Table 2.

Probability of an Inconsistent Choice

	(1)	(2)	(3)	(4)
Choice occasion	−0.000077 (0.0000113)^**		−0.000077 (0.0000178)^**
Ln(Choice occasion)		−0.00498 (0.000518)^**		−0.00498 (0.000796)^**
PSD	−0.0111 (0.000265)^**	−0.0111 (0.000266)^**	−0.0111 (0.000575)^**	−0.0111 (0.000579)^**
Public	0.00687 (0.000979)^**	0.00677 (0.000969)^**	0.00687 (0.00122)^**	0.00677 (0.0012)^**
Time	0.000505 (0.0000787)^**	0.000316 (0.0000815)^**	0.000505 (0.000131)^**	0.000316 (0.000118)^**
Age	−0.000588 (0.000202)^**	−0.000579 (0.000199)^**	−0.000588 (0.000253)^**	−0.000579 (0.000249)^**
Gender	−0.000781 (0.000994)	−0.00075 (0.000983)	−0.000781 (0.00192)	−0.00075 (0.00189)
School	0.000422 (0.000380)	0.000423 (0.000376)	0.000422 (0.0006)	0.000423 (0.000593)
Log likelihood	210,159	210,134	210,159	210,134
AIC	20,332	20,282	20,332	20,282
N	50,530	50,530	50,530	50,530

Note: Dependent variable, y_ij, equals 1 if the choice was identified as inconsistent. Marginal effects reported. Standard errors in parentheses. Columns (1) and (2) contain models that treat each observation as independent. Columns (3) and (4) adjust the standard errors for clustering by individual. AIC, Akaike information criterion; PSD, preference score difference.
↵** Coefficient is significant at the p < 0.05 level.