Table 2

Relationship between Distance to Sink in Minutes and Main Outcomes

Hurdle
First StageSecond Stage
Treatment: co-benefits−0.17 (0.24)−1.12 (2.32)
Age−0.01 (0.01)0.17* (0.07)
Female−0.22 (0.26)−2.19 (2.88)
Time−0.05 (0.04)−0.37 (0.41)
Risk0.04 (0.06)0.80 (0.62)
Paternalism−0.08 (0.05)−0.54 (0.56)
Trust0.06 (0.05)0.31 (0.51)
Complexity0.03 (0.05)−0.19 (0.44)
Forest coverage0.00 (0.03)−0.23 (0.23)
Recreational space0.04 (0.11)−1.61 (1.02)
Agricultural space−0.01 (0.03)−0.34 (0.25)
Rurality−0.02 (0.01)−0.14 (0.14)
Wind energy0.00 (0.00)0.00 (0.00)
Habitat density0.00+ (0.00)0.00 (0.00)
Distance category (travel time)
 First quartile (0–137.2 min)
 Second quartile (137.3–197.1 min)−1.12* (0.46)−1.76 (4.52)
 Third quartile (197.2–329.5 min)−0.19 (0.42)0.56 (4.06)
 Fourth quartile (329.6–602.6 min)−0.69 (0.46)4.19 (5.04)
Constant3.06 (2.67)27.81 (22.03)
Constant hurdle2.05*** (0.13)
Observations148148

Note: The table entails a regression analysis based on two-stage hurdle models. The first stage consists of probit regression models (where the dependent variable is equal to one for positive donations and zero otherwise). The second stage consists of truncated linear regression models (where the continuous dependent variable is the donation amount, assuming donation is made). Co-benefits indicate the treatment variation that introduces the additional information on co-benefits. Robust standard errors are in parentheses.

  • + p < 0.10;

  • * p < 0.05;

  • ** p < 0.01;

  • *** p < 0.001.