Table 6

Plot Enrollment in the Sloping Land Conversion Program (SLCP) by the end of 2002, Binomial Logit Marginal Effects

Explanatory VariablesaLevels
All (n = 2,004)Autonomy (n = 1,066)No Autonomy (n = 938)
1999 Plot Characteristics
Plot size (ha)0.313****0.444****0.137***
1999 income/ha (RMB)−0.000***−0.000***−0.000
Plot affected by a disaster in 1999 (1 = yes)0.459****0.449****0.359****
Slope > 25°0.247****0.274****0.123****
Slope 15°–25°0.091**0.0820.060*
High-quality land−0.034−0.062−0.004
Low-quality land0.053**0.127***0.000
Land rights
 Responsibility or ration land0.109***0.163**0.023
 Contract land0.201*0.274*0.021
 Other−0.062−0.194****−0.012
Irrigation
 Surfacewater−0.129****−0.125*−0.064****
 Groundwater−0.067−0.198****0.073
 Other0.037−0.170**0.172
Distance
 To nearest road (km)−0.014*−0.043**−0.001
 To nearest gully or ditch (km)0.014***0.019***0.003
 To home (km)0.041****0.095****0.009*
1999 Household Characteristics
Household head age−0.001−0.0010.000
Household head years of education−0.006*−0.014**0.000
Household population−0.013−0.008−0.001
Household per capita income (RMB)0.000**0.000***0.000
Nonagricultural share of household head per capita income−0.067**−0.051−0.028
Household per capita land (ha)−0.166−0.198−0.012
Household labor0.010−0.0040.004
Nonagricultural share of laborb0.075*0.0540.018
1999 Village Characteristics
Village population0.0000.0000.000
Village per capita income (RMB)0.001****0.001****0.000**
Village per capita agricultural land (ha)0.865**0.5530.960***
Share of village population in nonfarm wage work1.178****0.7781.349***
Village leader years of education0.015**0.010−0.001
Village secretary years of education0.006−0.0110.055***
Village leader age0.010*0.017*−0.016***
Village secretary age0.007*0.0040.020***
Institutional Factors
Number of Years village has been implementing the SLCP0.149****0.175**−0.008
Share of village agricultural land with slope > 15°0.294**0.4340.069
Village leader worked previously at a forestry department (1 = yes)0.0520.098−0.038
Village secretary worked previously at a forestry department (1 = yes)0.384****0.2960.592***
Number of villagers working in the county-level forestry department0.0100.102−0.189***
Pseudo-R20.3860.3990.419
% correctly predicted84.682.089.3
  • * Significant at 10%;

  • ** significant at 5%;

  • *** significant at 1%;

  • **** significant at 0.1%. Statistical results are based on robust standard errors clustered at the household level.

  • a Province and township dummies were used in the model but are not reported. Marginal effects for 0, 1 variables are for a discrete change from 0 to 1.

  • b Calculated using the number of head of household laborers working part-time or full-time off-farm.