%;
↵** significant at 5%;
↵*** significant at 1%;
↵**** significant at 0.1%. Statistical results are based on robust standard errors clustered at the household level.
↵a Province and township dummies were used in the model but are not reported. Marginal effects for 0, 1 variables are for a discrete change from 0 to 1.
↵b Calculated using the number of head of household laborers working part-time or full-time off-farm.