Regular Article
Environmental and Distributional Impacts of Conservation Targeting Strategies

https://doi.org/10.1006/jeem.2000.1146Get rights and content

Abstract

Resource purchasing funds have become a major tool for environmental protection and resource conservation. These funds use various strategies to target resources for conservation, the choice of which may lead to striking differences in environmental performance. This paper develops an analytical framework to analyze the impact of alternative targeting strategies on different interest groups, including consumers, producers, labor, and environmentalists. We show that ignoring the output price effect of purchasing funds reduces environmental gain and in some cases may make a purchasing fund counterproductive, and we argue that the optimal design of targeting criteria must consider the price feedback effect.

References (26)

  • J. Alston et al.

    Some neglected social costs of government spending in farm programs

    Amer. J. Agricul. Econom.

    (1990)
  • B.A. Babcock et al.

    The economics of a public fund for environmental amenities

    Amer. J. Agricul. Econom.

    (1996)
  • B.A. Babcock et al.

    Targeting tools for the purchase of environmental amenities

    Land Econom.

    (1997)
  • W.J. Baumol et al.

    The Theory of Environmental Policy

    (1988)
  • P. Berck et al.

    Hotelling's theory, enhancement, and the taking of the Redwood National Park

    Amer. J. Agricul. Econom.

    (1997)
  • P. Berck et al.

    Reconciling the von Liebig and differentiable crop production functions

    Amer. J. Agricul. Econom.

    (1990)
  • P. Berck, and, G. Helfand, Mathematical appendices for: Reconciling the von Liebig and differentiable crop production...
  • P. Dasgupta et al.

    A note on imperfect information and optimal pollution control

    Rev. Econom. Studies

    (1980)
  • D. Fullerton

    Reconciling recent estimates of the marginal welfare costs of taxation

    Amer. Economic Rev.

    (1991)
  • T. Groves

    Incentive in teams

    Econometrica

    (1973)
  • E. Hochman et al.

    Examination of environmental policies using production and pollution microparameter distribution

    Econometrica

    (1978)
  • H.S. Houthakker

    The Pareto distribution of the Cobb–Douglas production function in activity analysis

    Rev. Econom. Studies

    (1955)
  • Cited by (0)

    Please address all correspondence to: JunJie Wu, Department of Agricultural and Resource Economics. 200A Ballard Extension Hall, Oregon State University, Corvallis, OR 97331. The authors thank Kathy Segerson, two anonymous referees, and an associate editor of this journal for their useful comments and suggestions.

    View full text