Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Reconsidering Environmental Policy: Prescriptive Consequentialism and Volitional Pragmatism

  • Published:
Environmental and Resource Economics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Prescriptive consequentialism informs currentassessments of rational action in economics. Choice is alleged to start with stable andknown preferences over alternative outcomes,and rational agents choose actions thatmaximize well being with respect to thesepreferences. Evidence suggests that thisformulation fails as an accurate and reliabledescription of how individuals make choices,and this formulation seems particularly at oddswith collective decision making with respect toenvironmental policy. Pragmatism, an importantbranch of philosophy, offers a theory of humanaction that economists would find helpful. This promise is especially pertinent to effortsdevoted to the assignment of values to parts ofnature, and to environmental policy in general.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Akerlof, G. (1970), ‘The Market for “Lemons”: Quality Uncertainty and the Market Mechanism’, The Quarterly Journal of Economics 84(3), 488–500.

    Google Scholar 

  • Akerlof, G. and W. T. Dickens (1982), ‘The Economic Consequences of Cognitive Dissonance’, American Economic Review 72(3), 307–319.

    Google Scholar 

  • Alpay, E., S. Buccola and J. Kerkvliet (2002), ‘Productivity Growth and Environmental Regulation in Mexican and U.S. Food Manufacturing’, American Journal of Agricultural Economics 84(4), 887–901.

    Google Scholar 

  • Altman, M. (2001), ‘When Green Isn't Mean: Economic Theory and the Heuristics of the Impacts of Environmental Regulations On Competitiveness and Opportunity Cost’, Ecological Economics 36(1), 31–44.

    Google Scholar 

  • Arrow, K. J., M. J. Cropper, G. C. Eads, R.W. Hahn, L. B. Lave, R. G. Noll, P. R. Portney, M. Russell, R. Schmalensee, K. V. Smith and R.N. Stavins (1996), ‘Is There a Role for Benefit-Cost Analysis in Environmental, Health, and Safety Regulation?’, Science 272 (12 April), 221–222.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blackorby, C. and D. Donaldson (1990), ‘A Review Article: The Case against the Use of the Sum of Compensating Variations in Cost-Benefit Analysis’, Canadian Economics Journal 3 (August), 471–494.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boadway, R.W. (1974), ‘TheWelfare Foundations of Cost-Benefit Analysis’, Economic Journal 84, 926–939.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boadway, R. W. (1976), ‘Integrating Equity and Efficiency in Applied Welfare Economics’, Quarterly Journal of Economics 90, 541–556.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boadway, R. W. and N. Bruce (1984), Welfare Economics. Oxford: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bowles, S. (1998), ‘Endogenous Preferences: The Cultural Consequences of Markets and Other Economic Institutions’, Journal of Economic Literature 36 (March), 75–111.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brandom, R. B. (1994), Making it Explicit: Representing, and Discursive Commitment. Cambridge, Massachusetts: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brandom, R. B. (2000), Articulating Reasons. Cambridge, Massachusetts: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brock, W. A. and D. Colander (2000), ‘Complexity and Policy’, in D. Colander, ed., The Complexity Vision and the Teaching of Economics. Cheltenham, UK: Elgar.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bromley, D.W. (1989a), Ecomomic Interests and Institutions: The Conceptual Foundations of Public Policy. Oxford: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bromley, D. W. (1989b), ‘Entitlements, Missing Markets and Environmental Uncertainty’, Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 17(2), 181–194.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bromley, D. W. (1990), ‘The Ideology of Efficiency: Searching for a Theory of Policy Analysis’, Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 19(1), 86–107.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bromley, D. W. (1991), Environment and Economy: Property Rights and Public Policy. Oxford: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bromley, D. W. ed. (1992a), Making the Commons Work: Theory, Practice, and Policy. San Francisco: ICS Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bromley, D. W. (1992b), ‘The Commons, Common Property, and Environmental Policy’, Environmental and Resource Economics 2, 1–17.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bromley, D. W. (1993), ‘Regulatory Takings: Coherent Concept of Logical Contradiction’, Vermont Law Review 17(3), 647–682.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bromley, D. W. (1995), Property Rights and Natural Rescource Damage Assessment', Ecological Economics 14, 129–135.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bromley, D. W. (1997a), ‘Rethinking Markets’, American Journal of Agricultural Economics 79(5), 1383–1393.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bromley, D. W. (1997b), ‘Constitutional Political Economy: Property Claims in a Dynamic World’, Contemporary Economic Policy 15(4), 43–54.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bromley, D. W. (1998), ‘Searching for Sustainability: The Poverty of Spontaneous Order’, Ecological Economics 24, 231–240.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bromley, D.W. (2000), ‘Can Agriculture Become an Environmental Asset?’, World Economics 1(3), 127–139.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bromley, D.W. and J. Paavola, eds. (2002), Economics, Ethics, and Environmental Policy: Contested Choices. Oxford: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chipman, J. S. and J. C. Moore (1978), ‘The New Welfare Economics: 1939-1974’, International Economic Review 19(3), 547–584.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coate, S. (2000), ‘An Efficiency Approach to the Evaluation of Policy Changes’, The Economic Journal, 110 (April), 437–455.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cooter, R. and P. Rappoport (1984), ‘Were the Ordinalists Wrong about Welfare Economics?’, Journal of Economic Literature 22 (June), 507–530.

    Google Scholar 

  • Damasio, A. R. (1999), The Feeling of What Happens. New York: Harcourt Brace.

    Google Scholar 

  • Damasio, A. R. (2000), Descartes' Error. New York: Harper Collins.

    Google Scholar 

  • Deblonde, M. (2002), Economics as a Political Muse: Philosophical Reflections on the Relevance of Economics for Ecological Policy. New York: Kluwer Academic Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Diamond, P. A. and J. A. Hausman (1994), ‘Contingent Valuation: Is Some Number Better than No Number?’, Journal of Economic Perspectives 8(4), 45–64.

    Google Scholar 

  • Field, A. J. (1979), ‘On the Explanation of Rules Using Rational Choice Models’, Journal of Economic Issues 13 (March), 49–72.

    Google Scholar 

  • Field, A. J. (1981), ‘The Problem with Neoclassical Institutional Economics: A Critique with Special Reference to the North/Thomas Model of Pre-1500 Europe’, Explorations in Economic History 18, 174–198.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gabel, H. L. and B. Sinclair-Desgagné (1998), ‘The Firm, its Routines and the Environment’, in T. Tietenberg and H. Folmer, eds., The International Yearbook of Environmental Economics: 1998-1999 (Chapter 3). Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gillroy, J. M. (1992), ‘The Ethical Poverty of Cost-Benefit Methods: Autonomy, Efficiency, and Public Policy Choice’, Policy Science 25, 83–102.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gorman, W. M. (1955), ‘The Intransitivity of Certain Criteria Used in Welfare Economics’, Oxford Economic Papers (new series) 7(1), 25–35.

    Google Scholar 

  • Graaff, J. de V. (1957), Theoretical Welfare Economics. Cambridge Cambridge: University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gregory, R., S. Lichtenstein and P. Slovic (1993), ‘Valuing Environmental Resources: A Constructive Approach’, Journal of Risk and Uncertainty 7, 177–197.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hahn, F. H. (1970), ‘Some Adjustment Problems’, Econometrica 38 (January), 1–17.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hiedanpää, J. and D.W. Bromley (2002), ‘Environmental Policy as a Process of Reasonable Valuing’, in D. W. Bromley and J. Paavola, eds., Economics, Ethics, and Environmental Policy: Contested Choices (Chapter 5). Oxford: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Holland, A. (2002), ‘Are Choices Tradeoffs?’ in D. W. Bromley and J. Paavola, eds., Economics, Ethics, and Environmental Policy: Contested Choices (Chapter 2). Oxford: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoover, K. D. (1994), ‘Pragmatism, Pragmaticism, and Economic Method’, in R. Backhouse, ed., Contemporary Issues in Economic Methodology. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Joas, H. (1993), Pragmatism and Social Theory. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johansson-Stenman, O. (2002), ‘What Should We Do with Inconsistent, Nonwelfaristic, and Undeveloped Preferences?’, in D. W. Bromley and J. Paavola, eds., Economics, Ethics, and Environmental Policy: Contested Choices (Chapter 7). Oxford: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Larson, B. A. and D.W. Bromley (1990), ‘Property Rights, Externalities, and Resource Degradation: Locating the Tragedy’, Journal of Development Economics 33(2), 235–262.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lawson, T. (1997), Economics and Reality. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lewin, S. B. (1996), ‘Economics and Psychology: Lessons for Our Own Day from the Early Twentieth Century’, Journal of Economic Perspectives 34 (September), 1293–1323.

    Google Scholar 

  • Little, I. M. D. (1949), ‘A Reformulation of the Theory of Consumer's Behaviour’, Oxford Economic Papers 1, 90–102.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mishan, E. J. (1969), Welfare Economics: An Assessment. Amsterdam: North-Holland.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mishan, E. J. (1980), ‘How Valid Are Economic Evaluations of Allocative Changes?’, Journal of Economic Issues 14 (March), 143–161.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mohr, R. D. (2002), ‘Technical Change, External Economies, and the Porter Hypothesis,’ Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 43(1), 158–168.

    Google Scholar 

  • Norton, B. (2002), ‘The Ignorance Argument: What Must We Know to be Fair to the Future?’, in D. W. Bromley and J. Paavola, eds., Economics, Ethics, and Environmental Policy: Contested Choices (Chapter 3). Oxford: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Palmer, K., W. Oates, and P. R. Portney (1995), ‘Tightening Environmental Standards: The Benefit-Cost or the No-Cost Paradigm?’, Journal of Economic Perspectives 9 (Fall), 119–132.

    Google Scholar 

  • Payne, J.W., J. R. Bettman and D. A. Schkade (1999), ‘Measuring Constructed Preferences: Towards a Building Code’, Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, 19(1.3), 243–270.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peirce, C. S. (1934), Collected Papers: Vol 5. Cambridge, Massachusetts: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peirce, C. S. (ed. by V. Tomas) (1957), Essays in the Philosophy of Science. New York: The Liberal Arts Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Porter, M. E. and C. van der Linde (1995), ‘Toward a New Conception of the Environment-Competitiveness Relationship’, Journal of Economic Perspectives 9 (Fall), 97–118.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rabin, M. (1998), ‘Psychology and Economics’, Journal of Economic Literature 36 (March), 11–46.

    Google Scholar 

  • Raz, J. (1997), ‘Incommensurability and Agency’, in R. Chang, ed., Incommensurability, Incomparability, and Practical Reason. Cambridge, Massachusetts: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Robbins, L. (1932), An Essay on the Nature and Significance of Economic Science. London: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rorty, R. (1979) Philosophy and the Mirror of Nature. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rorty, R. (1982), Consequences of Pragmatism. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rorty, R. (1999), Philosophy and Social Hope. London: Penguin Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Russell, B. (1945), A History of Western Philosophy. New York: Simon and Schuster.

    Google Scholar 

  • Samuels, W. J. (1971), ‘The Interrelations Between Legal and Economic Processes’, Journal of Law and Economics 14 (October), 435–450.

    Google Scholar 

  • Samuels, W. J. (1974), ‘The Coase Theorem and the Study of Law and Economics’, Natural Resources Journal 14 (January), 1–33.

    Google Scholar 

  • Samuels, W. J. (1989), ‘The Legal-Economic Nexus’, George Washington Law Review 57(6), 1556–1578.

    Google Scholar 

  • Samuelson, P. A. (1950), ‘Evaluation of Real National Income’, Oxford Economic Papers (new series) 2(1), 1–29.

    Google Scholar 

  • Satz, D. and J. Ferejohn (1994), ‘Rational Choice and Social Theory’, The Journal of Philosophy 91(2), 71–87.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sen, A. (1993), ‘Markets and Freedoms: Achievements and Limitations of the Market Mechanism in Promoting Individual Freedoms’, Oxford Economic Papers 45, 519–541.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shackle, G. L. S. (1961), Decision, Order, and Time in Human Affairs. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shapin, S. (1994), A Social History of Truth. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Slovic, P. (1995), ‘The Construction of Preferences’, American Psychologist 50, 364–371.

    Google Scholar 

  • Slovic, P., D. Griffin and A. Tversky (1990), ‘Compatibility Effects in Judgment and Choice’, in R. M. Hogarth, ed., Insights in Decision Making: A Tribute to Hillel J. Einhorn (pp. 5–27). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tribe, L. H. (1972), ‘Policy Science: Analysis or Ideology?’, Philosophy and Public Affairs 2(1), 66–110.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vatn, A. (2002), ‘Efficient or Fair: Ethical Paradoxes in Environmental Policy’, in D. W. Bromley and J. Paavola, eds., Economics, Ethics, and Environmental Policy: Contested Choices (Chapter 10). Oxford: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vatn, A. and D. W. Bromley (1994), ‘Choices Without Prices Without Apologies’, Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 26(2), 129–148.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vatn, A. and D. W. Bromley (1997), ‘Externalities: A Market Model Failure’, Environmental and Resource Economics 9, 135–151.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Agricultural and Applied Economics, University of Wisconsin-Madison, 427 Lorch Street, Madison, WI, 53706, USA

    Daniel W. Bromley

Authors
  1. Daniel W. Bromley
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Bromley, D.W. Reconsidering Environmental Policy: Prescriptive Consequentialism and Volitional Pragmatism. Environmental and Resource Economics 28, 73–99 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1023/B:EARE.0000023821.33379.b7

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/B:EARE.0000023821.33379.b7

Search

Navigation