The impact of location on urban industrial land prices

https://doi.org/10.1016/0094-1190(90)90021-EGet rights and content

First page preview

First page preview
Click to open first page preview

References (11)

  • R.W. Schmenner

    The rent gradient for manufacturing

    J. Urban Econom.

    (1981)
  • P.K. Asabere et al.

    Zoning and the value of urban land

    Real Estate Issues

    (Spring/Summer, 1984)
  • E.F. Brigham

    The determinants of residential land values

    Land Econom.

    (November, 1965)
  • D.L. Chicoine

    Farmland value at the urban fringe: An analysis of sale prices

    Land Econom.

    (August, 1981)
  • P.F. Colwell et al.

    Area, time, centrality and the value of urban land

    Land Econom.

    (November 1978)
There are more references available in the full text version of this article.

Cited by (39)

  • Land rights, rental markets and the post-socialist cityscape

    2019, Journal of Comparative Economics
    Citation Excerpt :

    We first investigate demand side factors. For urban firms, location of a plot is crucial aspect of the demand for the plot (Kowalski and Paraskevopoulos, 1990). To capture differences in demand, we use a dummy variable indicating whether the primary production plot is located in the city center or not.

  • Does industrial land price lead to industrial diffusion in China? An empirical study from a spatial perspective

    2018, Sustainable Cities and Society
    Citation Excerpt :

    Moreover, a lot of researches focused on the influence of land characteristics, including land location, transaction mode and volume rate on land price by using the Hedonic Price Mode. Kowalski and Paraskevopoulos (1990) investigated the effects of location characteristics on land price in Detroit’s industrial zone, and found that there was positive correlation between transportation convenience and industrial land price. Saz-Salazar and Garcı́A-Menéndez (2005) came to the same conclusion through the analysis of the 343 industries in Valencia autonomous region based on the hedonic approach.

  • How does sprawl differ across urban built-up land types in China? A spatial-temporal analysis of the Beijing metropolitan area using granted land parcel data

    2016, Cities
    Citation Excerpt :

    Moreover, studies of urban land-use structure have focused on the static perspective (including size and spatial form) (Wu, Ye, Shi, & Clarke, 2014; Inostroza, Baur, & Csaplovics, 2013), the inner and outer driving mechanisms (Xu, Tang, Fan, Bennett, & Li, 2011; Wu & Zhang, 2012; Shu, Zhang, Li, Qu, & Chen, 2014; Salvati, 2015; Pijanowski et al., 2014), urban land-use structure efficiency (Burgalassi & Luzzati, 2015; Jacobs-Crisioni, Rietveld, & Koomen, 2014), and the rationality of urban land-use structure (Fan & Myint, 2014; Paulsen, 2012). Furthermore, studies examining how urban land is divided into different land-use types mainly focus on the differences in distribution patterns among residential land (Kowalski & Paraskevopoulos, 1990; Muth, 1969), industrial land (Kowalski & Paraskevopoulos, 1990), etc. from the perspective of land rents and land prices. In summary, from the perspective of urban sprawl patterns, current research on urban land-use spatial structure involves theoretical discussions.

View all citing articles on Scopus
View full text