Descriptive Statistics by Type of Contract
Variable | Sharecropping (n = 248) | Fixed Rent (n = 105) | Difference | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Mean | Std. Err. | Mean | Std. Err. | ||
Plot Characteristics | |||||
Plot size | 108.561 | 5.718 | 109.418 | 10.618 | |
Imputed land value | 12.328 | 0.629 | 14.711 | 1.142 | |
Imputed land title | 0.394 | 0.015 | 0.421 | 0.026 | |
Rice plot | 0.850 | 0.030 | 0.906 | 0.035 | |
Hillside plot | 0.061 | 0.019 | 0.037 | 0.023 | * |
Lowland plot | 0.109 | 0.026 | 0.096 | 0.037 | |
Irrigated plot | 0.730 | 0.036 | 0.840 | 0.044 | * |
Distance from house to plot | 31.751 | 2.106 | 35.228 | 4.786 | |
Landlord Household Characteristics | |||||
L household size | 5.629 | 0.178 | 5.321 | 0.319 | |
L household dependency ratio | 0.463 | 0.018 | 0.439 | 0.032 | |
L age | 51.658 | 1.214 | 55.865 | 1.819 | |
L female | 0.147 | 0.024 | 0.169 | 0.044 | |
L education | 5.092 | 0.276 | 5.557 | 0.681 | |
L household assets per capita | 1.929 | 0.198 | 2.658 | 0.947 | |
L household income per capita | 1.034 | 0.170 | 1.116 | 0.289 | |
L household liquidity-constrained | 0.248 | 0.035 | 0.252 | 0.055 | |
Tenant Household Characteristics | |||||
T household size | 5.566 | 0.197 | 6.007 | 0.301 | |
T dependency ratio | 0.441 | 0.019 | 0.404 | 0.024 | ** |
T age | 37.777 | 0.700 | 40.184 | 1.333 | |
T education | 6.007 | 0.276 | 6.262 | 0.405 | ** |
T household assets per capita | 2.794 | 0.383 | 3.539 | 0.663 | |
T household income per capita | 0.931 | 0.120 | 1.456 | 0.245 | ** |
T household liquidity-constrained | 0.355 | 0.038 | 0.390 | 0.062 | |
Landlord-Tenant Match Characteristics | |||||
T is kin | 0.652 | 0.039 | 0.661 | 0.062 | |
T introduced by kin | 0.033 | 0.011 | 0.094 | 0.046 | |
T introduced by other than kin | 0.030 | 0.014 | 0.022 | 0.016 | |
T is a friend | 0.286 | 0.037 | 0.223 | 0.051 | |
T chosen because kin | 0.258 | 0.034 | 0.207 | 0.048 | |
T chosen for his wealth | 0.099 | 0.025 | 0.022 | 0.011 | |
T chosen for his honesty | 0.138 | 0.029 | 0.129 | 0.049 | |
T chosen for his risk-bearing ability | 0.002 | 0.002 | 0.008 | 0.008 | |
T chosen to return a favor | 0.005 | 0.003 | 0.000 | 0.000 | * |
Time spent looking for a tenant | 1.088 | 0.148 | 1.506 | 0.283 | |
Other potential tenants considered | 1.582 | 0.184 | 1.398 | 0.426 | |
Relationship length | 2.245 | 0.166 | 1.893 | 0.213 | |
Geographical Indicators | |||||
Commune 1 | 0.118 | 0.021 | 0.041 | 0.020 | *** |
Commune 2 | 0.255 | 0.037 | 0.180 | 0.048 | |
Commune 3 | 0.224 | 0.032 | 0.156 | 0.042 | |
Commune 4 | 0.072 | 0.018 | 0.214 | 0.054 | ** |
Commune 5 | 0.287 | 0.040 | 0.231 | 0.062 | * |
Commune 6 | 0.044 | 0.011 | 0.177 | 0.043 | ** |
Note: L, landlord; T, tenant.
↵*, **, *** Significance at the 10%, 5%, and 1% levels, respectively.